Today on Categorical Imperatives we will be looking at the massive influence the Roman Republic had on our Founders and is part of a series that will be looking at the influence of Classical Republicanism on our Founders and our Constitution's framers and ratifiers.

Collected works of Greco-Roman philosophers and historians of Classical Republicanism

Follow & Support

Brand new website with blog, search past episodes, browse show notes page, , links to audio/video podcast, articles, resources to support the show and more coming soon!

https://categoricalpodcast.wordpress.com/

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - [email protected]

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today On Categorical Imperatives we will be discussing the Supreme Court case every leftist loves to hate: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010) 

In my last video I briefed  3 landmark Supreme Court cases dealing with issues of money and speech, including Citizens United. Today I want to go further in exploring this case and it's legacy.

My previous video was part of my “Today in Supreme Court History” Series which means what you got was a purely objective and scholarly explanation of those cases in their background, the facts of the case, the primary holding and the precedent they set. 

Today’s video is meant to be an open letter of sorts to people who think citizens united is a case that ruled corporations are people and money is speech. 

Mentions links and articles: 

Today on Categorical Imperatives we have a new video in my "Today In Supreme Court History" series. This weeks marks the 12 year anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in the case of Citizen's United v Federal Election Commission. So I have briefed three landmark Supreme Court cases concerning the relationship between money and speech as a matter of law. We will be starting with: 

Buckley v Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)

which set the precedent upon which the second case is constructed: 

McConnell v F.E.C. 540 U.S. 93 (2003)

which is the case Citizens United overturned: 

Citizens United v F.E.C. 558 U.S. 310 (2010)

 Citizens United and Twelve Years of Unjustified Resentment

Episode #79  *Correction: Dave DeCamp is news editor (not managing editor) at antiwar.com* 

In this episode I am joined by Dave Decamp, writer and news editor for antiwar.com With escalating tensions between the United States and Russia over the future of Ukraine it always feels their is vital, but missing, information and context in the official explanations our governments gives and in the way corporate media talks about the subject . Dave has been following these events and writing about them over the last few months, so I brought him on the show to talk about what is being left out by our government and by the mainstream press in their coverage.

Follow & Support

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - [email protected] 

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Episode Tags: Russia, US, America, biden, putin, war, ukraine, conflict, tension, nato, dave decamp, antiwar.com

Today on Categorical Imperatives I will be responding to some feedback I got from a viewer on a past video about American Constitutional Republicanism. This episode will be the first of three videos covering the topics I am responding to. Today, that topic is the Electoral College  and what role it plays in our elections as well as discussing faithless electors, gerrymandering and redistricting and I give my own personal take on what we can do to make Presidential elections matter and put power back in the hands of the people as opposed to the 2 major political parties.

►Related Links From Viewer Feedback

Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/AllRoadsLeadToTheTruth/

Facebook Article On My American Constitutional Republicanism Video:  https://www.facebook.com/groups/AllRoadsLeadToTheTruth/posts/4737729229599106/

What Is The Electoral College: https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/about

Faithless Electors Article: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10515

Redistricting Article:   https://www.ocfl.net/OpenGovernment/Redistricting2011/FrequentlyAskedQuestionsRedistricting.aspx

►My Links 

American Constitutional Republicanism: https://youtu.be/R8cPu7GFPTY

Electoral College Part One:  https://youtu.be/aQ3PXuJJRmc

Electoral College Part Two: https://youtu.be/jbWAoW1FZmo

Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/

Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives

Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/

Substack-- https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/

Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/

Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:

Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives

PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ

Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made

E-mail the Show: [email protected]

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

In today's episode of Categorical Imperatives we will be taking a look at beliefs amongst the sovereign citizen movement Including The capitalization of names on Court documents, the supposed meaning of gold fringe on a flag, The meaning of the term "color of law" The difference between suits at common law and suits in equity and the difference between the privileges and immunities of citizenship and their relation to natural rights in both Common law and Constitutional law.

Follow & Support

To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

Substack - https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/

Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/

Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/

Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

How to support the channel:

Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives

Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer

PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ

All PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USD

Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made

E-mail the Show: [email protected]

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

In this episode of Categorical Imperatives we look at the likely outcome and consequences if the Supreme Court was to reaffirm Roe next June in it's opinion on the case for Dobbs v Jackson Whole Women's Health.

Why this outcome is more likely than most people believe it is and what it will mean for the future of the legal conservative movement.

Follow & Support

Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month as a Citizen Producer

Patreon: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives

PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ

All PayPal Donation Options - https://www.paypal.com/donate?business=4G3R7WQTR7T58¤cy_code=USD

Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/

Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/

Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/

Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made

E-mail the Show: [email protected]

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request - [email protected]

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Episode #74

In this episode we discuss what I think some of the most likely and moat interesting possibilities if the Supreme Court does, in fact, overrule Roe v Wade in the recent case of Dobbs v Whole Women's Health

The future of state and federal abortions laws, the role of implied powers, it's affect on Federalism, the Commerce Clause, State's Rights and much, much more...

Related Episodes

Related Articles

Follow & Support

Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month

Send Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request 

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we discuss the unavoidable fact that experience shows that what little good travel bans may do is outweighed by the immensely cruel harm.

Follow & Support To find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media:

LBRY - https://lbry.tv/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Odysee - https://odysee.com/@CategoricalImperatives:a

Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/user/ReverendBob23/

Anchor.fm - https://anchor.fm/categoricalimperatives

Libertarian Institute Contributor Page - https://libertarianinstitute.org/author/bob-fiedler/

Substack-- https://categoricalimperatives.substack.com/

Tenth Amendment Center Coontributor Page - https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/author/bobfielder/

Twitter - https://twitter.com/LockeanLiberal

Bitchute - https://www.bitchute.com/categoricalimperatives/

How to support the channel:

Come join me over on Patreon right now for as little at $2/month -: www.patreon.com/categoricalimperatives

PayPal.Me - https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/categoricalimperativ

Venmo Donations - http://www.venmo.com/LockeanLiberal

Show Suggestions, Ideas, Questions or Topic Request : These are best made

E-mail the Show: [email protected]

Categorical Imperatives is a podcast that applies legal theory and moral philosophy to discussions of current events in law, politics & culture.

Today on Categorical Imperatives we are going to be talking about the Biden Vaccine Mandate in the form of OSHA ETS. The 5th Circuit recently stayed an injunction against the mandate's implementation until it can be assessed on the merits in the Circuit Court.

Follow & SupportTo find the show on other platforms, find the articles I publish about law & moral philosophy or follow me on social media: