
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


As libertarians, we all agree: taxation is theft. But in this episode, Dr. James Harrigan joins Josh to wrestle with a question that hits close to home for many of us—what if some level of taxation is the "necessary evil" that prevents worse evils in society?
They dive into what, if anything, is the legitimate role of government in a free society: What services, if any, do free people truly need from the state to protect private property, individual liberty, and the equal human value of every citizen? And what moral dilemmas arise when there's no government "stop-gap" at all. Does pure voluntarism leave the vulnerable exposed? What uncomfortable realities would we face in a purely voluntary system, and would we be okay with those realities?
Obviously, this isn't about defending the state—it's an honest, sometimes uncomfortable look at the internal conflicts we libertarians face when principle meets real-world messiness.
Follow James's on Facebook and on X:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1Dgtiyzhhx/?mibextid=wwXIfr
https://x.com/jamesrharrigan?s=21&t=S8JoQpY3m4n6bFrTo8tLrg
Check out James on the Words & Numbers podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/words-numbers/id1237781005
https://open.spotify.com/show/5MUcXpKrH4QzFisyy8Ucll?si=owCMeXoQTKSFQjfKSXP0Lw
If you have questions, comments, hate mail, or just want to join in this conversation email me:
By Good Morning Liberty4.8
293293 ratings
As libertarians, we all agree: taxation is theft. But in this episode, Dr. James Harrigan joins Josh to wrestle with a question that hits close to home for many of us—what if some level of taxation is the "necessary evil" that prevents worse evils in society?
They dive into what, if anything, is the legitimate role of government in a free society: What services, if any, do free people truly need from the state to protect private property, individual liberty, and the equal human value of every citizen? And what moral dilemmas arise when there's no government "stop-gap" at all. Does pure voluntarism leave the vulnerable exposed? What uncomfortable realities would we face in a purely voluntary system, and would we be okay with those realities?
Obviously, this isn't about defending the state—it's an honest, sometimes uncomfortable look at the internal conflicts we libertarians face when principle meets real-world messiness.
Follow James's on Facebook and on X:
https://www.facebook.com/share/1Dgtiyzhhx/?mibextid=wwXIfr
https://x.com/jamesrharrigan?s=21&t=S8JoQpY3m4n6bFrTo8tLrg
Check out James on the Words & Numbers podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/words-numbers/id1237781005
https://open.spotify.com/show/5MUcXpKrH4QzFisyy8Ucll?si=owCMeXoQTKSFQjfKSXP0Lw
If you have questions, comments, hate mail, or just want to join in this conversation email me:

1,779 Listeners

3,364 Listeners

4,950 Listeners

2,279 Listeners

974 Listeners

1,150 Listeners

7,497 Listeners

483 Listeners

2,183 Listeners

7,684 Listeners

4,478 Listeners

3,475 Listeners

836 Listeners

17,121 Listeners

547 Listeners