FedSoc Forums

Litigation Update: Yim v. City of Seattle


Listen Later

On June 11, 2019, the Washington State Supreme Court heard back-to-back arguments in a pair of cases entitled, Yim v. City of Seattle (Yim I and Yim II). At issue are two Seattle ordinances that significantly alter the way residential landlords are allowed to select their tenants. Yim I concerns the City’s “first in time” rule, which requires landlords to offer tenancy to the first qualified applicant. If the applicant does not exercise the right, then it passes to the next in time applicant until accepted. The ordinance declares it unlawful for a landlord to deviate from this process, depriving landlords of discretion in the selection process (including the common practice of waiving minimum requirements for otherwise worthy applicants). A King County trial court held that the ordinance violated the takings, due process, and free speech clauses of Washington’s constitution. Seattle appealed the decision directly to Washington’s Supreme Court, asking the Court to overrule decades of regulatory takings and due process case law.
Yim II involves a substantive due process challenge to Seattle’s “fair chance housing ordinance,” which declares it unlawful for a landlord to inquire into an applicant’s criminal history or deny an application based on the applicant’s criminal history. At issue there is Washington’s due process test, which asks, in part, whether a law is unduly oppressive on individual rights. On summary judgment, the City argued that the unduly oppressive test is an anachronism that had been impliedly overruled by Amunrud v. Bd. of Appeals, 158 Wn.2d 208 (2006). The Washington Supreme Court took review of this issue as part of a certified question regarding the proper standard of review in a due process claim involving a deprivation of a property right.
Featuring:
Ethan W. Blevins, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation
Brian T. Hodges, Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up on our website. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

83 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Cato Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Podcast

974 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

674 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

703 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,113 Listeners

The Libertarian by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

The Libertarian

986 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture by The Heritage Foundation

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

522 Listeners

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

6,593 Listeners

What the Hell Is Going On by AEI Podcasts

What the Hell Is Going On

638 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,901 Listeners

The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

The Dispatch Podcast

3,336 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

399 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

745 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

36 Listeners