This is episode 14 of the Logos Institute Podcast, the official podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In this first half of our interview with Dr Kevin Diller, we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan C. Rutledge) discuss what significance, if any, Karl Barth has for work in analytic theology. Here are a few time stamps to help you navigate:

3:16 - Why should we care about Karl Barth and natural theology?

4:51 - What is Protestant Liberalism?

6:45 - What does Karl Barth have to do with analytic theology?

9:29 - What are some common caricatures of Barth?

14:05 - Introduction of Eustace to our discussion group

14:50 - What is Barth's concern about philosophy, given that one worry he had about theology was that it was too philosophical?

19:07 - How does Barth understand knowledge of God?

23:52 - Would Barth accept natural knowledge of God, revelatory knowledge, or a priori knowledge of God?

If you've enjoyed listening to this interview, please see other content from our guest:

Kevin Diller - https://www.taylor.edu/employee/faculty/kevin-diller

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. You can also find us on and Twitter (@TheologyStAs) and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheologyStAs/?fb_dtsg_ag=AdwhhK5rtawkwfYqd8WUMRUNGn_PO0l8tiKfBU-4PAc0EQ%3AAdx1Rm34w8Ln5duFF8QYwUONwpNsU_Oc4Pz4P0qkCrfO_w

This is episode 13 of the Logos Institute Podcast, the official podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In this final installment of a three-part interview, we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan Rutledge) dialogue with Professors Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea about original sin, the fall, and the future of analytic theology. Here are a few time stamps to help you navigate:

1:28 - What is Original Sin?

3:33 - How does Original Sin relate to the Fallenness of Humanity?

4:25 - Should we connect a doctrine of Original Sin with a particular view of the historical Adam & Eve?

7:47 - If Christ is fully human and human nature is fallen, should we affirm that Christ assumed a fallen human nature?

13:12 - Are we to blame for the corruption of our nature consequent on the fall?

17:11 - Why not say that the divine person in the assumption of a corrupted nature heals it?

22:44 - Are there any implications for this sort of account of Christ's human nature for contemporary Pauline theology concerning union with Christ?

23:21 - What thoughts do you have on the future of analytic theology?

If you've enjoyed listening to this interview, please see other content from our guests:

Oliver D. Crisp

1. Oliver's Website - https://www.fuller.edu/faculty/oliver-crisp/

2. Analytic Theology @ Fuller - http://analytictheology.fuller.edu/

Michael C. Rea

1. Mike's Website - https://www.michaelrea.org/

2. Notre Dame Center for Philosophy of Religion - http://philreligion.nd.edu/

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. You can also find us on Facebook and Twitter (@TheologyStAs).

This is episode 12 of the Logos Institute Podcast, the official podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology at the University of St Andrews. In this second installment of a three-part interview, we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan Rutledge) dialogue with Professors Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea about the problem of divine hiddenness. This includes thinking a bit about the notions of divine transcendence, divine love, and their relationship to scriptures (e.g. Job and Lamentations). Here are a few time-stamps to help you navigate:

0:28 - What is the problem of divine hiddenness (DH)?

2:57 - Does thinking of God as a heavenly parent help?

3:10 - Non-resistant non-belief and contemporary philosophical discussions of DH?

5:38 - What's the relationship between DH and the problem of divine silence?

6:58 - What are some of the standard responses to DH?

9:46 - Professor Rea's preferred solution to DH

13:13 - Is there an aspect of skeptical theism involved in this solution?

15:46 - Scripture in Rea's response: Job and Lamentations depicting a God to contend with

If you've enjoyed listening to this interview, please see other content from our guests:

Oliver D. Crisp

1. Oliver's Website - https://www.fuller.edu/faculty/oliver-crisp/

2. Analytic Theology @ Fuller - http://analytictheology.fuller.edu/

Michael C. Rea

1. Mike's Website - https://www.michaelrea.org/

2. Notre Dame Center for Philosophy of Religion - http://philreligion.nd.edu/

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. You can also find us on Facebook and Twitter (@TheologyStAs).

This is episode 11 of the Logos Institute Podcast, the official podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In this first installment of a three-part interview we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan Rutledge) dialogue with Professors Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea about the origins of analytic theology. This includes learning a bit about the backgrounds of our two eminent guests whose contributions to analytic theology are undoubtedly foundational for where analytic theology stands today. Here are a few time-stamps to help you navigate:

1:48 - Can you give us a brief history of how analytic theology (AT), as it's known today, came about?

4:11 - How has dialogue between philosophers and theologians increased since the beginnings of AT?

7:57 - How did Oliver (a theologian) and Mike (a philosopher) end up with such similar interests and methodologies with such different academic backgrounds?

10:38 - To what extent is there a good fit between theology as it has been done in the past and analytic work we find today?

If you've enjoyed listening to this interview, please see other content from our guests:

Oliver D. Crisp

1. Oliver's Website - https://www.fuller.edu/faculty/oliver-crisp/

2. Analytic Theology @ Fuller - http://analytictheology.fuller.edu/

Michael C. Rea

1. Mike's Website - https://www.michaelrea.org/

2. Notre Dame Center for Philosophy of Religion - http://philreligion.nd.edu/

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. You can also find us on Facebook and Twitter (@TheologyStAs).

This is episode 10 of the Logos Institute Podcast. It is composed of two parts, the first of which is a lecture by Professor Wolterstorff on Justice and Injustice in Christian Liturgies followed by a Q&A session (beginning at approximately 56:30).

Nicholas Wolterstorff - https://religiousstudies.yale.edu/people/nicholas-wolterstorff

Logos Institute - http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/

Blogos - http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/

This is episode 9 of the Pogos, the official podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In this episode, Professor Nicholas Wolterstorff (https://religiousstudies.yale.edu/people/nicholas-wolterstorff) presents a brief description of his views on liturgy as a means to knowing God and participates in a lengthy discussion session with students and faculty from the university involved.

If you would like to learn more about the Logos Institute, its activities and its vision, then visit us at http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk.

This is episode 8 of Pogos, the official Podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In it we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan Rutledge) dialogue with Dr Amy Peeler (Associate Professor of New Testament at Wheaton College) about her recent work on kinship in the book of Hebrews and the New Testament. Dr Peeler has also contributed a few entries to our blog (see, for instance, blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2018/02/05/…amy-peeler/) and is with us at Logos as a residential research fellow.

0:27 – What is kinship?

5:45 - Why is it important to pay attention to kinship in scripture?

8:05 – What added to 'Son of God' gets us divinity?

11:30 – Keeping clear what is created and uncreated in Hebrews concerning Jesus.

12:37 - What is the evidence Dr Peeler sees that kinship plays the three roles she assigns to it?

17:20 - Is the "name that is greater than the angels" indicative of divinity or merely an exalted humanity in Adam?

20:10 - What is the relevance of our answer to our status as human beings?

21:57 - What attitude should we take with respect to the extra-biblical texts used to exegete scripture?

25:12 - Is patriarchal language in the New Testament and Hebrews objectionable? What might you say to someone struggling to find themselves in the text due to these features?

31:03 - What drew Dr Peeler to kinship language to begin with?

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk.

This is episode 7 of Pogos, the official Podcast of the Logos Institute for Analytic and Exegetical Theology. In it we (Stephanie Nicole Nordby & Jonathan Rutledge) dialogue with Dr Amy Peeler (Associate Professor of New Testament at Wheaton College) about engaging in cross-disciplinary scholarship with theology. Dr Peeler has also contributed a few entries to our blog (see, for instance, http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2018/02/05/the-humility-of-god-by-amy-peeler/) and is with us at Logos as a residential research fellow.

1:00 – Amy Peeler’s Background

1:57 – Current work and projects

3:22 – Why did you get drawn into work on kinship in particular?

5:50 – What implications does your work on kinship, especially given the prominence of patriarchal language, have for the church or the life of the church?

8:04 – What is the relationship between the text of scripture and theology?

11:33 – Do you think that doctrines such as perichoresis or the eternal generation of the Son can be found in scripture? If so, in what sense?

12:43 – To what extent is theology an imposition on the historical meaning of the texts?

16:41 – Is interdisciplinary work worth it, and why?

18:56 – Would you say that Paul was doing theology?

22:26 – How might you divide up theology; that is, biblical vs systematic theology?

30:04 – Are there any models of atonement that you think might be insufficiently conversant with history?

32:07 – types of purity in the OT and sin;

To learn more about the Logos Institute, visit our webpage @ http://logos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk. And don't forget to follow us on our blog where we post content from friends of the institute @ http://blogos.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk.