I address the racist demagoguery and vilification of citizens by John Brennan, former director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency, that he made during an interview on MSNBC when he said that he was “increasingly embarrassed to be a white male.”  His racist diatribe is just part of a continuing effort to Balkanize the populace in order to weaken our social fabric and undermine our individual liberty and our country’s sovereignty.  Brennan specifically vilified the citizens who participated in the protest at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021.  These citizens were exercising their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances because of the blatant election fraud that gave a veneer of justification for the installation of a corrupt, decadent puppet, Joe Biden, as president.

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

The abandonment of the Biblical ethic by our populace, which to a great extent has been facilitated by our religious leaders and religious institutions, is so foundational to the ongoing destruction of our civil and religious liberties, that I will continue to look at this issue in this program. Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  

In particular, I continue to illustrate how the abandonment of the Biblical ethic by our populace, which to a great extent has been facilitated by our religious leaders and religious institutions, is threatening to destroy our civil and religious liberties, undermine our social fabric, and jeopardize the health, safety, and lives of our children.  In particular, I will comment on the remark by US Representative Jerry Nadler, Democrat from New York, made during a debate on H.R. 5, the grossly misnamed “Equality Act,” which will grant the most depraved sexual anarchists unfettered access to our children, our schools, and our military, grant social affirmation to filthy, disgusting, and unhealthy behavior, and negate our most cherished God-given freedoms in the First Amendment: religion, speech, the press, assembly, and petition for grievance redress.  If the truth-in-labeling law applied to congressional legislation as it does to products, the “Equality Act” would be renamed the “First Amendment Abolition Act.”

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

The abandonment of the Biblical ethic by our populace, which to a great extent has been facilitated by our religious leaders and religious institutions, is so foundational to the ongoing destruction of our civil and religious liberties, that I will continue to look at this issue in this program. Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  

In particular, I will continue to address the article “Faith groups among those calling for Trump’s impeachment after US Capitol occupation,” written by Alejandra Molina and that appeared in the on-line website religionnews.com on January 7, 2021.  Religionnews.com is published by Religion News Service.  If the truth-in-labeling laws applied to organizations as it does to products, Religion News Service would be renamed One-World-Religion News Service.Religionnews.com is published by Religion News Service.  If the truth-in-labeling laws applied to organizations as it does to products, Religion News Service would be renamed One-World-Religion News Service.  I will justify my critique with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. 

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

The abandonment of the Biblical ethic by our populace, which to a great extent has been facilitated by our religious leaders and religious institutions, is so foundational to the ongoing destruction of our civil and religious liberties, that I will continue to look at this issue in this program. Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  

In particular, I will address the article “Faith groups among those calling for Trump’s impeachment after US Capitol occupation,” written by Alejandra Molina and that appeared in the on-line website religionnews.com on January 7, 2021.  Religionnews.com is published by Religion News Service.  If the truth-in-labeling laws applied to organizations as it does to products, Religion News Service would be renamed One-World-Religion News Service.  I will justify my critique with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

In this program, I will continue to pursue the concept that the abandonment of the Biblical ethic by our populace, as facilitated by our religious leaders and religious institutions, is the root cause for the ongoing destruction of our civil and religious liberties.  I will finish commenting on the Op-Ed article “The ferocious last gasps of the religion of Christian America” that appeared in the January 19, 2021 edition of latimes.com (Los Angeles Times newspaper). In the article, Richard T. Hughes, a professor emeritus from Pepperdine University, lives down to the behavior of the false prophets about which 2 Peter chapter 2 warns us.  The article mocks Christians who support Biblical morality, grossly misrepresents facts, slanders those who peacefully exercise their Constitutional rights, distorts the Biblical directives for government, and ignores the foundational role that the Bible and Christianity played in the founding of the United States and in the codification of our liberties in our Constitution.  Professor Hughes’ views are anti Biblical and illustrate the phenomenon of ethical inversion.  Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  I will justify my critique with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence.      © Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

This program is a continuation of my response to the Op-Ed article “The ferocious last gasps of the religion of Christian America” that appeared in the January 19, 2021 edition of latimes.com (Los Angeles Times newspaper).  In the article, Richard T. Hughes, a professor emeritus from Pepperdine University, lives down to the behavior of the false prophets about which 2 Peter chapter 2 warns us.  The article mocks Christians who support Biblical morality, grossly misrepresents facts, slanders those who peacefully exercise their Constitutional rights, distorts the Biblical directives for government, and ignores the foundational role that the Bible and Christianity played in the founding of the United States and in the codification of our liberties in our Constitution.  Professor Hughes’ views are anti Biblical and illustrate the phenomenon of ethical inversion.  Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  I will justify my critique with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. 

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

This program is a continuation of my response to the Op-Ed article “The ferocious last gasps of the religion of Christian America” that appeared in the January 19, 2021 edition of latimes.com (Los Angeles Times newspaper).  In the article, Richard T. Hughes, a professor emeritus from Pepperdine University, lives down to the behavior of the false prophets about which 2 Peter chapter 2 warns us.  The article mocks Christians who support Biblical morality, grossly misrepresents facts, slanders those who peacefully exercise their Constitutional rights, distorts the Biblical directives for government, and ignores the foundational role that the Bible and Christianity played in the founding of the United States and in the codification of our liberties in our Constitution.  Professor Hughes’ views are anti Biblical and illustrate the phenomenon of ethical inversion.  Refer to Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Jesus referred to this condition when your heart becomes so corrupt that you think that evil is good: Matthew 6:23 “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!”  I will justify my critique with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. 

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

This program is a response to the Op-Ed article “The ferocious last gasps of the religion of Christian America” that appeared in the January 19, 2021 edition of latimes.com (Los Angeles Times newspaper).  In the article, Richard T. Hughes, a professor emeritus from Pepperdine University, lives down to the behavior of the false prophets about whom 2 Peter chapter 2 warns us. The article mocks Christians who support Biblical morality, grossly misrepresents facts, slanders those who peacefully exercise their Constitutional rights, distorts the Biblical directives for government, and ignores the foundational role that the Bible and Christianity played in the founding of the United States and in the codification of our liberties in our Constitution. I will justify my views with facts from contemporary events, verses from the Bible, and quotes from the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence. 

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

This program discusses a specific incident that occurred on January 5, 2021, in Washington, DC, the night prior to the “Stop the Steal” rally, in which Theresa Duke, a middle-aged woman from Boston, Massachusetts, was viciously punched in the face in during what appears to be an unprovoked attack by a private security guard named Ashanti Smith.  Theresa Duke was part of a peaceful demonstration by US citizens protesting against the conquest of the US by globalists via massive, overt election fraud that occurred in multiple states.  I will compare the coverage of the event by the deceitful legacy media and give my views on how to assess the event using the Bible and the US Constitution as a standard. 

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity

In this program, I will discuss the incident that occurred on January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol Building in which violent agent provocateurs turned a peaceful demonstration by US citizens protesting against the conquest of the US by globalist supporters via election fraud into a violent event.  I will compare the coverage of the event by the deceitful legacy media and give my views on how to assess the event using the Bible and the US Constitution as a standard.

 

© Copyright 2021 Liberty and Posterity