Make America STATES Again

Make America STATES Again

By The John Birch SocietyNewsEducationGovernmentPolitics
Download on the App Store

Make America STATES Again episodes

  • Lesson 11: What Would Jefferson Do? — Defending Nullification and State Sovereignty
    Introduction

    The concept of nullification often faces harsh criticism, with proponents being labeled as radicals or secessionists. However, nullification is rooted in the very principles that the Founders, including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, championed to protect the union from federal overreach. This lesson explores the historical and logical basis for nullification, refuting the misconceptions that surround it.

    Key Concepts:
    Nullification: A Defense, Not a Rebellion:
    • Nullification is not about undermining the union or rejecting the Constitution; it is about preventing the unconstitutional expansion of federal power.
    • The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, authored by Madison and Jefferson, were designed to safeguard the union by resisting unconstitutional actions by Congress, not to promote disunion or secession.
      • The Founders’ Intent:
      • Jefferson and Madison were deeply committed to preserving the union they helped to create. They recognized that allowing the federal government to exceed its constitutional limits would ultimately lead to tyranny.
      • Jefferson argued that if states seceded to form new unions, they would face the same problems, eventually leading to their fragmentation into isolated, weaker entities.
        • Strengthening the Union Through Constitutional Limits:
        • By enforcing the enumerated powers listed in the Constitution, the union is strengthened because it prevents the federal government from overreaching and fraying the bonds between the states.
        • If the federal government continues to overstep its bounds, it risks pushing states away, potentially leading to their eventual separation.
          • The Tenth Amendment and State Sovereignty:
          • The Tenth Amendment clearly reserves powers to the states and the people, underscoring the limited nature of federal authority.
          • If the states had surrendered all their powers to the federal government during ratification, there would be no need for the Tenth Amendment to exist, as there would be nothing left to reserve.
          • The states are not third-party beneficiaries of the Constitution; they are the very creators of the federal government, and thus retain the right to judge the constitutionality of federal actions.
            • The Homeowners’ Association Analogy:
            • The relationship between the states and the federal government can be compared to a homeowners’ association (HOA). The HOA is created by homeowners (states) to manage specific, enumerated responsibilities.
            • If the HOA (federal government) oversteps its bounds—such as by mandating all homeowners purchase a specific car — it is the homeowners who have the right to reject this overreach.
            • In the same way, states have the right and responsibility to nullify any federal act that exceeds the authority granted by the Constitution.
              • The Need for Consistent Nullification:
              • States must consistently nullify every unconstitutional federal act to maintain their sovereignty and protect the liberties of their citizens.
              • Failure to do so is akin to the homeowner in the analogy who obediently buys the mandated car, even though the HOA has no authority to demand it.
                • Jefferson’s Legacy and the Modern Implications:
                • Jefferson, a fierce advocate for liberty and state sovereignty, would never have complied with unconstitutional mandates from the federal government.
                • Following Jefferson’s example, modern states should actively resist federal overreach by employing nullification, thereby preserving the union and ensuring the federal government remains within its constitutional boundaries.
                  • Conclusion

                  Nullification is a constitutional defense mechanism, not an attack on the union. It is rooted in the principles of the Founders, particularly Jefferson and Madison, who sought to protect the states from federal overreach while maintaining the integrity of the union. By understanding and embracing nullification, states can safeguard their sovereignty and prevent the federal government from becoming the very tyrant that the Constitution was designed to restrain. Just as Jefferson would have resisted unconstitutional mandates, so too should modern states stand firm in their defense of liberty and constitutional governance.

                  7 min
                • Lesson 12: Madison’s Confidence in State Resistance and the Reality of Modern Federalism
                  Introduction

                  In The Federalist, No. 46, James Madison expressed great confidence in the states’ ability and willingness to resist federal overreach. He believed that any ambitious encroachments by the federal government would be met with strong opposition from the states, and that these states would band together to protect their sovereignty. This lesson examines Madison’s expectations and contrasts them with the reality of modern state-federal relations.

                  Key Concepts:
                  Madison’s Optimism in State Sovereignty:
                  • Madison was confident that states would fiercely protect their constitutionally guaranteed sovereignty and would not tolerate any federal overreach.
                  • He believed that states would raise “signals of general alarm” in response to any federal encroachments and would collaborate to resist such actions.
                    • The Vision of Unified State Resistance:
                    • Madison envisioned states forming alliances to resist federal tyranny, much like the colonies did during the American Revolution.
                    • He expected that states would communicate, coordinate, and collectively plan resistance to any unconstitutional actions by the federal government, driven by a shared spirit of liberty.
                      • The Reality of Modern State-Federal Relations:
                      • Contrary to Madison’s expectations, modern states often compete with each other for federal favors rather than banding together to resist federal overreach.
                      • State governors and legislators frequently seek federal grants, contracts, and other benefits, often at the expense of their own state sovereignty.
                      • The political ambition of many state officials leads them to prioritize federal approval and party loyalty over the protection of their state’s constitutional rights.
                        • The Corruption of State Legislatures:
                        • Many state legislators are more interested in advancing their political careers than in upholding the Constitution.
                        • They often misinterpret or misuse the “Supremacy Clause” of the Constitution to justify compliance with federal mandates, even when those mandates overstep constitutional boundaries.
                        • This behavior undermines the states’ ability to act as a check on federal power and contributes to the erosion of federalism.
                          • The Consequences of Inaction:
                          • Madison believed that if states did not resist federal encroachments, they would eventually be reduced to mere vassals of a centralized authority.
                          • He expected that if the federal government began to act like a tyrant, the states would respond with the same determination and force that the colonists used to resist British rule.
                          • However, modern Americans have largely become complacent, content to protest online rather than take meaningful action to protect their liberties.
                            • The Danger of Modern Apathy:
                            • The current culture of convenience and complacency has led to a decline in the vigilance and virtue that Madison believed were essential to maintaining a free society.
                            • Many Americans are more concerned with maintaining their lifestyle and comforts than with defending the principles of liberty and federalism.
                            • This apathy has allowed the federal government to grow unchecked, leading to the centralization of power that Madison warned against.
                              • Conclusion

                              Madison’s confidence in the states’ ability to resist federal tyranny was based on his belief in the vigilance and virtue of the American people. However, the reality of modern state-federal relations has shown that many state leaders are more interested in securing federal favors than in protecting their state’s sovereignty. This shift has weakened the states’ ability to act as a check on federal power and has led to the centralization of authority that Madison feared. To restore the balance of power, citizens and state leaders must rekindle the spirit of resistance and take meaningful action to protect the principles of liberty and federalism.

                              6 min
                            • Lesson 13: The Storm of Statism and the Remedy of State Sovereignty
                              Introduction

                              The union is facing a storm of despotism, with federal overreach threatening to drown the sovereignty of the states. This lesson examines how the principles of state sovereignty and nullification can serve as a powerful remedy to counteract the pervasive influence of federal power, drawing inspiration from historical allegories and the wisdom of the Founders.

                              Key Concepts:
                              The Ominous Clouds of Federal Overreach:
                              • Federal power is growing unchecked, with states struggling to maintain their sovereignty amidst a deluge of unconstitutional mandates and regulations.
                              • The “great madness” of centralization is not only rampant in Washington, D.C., but has infiltrated state assemblies, diluting the authority of state governments.
                                • The Procrustes Analogy:
                                • The story of Procrustes, the mythical innkeeper who forced his guests to fit the dimensions of his bed through stretching or mutilation, serves as a metaphor for how modern lawmakers distort the Constitution to fit their political agendas.
                                • Just as Procrustes manipulated his guests, many elected officials manipulate the Constitution, stretching its clauses or cutting away its limits to justify their legislative actions.
                                  • The Betrayal of Constitutional Promises:
                                  • Many politicians campaign on promises of adhering to the Constitution and limiting government power, only to abandon these commitments once in office.
                                  • These “conservatives” often rationalize their support for unconstitutional programs, betraying the trust of those who elected them and contributing to the expansion of federal power.
                                    • The Need for Unyielding Vigilance:
                                    • Restoring the Republic requires relentless attention to every bill proposed in Congress and a refusal to compromise on constitutional principles.
                                    • The fight against federal overreach must be pursued with the same dedication and resolve as the Founders demonstrated in their struggle for independence.
                                      • The Role of Nullification:
                                      • Nullification is a crucial tool for states to resist unconstitutional federal actions and to reclaim their sovereignty.
                                      • As Madison stated in the Virginia Resolution, the states have the right and duty to “interpose for arresting the progress of the evil” of federal overreach.
                                        • Modern-Day Theseus:
                                        • Just as the hero Theseus dealt justice to Procrustes by forcing him to fit his own bed, constitutionalists today must hold elected officials accountable to the Constitution.
                                        • Lawmakers must be confined within the bounds of the Constitution, and any who break their oath must face the consequences.
                                          • The Importance of State Sovereignty:
                                          • The sovereignty of the states is the silver lining in the storm of federal overreach. The consistent and courageous assertion of state rights through nullification can dispel the fog of despotism.
                                          • State leaders and citizens must be unwavering in their commitment to uphold the Constitution and to resist the temptations of federal power and influence.
                                            • The Call to Action:
                                            • The time has come for every American to declare their allegiance to the Constitution. Partisan labels must be set aside, and the focus must be on defending the principles of liberty and limited government.
                                            • As Edward Livingston of New York said during the debates on the Alien and Sedition Acts, when laws infringe upon the Constitution, the people should not hesitate to choose which to obey.
                                              • Conclusion

                                              The current storm of federal overreach demands a response rooted in the principles of state sovereignty and nullification. By following the example of the Founders and holding elected officials to their constitutional commitments, Americans can restore the balance of power and protect their liberties. The fight against despotism requires unwavering dedication and a willingness to stand firm against the tide of centralization. The Constitution is our banner, and we must resist any attempts to distort or discard it. Now is the time to pledge our loyalty to the cause of liberty and to take action in defense of our union.

                                              6 min

                                            About Make America STATES Again

                                            From the publisher's feed

                                            To bring about less government, more responsibility, and with God's help a better world.