JIM WEBB PODCAST

A $34 million primary challenge. A Congress that looks bought and paid for. And a country that keeps drifting toward new wars while veterans keep dying at home. I sit down with former CIA analyst Larry Johnson, co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity and the voice behind Sonar 21, to sort through what’s real, what’s theater, and what the incentives are behind the noise.

We start with the Thomas Massie fight and why “don’t cross AIPAC” has become a quiet rule in Washington. From there, we move into the part of this conversation that hits hardest: veteran suicide, moral injury, and the rage that comes from watching endless conflicts produce political careers and defense profits, but not real closure for the people who fought.

Then we pivot to Iran and the practical constraints most pundits skip. Larry breaks down why Saudi Arabia, basing, and air refueling logistics like KC-135 tankers can decide whether escalation is even feasible, and why air power has limits when the political end state is unclear. We also zoom out to Israel, Lebanon, Hezbollah, the changing media landscape, and the bigger global shift toward a Russia China partnership, BRICS, and alternatives to the US dollar system.

Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review. What part of this story do you think most Americans are still missing?

Chapter Markers

0:00. Welcome And Larry Johnson’s Background

3:40. The Massey Primary And AIPAC Power

5:45. Veteran Suicide And Moral Injury

10:05. Why Iran Matters And Who Benefits

14:50. Saudi Airspace And War Logistics Reality

26:55. Predictable Tactics And Yes Men Culture

30:40. Israel, Lebanon, Hezbollah, And Leverage

35:30. New Media Breaks The Old Gatekeepers

42:50. Russia China Partnership And BRICS Future

50:00. Religion, War Limits, And Civilian Protection

54:30. Final Thoughts And What’s Next

A newborn comes home from the hospital and, minutes later, we’re back on the hardest question in American life: who actually has power in Washington when a high-profile incumbent can be drowned under tens of millions in outside money? We start with Thomas Massey’s primary loss and talk candidly about donor influence, lobbying pressure, and why it feels like some foreign policy positions are effectively “off limits” if you want to keep your seat. If you’ve ever wondered why Congress struggles to reflect what voters say they want, this is the uncomfortable incentive structure behind it.

From there, we connect the political story to the economic one. We dig into runaway spending, entitlement promises no one wants to reform, and the slow-motion danger of a weakening dollar. The theme is simple: meaningful change rarely arrives because of speeches or think pieces, it arrives when households feel real pain through inflation, shortages, or job loss. That’s when public opinion stops being theoretical and starts becoming political force.

Then Col. Doug McGregor walks through the escalating risk of war with Iran and why the Persian Gulf is not a place where the US can assume dominance. We talk modern surveillance and strike networks, missile saturation, lessons from Ukraine’s battlefield, and how a wider conflict could hit oil infrastructure and desalination plants with knock-on effects that ripple through energy markets, shipping, fertilizer, and food prices. We also zoom out to BRICS, gold settlement, and the growing China Russia Iran alignment, ending on what we should prioritize first: defending North America and rebuilding real capacity at home.

If this conversation sharpens your thinking, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave a rating or review so more people can find the show.

Chapter Markers

0:00. Baby News And Guest Welcome

1:47. Massey’s Defeat And Foreign Influence

4:17. Debt, Entitlements, And Dollar Decline

10:13. Pain Before Political Change

11:31. Congress For Sale And Corruption

15:11. Scarcity, Jobs, And Social Unrest

20:04. Cromwell’s Legacy And American Values

22:34. Home Front First And Cohesion

24:15. Why War With Iran Backfires

33:26. Ukraine Lessons And Modern Firepower

37:38. Gulf Infrastructure And Energy Shock

39:54. BRICS, Gold, And Eurasian Alignment

47:55. Defending North America And Closing

The strangest part of the US China summit is how little it clarifies. After two days of praise and photo ops, we’re left asking what Washington actually went to get, and what Beijing was happy to let it take home. With Alex Christophorou of The Duran, we unpack why the trip reads more like a high-level business roadshow with top CEOs than a fully prepared superpower negotiation, and why that distinction matters when global markets are already on edge.

From there, we move straight into the real pressure point: Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. We talk through how a blockade strategy can shrink your leverage instead of expanding it, especially when China has deeper ties with Tehran and a direct stake in keeping energy flows stable to Asia. The bigger story isn’t only whether ships move or don’t move, it’s what that signals to US-aligned countries in Asia about who can actually protect energy supply in a crisis. That’s where BRICS diplomacy and parallel negotiations start to look less like background noise and more like a competing center of gravity.

We also dig into what could come next, including a potential Putin visit to China and the energy realignment implications of Power of Siberia 2 for Europe’s long-term gas and LNG outlook. On the US side, we connect foreign policy swings to domestic pain: high prices at the pump, strategic petroleum reserve drawdowns, and the political blowback that follows. We close with the growing focus on Cuba, why “easy win” thinking can be dangerous, and how escalation risk creeps in when sanctions and ship seizures become the main tools.

• 0:00. Welcome And Guest Setup
• 2:00 Why The China Summit Felt Empty
• 10:25 Iran Leverage And The Hormuz Blockade
• 18:45 China Signals Power To US Allies
• 24:40 BRICS Diplomacy And A Saudi Proposal
• 30:50 Putin’s China Visit And Energy Realignment
• 38:55. US Energy Prices And Reserve Drawdowns
• 43:55 Ground War Talk And Lebanon’s Ongoing Fight
• 50:55 Market Timing Claims And Cuba Pressure
• 54:05 Final Thoughts And What’s Next

The Strait of Hormuz closes and suddenly the whole world feels it. Who’s blamed abroad, and why do China and Iran hold more cards than US headlines admit? Listen now and tell me who miscalculated?

• 0:00. Welcome And Stakes Of The Day
• 1:35 Hormuz Blockade And Global Blame
• 5:55 China Runs The Blockade Anyway
• 11:55 Let Your Opponent Make Mistakes
• 17:20 Trump Xi Goals And Missing Leverage
• 24:45 Why Summit Prep Really Matters
• 31:50 Thucydides Trap And Taiwan Warnings
• 37:55 British Empire Overreach As A Warning
• 43:55 China Iran Support And US Weaknesses
• 49:05. Britain’s Political Crisis And Farage
• 50:55 Final Thoughts And Subscribe Request

A ceasefire that’s “on life support,” a Strait of Hormuz that still shapes global energy, and a US military that looks powerful on paper but struggles to surge in reality: that’s where this conversation goes fast. I’m joined by retired Lieutenant Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, a former Pentagon and NSA professional and a founding member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, to sort through what’s signal versus noise.

We start surprisingly close to home with Virginia redistricting and gerrymandering, because engineered maps don’t just pick winners, they erode real representation and deepen political separation. From there we move into the Iran conflict and the question Karen keeps pressing: what does “victory” even mean if objectives keep shrinking, commercial shipping remains threatened, and Americans feel the blowback in gas prices and economic stress?

Then we get concrete about military readiness and the defense industrial base: production at scale, logistics, long deployments, and why modern warfare is being reshaped by cheap drones, rapid iteration, and adversaries who adapt quickly. We also touch the bigger arc of a multipolar world, rising interest in gold and precious metals, and what it signals when confidence in US power and strategy slips.

Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with a friend who argues politics or foreign policy for sport, and leave a review with your biggest takeaway.

• 0:00. Welcome And Guest Background
• 1:40 Virginia Redistricting And Gerrymandering
• 9:20 Trump, Iran, And The Chess Question
• 16:40 Military Readiness And Production Limits
• 24:44 Strait Of Hormuz And Strategic Loss
• 34:05 A Face Saving Exit Strategy
• 37:41 Israel Aid, Gas Prices, Public Opinion
• 40:16 Gold Exports And A Declining Empire
• 44:50 Drones, Deterrence, And Defense Reform
• 51:04 Where To Follow Karen And Closing

“47 years with Iran” sounds clean and simple, and it’s also a shortcut that erases the part that explains everything. We sit down with Scott Horton to walk the U.S. Iran timeline back to the 1953 coup against Mohammad Mossadegh, the rebuilding of the Shah’s rule, and how Washington’s habit of picking winners abroad creates the rage and instability it later points to as a reason to intervene again.

From there, we separate the 1979 Iranian Revolution from the hostage crisis, track the Carter Doctrine’s transformation of the Persian Gulf into a declared U.S. vital interest, and follow the chain into Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Iran and the Iran-Iraq War. We also connect the post-1991 era of basing and “dual containment” to the strategic mess of Iraq in 2003, including the sectarian math that made civil conflict predictable and the regional spillovers that fed the Syria war and the rise of ISIS.

Then we hit the claims that still drive calls for escalation right now: whether Iran “killed 600 Americans in Iraq,” what’s true and what’s politics, and what Iran’s nuclear program looks like under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, IAEA inspections, and the JCPOA framework. We end with the hard realities of escalation in the Gulf, including the Strait of Hormuz, and why “regime change” talk ignores the limits of airpower and the costs of occupation.

Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with someone who argues about Iran, and leave a review with the strongest point you agreed or disagreed with.

• 0:31. Welcome And Scott Horton Joins
• 3:00 1953 Coup And Shah Backstory
• 10:10. Revolution Versus Hostage Crisis
• 14:10 Carter Doctrine And Iran-Iraq War
• 19:14 From Gulf War To Iraq 2003
• 24:37 Oct 7 And The Push On Iran
• 31:28 Debunking The Iran Killed 600 Line
• 38:02 Hormuz Risks And Why Withdrawal Matters
• 48:14 Nukes Inspections And The Regime Change Trap

Gas prices don’t care about political talking points, and neither do missiles, shipping lanes, or hard deadlines on the battlefield. We sit down with Kyle Anzalone, opinion editor at Antiwar.com and news editor at the Libertarian Institute, to sort signal from noise as Ukraine slips off the front page and the Iran war dominates everything.

We start with the Ukraine ceasefire headlines and the scramble for credit around Victory Day. Kyle walks through how Russia and Ukraine announced their own unilateral pauses, how the timing mismatch fueled instant accusations, and why US media framing can turn a messy reality into a feel-good diplomatic story. From there we dig into why decorum and historical memory matter in negotiations, and why ignoring them makes off-ramps harder to find.

Then we shift to the Middle East: Iran’s posture on nuclear negotiations, sanctions relief, and the Strait of Hormuz, plus the problem of Lebanon as a dealbreaker. We pressure-test the claim that the US “doesn’t need” Hormuz against global energy markets, allies’ dependence, and the vulnerability of Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Finally, we examine Israel’s expanded Hasbara spending and why propaganda may be accelerating the backlash it’s meant to stop.

If you want sharper context on US foreign policy, Iran sanctions, the Strait of Hormuz, and the Ukraine war narrative battle, hit play. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review with your take: what would a realistic off-ramp look like?

• 0:00. Welcome And Guest Setup
• 4:10 Trump’s Ukraine Ceasefire Credit
• 12:20 Why Decorum Matters In Diplomacy
• 19:40 Aegis Ashore And Russia’s Red Lines
• 25:50 Ending War
• 33:10 Hormuz, Gas Prices, And Fifth Fleet
• 40:55. Hasbara Spending And Backlash In US
• 46:55 Closing Thoughts And What’s Next

A single vote in a Kentucky primary could tell you more about American power than a hundred cable news panels. We sit down with attorney Robert Barnes to connect the dots between populism, civil liberties, and the machinery that keeps Congress weak and the executive strong.

We start with Barnes’s personal story: a hard upbringing in Chattanooga, losing his father young, and a deep skepticism of elitism that later pushes him to leave Yale in protest over policies he says punish poor students. From there, we track how that worldview shapes a legal career built around civil rights, constitutional law, and pro bono defense of people caught in the gears of institutions that rarely face consequences.

Then the conversation turns bluntly political. Barnes explains why Trump’s early message on ending forever wars, challenging the bureaucracy, and putting workers ahead of Wall Street felt real to many voters, and why he believes that promise collapses under donor pressure. We dig into the Thomas Massey primary, FISA and warrantless surveillance, and the broader question of whether foreign lobbying and big-money influence can effectively “buy” a House seat.

Finally, we walk through war powers and the War Powers Resolution, using the Iran conflict as the real-time test case. If Congress cannot control war, what can it control? If you care about the Constitution, congressional authority, and stopping endless wars, you’ll want this breakdown.

Subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What’s the one reform that would actually force Congress to do its job?

• 0:00 Welcome And Guest Introduction
• 1:10 1776 Law Center And Conference
• 2:48 Why Likes And Subscribes Matter
• 3:06 Growing Up Poor And Leaving Yale
• 10:06 Why Trump’s Message Worked
• 17:38 Donor Capture And A Changed Trump
• 25:50 Thomas Massey And Foreign Money
• 37:45 Strait Updates And War Powers Law
• 48:46 How Congress Can Take Power Back

You can feel it when a country’s leadership stops matching the character of the people it asks to serve. That’s where this conversation begins, with a rare father and son pairing: the host sits down with his dad, Jim Webb, former U.S. Senator and Secretary of the Navy, Navy Cross recipient, and author of Born Fighting and Fields of Fire, to talk about the cultural roots that still drive American populism and military service.

We dig into the Scotch-Irish “citizen soldier” tradition: why honor, duty, and loyalty matter, why people distrust aristocracy, and how everyday customs like hunting, firearms rites of passage, and constitutional instincts around the Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment connect to a bigger story about democracy American style. From Ulster Scots migration to the Revolutionary War and the Battle of Kings Mountain, we trace how this culture helped form the backbone of the American military and a bottom-up expectation that leaders must earn allegiance through courage and humility.

Then the conversation turns to the cost of blurred missions. Webb reflects on Vietnam, on-the-ground leadership, and his reporting from Beirut, where Marines carried political symbolism without political clarity. From there we tackle Congress, war powers, and why the post-9/11 era normalized executive overreach. Finally, Webb compares today’s Iran and Strait of Hormuz tensions to the 1980s tanker wars, arguing that U.S. choices can widen conflict and trap us in long-term Middle East entanglement.

If you care about U.S. foreign policy, civil-military relations, and how American political culture is changing in real time, listen through to the end, then subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review with what you think Congress should do next.

Chapter Markers

0:00. Welcome And Why Culture Matters

4:20. Family Traditions, Guns, And Rights

10:00. Born Fighting, Populism, And Betrayal

15:30. Ulster Scots Origins And Kings Mountain

22:40. Vietnam Lessons And Fields Of Fire

29:50. Beirut Marines And Unclear Missions

45:10. War Powers, Congress, And Accountability

49:20. Tanker Wars, Hormuz, And Hard Choices

56:00. Final Clip, Leadership, And Closing

“Project Freedom” sounds bold until you game out what it really means: more U.S. ships and aircraft operating in the Strait of Hormuz, more opportunities for Iran to take a shot, and more chances for a single incident to drag us into a wider regional war. We sit down with Joe Kent to cut through the slogans and ask the question that keeps getting skipped in public: what is the U.S. strategic objective, and what does the end state look like when the shooting stops?

We walk through why escorting global commerce can be an escalation trap, why a “temporary pause” may just be a reset for the next round, and how influential war voices can box presidents into maximalist demands. Joe draws on hard-earned experience to dismantle the recurring “arm the moderates” fantasy, tracing how well-branded proxy plans in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria have repeatedly produced blowback, empowered extremists, and left Americans paying the bill in blood and treasure.

Then we focus on a diplomatic off ramp that treats incentives and verification as real tools, not talking points. We discuss pulling vulnerable U.S. footprints back from Iran’s borders, targeted sanctions relief as leverage, and the nuclear question: how insisting on zero enrichment can poison negotiations, and how continued fighting can actually guarantee long-term nuclear proliferation as leaders look to North Korea-style “insurance.” We also dig into U.S. credibility, the petrodollar, alliance leverage, and what it would take to rebuild a foreign policy culture that prioritizes clear interests over endless entanglements.

If you care about U.S. foreign policy, Iran diplomacy, Middle East strategy, and a serious America-first use-of-force threshold, this is the conversation to hear. Subscribe, share this with a friend who argues about the news, and leave a review with your answer: what should the United States demand, and what should it stop doing?

Chapter Markers

0:00. Introducing Joe Kent And Stakes

3:20. Project Freedom And Hormuz Risks

6:55. Pause Or Pretext For More War

9:55. Lindsey Graham And War Messaging

12:55. The Myth Of Moderate Rebels

18:40. A Diplomatic Off Ramp That Works

23:50. Nuclear Incentives And The Goldilocks Line

26:35. Credibility Damage And China’s Opening

29:10. Putting Israel In Check With Aid

32:10. Money In Politics And Transparency

36:45. A Real Use Of Force Threshold

40:20. Fixing Diplomacy Beyond Threats

43:55. Bringing Combat Veterans Into Government

47:00. Closing And Tomorrow’s Preview