Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Legale§e
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Legale§e episodes
- My Discussion With Scott Horton
Today on Categorical Imperatives we are talking to the one and only Scott Horton. Scott is founder of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of Anti-War.com, host of the Scott Horton show and has written several books, including his most recent: "Enough Already - Time to end the war on terror, You can find him at these sites:
The Libertarian Institute - https://libertarianinstitute.org/
AntiWar.com - http://www.antiwar.com/The Scott Hoton Show - https://scotthorton.org/Enough Already: Time To Win The War On Terrorism -
Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperativesSubstack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalHow to support the channel:Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected] Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.---Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives/message54 min - Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) - Today In Supreme Court History
Episode #41
Today on Categorical Imperatives we do our latest installment of "Today In Supreme Court History. This is the 1992 case that sought to overturn Roe v Wade, but ended up reaffirming Roe, however with some very interesting changes to the original decision. This case had a fascinating treatment of a number of areas of 14th amendment jurisprudence including it's shifting views on the application of substantive due process & judicial scrutiny. As well as an odd an unique approach to Stare Decisis.Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperativesSubstack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalHow to support the channel:Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected] Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.22 min - My Discussion With Scott Horton
Today on Categorical Imperatives we are talking to the one and only Scott Horton. Scott is founder of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of Anti-War.com, host of the Scott Horton show and has written several books, including his most recent: "Enough Already - Time to end the war on terror, You can find him at these sites:
The Libertarian Institute - https://libertarianinstitute.org/AntiWar.com - http://www.antiwar.com/The Scott Horton Show - https://scotthorton.org/Enough Already: Time To Win The War On Terrorism - https://www.amazon.com/dp/1733647341/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ref_=pe_3052080_397514860&linkCode=ll1&tag=scotthortonshow-20&linkId=a5eb35979325927537d9e8e9e11744d4&language=en_US54 min - Sedition: An American Virtue
In today's episode of Categorical Imperatives I attempt to rehabilitate the term "Sedition". We have heard it used a great deal lately and always as a negative. I wish to suggest and show that Sedition is a distinctly American virtue that should be treasured instead of shunned. I will discuss the deplorable truth of our past Sedition laws, namely those of 1798 and 1918 and use them to show you why people, largely on the left, calling for new Sedition laws following the January 6th storming of the Capital should really rethink their position.
As I will demonstrate in this video, sedition laws are always used first and foremost to prosecute the very people who demanded their passage.How Supreme Is The Supreme Court?” https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/how-supreme-is-the-supreme-court/Cooper v Aaron: https://youtu.be/5PM4cEzkxzcFollow & SupportCome join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPatreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected]Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.►00:00 Introduction►06:38 Woodrow Wilson: What A Dick, Right?►17:33 Schenck v United States (1919)►21:26 Debs v United States (1919)►22:18 Abrams v United States (1919)►24:24 Sedition In The Modern Era►27:12 The Alien & Sedition Acts of 1798►28:35 Virginia & Kentucky Resolutions►32:00 Madison's Two Theories of The Freedom of Speech►34:50 Thomas Jefferson & Why Sedition Is The Greatest Virtue For Liberty►38:50 Conclusion---Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives/message41 min - Who Reigns Supreme In Britain
On a recent episode I did about the American conception of Popular Sovereignty I was asked how Sovereignty works in England, and it's actually a pretty damn interesting question to answer. This gave me a chance to touch on much of my most favorite areas of the study and practice of law: Constitutional law, Common Law & Comparative all mixed in with the fascinating history of power struggle and usurpation that made Britain a nation known for it's rule by consent and strong sense of English liberty. We discuss English Sovereignty and then give a captive discussion on how it contrasts and compares with American Jurisprudence and even how a concept known as "Parliamentary Sovereignty" and it's little known role in the earliest causes of the American rebellion that turned into our Revolution from the country whose liberties we loved, then lost, then re-created in our own image.
Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperativesSubstack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalHow to support the channel:Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected] Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.45 min - The Bill Of Rights As A Term Of Art (Part II)
Episode #50
Justice Hugo Black famously said that the bill of rights is the heart of the Constitution.Contemplating what he meant by that is an interesting question to ponder. But even more compelling is asking the question what exactly is the Bill Of Rights? Because the first 10 amendments to the Constitution were never consistently even considered A bill of rights, and certainly not THE Bill Of Rights. This only occurs around the time Justice Hugo Black said these amendments were the bill of rights and they are the heart of the Constitution, but that was in the mid 20th Century.This series explores their drafting, their application throughout the country from the earliest days to modern day, it also follows their meaning during history which was something that changed over time as their applications began to be differentFollow & SupportPatreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalLBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected]Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.►00:00 Introduction►02:20 Part 1 Recap►05:40 III. The New Deal►07:20 Section III part One: The Master Politician►13:53 Section III Part Two The Bill Of Right Goes To War►31:55 IV Judicial Review►33:24 Section IV Part One The Rough Rider►38:03 Section IV Part Two The Road To Barnette►42:38 Section IV Part Three A Fixed Star In The Constitutional Constellation►47:43 Section IV Part Four The Right To Privacy►53:09 Section V Conclusion►59:46 Conclusion---Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives/message1 hr - Cannabis, Commerce & the Constitution: The Lessons of Gonzalez v Raich (2005)
Today we have another installment of a series that has consistently been some of my personal favorite episodes and that consistently get 2x or 3x the views of other videos. Today In Supreme Court History. As of the day I am recording this, June 8th in 2005 the Supreme Court issued their opinion in the case of Gonzalez v Raich (2005)
This case has relevance to innumerable aspects of Constitutional Law. This case is regarded prima Facie, as a Commerce Clause case (Article I, § 8, Clause 3) - It was not only the first time that the court had expanded Congress' powers under the commerce clause since Wickard v Filburn in 1942, this was a case that did not hinge of the commerce clause, but instead enlarged the "Implied Powers" of the necessary and proper clause.Follow & Support
To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Substack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalHow to support the channel:Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesCome join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected]Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.30 min - To Beat, Or Not To Beat - How activists condemn the very thing they created
Episode #52
In this episode we will be revisiting a recent controversy when Ocean City Police assaulted a group of people doing nothing wrong. I want to discuss how advocates who condemn the enforcement of the very law they insistently got passed.Campaign For Tobacco Free Kids tweet - https://twitter.com/TobaccoFreeKids/status/1404536501828993027?s=20Maryland's "Stop and Identify" statute (Md. Criminal Code §4-206)Maryland Tobacco Use & Public Smoking Laws - (Article, 2-106(b)(4) and 5-312, Annotated Code of Maryland)What Is An Assault Weapon - https://youtu.be/FHt1hER8Las"Assault Weapons In America" (https://vpc.org/publications/assault-weapons-and-accessories-in-america/)Follow & SupportPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll Paypal Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - [email protected]Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.17 min - I got 99 Problems, But 230 Ain't One
Episode #54
In this episode we discuss Section 230's Legal meaningBootleggers and Baptists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootleggers_and_BaptistsSection 230 Bootleggers and Baptists: https://reason.com/volokh/2020/05/29/section-230-bootleggers-and-baptists/47 U.S. Code § 230: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230'CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS19-1046 PHAM, TONY H., ET AL. V. RAGBIR, RAVIDATH L., ET AL. 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100520zor_3204.pdfFollow & SupportPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll Paypal Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - [email protected]Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.►00:00 Introduction►03:20 Political "Meaning"►09:00 Legal Meaning►11:16 Bootleggers and Baptists►12:23 Section 230 Legal meaning►13:05 Definitions►15:00 Textualist Construction►19:50 Traditional Law - Categories Of Protection►24:30 Traditional Law - The Internet Before 230►29:45 Takeaway Lessons►33:30 What's A Ron Wyden?►37:30 Common Misconceptions of Section 23050 min - What Is an Assault Weapon - An Open Letter To Gun Control Advocates
Today on Categorical Imperatives I want to talk about some common gun control myths and push back on a lot of the misinformation that comes from both politicians and the media and most importantly, from the White House. Joe Biden has a long history of supporting severe gun control laws that are often based on outright lies about non-existent loopholes, imaginary classes of weapons and lies about the functionality of firearms such as the AR-15 and outright dishonest use of terminology such as "military style weapon" or "weapon of war".
This is an episode I believe will be interesting for those already in gun culture and the 2A community and for those entirely unfamiliar with guns and especially for people who also call for the kind of severe gun control acts that Creepy Uncle Joe favors. If you are someone who supports gun control I would ask you to take the time to watch this and just keep an open mind. I think you will be surprised at the truth behind a lot of common gun control myths and even if nothing in this video changes you mind about gun control that's okay, you will leave this video able to better articulate your own position. You have nothing to lose!►00:00 Introduction
►02:47 Joe Biden's Gun Control Position►08:08 What is an "assault weapon"►17:45 What is an assault rifle?►20:22 Weapons of war►22:55 What is an AR-15►24:04 Common gun myths►40:50 Joe Biden's not-so-common sense gun reform►60:30 ClosingFollow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:
LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:aOdysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:aYoutube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperativesSubstack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberalHow to support the channel:Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperativesBitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen ProducerPayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativAll PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USDVenmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberalShow Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best madeE-mail the Show: [email protected] Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.1 hr 3 min
About Legale§e
From the publisher's feed
Legalese is a podcast discussing all things constitutional law, as well as current events in law, politics and culture.