Donald Trump’s threat to sue The Wall Street Journal if it published an article linking him to Jeffrey Epstein isn’t just a blustering headline — it’s an attempt to preemptively kill reporting that may be factual, inconvenient, or worse: undeniable. Whether or not the story sees daylight, the chilling effect already spreads.

The Game Isn’t Defense—It’s Distraction

It’s never about answering the question.

It’s about changing the subject so fast and so furiously, the public can’t keep up.

It’s political sleight of hand.

While we’re staring at the noise, the truth quietly disappears.

Trump’s long, losing legal battle in Scotland, where he tried to block an offshore wind farm near his Aberdeenshire golf course. He claimed the turbines would ruin the view and diminish property values. When the courts and the Scottish government didn’t side with him, the issue metastasized into something larger. It was no longer about one golf course; it became about betrayal, liberal overreach, and the indignity of being told "no."

In essence, a fact-checker's loyalty is to the truth, wherever it may lead. For someone simply seeking to support their own views, their loyalty lies with their pre-existing beliefs.

It’s possible to believe in fairness without cruelty. It’s possible to protect kids without persecuting others. And it’s essential to recognize when outrage is being manufactured for manipulation.

So maybe we should all stop judging each other by headlines and start reading the full article — or listening to the whole sentence.

That’s where the real truth still lives.

In an era where power no longer needs to pass laws to control speech, it simply needs to raise the cost of telling the truth. And that cost is now being paid in court.

Recent immigration policies have aggressively tightened borders and expanded enforcement efforts, but the human and societal costs are profound. The use of mass raids and detentions — often described as paramilitary operations — has sowed fear and mistrust in immigrant communities. These tactics disrupt families, undermine due process, and raise serious questions about civil rights and humane treatment.

In a time when credible intelligence is vital to the safety and stability of the nation, it is deeply troubling to witness leadership that favors superstition and spectacle over facts and expertise. Instead of placing trust in the dedicated professionals of the intelligence community, we see a disturbing pattern of turning to unreliable sources — from internet influencers to conspiracy theories — for guidance on matters of grave consequence.

And let's be honest — no one really sees what I do.

I’m not Elon. I’m not one of the influencers with a million eyes tracking every word.

I’m just… me. A nobody trying to be seen and heard.