Trump Administration Pushes Ethnicity Issue Onto Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket
**Trump Administration Pushes Ethnicity Issue Onto Supreme Court’s Emergency Docket**
The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to let immigration agents in Los Angeles use a handy new toolkit of suspicion—skin tone, Spanish, job type, and whatever neighborhood you happen to be standing in. Yes, the Department of Justice dusted off a half‑century‑old precedent that once allowed Border Patrol to pull over drivers for looking “Mexican,” as if policing by haircut were a time-honored constitutional principle.
A federal judge had temporarily blocked agents from relying on factors like ethnicity or language when deciding whom to detain, after multiple U.S. citizens in L.A. claimed they were rounded up and interrogated anyway—licensed drivers, lifelong residents, and even a carwash manager who says he was told to “shut the [expletive] up” when he asked for a warrant. The Justice Department now insists that in a district where nearly half the population is Latino, ethnicity can still be “probative” of immigration status. Translation: half the local community, by default, is suspicious.
Civil rights groups, city governments, and common sense all argue this is textbook racial profiling, while the administration maintains that “no factor is off-limits” in hunting immigration violators. The request now sits before Justice Elena Kagan, who must decide whether immigration enforcement in America looks forward—or retreats to the era when a person’s accent was grounds for a federal takedown.
DOJ: Woman Threatened to Kill Donald Trump in Retaliation for COVID-19 Deaths
**DOJ: Woman Threatened to Kill Donald Trump in Retaliation for COVID-19 Deaths**
Federal prosecutors say a 50-year-old Indiana woman, Nathalie Rose Jones, has been arrested in Washington, D.C., after allegedly threatening to kill President Donald Trump as retribution for COVID-19 deaths. Authorities claim her threats began on social media in early August, where she labeled Trump a dictator and “terrorist,” before escalating into explicit descriptions of violence.
In a voluntary interview with the Secret Service, Jones reportedly doubled down, vowing to use a “bladed object” to assassinate Trump if given the chance, while declaring her mission was to avenge lives lost in the pandemic. She later reiterated her admission of threats but denied current intent to cause harm.
Officials say she faces charges of threatening the life of the president, kidnapping threats, and transmitting violent communications across state lines. The U.S. Attorney for D.C. called threatening the president “one of the most serious crimes” and promised swift prosecution—a reminder, perhaps, that while Americans argue endlessly about their leaders, the line between free speech and felony is drawn in blood-red ink.
Council Succeeds in Blocking Hotel Use for Asylum Seeker Accommodation
**Council Succeeds in Blocking Hotel Use for Asylum Seeker Accommodation** — The High Court has ruled asylum seekers will no longer be housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, handing local councillors the win they so desperately wanted. Because nothing says “sound governance” quite like deploying an army of lawyers to stop vulnerable people from sleeping under a roof that isn’t made of tarpaulin.
High Court Issues Injunction Halting Plans to House Asylum Seekers in Epping Hotel
**High Court Issues Injunction Halting Plans to House Asylum Seekers in Epping Hotel**
Tonight, another round in Britain’s ongoing bureaucratic cage match: the High Court has issued a temporary injunction stopping the government from housing asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel in Epping Forest. The Home Office tried to crash the party with a last-minute intervention, but the judge waved them off like an overeager wedding crasher. And so, the legal limbo continues—because if there’s one thing the UK has mastered, it’s turning human shelter into a spectator sport of procedural gridlock.