
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Why is objectivity important when it comes to how judges decide cases? Tara A. Smith joins us this week to talk about what people mean when they say “We want judges to be objective and to uphold the law.”
We discuss the what, how, and why of judicial objectivity, first principles, the value of discretion among different government actors in a legal system, and we compare Smith’s theory of judicial review to other, competing theories.
Show Notes and Further Reading
Smith’s book on this subject is Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015).
Trevor recommends the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremberg, directed by Stanley Kramer.
Near the end of the episode, Smith mentions Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman’s Weekly Standard article “The Next Justices.”
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Libertarianism.org4.6
299299 ratings
Why is objectivity important when it comes to how judges decide cases? Tara A. Smith joins us this week to talk about what people mean when they say “We want judges to be objective and to uphold the law.”
We discuss the what, how, and why of judicial objectivity, first principles, the value of discretion among different government actors in a legal system, and we compare Smith’s theory of judicial review to other, competing theories.
Show Notes and Further Reading
Smith’s book on this subject is Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015).
Trevor recommends the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremberg, directed by Stanley Kramer.
Near the end of the episode, Smith mentions Randy Barnett and Josh Blackman’s Weekly Standard article “The Next Justices.”
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

8,127 Listeners

10,195 Listeners

64 Listeners

55 Listeners

12 Listeners

2,169 Listeners

28,390 Listeners

35 Listeners

28 Listeners

91 Listeners

33 Listeners

5 Listeners