This is a teaser of a bonus episode for paid subscribers. If you’d like to listen to the full episode, please consider subscribing.

One of the central issues that has arisen in terms of the relationship between trans rights and women’s rights is whether trans people have a legal entitlement to keep information about their biological sex at birth private.

In this episode, I’m joined by Tim Pitt-Payne KC, one of the UK’s leading privacy and information law barristers to discuss the law in this area. This is a bonus episode that discusses the privacy issues that arose in the case of Adams v Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre where a member of staff who identified as non-binary claimed a right to keep facts about their biological sex private and that Roz Adams had engaged in misconduct when she emailed her manager asking how to respond to a request from a rape victim to know whether her counsellor was female.

Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Special thanks to Oscar Kinross for excellent editing work.

One of the central issues that has arisen in terms of the relationship between trans rights and women’s rights is whether trans people have a legal entitlement to keep information about their biological sex at birth private.

In this episode, I’m joined by Tim Pitt-Payne KC, one of the UK’s leading privacy and information law barristers to discuss the law in this area. This is the second of three episodes on this topic. This episode applies the general legal principles discussed in Part 1 to the case of Goodwin v United Kingdom. It then explores whether there is a legal right for trans people to keep their biological sex or information around their gender history private and, if so, in what contexts.

There is a bonus episode for paid subscribers where Tim and I speak about Adams v Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre and the privacy claims that arose there. If you’d like to listen to that, please consider subscribing.

Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Special thanks to Oscar Kinross for excellent editing work.

One of the central issues that has arisen in terms of the relationship between trans rights and women’s rights is whether trans people have a legal entitlement to keep information about their biological sex at birth private.

In this episode, I’m joined by Tim Pitt-Payne KC, one of the UK’s leading privacy and information law barristers to discuss the law in this area. This is the first of three episodes on this topic. This episode discusses the general legal rules around the right to privacy and applies that cases involving the request for same-sex intimate care.

Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Special thanks to Oscar Kinross for excellent editing work.

Timothy Pitt-Payne KC is a barrister practising from 11KBW chambers in London. He is one of the UK’s leading privacy and information lawyers. He was a pioneer of the emerging law of data protection in the early 2000’s and has since built up an impressive practice at the cutting-edge of the law relating to Freedom of Information and GDPR.

Recently we both presented at a conference organised at the University of Edinburgh on Democracy, Rights, and the Rule of Law in a Data-Driven Society. In this podcast we begin by discussing the law relating to data protection and some of the cases Tim was involved in, including disclosure of information relating to the Iraq war and correspondence between the then Prince Charles and government ministers.

We then discuss the rise of Artificial Intelligence and its relationship to democracy and what we might describe is good governance, particularly the right to a human decision and why that’s important. Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Sarah Vine KC is a barrister specialising in criminal law at Doughty Street Chambers. Her practice includes economic and business crime, homicide, serious organised crime, sexual offences, and cases involving vulnerable defendants and witnesses.

In this episode we discuss the law relating to sex by deception - where consent to sex is considered to be vitiated by one party deceiving the other.

In the extended episode, Sarah and I also talk about how this law applies to cases where someone is induced into sexual activity by a deception as to biological sex. If you’d like to listen to that, head over to knowingius.substack.com and subscribe. Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Sarah Vine KC is a barrister specialising in criminal law at Doughty Street Chambers. Her practice includes economic and business crime, homicide, serious organised crime, sexual offences, and cases involving vulnerable defendants and witnesses.

In this episode we discuss what its like to be a criminal defence barrister; the nature of criminal law; its relationship with sexual crime; and the difficult balance that must be struck between the rights of victims of sexual crime and the presumption of innocence that is central to the criminal law. A part of this discussion involves the topic of rape and the legal tests that must be met in order for a conviction to be secured. One question that stems for this is whether there should be a requirement that the defendant in a rape case knew that there was no consent or did not reasonably believed that there was consent.

Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Knowing Ius is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

One of the sticking points that I see regularly in the debate around single-sex services centres on the requirement in the Equality Act 2010 that the provision of single- or separate- sex services must be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Some argue that this requirement means that it is unlawful to operate with a blanket rule excluding all men from women-only services. In this episode, I explain why that is incorrect in law. Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson

Naomi Cunningham is a discrimination law barrister, writer and campaigner. She is most know for her work as chair of the human rights charity Sex Matters and her role in several important Employment Tribunal cases on gender critical belief discrimination.

In this episode, we talk about how she came to be the chair of a human rights charity; philosophical belief discrimination; whether gender critical views are best categorised as a belief or a mere statement of fact; whether gender identity belief is protected under the Equality Act; her role in Meade v Social Work England; Single-Sex services and whether there needs to be a case-by-case assessment when operating a single-sex service.

Music: The Cobblestone by Hans Johnson