Anita Among the worst Speaker of all time Uganda has ever had. Bino byaali mukolamu parliament, Mbabuuza, Parliament tugikolereki?

https://youtu.be/ZOEwQoMBfvQ

Anita Among Rejects Joel Ssenyonyi's Uganda Airlines COSASE Report implicating Jennifer Bamturaki and her team plus all the inconsistencies and dirty deals in Uganda airlines | Accuses Joel of being Lazy,

About Opposition Mps and their conduct in Helping to Depose Museveni

Hear about the outcry Police Man whom Gashumba made sure is Sacked from Police

Is Opposition Unity an important aspect of  the liberation Struggle?

Laba kyebakola ssegiriiny abantu be Kawempe nabakulembeze | Ensonga tekyali ku M7 Musiba wabula bo

For some time now, several people have been asking me what happened to the Uganda Airlines report. Well, in September 2022, they submitted the report to the Speaker and the Clerk so that we table it on the floor of Parliament. All this while, Speaker Anita Among has been saying she's studying the report, and that she will give feedback! I saw the energy used to censure Hon Zaake and now Hon Namuganza over what is largely personal issues, I wish the same energy could be applied to executing Parliament work such as committee reports. Nonetheless, we shall not be deflated in our quest to do our work as we expose the rot in Gov't entities, whether the reports are eventually tabled or not. In this new year 2023, we're taking the exposing (kulabisa) to a whole new level!

Uganda under dictator Museveni, a country in serious Trouble 

How Africa can avoid getting Scrambled | China America, Russia etc are all pulling Africa for a share  African leaders must be more imaginative and proactive in pooling their efforts and setting the agenda. At the conclusion of the Berlin Conference of 1884-85, which notoriously carved up the African continent and apportioned its territories to Europe’s imperial powers of the day, signatories to the act that formalized the new borders and zones of influence highlighted education and the “material well-being of the native populations” as justification for their historic power grabs. Over the half-century or so that followed what came to be known as the “Scramble for Africa,” Europe did virtually nothing to further education on the continent and inflicted some of the worst atrocities of the modern era on Africans, as colonists raced to extract natural resources using land seizures and forced labor, and implemented military conscription to fight and provide pack horse-like logistical support in Europe’s wars. Most of what is recalled today about this terrible scramble are the arbitrary borders that created numerous economically crippled, landlocked territories and by turns divided members of coherent ethnic groupings and thrust together people with vast cultural differences or histories of enmity. Forgotten almost completely are the moral rationales that Western powers mobilized to justify their takeover and stewardship of an entire continent. Much has been written lately about a new scramble for Africa that is supposedly underway, involving a growing list of outside powers. The list is led by China, the United States, France, and Russia, but also present are other parties that have less history of involvement with Africa but are now being drawn in, including Brazil, Japan, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, South Korea, Turkey, Vietnam, and others. All are seeking business opportunities on the continent positioned to drive most human population growth over the rest of this century—or more insidiously, are aiming to counter the influence of a global or regional rival. Talk of a new scramble for Africa was strongly revived by last week’s U.S.-Africa Summit in Washington, the first since the Obama administration held one in 2014. U.S. press coverage has been peppered with allusions to a subtext for the event that was all but proscribed in the proceedings themselves but nonetheless seemed ever present in the minds of U.S. officials: how the United States can compete with China for influence in Africa.  

The Biden administration pledged $55 billion for food security, climate crisis and trade partnerships, in addition to a new agreement with the African Continental Free Trade Area that will give US companies access to 1.3 billion people and a market valued at $3.4 trillion.  The summit is the first of its kind since 2014 under then-president Barack Obama.  Meanwhile, China has been holding the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation every three years since 2000, widely seen as an essential means of advancing Chinese diplomatic and commercial interests.  For nearly two decades, Beijing has ploughed funds into African infrastructure and supplied the continent with affordable consumer goods, ranging from mobile phones and solar panels to plastics.  Until now, Sub-Saharan Africa has always been a low foreign-relations priority for the US, accounting for just 1.2 percent of its total two-way trade.  However, western leaders have sharply criticised what they see as Beijing’s reluctance to address the heavy debt burden facing many African countries.  Beijing’s ambassador to Washington rejected the idea ahead of the summit, citing a report that African countries owe three times more debt to Western institutions while noting that Chinese-built hospitals, highways, airports and stadiums are “everywhere” in Africa.  Can Washington close the gap?  As the US-China rivalry sucks the global economy and international relations into its orbit, the gap between Washington and Beijing’s footprint on the African continent is stark.  China-Africa trade accounts for $254 billion – four times that of US-Africa, which stands at $64.3 billion. China is also the largest provider of foreign direct investment – double the level of US FDI – and supports hundreds of thousands of African jobs.  Beijing formalized commercial engagement with Africa in 2013 with the Belt and Road Initiative, a well-resourced effort to build political influence and grow commercial relationships throughout the developing world through Chinese infrastructure lending, construction and resource extraction.  A survey conducted earlier this year found that 76 percent of Africans aged 18-24 view China as a positive influence on their lives, compared with 72 percent for the US – further evidence that China is winning the battle for the hearts and minds of Africans.  That is something US observers are starting to take note of.  Released in August, the Biden administration’s US-Africa strategy document highlights that with one of the world’s fastest-growing populations, largest free-trade areas by geographical area and most diverse set of ecosystems, African governments, institutions, and people “will play a critical role in solving global challenges”.