FedSoc Forums

Litigation Update: Mid Vermont Christian School v. Saunders


Listen Later

From the Olympics to San Jose State, each month we hear of new controversies where biological men are competing in women’s sports. Most of those situations relate to college, international, or public school competitions. But how do policies that permit transgender athlete participation impact private religious schools, both now and in the future? How do such schools’ sincerely-held religious beliefs about these issues change what state actors can and can’t do? In Mid Vermont Christian School v. Saunders, the Vermont Principals Association (VPA), a state-sponsored sports league, removed Mid Vermont from its athletic association because the school forfeited a girls’ playoff basketball game against another team with a male athlete who identified as female. The Christian school declined to play the game because of its religious beliefs about sex, yet the VPA imposed this punishment while still allowing forfeits for secular reasons. Although the VPA has historically prohibited boys from playing on girls’ sports teams “to protect opportunities for girl athletes,” it recently adopted policies that allow males who identify as female to participate in girls’ sports and demanded Mid Vermont’s girls’ teams play against teams with male athletes or not play at all. Mid Vermont and some of its families sued in response. In June 2024, a federal district court applied rational-basis review and denied Mid Vermont’s motion for preliminary injunction. The case is currently pending at the Second Circuit, where the court will resolve whether, while the case proceeds below, Mid Vermont will be allowed to rejoin the state athletic association it competed in for close to 30 years. Join us for a discussion of this case, the religious liberty issues implicated, and the larger consequences state nondiscrimination laws may have on religious schools going forward.
Featuring:

David A. Cortman, Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation, Alliance Defending Freedom
(Moderator) Eric W. Treene, Senior Counsel, Storzer and Associates; Adjunct Professor at the Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

82 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,096 Listeners

Cato Daily Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Daily Podcast

961 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

City Journal Audio by Manhattan Institute

City Journal Audio

595 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by Ricochet

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

679 Listeners

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch by Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

2,792 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

678 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,776 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

822 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,801 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,757 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

370 Listeners

Capital Record by National Review

Capital Record

429 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

665 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

17 Listeners