Why are corporate knowledge workers structurally prohibited from learning the most important skill of the decade?

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy sits down with Nona Black, Head of People, to unpack why hiring 36 people feels harder than running 36 Mac minis with Claude Cowork and why that's both a joke and a serious question. From Delta Airlines innovation leadership to startup chaos, Nona brings the corporate perspective on what happens when IT departments become the biggest barrier to workforce evolution.

The conversation spans the tactical (how Claude holds your ADHD thoughts while you context-switch), the structural (why engineers need to collapse into product roles and talk to customers), and the philosophical (should we expect new hires to show up AI-fluent, or is that unfair?). KP argues that medium-level AI competency means you've automated something frustrating in your workflow not just asked ChatGPT about the weather. Nona counters that most people in corporate America don't have access, incentive, or permission to build that skill, which creates a massive disadvantage for anyone not in a startup environment.

Key topics covered:

• Why managing people is harder than managing AI agents and why that's both true and not the point
• How Claude Cowork helps ADHD superpowers: holding half-finished tasks while you context-switch and come back later
• The expert generalist thesis: AI tools are making everyone capable of cross-functional work without formal training
• Why KP tells architects to keep IT out of the room if they want to make progress on AI adoption
• The three A's of knowledge work: Attitude, Aptitude, and Access and why access is the limiting factor in corporate America
• Why engineers need to collapse into product roles and learn customer empathy, not just coding mechanics
• The middle ground of AI competency: automating frustrating workflows, not just asking questions Google can answer
• Why Claude asked KP if he wanted to pay for data aggregation services or go straight to free public sources
• How to evaluate AI fluency in hiring: have they built an agent, automated a task, or just used ChatGPT for trip planning?
• Why solo entrepreneurship is more appealing now than ever, you don't need 17 people to fill 17 roles anymore
• The sandbox problem: corporate risk tolerance vs. giving employees freedom to tinker and experiment
• Why offshore development teams struggle to build good software, they're not living the customer's life
• How Claude gives real-time feedback on KP's fiction writing: "This chapter doesn't make sense, are you coming back to this?"

If you're a knowledge worker wondering whether to stay in corporate or jump to a startup, a leader trying to figure out how to hire for AI fluency, or an IT department blocking progress in the name of risk management, this episode will challenge how you think about access, aptitude, and the future of work.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

What matters after decades of building, losing, and rebuilding?

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy turns 55, and Nick uses the milestone for a lightning round conversation exploring career highs, crushing losses, and the philosophy that's shaped three decades of entrepreneurship. From living in a truck eating 19-cent tuna to running a VC fund, KP reflects on the moments that actually stuck and why they weren't the trophy wins.

The conversation moves between tactical and existential. KP explains how Claude Cowork is now his nurse practitioner (drafting insurance appeals, scheduling appointments, analyzing x-rays), why he runs four Mac Studios doing different jobs while he unpacks office furniture, and why the future of CRM is taking people to lunch instead of data entry. But the deeper thread is about identity: why his worst fear (going back to zero) doesn't actually scare him, why his family has more confidence in him than he has in himself, and why the 2008 financial crisis validated the self-doubt that still drives him today.

Key topics covered:

• Why KP spent his 55th birthday at the DMV after his assistant cleared his calendar without asking
• How Claude became his healthcare coordinator and delivered better emotional support than his mom
• The blank slate moment after his first exit paying off the house and feeling peace, not accomplishment
• Living in a truck with sleeves of tuna and stolen mayo packets and why going back doesn't scare him
• The 2008 crisis, personal guarantees, and why losing everything validated his lack of confidence
• Why "celebrating small wins" is for people not building unicorns assume wins, magnify losses
• Vibe working: running four Mac Studios with Claude Cowork while doing manual labor he actually wants to do
• Why relationship-driven CRM beats software: take engineers to lunch after RFP meetings, not Salesforce data entry
• The manager vs. maker schedule and why KP operates at sprint speed with no please-and-thank-yous
• Morning meditation as leadership: visualizing every founder and team member's context before the workday
• Why one founder said "I can feel when you're praying for me" and what that reveals about leading mission-driven teams
• The 10-year goal isn't three private jets, it's building community where all LPs are former founders who exited and came back

If you're navigating what success looks like after the wins, trying to lead without micromanaging while operating at full speed, or wondering whether your worst-case scenario is actually that bad, this episode will reframe how you think about ambition, fear, and what matters most.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

What happens when execution isn't enough to raise capital?

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy and Nick tackle a critical founder mistake: obsessing over traction while forgetting to sell the vision. Inspired by a portfolio company struggling to fundraise despite excellent execution, they unpack why venture capital demands storytelling (not just proof points) and why construction tech founders in particular fall into the "show me" trap when they should be in "tell me" mode.

The conversation spans SaaS market dynamics (why KP canceled Salesforce mid-contract), the psychology of software loyalty (people love Excel, tolerate Salesforce), and why personalization unlocks joy in enterprise tools. Then they pivot to fundraising fundamentals: Elon Musk could pitch on outcomes alone but chooses to tell the Mars story. Why? Because investors back energy, mission, and vision, not spreadsheets.

Key topics covered:

• Why KP canceled Salesforce after prepaying for the year and what that signals about SaaS churn in 2026
• The difference between software people love (Excel, Milwaukee Tools) vs. software they tolerate (Salesforce, SAP)
• Why usage data won't show up in earnings until 2027 and why the market is pricing in fear, not facts
• Application layer thesis: why natural language interfaces will replace system-of-record UX entirely
• The critical founder error: pitching what you've done instead of where you're going
• Show me vs. tell me: how to know when investors need vision, not validation
• Why Elon Musk still tells the Mars story despite decades of execution proof
• The hustler/hacker co-founder dynamic and why two hackers never raise capital
• Why construction tech founders index too hard on substance and struggle with showmanship
• How to separate customer narratives (narrow, fact-based) from investor narratives (expansive, visionary)
• The modern equivalent of "nice office space": swag stores, media presence, and dinner party bragging rights

If you're a founder who's executing well but struggling to raise, an investor trying to understand why traction isn't translating to term sheets, or an operator wondering why personalization matters more than features, this episode will reset your fundraising strategy.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

What if getting cheaper is actually the goal?

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy and Nick unpack why AI-driven deflation isn't something to fear, it's the entire point of innovation. From Davos narratives to Elon's predictions to the Grok CEO's commentary, deflation is becoming the dominant framework for understanding AI's economic impact. But construction, housing, healthcare, and education have resisted this trend for decades. Why?

KP walks through live AI experiments: writing 150 job descriptions in 30 minutes, automating recruiting workflows, and why corporate acquisitions like Consigli (AECOM) and Datagrid (Procore) are really about speed-to-market and talent acquisition, not just technology. The breakdown? These deals are cultural change plays disguised as product acquisitions and the real value is in people who are "in it" 24/7, not just using ChatGPT for poems.

Key topics covered:

• Why deflation is a core first principle of innovation and why construction has resisted it
• The real structure behind the Consigli acquisition: talent, change agents, and customer pull-through
• Why Procore bought Datagrid for speed, not capability. Bulletproofing AI takes time
• How MCP servers are hackable and why proof-of-concept to production still requires curing time
• KP's live experiment: 150 job descriptions written and posted in 30 minutes using Claude Cowork
• Why CEOs who subordinate AI strategy should resign, you can't delegate this
• The Canvas Robotics acquisition by JLG and what industrialized robotics mean for wall finishing costs
• Why 30% of every building ends up in the dumpster and how AI + robotics finally solve it
• The talent arbitrage game: why companies can't hire$5M individual contributors but can acquire them
• Safety improvements in construction: 96 deaths at Hoover Dam vs. today's job sites

If you're a founder wondering whether your product roadmap is fast enough, an investor trying to understand why acquisitions are spiking, or an operator who thinks "using ChatGPT" counts as AI adoption, this episode will reset your expectations for 2025.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

This episode is a reality check for anyone who thinks construction is just catching up to tech. It's not. Construction is now leading it.

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy and Nick make the case that design and construction have become the single most important constraint on technological progress. Data centers can't get built fast enough. Housing can't scale. Power generation is racing to keep pace. And for the first time in history, construction is facing technology-driven upgrade cycles, not aesthetic ones.

But this isn't just macro. KP walks through live experiments with Claude Cowork and Claude Code: automating LinkedIn grooming, generating $7K in Substack revenue, replacing million-dollar consulting contracts, and sending 1,000 personalized emails in under an hour. The breakthrough? AI agents don't need APIs anymore. They're reading screens and controlling desktop applications, which means on-screen takeoff, Revit, and legacy construction software are suddenly vulnerable.

Key topics covered:

• Why on-screen automation could kill 50+ construction tech startups in the next year
• How AI agents control your desktop by watching and clicking, not integrating via API
• Real experiments: LinkedIn automation, competitive analysis, email campaigns, vibe modeling in Excel
• Why construction is the bottleneck for AI infrastructure, housing supply, and energy distribution
• The shift from trickle-funding to big bets: why seed rounds should be $15–25M for real problems
• How to get surgical about ICP definition using AI-powered research
• The 48-hour email delay hack: protecting your time when automation makes you too efficient
• Why sales-oriented, variable-comp businesses are ideal for AI leverage right now

If you're a founder building in AEC, an investor trying to understand where capital should flow, or an operator wondering whether your software strategy is already obsolete, this episode will reframe how you think about the next five years.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

This episode is a gut check for founders heading into 2026.

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP sits down with Nick to unpack a question every builder eventually faces: are you pushing through healthy friction or slamming into an immovable wall? From startup shutdowns to lifestyle businesses to full resets, they explore how to make clearer decisions when time (not money) is the real constraint.

This conversation spans the very practical (how founders are using AI tools daily to replace entire workflows) to the deeply strategic (why AI adoption has become a diligence filter) to the speculative-but-serious (how autonomy, robotics, and AI in the physical world could reshape where and how we live).

If you’re a founder, operator, or investor trying to decide whether to grind, pivot, or quit, this episode will sharpen your judgment.

Key topics covered

• The “friction test”: how to tell the difference between productive resistance and a dead end
• Why time should be treated as capital and how that reframes shutdown decisions
• AI as a new baseline skill: why hours per day in tools like Claude are now table stakes
• How non-technical founders are building real products from scratch using AI
• Why AI adoption is becoming a red-flag test in founder diligence
• Real-world AI in high-stakes environments (including life-or-death decision-making)
• Eliminating “thought mind work”: how automation reduces stress and extends founder longevity
• Big bets on the physical future: autonomous vehicles, robotics, VTOLs, space hotels, and living farther from cities without the commute tax

If you’re navigating 2026 planning and wondering whether to double down or walk away this episode is for you.

Listen now.

BuildingWorks & Brookwood Sponsors

This is our final episode of the year, and we’re ending it with the kind of conversation AEC needs more of.

In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP sits down with Dr. Barry Clark (CTO) to connect the dots from “physical startups” (robots sewing denim) to what comes next: robots + humans coexisting on jobsites, AI-driven motion control, and a coming wave of materials + manufacturing innovation that could reshape how we design and build.

If you’re a founder, operator, or AEC leader wondering what’s real vs. vaporware, this one will sharpen your lens.

Key topics covered

• From robotics in apparel to robotics in construction: why “physical startups” are back
• Why construction is the hardest automation environment (unstructured, bespoke, constant pivots)
• AI’s impact on robotics: from brittle logic to learning systems that handle “unknown unknowns”
• Digital twins + simulation: getting cheaper, more practical, closer to daily use
• KP’s thesis: a materials renaissance for AEC—and the real bottleneck (commercial scale)
• What “motion control” actually means (path planning + actuator control)
• The missing layer: orchestration across people + robots on live jobsites
• A hard truth: project tools often become archives, not systems that drive behavior

Guest bio
 Dr. Barry Clark is KPR’s CTO with a background in mechanical engineering, optimal control, computer vision, and automation, spanning robotics startups and large-scale automated assembly (including server assembly and software-defined manufacturing).

If you want to understand the future of construction, look at your phone. In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy and Nick explain why the next major shift in AEC will mirror the moment Uber replaced the taxi. Not because of sci-fi tech, but because of something simpler: total transparency.

Today’s owners operate in a black box. Schedules slip, change orders land without context, and updates lag behind reality. KP and Nick argue that the construction company that embraces real-time visibility will dominate the next decade.

From jobsite cameras and drone data to cultural shifts inside design and engineering teams, this episode lays out what it takes to build the first truly transparent construction firm and why owners will reward it.

Highlights

1) The Uber analogy

•  Real-time tracking vs radio silence
•  Why transparency became a competitive weapon
•  How expectations changed overnight once riders saw the truth

2) Transparency on the jobsite

• Daily visibility instead of weekly reporting
• Drone imagery, progress photos, and time-stamped reality
• Owners checking job status as easily as tracking a car

3) Culture as the real blocker

•  The fear of showing mistakes in real time
•  Old school habits inside design and engineering teams
•  Why new firms may adopt transparency faster than incumbents

4) Incentives and stress

•  Why most GCs do not actually want surprise change orders
•  How hiding small issues snowballs into major delays
•  Transparency as the ultimate stress reliever for teams

5) The technology already exists

• Reality capture, project management, AI context layers
• Why this is a full stack shift, not a point solution
• The first GC to commit wins disproportionate market share

If you believe construction is overdue for its Uber moment, this episode shows why transparency wins and how the industry gets there.

Ready to go deeper on modern AEC leadership and operations?

Join the KPR Co Q1 Event for hands-on sessions with founders, operators, and owners.

Founders, if your board meetings feel pointless, this one’s for you. Rethink the people shaping your company’s future.

Private company boards should drive growth, not block it. Yet too often, they become performative, disengaged, or simply wrong for a company’s stage. In this episode of KP Unpacked, KP Reddy and Nick unpack what makes boards work — and why so many founders get them wrong.

They break down the difference between governance and guidance, how private equity’s rigor reshapes accountability, and why boards need to evolve just like product or operations. From “dead board members” to mismatched corporate execs, this episode is a blueprint for building a board that adds real value.

Highlights

1) What Makes a Bad Board

•  Unengaged board members: the silent signal of a dying organization
•  Corporate mindsets in startup spaces: when governance eclipses problem solving
•  Analysts and placeholders: why some seats are signs investors have checked out

2) Building the Right Board

•  Functional expertise over resume shine: the power of one domain expert who actually adds value
•  Founders as architects of their board: setting expectations, structure, and chemistry
•  Evolving governance: how Series A and B boards should look different from pre-seed

3) Dynamics and Chemistry

•  Why founder board trust breaks when communication stops between meetings
•  The “honeymoon” effect of early boards and how to keep engagement alive
•  How to fix board structure without burning relationships

4) The Private Equity Pattern

•  Pattern recognition through repetition: why PE backed AEC boards outperform
•  Experience as leverage: what seasoned investors see that most founders miss

5) Real Talk on Board Power

•  Why many investors lose interest when companies plateau and how founders can counter it
•  The hidden tension of “board coups” and replacing founders
•  How ego defines leadership longevity from Larry Ellison to Bill Gates

If you’ve ever left a board meeting wondering what the point was, this one’s for you. Learn how to build a board that keeps you accountable and scales with your business.

Join the KPR Co Q1 Event to connect with founders and investors shaping the next generation of AEC growth.

Register for the Owner Training Webinar happening on Nov 20th to go deeper into leadership, governance, and scaling for the real world.

AEC leaders, operators, and innovators, this one matters. Listen now and fix your closeout before it burns value.

The closeout process is where most projects quietly fail. In this episode of KP Unpacked, the #1 podcast in AEC, KP Reddy and Nick pull back the curtain on why handovers break, why owners get stuck with the bill, and how to design for decades instead of deadlines. 

From BIM’s broken promise to the CapEx vs OpEx split, this is a hard reset on how AEC should finish work.

Highlights

1) Documentation and data

• BIM vs reality: digital models did not eliminate banker boxes or fragmented handovers
• Documentation as asset value: warranties, submittals, service records as the true owner’s manual
• Modern handover standard: digitize everything, make it queryable, and keep data portable across owners

2) Incentives and ownership structure

• CapEx vs OpEx: split mindset drives short-term choices that hurt operations
• Incentives and warranties: tie first five years of maintenance to designers and contractors
• Design–Build–Operate: operating accountability changes what gets built

3) Operations and economics

• Maintenance economics: lifecycle costs can exceed build costs and should change design choices
• Manufacturers and feedback loops: lost warranty visibility and how direct data ties prevent waste

4) Process and workflows

• Decentralized workflows: hundreds of contributors, no single system, and why forcing one platform fails at closeout

5) Owner playbook

• Set closeout requirements early, enforce data standards in contracts, and involve operations from day one.

After months of conversations with Owners and Owner Reps, we have launched our Owner Training Series to help you fix what breaks between design, build, and handover. Learn how to manage risk, enforce better closeouts, and align your teams for long-term success.

2nd Webinar is on Nov 20th.

Enroll now and get the replay of first one → https://kpreddy.co/owner-training-series