In this episode of "Information for Life - Insights and Ideas to Navigate Your World," we delve into the fascinating topic of the overlap and misdiagnosis of ADHD and narcissism. Discover how certain traits can be mistaken for ADHD, the implications of misdiagnosis, and the importance of seeking professional help for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Sources:

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

Mouti, A., & Pinto, A. (2020). The overlap between ADHD and narcissistic personality disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718821730

National Institute of Mental Health. (2018). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-adhd/index.shtml

Mayo Clinic. (2020). Narcissistic personality disorder. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

In this episode, we explore what men and women want out of relationships, including their priorities and expectations. For men, the top five priorities in a relationship include communication, respect, emotional support, trust, and physical intimacy. Meanwhile, women value communication, trust, mutual respect and support, and an affectionate and attentive partner. The episode stresses the importance of recognizing that no one is perfect and having realistic expectations, as well as the need for communication, compromise, and understanding in a healthy relationship.

Sources for further reading:

Borzillo, C. (2015, May 28). 20 Things Men Want Women to Do in Bed. Women's Health. https://www.womenshealthmag.com/sex-and-love/a19974812/things-men-want-in-bed/

Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). What do men and women want from a long-term partner? Different answers across the lifespan.

Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). What women and men want in a partner.

Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideal standards in intimate relationships: their stability and change over time.

Hsieh, C. (2020, January 3). 21 Things Men Want in a Woman. Cosmopolitan. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/g2167/things-men-want-in-women/

McGraw, K. M., & Carter, E. A. (2016). Gender differences in relationship expectations: A developmental approach.

Psychology Today. (2015, May 5). What Men Want in a Relationship. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sliding-vs-deciding/201505/what-men-want-in-relationship

Psychology Today. (2016, March 22). What Women Want in a Relationship. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sliding-vs-deciding/201603/what-women-want-in-relationship

Sama, J. M. (2015, July 7). 11 Things Men Want You to Know About Dating and Relationships. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/11-things-men-want-you-to-know-about-dating_b_7649468

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

This episode explores attachment styles in relationships and how they are shaped by early experiences with caregivers. The four main attachment styles are secure, anxious-preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant, and fearful-avoidant. Narcissists tend to have an avoidant attachment style, but not everyone with this style is a narcissist. Individuals with a secure attachment style tend to have more satisfying and stable relationships compared to those with insecure attachment styles. The development of insecure attachment styles is influenced by factors such as parental neglect, inconsistent parenting, overly controlling or intrusive parenting, and traumatic experiences. Unhealthy attachment patterns can be recognized and addressed with therapy, self-awareness, and communication skills.

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

In this episode, we discuss the pitfalls of intellectual snobbery and the fallacy of assuming that something is smart just because it sounds smart. We examine examples of nonsensical text that are used in academic writing, business jargon, political speeches, and pseudoscience. We explain how to identify such language and highlight the importance of using clear, concise, and logical language to communicate ideas effectively. Beware of the dangers of assuming that complex-sounding phrases are synonymous with intelligence or knowledge.

Here are a few sources that discuss the use of pseudo-intellectual language and its potential harm:  

"The Art of BS" by Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand in Skeptic Magazine: This article explores the phenomenon of "pseudo-profound" language and how it can be used to deceive others into thinking someone is smarter or more insightful than they actually are.  

"Why People Prefer Complex Language" by Julie Sedivy in Nautilus: This article delves into the psychology of language and why people tend to prefer complex language, even when simpler language would suffice.  

"The Cult of the Complex" by Richard Feynman in Engineering and Science: This essay, written by the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman, criticizes the use of complex language in science and argues that it often serves to obscure rather than clarify ideas.  

Again, one clue for spotting pseudo-intellectual language is that it often uses big, impressive-sounding words that are not commonly used in everyday speech. Additionally, it may lack concrete meaning or be difficult to parse, even upon repeated readings. Finally, it may be used when the speaker or writer tries to impress others rather than genuinely communicating information.

Remember, clear and concise language is essential for effective communication. Using complex-sounding language to sound knowledgeable, or intelligent, without conveying any coherent meaning can be detrimental and is often referred to as "word salad." Beware of assuming something is smart just because it sounds smart. It's important to recognize and avoid the pitfalls of intellectual snobbery, whether it's in academic writing, business jargon, political speeches, or pseudoscience. The easiest way to spot such nonsensical text is to look for language that is needlessly complex or convoluted, or uses technical jargon that doesn't make sense in the context of the topic being discussed. Remember to always engage in continuous self-reflection and introspection to avoid falling into the trap of intellectual snobbery.

Thank you for listening, and join us in our next podcast entitled "Understanding Attachment Styles in Relationships - The Impact of Early Experiences and How to Cultivate a Healthy Attachment Style"

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

This episode discusses the drawbacks of relying solely on dating apps for finding partners. It delves into issues such as limited ability to connect in real life, addictive behavior leading to desperation, superficiality in choosing partners based on appearance, and exposure to scams and predators. The episode recommends balancing virtual and face-to-face interaction to build trust and create meaningful connections. The importance of developing meaningful relationships in real life is emphasized, including trying out matchmaking services, participating in social events, and building connections based on shared interests and values.

References:

Berkowitz, Dana, et al. “Tinder: A Game with Gendered Rules and Consequences.” Social Currents, vol. 8, no. 5, Oct. 2021, pp. 491–509. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1177/23294965211019486.

Flug, Kyla C. Swipe, Right? Young People and Online Dating in the Digital Age. 2016, https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:54835504.

Henderson, Rob. “The Science Behind What Tinder Is Doing to Your Brain | Psychology Today.” Psychology Today, 28 May 2018, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201805/the-science-behind-what-tinder-is-doing-your-brain.

Hobbs, Mitchell, et al. “Liquid Love? Dating Apps, Sex, Relationships and the Digital Transformation of Intimacy.” Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, no. 2, June 2017, pp. 271–84. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316662718.

Lenton, Alison P., et al. “‘Shopping’ for a Mate: Expected versus Experienced Preferences in Online Mate Choice.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no. 2, June 2008, pp. 169–82. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2008.2000342.

Ranzini, Giulia, and Christoph Lutz. “Love at First Swipe? Explaining Tinder Self-Presentation and Motives.” Mobile Media & Communication, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 80–101. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157916664559.

Sumter, Sindy R., et al. “Love Me Tinder: Untangling Emerging Adults’ Motivations for Using the Dating Application Tinder.” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 34, no. 1, Feb. 2017, pp. 67–78. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009.

Timmermans, Elisabeth, and Cédric Courtois. “From Swiping to Casual Sex and/or Committed Relationships: Exploring the Experiences of Tinder Users.” The Information Society, vol. 34, no. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 59–70. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1414093.

Toma, Catalina L., and Jeffrey T. Hancock. “What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles.” Journal of Communication, vol. 62, no. 1, Feb. 2012, pp. 78–97. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x.

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

This episode is about navigating toxic relationships and rebuilding trust. The host explains that while it's important to prioritize our own well-being and remove toxic people from our lives, it's also essential to approach the situation with empathy and understanding. They give suggestions on rebuilding trust after a betrayal and emphasize the importance of open and honest communication, active listening, and a willingness to compromise and make changes. The host concludes that working on an existing relationship can be more rewarding than seeking the perfect person.

Sources:

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25(1), 1-41.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (2015). The seven principles for making marriage work. Harmony.

Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family relations, 55(4), 499-509.

Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., & Johnson, M. D. (2015). Premarital relationship education and couple therapy: An empirical review. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14(2), 158-182.

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures that predict relationship resilience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(2), 198-212.

Gottman Institute: Rebuilding Trust in a Relationship After a Betrayal

Psychology Today: How to Rebuild Trust After Betrayal

Verywell Mind: Can You Ever Trust Again After Betrayal?

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

This episode is about ethical non-monogamy and the importance of clear boundaries, agreements, and rules in relationships. The host distinguishes the three concepts and explains how they serve different purposes in ensuring mutual respect and security in all parties involved. The importance of open and honest communication is highlighted, as well as the need for negotiation when a third party is involved. Punishing partners for past mistakes is discouraged as it does not contribute to building healthy relationships. Finally, the host cautions against using rules, which can create power imbalances and restrict behavior.

References used for this podcast are as follows:  

"The Ethical Slut: A Guide to Infinite Sexual Possibilities" is a book written by Dossie Easton and Janet W. Hardy and published by Celestial Arts in 2009.

Another book on ethical non-monogamy is "More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory" by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert, which was published by Thorntree Press in 2014.

In an article published on Psychology Today on December 9, 2020, titled "How to Create a Relationship Agreement That Works for You," Eva Taylor Grant offers tips for negotiating relationship agreements that are customized to each individual's needs.

The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom provides a resource on their website called "Polyamory Basics," which can be found at ncsfreedom.org.

A blog post on Psychology Today by Frankie Bashan titled "Polyamory: A Practical Guide" provides advice on communication, boundary-setting, and other aspects of polyamorous relationships.

Finally, Meera Solanki Estrada wrote an article for HuffPost called "Polyamorous Relationships: A Definition of Polyamory, How It Works And Why It's Not All About Sex" which explores common misconceptions about non-monogamy and offers an introduction to the concept of polyamory.

To conclude, establishing boundaries, agreements, and rules is essential for maintaining respectful and healthy relationships, particularly in the context of ethically non-monogamous relationships. It's critical to understand the distinctions between each of these concepts to avoid misunderstandings, respect personal limits, and negotiate mutual agreements that work for everyone involved. Remember, boundaries are personal limits, agreements are mutual understandings, and rules are external guidelines that should be avoided. The following podcast will discuss navigating toxic relationships and rebuilding trust, so stay tuned. Thank you for listening, and until next time, stay safe, stay respectful, and keep exploring your relationships.

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

In this episode, we explore why the "silent treatment" is a harmful and ineffective form of communication in relationships. This strategy is often used to control, manipulate or punish another person, but it can lead to emotional distress, damage to mental health, and relationship problems. We discuss why healthy relationships require communication, respect, and mutual understanding, and provide tips for dealing with a partner who uses the "silent treatment." Remember, healthy relationships are built on communication, respect, and mutual understanding, not power, control, and manipulation.

References used for this article include:

"The Silent Treatment: A Harmful Way to Deal with Conflict," published by the American Psychological Association in 2014. The article can be found at apa.org  

"The Silent Treatment: When People Leave You Guessing," published by the Greater Good Science Center at the University of California in 2019. The article can be found at greatergood.berkeley.edu  

"The Silent Treatment," published by the University of Texas at Austin in 2019. The article can be found at cmhc.utexas.edu  

"Dealing with the Silent Treatment in Marriage or Relationships," by Dr. Kurt Smith, Psy.D. The article can be found at guystuffcounseling.com  

"How to Deal with the Silent Treatment in a Relationship," by Alexandra Haller, M.S., L.M.F.T. The article can be found at talkspace.com  

"How to Communicate with Someone Who Gives You the Silent Treatment," by Dr. Judith Orloff. The article can be found at drjudithorloff.com  

"The Silent Treatment: When People Leave You Guessing," by Andrea Bonior, Ph.D., published on Psychology Today on December 11, 2019. The article can be found at psychologytoday.com  

"Why the Silent Treatment is So Damaging and How to Fix It," by Lori Deschene. The article can be found at tinybuddha.com  

"Why the Silent Treatment Is Really About Abuse and Control," by Lisa Aronson Fontes, PhD, published on Psychology Today on March 1, 2019. The article can be found at psychologytoday.com  

Remember, the "silent treatment" is a communication strategy that involves intentionally ignoring or refusing to speak to another person as a means of punishment, control, or manipulation. It is a harmful tactic that can lead to emotional distress, damage to mental health, and relationship problems, including future relationships. If you find yourself on the receiving end of the "silent treatment," it's essential to address the issue and communicate your feelings healthily and constructively. If you're using this tactic, you must recognize its impact on your partner and others and seek help for your toxic behavior. Healthy relationships are built on communication, respect, and mutual understanding, not power, control, and manipulation. It's time to break the silence and have an open, constructive dialogue to build a healthy relationship.

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

In this episode, we talk about Selective Outrage and the inconsistency in the moral values and principles people apply when evaluating situations. Selective outrage is when people express outrage over some issues while remaining indifferent to others. We explore the harm this behavior causes, its prevalence, and 19 examples of selective outrage. Join us to learn more about why we should be careful before joining the outrage bandwagon.

References used for this article are as follows:

Adichie, C. N. (2019). Is it time to cancel cancel culture? The Guardian.
Arriola, E. (2019). Why Animal Rights Activists Should Care About Human Suffering. Medium.
Brinjikji, H. (2014). Ebola vs. celebrity nudes: Americans really like to Google celebrities. Quartz.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Motor Vehicle Safety.
Chomsky, N. (2019). The Roots of Mass Migration. Jacobin.
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions.
Friedersdorf, C. (2017). The Dangers of Ignoring Systemic Racism. The Atlantic.
Gershman, M. (2016). The Complexities of Cultural Appropriation. The New Yorker.
Jones, R. (2019). Trump's Immigration Policy Is about Racism, Not Security. Newsweek.
Kaminer, W. (2018). In Defense of Political Correctness. The Atlantic.
Kim, E. (2018). Stop Focusing On Offensive Language And Start Addressing Systemic Discrimination. Forbes.
Kine, P. (2017). Chicago had more than 4,000 shooting victims in 2016. CNN.
Omidvar, R. (2018). 'Traditional Values' Can't Justify the Denial of Human Rights. The Globe and Mail.
Pew Research Center. (2017). The partisan divide on political values grows even wider.
Ranganathan, J., & Waite, R. (2020). The Problem With Climate Change Is Not Climate Change. Wired.
Rosenwald, M. S. (2018). Why outrage over Facebook's data scraping is misplaced. The Washington Post.
Scott, C. (2019). The Irrelevance of Celebrity Gossip. The Atlantic.
Singh, M., & Levine, D. I. (2021). The Partisan Divide in Fear of COVID-19.
Subramanian, S. (2015). India's tiger crusade: High ideals and hidden realities. BBC News.
Szalavitz, M. (2012). When It Comes to Suffering, It's Humans First, Animals Second. Time.
University of California - Berkeley. (2015). Earthquake relief: People more generous toward fellow citizens than foreign victims. ScienceDaily.
United States Government Publishing Office. (2010). H.R. 5566 - Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010.
Yglesias, M. (2017). The intellectual weaknesses of outrage culture. Vox.
Zhang, S. (2017). The Problem With Calling Out Cultural Appropriation. The Atlantic.

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms

In this episode, we delve into the history of gaslighting and define what it is and what it isn't. We explore common situations that are often confused with gaslighting and discuss how unintentional gaslighting can occur. Additionally, we examine the impact of gaslighting on individuals' mental health and well-being and how to recognize and address it. 

Sources:

American Family Physician. (2016). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders. https://www.aafp.org/afp/2016/0915/p522.html

Burgo, J. (2015). The narcissist you know: Defending yourself against extreme narcissists in an all-about-me age. Touchstone.

Healthline. (n.d.). Gaslighting: What it is and what to do about it. https://www.healthline.com/health/gaslighting

Mayo Clinic. (2017). Gaslighting: A form of emotional abuse. https://www.mayoclinic.org/.../gaslighting/art-20402170

Mayo Clinic. (2021). Narcissistic personality disorder. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

Psychology Today. (2017). The art of gaslighting. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/the-art-gaslighting

Psychology Today. (n.d.). Gaslighting: Know it, identify it, and protect yourself. https://www.psychologytoday.com/.../gaslighting-know-it...

Psychology Today. (n.d.). Self-assessment: Am I narcissistic? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/tests/personality/narcissistic-personality-test

Malkin, C. (2020). Why narcissists don't change - and what you can do about it. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/romance-redux/202002/why-narcissists-dont-change-and-what-you-can-do-about-it

The National Domestic Violence Hotline. (n.d.). What is gaslighting? https://www.thehotline.org/resources/what-is-gaslighting/

Tap HERE for all Social Media, email, and Podcast platforms