Send us Fan Mail

A child comes back from contact and something feels off. They’re quieter than usual, suddenly clingy, angry, sick to their stomach, wetting the bed, or refusing to sleep alone. You can’t prove what it means, but you can’t ignore it either. That’s the impossible space we sit with today: the moment a parent believes their child may be unsafe, and the act of trying to protect them gets reinterpreted as parental alienation.

We talk through why this happens and why it’s so hard to untangle. A parent describing themselves as “protective” might be right, might be mistaken, or might be reacting through fear and history. But a parent claiming “alienation” is not automatically right either. Both claims need careful investigation, and we can’t assess safety by vibes alone. We dig into the Family Justice Council guidance that separates genuinely protective behavior from alienating behavior, and we explain why a protective action can’t be judged without examining what the parent believes the child needs protection from.

A big focus is coercive control and domestic abuse as patterns. Single incidents can look harmless until you see the repetition, the context, and the effect on the child. We also explore how children communicate risk without language, how adults can respond without dismissing them or flooding them with fear, and why the real question is always: what’s the story beneath the headline, and what is the impact on the child?

If this conversation helps you think more clearly about child contact refusal, safeguarding, and family court narratives, share it with someone who needs it. Subscribe, leave a review, and tell us what questions you want answered next.

Send us Fan Mail

“I don’t want to go.” Four words that can trigger panic, rage, and heartbreak in separated families, and can quickly pull schools, therapists, and the family court system into the middle. I’m Kim Lee, a child and adolescent psychotherapist, and I’m shifting the focus away from adult interpretations and back to the child’s experience. Refusal is behavior, and behavior is the headline, not the story.

We unpack the range of reasons a child might say no to contact, and why reaching for labels like parental alienation too early can block understanding. I talk through fear and safety first, including why guidance like Cafcass emphasizes considering domestic abuse and harmful parenting at the start of assessment. We explore the difference between a one off argument and a pattern that leaves a child feeling intimidated, humiliated, or unable to escape, and why what happens after an incident matters just as much as the incident itself.

We also look at less obvious drivers: a child who feels responsible for a parent’s wellbeing, a child navigating anger and grief after separation, and the “felt sense” that doesn’t shift just because an adult has explained the facts. Then we get practical and specific about what the child may be refusing: overnights, long journeys, a person in the household, or the strain of moving between two homes. I challenge assumptions about 50-50 shared care and highlight how changeovers and the conversations around them can be the hardest part.

If this resonates, subscribe for the rest of the series, share the episode with someone navigating contact arrangements, and leave a review so more parents and professionals can find it. What do you think a child is really saying when they refuse to go?

Send us Fan Mail

A child says “no” to contact and suddenly the adults are fighting over a single phrase: parental alienation. I’m Kim Lee, a child and adolescent psychotherapist, and I want to slow the rush to certainty. When we treat a child’s refusal as proof of manipulation, we can end up deciding the outcome before we’ve understood the story, and that can silence the one voice that most needs protection.

We dig into where the term “parental alienation” comes from, why the “syndrome” framing sounds more clinical than it actually is, and how that language can tilt professionals toward fixing a supposed condition rather than investigating what happened in the family. I talk about why calling a child’s rejection “unjustified” is a major conclusion, and what it should require: real history, the chance for a child to speak freely, and a careful look at the relationship before court became involved.

We also look at guidance and practice: the World Health Organization’s ICD-11 and the Family Justice Council’s position that parental alienation is not a diagnosis. From there, we move to a more useful lens focused on evidence and alternative explanations, including the rejected parent’s behavior, attachment, affinity, domestic abuse, harmful parenting, and safeguarding concerns like emotional harm. The most important question I keep coming back to is this: are we seeing alienation, or are we seeing protection?

If this helps you think more clearly about child contact refusal, family court disputes, and child welfare, please follow the show, share the episode, and leave a review. What do you think adults too often miss when a child refuses contact?

Send us Fan Mail

From the new album- 'Reflections'. Coming soon from kims-music.com. Release date soon

Send us Fan Mail

Send us Fan Mail

Send us Fan Mail

When a connection feels like a twin flame, the ending doesn’t just hurt, it rewrites your sense of reality. We lean into that raw, poetic space where the spark fades, the mind starts circling for answers, and you’re left trying to tell the fire from the shame. The lines are simple but loaded: survival after love, the way doubt dims what once felt bright, and the quiet terror of not knowing what was real. 

We also draw a hard boundary that can change how you heal: there’s a path to grief and a path to blame, and they are not the same road. Grief asks you to feel what’s true without turning it into a trial. Blame keeps you stuck rehearsing evidence, re-reading the past, and outsourcing your worth to someone else’s choices. If you’ve been caught in rumination after a breakup, this is a reminder that meaning-making can become its own kind of fire. 

The closing turn is the takeaway I keep coming back to: return to yourself, trust what you know, and do what you know is right even when the night feels endless. That’s twin flame healing without the hype, grounded in self-trust, emotional resilience, and the slow work of rebuilding. If this resonated, subscribe, share it with someone who’s rebuilding after heartbreak, and leave a review with the line that hit you hardest.

Send us Fan Mail

Send us Fan Mail

A prime-time documentary can spark a needed conversation, but it can also blur the line between good questions and bad conclusions. We watched Channel 4’s “The Great ADHD Myth” with interest because concerns about rushed ADHD diagnosis, uneven assessment quality, and careless prescribing deserve daylight. Then the program reached for something much bigger: the suggestion that ADHD may not be a genuine neurodevelopmental disorder. That claim carries an evidential burden the film simply didn’t meet.

We walk through what “where is the evidence?” really means here, and why ADHD research can’t be reduced to one brain scan, one skeptical opinion, or one child’s short-term medication change. We break down the idea of converging evidence across genetics, twin and family studies, epidemiology, neuropsychology, longitudinal research, and controlled treatment trials, including why polygenic risk and replicated findings are difficult to square with the idea that modern life “creates” ADHD. We also clarify the brain imaging debate: no scan diagnoses an individual, but group-level differences are still meaningful and often misunderstood.

We also stay grounded in lived experience, including the child who said medication took away his “funness.” That sentence matters. Treatment must serve the child, not convenience, and medication side effects like appetite loss, sleep disruption, or emotional numbing require serious review. At the same time, improvements after lifestyle changes don’t automatically prove the original vulnerability never existed; environment can amplify or soothe symptoms without being the root cause.

If you care about child mental health, ADHD assessment, parenting guilt, school pressures, or what ethical prescribing should look like, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share this with someone navigating an ADHD diagnosis, and leave a review with the question you most want answered next.

Send us Fan Mail