
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Elliot. Thank you for your support. Elliot didn't have a specific question so I'm going to discuss something brought up briefly in yesterday's video. And that's the issue of palimony. Palimony is essentially alimony but without the marriage contract. It's usually paid out by a man to his common law spouse after they stop living together. Basically it's spousal support without the state sanctioned wedding ceremony. And it works against both gay and straight couples. Martina Navratilova was sued by her female partner Judy Nelson in 1991. And Even Bill Maher the crown prince of MGTOW talk show hosts was sued by an ex girlfriend in 2004 for palimony.
Nancy "Coco" Johnson his ex tried to beat him in court but the case was dismissed. This just goes to show that cohabitation is dangerous for men going their own way. And it can be just as dangerous as signing a wedding contract. Usually palimony is spousal support paid by on party in a relationship to the other party that stayed home and put work into the household. More often then not in it is the woman that stays home and gives up her career to take care of children, although that practice has been changing in recent years. This whole idea of palimony started back in 1976 when Michelle Triola Marvin took her ex-boyfriend Lee Marvin to court. This was the first time in American history where unmarried
people could sue one another for property division after a relationship came to an end. There's even a famous soundbite that goes as follows: "If a man wants to leave his toothbrush at my house, he better bloody well marry me," she said after the 1979 trial. The whole situation went to an appeals court and she never got her money but the legal precedent had been set for future palimony cases. Michelle Marvin was awarded about one hundred thousand dollars for rehabilitation by the lawyer. She wanted 1.8 million. Half the money her boyfriend made while he was working. The rehabilitation money was awarded to her so she could transition from being the wife of a motion picture star to becoming a separate independent person. She didn't even get the hundred grand and Michelle Triola Marvin She later went on to marry actor Dick Van Dyke. So that was the world's introduction to palimony and it took a high profile celebrity case to get the ball rolling and for other people to realize they too could fight for money from their common law spouses or even girlfriends or boyfriends. Having any long term relationship even if you just leave your toothbrush at your girlfriends house can get you into trouble if you are helping her out financially. The precedent has been set. Right now palimony means couples that have been co-habituating for a long period of time. Usually 2 years where I live because that's the length of time it takes for common law to kick in.
Michelle Triola Marvin dies at 75; her legal fight with ex-lover Lee Marvin added 'palimony' to the language
http://www.latimes.com/local/obituari...
Dumped? Now Claim Palimony!
http://idiva.com/news-relationships/d...
I left the love of my life because I thought I could do better. Now I'm childless and alone at 42
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/art...
Women are quite happy to depend on the government if the father doesn't meet her expectations. Men are quite happy too, as higher taxes are a lot better than complete financial annihilation through divorce. Governments love higher taxes. Many same sex couples are going to want children. As the decline in heterosexual “marital” relationships continues (and it will), more and more will opt for same sex relationships/domestic partnerships/cohabitation. Traditionalist views on relationships will gradually become extinct (like the dodo and dinosaur). Polygamist like relationships and/or the broad acceptance of polygamist domestic partnerships among heterosexuals, bisexuals, homosexuals and lesbians will become more popular as well. Female empowerment means that there are fewer men capable of providing for a family (hence the decline of marriage). Women want the highest paying, most prestigious jobs for themselves. As divorce is nearly a death sentence for bread winning males, men are opting out of marriage and family. Most every bread winning man now knows the devastating consequences that divorce can have on their lives. The result of divorce is often severe psychological, emotional, legal, physical and financial destruction. For these reasons, men will continue to opt out of marriage and family or resort to cohabitation as a lessor of the two evils. As women become the majority of breadwinners (and they will), they’ll feel the same way. Feminism taught women that marriage was slavery. Bread winning men now know that
marriage is a death trap (took them long enough). Both sides are in many ways correct. Women were at one point in time abused in marriage and through divorce, left destitute. They're not going back to those times. For the past several decades, the shoe has been on the other foot and it's mostly men that have been destroyed through divorce. Men are opting out in ever growing numbers. The liberal/feminist model of heterosexual marriage has and will continue to fail. Most men aren't going to allow themselves to be ruled by women in relationships. Women think they want to have power over men in relationships, but have no respect for and are repulsed by the men that aren't at least their equal in terms of education, finances and social standing. Both sides under the liberal/feminist model are far more promiscuous, more likely to commit adultery and more likely to indulge in infidelity – even in the face of STDs. The playing field for the worst in human behavior is level under the feminist/liberal model.
"Hi Sandman my question is I'm a Canadian who lives in Toronto for at least 5 years now, and I've noticed that since the Slut Walk phenomenon, that Toronto is very anti-male while women are free to pursue anything without opposition, including activities which may be criminal such as female teacher and student relations. Do you see an increase in predatory female teachers in the near future because men 18+ have gone their own way? Thank You." Well that's what he has to say. Anyways, first of all there are other places where you are more likely to find female sexual predators. Most female teachers aren't going to jeopardize their careers and retirement to sleep with a seventeen year old student when they can go out to a cougars night at Crocodile Rock or Blue Suede Sues here in Toronto and find a young guy in his early to mid twenties and rob the cradle that way. So no I don't think that we are going to see an increase in teachers going after their students because there are more MGTOWs. But then again this is Toronto after all the most popular city for MGTOW on the planet. I also have some amazing news about something I just saw on google trends today. Apparently the interest in MGTOW is now ten times more then it was just a week ago. Not ten percent higher, but ten times higher. I'm not sure if this is just some random spike in traffic or if it symbolizes the beginning of the a MGTOW super-spike and a situation where interest in MGTOW goes exponential. Before this spike MGTOW was already growing at an exponential hockey stick pattern growth rate. And I've also noticed that my traffic has increased about thirty percent in the last week or so. Not sure what's going on out there but when I look at the youtube comments section I'm seeing more new users and posters then at any point before. It's exciting to see that eleven to twelve thousand men are now coming through my youtube page each and every day. There are more daily viewers then subscribers and it keeps growing. Anyways, now on with the
topic, Female Teacher Predators. With regards to personal stories I've heard about female teachers trying to take advantage of students I've heard one story in the last couple of years. I heard that from one of my clients that another one of my clients was making sexual comments and hitting on a guy dude that was sixteen. Nothing happened between them and apparently he was disgusted that a middle aged woman would be hitting on him. She sees herself as all that and a bag of chips. She was a music teacher and although I don't have any proof that she actually hit on this sixteen year old. But she would often make sexual comments to me all the time as well. I was disgusted and no longer work with her.
Florida Epidemic: Teachers Sleeping with Students
http://content.time.com/time/nation/a...
Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Marcus Brown. He didn't have a specific topic he wanted to cover so I've decided to dedicate this topic to him. All the footage you are seeing from Busker-fest that happened here in Toronto a few weeks ago. Anyways, a couple of my friends and I got together and started talking about the idea that girls that have been riding the cock carousel for many years decide to stop at some point and avoid having sexual intercourse for a few year or more when they start looking for a man to settle down with. The goal is reduce some of the damage they've gotten by having too many men inside of them. And if a woman abstains from sex or inserting anything into her vagina for a few years she becomes vaginally tighter. So it's a way to deceive men about the number of guys she's slept with. Effectively she's trying to put back together her humpty dumpy hymen. In the body-shop world this is the equivalent to slapping on a fresh coat of paint onto a rusting car and inserting a new stereo system. But a few months later the rust will eat through the pain and the stereo will start to shake the car apart. That girl called
Sailor Spoon I was telling everyone about didn't like the idea of male penetration. She thought that intercourse destroyed her value in the sexual marketplace. She told me that there was a guy she slept with a year before she met me that she regretted sleeping with. She never gave me the exact number of men she slept with but I brought this concept of the born again virgin with my friends and they thought I should definitely talk about it on my channel. I have heard several women in my own life that say that they are born again virgins. To me that means the guy they try to find and marry will never get to experience all the great things she did sexually with other guys before you. In today's world the number of men a woman sleeps with is a guarded number that only her friends know. If you ever want to the true number get her best friend drunk and ask her that question. There's a good chance she'll tell you. Or ask one of her female friends boyfriends to see if he knows. It's kind of ironic that the number of sexual partners has become one of women's most closely protected secrets. And many of the blogs, websites and articles I found on the internet claim that a woman becomes a born again virgin after not having sex for over a year.
Selena Gomez Is Now A ‘Born-Again Virgin’ After Justin Bieber Betrayal
http://hollywoodlife.com/2014/05/28/s...
The Cult of the Born-Again Virgin: How Single Women Can Reclaim Their Sexual Power
http://www.amazon.com/The-Cult-Born-A...
Women Have Surgery to 'Restore' Virginity
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/WomensHeal...
And this is what Esteban has to say: "Hi Sandman, I've had many married friends in my time, and there's a pattern that's repeated itself over and over. Before they were married, my friends had lots of time to spend with their male friends. Afterward, not so much, and that's fine. Keeping a marriage working is a full-time job and it's unreasonable to expect the same kind of contact we had as single guys. What I find is that when I visit, I end up spending an inordinate amount of time with my friend's wife instead of him. She never works the kinds of hours he does, so she & I are together more than I am with him. Additionally, she has to be included in any activity we do together, and if I get any alone time with my friend it's after his wife has gone to bed--and that's maybe half an hour at the end of the day. Maybe I'm being selfish, but it seems strange that she & I can be without him, but he & I are not allowed to be without her. At first, it's a minor inconvenience. But after a while I find myself being treated like a second husband, including overt criticism if I haven't met her emotional needs. And this isn't a single couple; it's with nearly every married couple I've known over the last twenty years. What are your thoughts?" Well, that's what Esteban has to say. And comments are question about female nature are absolutely dead on. It's clear that women want to be included when guys hang out because in that way a woman can act like filter to make sure men aren't talking about her. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Women need men to adopt politically correct and woman friendly attitudes. Men have to behave well and be constantly put in their place. If you observe female behavior it's almost like they make many men feel like they are unable to manage their own emotions and require a woman to help navigate the emotional issues that men face. Women don't trust the way that men feel and think so they try to guide male action into a direction that is more suited towards their own needs. At the same time some women understand that if they cut their boyfriends and husbands off from their friendships entirely it makes them look like the bad ones. So they want their men to continue interacting with each other but only in ways that are socially acceptable. That's why women throw dinner parties so that everyone can socialize and be controlled and men can be herded around like a flock of sheep. Men that can think for themselves are a dying breed. We have advertising telling us what to buy. We have women telling us how to feel and we have the state making sure we do what we are supposed to at all times. Esteban you're just seeing the emotional prison your friends wife is trying to construct for you. Your friends wife is most likely interacting with you when your friend is not around for a number of different reasons. She might be assessing if you will be a negative influence on her man. She needs to determine if you are going to say or do anything that could potentially lead to him walking away in the future. She is acting the part of the psychologist.
Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Rick. He sent me three video clips that he wanted me to have a look at them and they are all about the hook up culture and no strings attached sexual
About a week ago anti feminist video blogger Kristal Garcia asked a question that I've spent the last week thinking about. She said what can women do to help the male brotherhood? After giving it a lot of thought I finally have an answer for her and everyone else. And that answer is to to support feminism. I know some of you are going to see my views as crazy but I'm not here to make friends or win a popularity contest. I'm here to grow the male brotherhood or
men going their own way movement. Or at the very least expose it to as many people as possible. And the best way to help the mgtow brotherhood is to help promote and feminism. What a radical concept. I realize that men will change when they see the insanity of feminism. Thinking back over the last year, it was Chanty Binx, better known as Big Red that did more to promote men's rights and mgtow then most of the people talking about it online, including myself. Women against feminism are giving naive and gullible men hope that feminist gynocentric society can reform itself. But feminism makes many men angry and convinces them to question their assumptions about male / female relationships in our society. Feminism is a gift to men going their own way because it expose an overt push by some women to rule over us. For most of history women have used covert tactics to manipulate men like in the wizard of OZ. Pay no attention to the Vagina behind the curtain. But because feminism is visible it shows men the subconscious feelings many women keep bottled up inside them bubbling up to the surface with regards to the way women really feel about men. And Feminism unleashes those subconscious desires upon society. It is a manifestation of gynocentric thought and behavior like the world has never seen before. For the longest time men didn't push back against feminists. And because of that feminism could flourished. Because it was the first time in history that women could express how they felt about men without reprisal. Only since the men's rights and MGTOW movements have been gaining momentum in the last few years has there now been push back against feminism. And surprisingly big gains are being made in the MRA and MGTOW movements because of our criticism of feminism. If I do a video criticizing feminism there are far more views then if I cover something more intellectual or related to only men. Most men's self image is based on the way that women perceive our value and utility. Feminism pisses off men because women are telling us that we have no value. That's like calling the prom queen ugly and telling her that her beauty is worthless. We destroy her self worth just like feminism has destroyed male self worth. But after forty years of men internalizing their own worthlessness they finally started rising up against the gynocentric culture. And now that culture is trying to scramble as quickly out of sight as possible like a cockroach when you turn on the lights. Men have reached for the metaphorical bottle of raid and are spraying everywhere.
How can women support the brotherhood of men?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbsap...
Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Laurie. And Laurie is actually a dude. This video is a combination of my critique of popular music and also a top five list of MGTOW songs. Before I get to the top ten list I'll read the stuff Laurie sent me and this is what he has to say: "Hello Sandman I'd be interested to see a video of you talking about Men Going Their Own Way in relation to the music we consume. I was on a long car journey a couple of months ago listening to some of my favorite music. I noticed that the majority of songs were about relationships – approximately 75%. And of these almost all of them were practically worshiping the ground of the woman involved. I wondered how MGTOWs can deal with this. I think it is true that we are very influenced by our surroundings, both culture and relationships – TV, family, friends etc. Music is no different. I love music; it's a huge part of my life, so I am hesitant to reject good music for its White Knight lyrics. However, I'd like to see a push for more MGTOW like songs, or just more songs highlighting the negativity women often bring to a relationship. This is something I try to do myself. With the powerful hands of music used for MGTOWs purposes, I wonder how quickly the world would wake up to the danger of relationships today. Imagine credible bands and artists like Bob Dylan, Led Zeppelin and Pink Floyd all singing out to highlight some of the nonsense that happens. I am reminded of the Punk Rock movement, particularly in the UK, where singing against the traditional values of the day helped spark a debate that continues today. I believe MGTOW would grow very quickly. I also think there is a danger that feminists may try to censor this music. Anyway as I say, I have tried to be proactive in this, so as to prove I'm not all talk I'll leave you a link to two of my songs that are explicitly about this issue. Thank you for reading and listening to what I have to say." Well that's what Laurie has to say. And I'm also including links to two his MGTOW songs in the description below. The first one is called Parasite Tarantula Wife and the second one is called What Did You Want From Me? And both links are to Laurie's Soundcloud page. Thanks for bringing up your questions Laurie I too have been thinking about the way music has changed in the last year or so. A year ago it was most electronic dance music playing on the radio. Now the market has turned more to poppy love ballads. There's a song playing on the radio in large circulation by a band called Queenston. And the lyrics go as follows: "I'm gonna marry that girl, marry her anyways. I'm gonna marry that girl, no matter what you say." They keep playing it over and over again on multiple radio stations here in Canada. The lyrics in music when combined with a loud thumping, repetitive beat are almost hypnotic and are a form of social conditioning. You are like Pavlovs dog being programmed how to think with such music. Maybe you're a guy with a fiance and you have your doubts about commitment and marriage. But you hear a song like this and the lyrics stick to your subconscious mind and then you go out and just marry her anyways. And you don't even know why you did it. Popular culture is all about social conditioning.
Parasite Tarantula Wife (Song)
https://soundcloud.com/laurie-wood-1/...
What Did You Want From me? (Song)
https://soundcloud.com/laurie-wood-1/...
5. Captain Andy: The MGTOW Blues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjcz1...
4. What Did You Want From me? (Song)
https://soundcloud.com/laurie-wood-1/...
3. SHUT THE FUCK UP - Feat. BIG RED (Live at the university of Toronto)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avu5N...
2. MGTOW - Marcus A. Brown - Ain't That Sumthin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g15l_...
1. MGTOW Theme Song - "Hey Mario" by Patent Pending
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ404...
Men in College men starting to get the message about rape culture. They are so scared about being called rapists and getting thrown out of school through false allegations that they are now no longer going out with college girls and buying them drinks. So if a man buys a woman a drink he's a potential rapist and if he doesn't buy her a drink he's cheap. This is a game of catch 22 and men with rational minds see this is a no win scenario so they are avoiding places that serve alcohol. I'm hoping that college aged men stop taking women on dates to restaurants for fear that women will order alcohol with their meal. I hope so called rape culture takes women's free drinks and free meals away. I hope
they suffer by getting less male attention. The culture is essentially training men to associate being generous to a woman with being a potential rapist. So is it wonder that men are going their own way. There is only so much suspicion a man can take before he just gives up, walks away from the table and goes his own way. Here is a partial reading from the article from the Washington Examiner talking about this issue. "Thanks to an increased focus on sexual assaults on college campuses – mostly due to an overblown statistic claiming 20 percent of college women have been sexually assaulted – young college men are starting to rethink how they talk to women. At first glance that might seem like a good thing – men learning to be more respectful of women and not be so rapey – but that’s not what this is. This is about men actually avoiding contact with women because they’re afraid a simple kiss or date could lead to a sexual assault accusation. Bloomberg reporters John Lauerman and Jennifer Surane interviewed multiple men from colleges like Harvard and Stanford who expressed concern over what was once known as a "hook-up culture" but is now labeled by feminists as "rape culture." The change in terminology ensures that all responsibility is placed on men, just because of their gender. Take Malik Gill of Harvard University, who said he wouldn't even give a female classmate a beer. “I don’t want to look like a predator,” Gill told Bloomberg. “It’s a little bit of a blurred line.” Gone are the days of buying a woman a drink – even if it’s just to be nice. Gill also told Lauerman and Surane that after he passed on the contact information of a woman who said she was interested in his fraternity brother, his friend was hesitant to call her. “Even though she was interested, he didn't want to pressure her,” Gill said. “He was worried about making her feel uncomfortable.” William Pollack, a Harvard Medical School psychologist, told the Bloomberg reporters about a patient who was kissing a girl during a party and began thinking about what would happen if things went further. “‘I want to go to law school or medical school after this,’” the student said, according to Pollack. “‘I said to her, it’s been nice seeing you.’” Pollack also noted that the media attention to campus sexual assault has led to a “witch-hunt” mentality. “Most males would never do anything to harm a young woman,” Pollack told the Bloomberg reporters. But the current focus is “starting to scare the heck out of the wrong people.”
college-men-now-suspicious-of-women
http://washingtonexaminer.com/fallout...
Jezebel - Stanford Student Compares Rape to Not Locking Up a Bike
http://jezebel.com/stanford-student-c...
So I go to see a psychotherapist about once a month and I saw him yesterday. In my twenties I was shut in and socially awkward and I spent most of my time working and making money and spent very little time socializing. Yesterday I was talking to my therapist about the idea of male harems and how women have more then one man to fulfill a specific function in their lives. To explain it better I'm putting a link to a video I did a while back call Women & Their Male Harems. And I'm including the link in the description below to my video as well as another one from Bernard Chapin on the same subject. I've heard women promote this idea of having a harem or gaggle of men to fulfill their needs. One guy to give them sex, another one provide money, yet another one to act as an emotional tampon and the fourth to have pseudo intellectual or artsy conversation with. And of course the gay man to come over and prepare her exquisite meals and clean her abode. So I was telling this to my therapist and I thought about what a modern day female harem would look like for a man. Would men even need four or five women around to fulfill their daily needs? What would a modern day female harem look like? The only reason a guy would have women around would be for sex, possibly cuddling or emotional intimacy and maybe co-parenting. We can have our social needs met by our male friends. We can have the deep
intellectual conversations with our friends as well. We can also cook our own food and make and keep our own money. Co-parenting is also an iffy proposition because there have been cases where the courts sided with the mothers and forced
the fathers to pay child support because the mothers took the men to court. So co-parenting isn't really a viable option for men. With regards to both modern day male and female harems you have to look at them as relationship networks. Women use social networking so their relationships with men are being compartmentalized. My therapist told me that women come into his office and say they meet different guys and many of them seem to pick and choose different qualities they like from different men. But there don't seem to be men out there for them that have everything they are looking for. So instead of settling for one guy that hast half or more of the qualities they are looking for they instead look for a bunch of guys that satisfy each of their needs fully. Men are only now starting to abandon relationships. I believe that many younger women abandoned relationships years ago in favor of having many guys in their relationship network to satisfy each role. A relationship network of women for one guy wouldn't work very well. Besides sex and cuddling What else could a woman provide that we couldn't get elsewhere? And even those services can be bought.
Women & Their Male Harems - MGTOW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I1_c...
Women Need a Male Harem!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUJ0V...
From the publisher's feed
All the wisdom of the MGTOW thanks to Sandman (https://www.youtube.com/user/SandmanMGTOW)

25,972 Listeners

28,273 Listeners