This week is Part I of our first two-parter! And it's an important one (at least for us).

In this two-parter, we talk about how the constant onslaught of bad news can be overwhelming and which psychological effects on individuals are at play.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

This week, we discuss the Earth Overshoot Day, which marks the date when humanity has used up all the resources the Earth can regenerate in a year. We ask ourselves why the day goes unnoticed so easily despite its presumably very alarming message (maybe that’s why?), and what would it require to shoot a bit less over the boundaries of the planet.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

This week, we discuss the dichotomy between two archetypes in environmental discourse: the Wizard, who believes in technological solutions, and the Prophet, who emphasises limits and lifestyle changes. The framework was coined by America journalist and author Charles C. Mann. We discuss why it is helpful to have a small framework as part of the discourse, the implications of each archetype, the need for balance, and the complexities of addressing climate change. The Wizard and the Prophet discussion highlights the importance of understanding different perspectives.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

Feedback time!

Thanks a lot for all the support out there. You can support us for free by leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Links for IC1: False Balance feedback (in Danish)

In this episode, we explore the question of whether expertise is necessary to engage in discussions about climate change. We ask ourselves, ‘if climate change is not a matter of opinion, do you need to be an expert to talk about it’? Of course not – every voice is valuable in a subject that affects us all. We discuss how taking part in the conversation and asking questions are actually very important (but we often don’t do that because we’re afraid of not knowing enough), how knowledge and expertise can take multiple forms, and how there is also a certain (empowering!) responsibility that comes with participation.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

In this episode of Inconvenient Chats, we delve into the complexities of global climate change negotiations, focusing on the role of UN COPs. Ever since the 2015 Paris Agreement, landmark agreements and decisive steps from UN COPs have been few and far between. Do we still need these big conferences? We discuss the historical significance of COPs, their successes and failures, and the ongoing challenges in achieving meaningful climate action.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources (not exhaustive, sorted chronological by COPs)

In this episode, we discuss what ‘inconvenient chats’ actually are. What is the discomfort that often creeps into the discussion when addressing complex topics, especially when it comes to climate change? Why do we feel that, and what does it tell us? What should we think about it?

We talk about our own experiences and reflections leading to choosing this name for the podcast. Elements we touch upon include the polarization of discussions, the importance of resisting the urge to find simple solutions, and the (paradoxical) beauty of opening up for inconvenient discussion. Ultimately, discomfort often indicates that we care about a topic, and we stand to learn a lot about ourselves next to the topic.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail with your topic recommendation and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

In this episode of Inconvenient Chats, we delve into the topic of what freedom means, particularly in the context of rising right-wing authoritarianism and the challenges faced by liberal democracies. We explore the different interpretations of freedom, the importance of debate in democratic societies, and the need to defend the true meaning of freedom against authoritarian narratives. We also emphasise the significance of individual values and the collective responsibility to uphold democratic principles.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Main source

In this episode of Inconvenient Chats, we discuss the significance of precise language in discussions and the interconnections and differences between various ecological crises – and the importance of understanding planetary crises in a broader context and the role of environmental literacy in fostering meaningful discussions.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about, send us an e-mail with your topic recommendation and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources

In this inaugural episode of Inconvenient Chats, we delve into the concept of false balance in science communication, particularly in the context of climate change. We discuss how false balance misrepresents scientific consensus potentially leading to inaction. We explore the implications of false balance on democracy and the trust in institutions.

If you want to give feedback you can write to [email protected] or [email protected].

If you have a topic on your mind that you have always wondered about send us an e-mail as well with topic recommendations and we’ll make it less inconvenient for all of you.

Sources