
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


OA1189 - The Supreme Court’s next term may not start until October, but their infamous shadow--sorry, “interim”--docket is in rare form as they issue snap decisions on everything from exactly where one 14-year-old boy can pee to just how openly racist ICE gets to be. Matt and Jenessa review which major precedents the conservative majority is ignoring to enable Trump’s worst policies this week before getting on to some Epstein-related legal updates and a radical new development from the Board of Immigration Appeals with massive implications for Trump’s mass deportation plans.
Finally, Matt drops a footnote to address one of our nation’s least pressing legal questions: is it really true that a wedding in Kentucky can be legally officiated by a dead bear once described as “filled to the brim with cocaine”?
SCOTUS order in Trump v. Slaughter (9/8/2025)
SCOTUS order (with Kavanaugh concurrence and Sotomayor dissent) in Noem v. Vasquez-Perdomo (9/8/25)
Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 21 I&N 216 (BIA 2025)
Kentucky Revised Statute 402.070
P.S. Matt messed up his audio and is very sorry about it!
By Opening Arguments Media LLC4.3
35523,552 ratings
OA1189 - The Supreme Court’s next term may not start until October, but their infamous shadow--sorry, “interim”--docket is in rare form as they issue snap decisions on everything from exactly where one 14-year-old boy can pee to just how openly racist ICE gets to be. Matt and Jenessa review which major precedents the conservative majority is ignoring to enable Trump’s worst policies this week before getting on to some Epstein-related legal updates and a radical new development from the Board of Immigration Appeals with massive implications for Trump’s mass deportation plans.
Finally, Matt drops a footnote to address one of our nation’s least pressing legal questions: is it really true that a wedding in Kentucky can be legally officiated by a dead bear once described as “filled to the brim with cocaine”?
SCOTUS order in Trump v. Slaughter (9/8/2025)
SCOTUS order (with Kavanaugh concurrence and Sotomayor dissent) in Noem v. Vasquez-Perdomo (9/8/25)
Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 21 I&N 216 (BIA 2025)
Kentucky Revised Statute 402.070
P.S. Matt messed up his audio and is very sorry about it!

3,552 Listeners

4,044 Listeners

3,211 Listeners

435 Listeners

2,604 Listeners

1,988 Listeners

6,305 Listeners

4,667 Listeners

2,666 Listeners

7,682 Listeners

1,905 Listeners

523 Listeners

269 Listeners

387 Listeners

784 Listeners