Mindframes

Mindframes – Episode 88: The Monkey (2025)

🎙️ A sometimes half-assed but always wholehearted film conversation.

🔹 Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield 🔹 Episode Runtime: Approx. 56 minutes 🔹 Film Discussed: The Monkey (2025) 🔹 Directed by: Osgood Perkins 🔹 Based on: The Monkey (1980), a short story by Stephen King (Skeleton Crew)

🎬 General Information – The Monkey (2025)

🔻 Director: Osgood "Oz" Perkins (The Blackcoat's Daughter, Longlegs, Gretel & Hansel) 🔻 Screenplay: Osgood Perkins 🔻 Based on: The Monkey by Stephen King 🔻 Cinematography: Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) 🔻 Special Effects Coordinator: Greg Pine (Final Destination-style death scenes!)

⭐ Cast Highlights

• Theo James (Divergent) – Hal & Bill (Twin Brothers, Dual Role)
• Christian Convery (Sweet Tooth) – Young Hal & Bill
• Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings) – Hammerman, a self-help parenting guru
• Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black, She-Hulk) – Aunt Lois
• Adam Scott (Severance, Parks & Rec) – Cameo as the Monkey's former owner
• Colin O'Brien (Wonka) – Petey
• Rowan Campbell (The Hardy Boys) – Ricky

🛠️ Special Trivia

• The toy monkey plays a drum, not cymbals, due to a legal conflict with Disney (Toy Story 3 featured a cymbal-playing monkey).
• Limited edition popcorn bucket featuring the monkey was a sought-after collectible.
• You can buy an official Monkey figurine for $125 at Neon's store.

📌 Episode Breakdown & Timestamps [00:00] – Introduction

• Michael and Dave introduce the episode and film under discussion.

[00:35] – What is The Monkey?

• Background on the film's origin from Stephen King's short story.
• Overview of Osgood Perkins' horror film career.

[01:39] – Osgood Perkins as a Director

• Dave shares his past interview with Perkins and how his films explore grief & trauma.
• Perkins' stylistic shift from atmospheric horror to dark comedy.

[02:52] – How Different is This from Stephen King's Story?

• King's original story = pure dread.
• This adaptation = comedic, absurd, yet still horror-infused.

[04:10] – Trivia: Why Doesn't the Monkey Have Cymbals?

• The monkey was originally designed with cymbals.
• Disney's legal team intervened (due to a character in Toy Story 3).
• A drum was used instead—and now it's iconic.

[05:58] – Cast & Performances

• Breakdown of the cast's performances.
• Theo James' dual role as Hal & Bill—a highlight of the film.
• Elijah Wood's role as a self-help guru satirizing modern parenting culture.
• Tatiana Maslany's role & why she stands out.

[09:47] – The Monkey's Death Scenes & Cinematography

• The over-the-top death scenes add to the Final Destination-style fun.
• Cinematography by Nico Aguilar (Longlegs) helps create aesthetic horror-comedy.

[15:48] – Special Effects & The Role of Blood

• Mix of practical effects and CGI.
• Hosts critique CGI blood overuse but praise the practical effects.

[18:46] – What is The Monkey Really About?

• The film explores generational trauma.
• Horror trend: Fathers passing down hidden burdens (Hereditary, The Wolfman).
• The monkey symbolizes trauma that can't be ignored.

[20:28] – How the Movie Handles Generational Trauma

• Hal tries to escape it—but the monkey keeps coming back.
• Final message: You can't erase trauma, only learn to live with it.

[27:31] – The Film's Ending (Spoilers)

• The monkey is not destroyed—Hal and Petey drive away with it.
• The Horseman of Death cameo—what does it mean?
• School bus cheerleader decapitation scene: Meta-commentary on horror audiences?

[39:55] – The Mystery of Ricky (Fan Theory)

• Could Ricky be Bill's secret son?
• Shared trauma & absentee fathers play a major role.
• Closet uniform mystery—not everything adds up.

[42:44] – Final Thoughts & Reviews

• Michael: Fun film, but not scary.
• Dave: Perkins proves his range beyond horror.
• Both agree: Worth watching, especially for horror-comedy fans.

[48:08] – What Would You Do If You Had The Monkey?

• The monkey does NOT take requests—it kills on its own terms.

[55:01] – Closing & Next Episode

• Next episode: Bong Joon-ho's Mickey 17 starring Robert Pattinson.
• Listener engagement:
  • Is The Monkey horror or comedy?
  • What do you think of its take on generational trauma?
  • Could there be a Monkey 2?

📲 Join the discussion: facebook.com/mindframesmovies 💬 Email Michael & Dave: mindframefilms.com

Episode Summary

In this episode, Dave and Michael discuss Companion, the directorial debut from Drew Hancock. A mix of science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller, Companion follows Iris, a robot companion, as she navigates power dynamics and hidden agendas during a weekend getaway at a remote lakeside estate. The film explores themes of toxic relationships, control, and AI consciousness, all while delivering sharp humor and unexpected twists.

• Director: Drew Hancock
• Genre: Sci-Fi, Dark Comedy, Thriller
• Produced by: Barbarian creative team (Zach Cregger, Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, Raphael Margolis)
• Cast:
  • Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris
  • Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh
  • Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick
  • Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat
  • Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli
  • Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei

Timestamps & Discussion Highlights 00:00:15 - Introduction

• Dave welcomes listeners to Mindframes and introduces the show's format.
• Michael reveals the movie they're discussing: Companion (2024).

00:00:35 - Movie Overview

• Companion is the directorial debut of Drew Hancock.
• A science fiction, dark comedy, and thriller with "stabby stab" moments but not a full horror film.
• The plot follows Iris, a robot companion, as she joins her human partner, Josh, for a weekend getaway that quickly turns into chaos.

00:02:06 - The Barbarian Connection

• Produced by Zach Cregger (Barbarian), along with Roy Lee, J.D. Lipschitz, and Raphael Margolis.
• Cregger was originally set to direct but handed the project to Hancock.
• Shares some tonal shifts and unexpected turns similar to Barbarian.

00:03:59 - A Surprisingly Funny Movie

• Marketed as horror, but the film has strong comedic elements.
• Michael stopped watching the trailer halfway because it reveals too much.
• Despite its darker themes, the humor is well-placed and helps with pacing.

00:04:26 - The Cast & Performances

• Sophie Thatcher (Yellowjackets, Heretic) as Iris – A standout performance.
• Jack Quaid (The Boys) as Josh – A departure from his usual roles, making him unrecognizable compared to his character Huey in The Boys.
• Lucas Gage (Euphoria, The White Lotus) as Patrick – Cast as the "pretty guy."
• Megan Suri (It Lives Inside, Never Have I Ever) as Kat – A complex role.
• Harvey Guillén (What We Do in the Shadows) as Eli – Comedic powerhouse, but hard not to see him as Guillermo.
• Rupert Friend (The Death of Stalin, Homeland) as Sergei – A mix of comedic and sinister.

00:12:51 - Cinematography, Editing & Directing

• Eli Bourne handles cinematography, giving the film an intimate, isolated feel.
• Michael praises the film's pacing and editing, crediting Josh Ether for helping keep the story sharp.
• The location scouting is excellent, contributing to the film's eerie atmosphere.

00:13:15 - The "Eat the Rich" Subgenre Comparison

• Companion shares *similarities with films like The Menu and Triangle of Sadness.
• Though not a direct critique of wealth, the film hints at class and power dynamics.

00:14:00 - January as a "Dumping Ground" for Movies

• Companion was released in early 2024, a time studios often use to release movies they're unsure how to market.
• Despite this, the film is better than most January releases and deserves more recognition.

Themes & Analysis 00:28:05 - Toxic Relationships & Power Imbalances

• Core theme: How control, manipulation, and exploitation manifest in relationships—both human and AI.
• Companion raises questions about agency and autonomy, especially in imbalanced relationships.

00:29:25 - Gender & Objectification

• Iris represents the struggles of real-world women who fight for autonomy in male-dominated spaces.
• Historically, women were seen as property—a dynamic mirrored in Iris's role as a "companion."

00:30:51 - The Film's Unique Take on AI Representation

• Unlike many AI films that focus on "Pinocchio syndrome" (wanting to be real), Companion focuses on how people treat objects that can think and feel.
• Dave argues that the film doesn't necessarily "humanize" Iris, but Michael strongly disagrees, saying she's treated as an individual from the start.

00:37:12 - The Relationship Between Josh & Iris

• A perfect example of a toxic relationship.
• Josh gaslights and controls Iris, using his "love" as a justification for ownership.
• Parallels to real-life relationships where one partner holds all the power.

00:39:38 - Eli & Patrick: Love or Control?

• Eli & Patrick's relationship is framed as genuine, but Eli literally has a kill switch for Patrick.
• Raises the question: Can there ever be real love when there's an extreme power imbalance?

00:45:12 - Kat: A Different Kind of User

• Kat manipulates Sergei for money, just as Josh uses Iris for companionship.
• Unlike Josh, Kat is honest about her self-serving nature—making her an interesting contrast.
• Her conversation with Iris about feeling "disposable" adds emotional depth to her character.

00:48:43 - Josh's Downfall & The Role of Technology

• Josh's death by an automatic corkscrew is a symbol of his reliance on technology and the loss of control he thought he had.
• Technology and control are central themes—whether AI, smart devices, or old-school CD players.

Verdict & Ratings 01:14:40 - Final Thoughts & Scores

• Dave: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5) - "One of the best AI movies in recent years."
• Michael: ⭐⭐⭐½ - ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (3.5 - 4/5) - "Great performances, strong pacing, and an excellent directorial debut."

01:20:00 - Why You Should See Companion

• Companion is in limited theatrical release, so see it before it's gone!
• Despite marketing challenges, it's one of the best films of early 2024.

Closing Notes & Where to Watch

• Companion is currently in wide release but may leave theaters soon.
• Mindframes encourages listeners to share their thoughts via email.

📢 What did you think of Companion? Let us know! 📧 Email us with your thoughts!

Mindframes: The Presence – A Steven Soderbergh Experiment

Episode Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave are joined by special guest Tarek Fayoumi (MoviesWithTarek.com, Chicago Indie Critics) to dissect Steven Soderbergh's new film, The Presence. They explore its unique point-of-view cinematography, thematic connections to isolation in modern horror, and its place within Soderbergh's diverse filmography. The trio also debates the film's strengths, weaknesses, and whether it truly earns its ghost story label.

🔖 Topics & Timestamps:

⏳ 00:00:14 – Welcome & Introductions

• Michael & Dave introduce the show and their guest, Tarek Fayoumi.
• Tarek shares insights from his work as a film critic.

⏳ 00:01:57 – Overview of The Presence

• Introduction to The Presence, a ghost story with a unique POV perspective.
• Soderbergh's cinematography choices and how they affect immersion.

⏳ 00:03:06 – Tarek's Experience with Soderbergh

• How Soderbergh creates realism in his films.
• Discussion of his past work, including Contagion and the Ocean's films.

⏳ 00:04:51 – What Makes The Presence Unique?

• The film's VR-like cinematography and immersive ghostly POV.
• How the film builds tension without traditional horror tropes.

⏳ 00:05:22 – Ghost Story Influences

• Comparing The Presence to films like The Others, The Sixth Sense, and The Haunting.
• How it differs from found footage and traditional ghost stories.

⏳ 00:08:00 – David Koepp's Writing & The Ending Debate

• Discussion of screenwriter David Koepp's contributions (Jurassic Park, Stir of Echoes).
• Does the film's ending work? Michael & Dave share mixed feelings.

⏳ 00:15:28 – Soderbergh's Diverse Career: Any Common Threads?

• Oceans 11, Erin Brockovich, Solaris, and Sex, Lies, and Videotape – what connects them?
• Soderbergh's recurring themes of surveillance, observation, and isolation.

⏳ 00:22:54 – Official Synopsis & Final Thoughts

• A family moves into a suburban home and suspects they are not alone…
• The Presence as an atmospheric rather than traditional horror.

⏳ 00:24:43 – Reviews & Star Ratings

• Dave: Compelling but imperfect; worth rewatching.
• Michael: A solid 3/5 stars – eerie but flawed.
• Tarek: 3/4 stars – an experimental approach that mostly works.

⏳ 00:30:23 – Spoiler Discussion: What is The Presence Really About?

• The film's twist ending and character revelations.
• Comparing the film's isolation themes to The Babadook, Hereditary, and Smile.

⏳ 00:41:50 – Isolation in Horror Films (Post-2010)

• The rise of horror exploring loneliness, grief, and societal detachment.
• Films like Midsommar, Talk to Me, Alone With You, and I Saw the TV Glow.

⏳ 00:52:04 – Final Thoughts on the Family Dynamics

• Lucy Liu as the mom – how does she fit into this role?
• The dad as a "perfect but helpless" figure.

🔗 Follow Us:

• 🌐 https://www.facebook.com/mindframesMovies
• 🌐 www.mindframesfilm.com
• 🎥 Guest: Tarek Fayoumi – MoviesWithTarek.com

In this episode of MindFrames, Dave and Michael break down the best films of 2024. With themes ranging from authoritarianism and resilience to identity and connection, the hosts discuss how these movies reflect and challenge the cultural zeitgeist. They also dive into the year's standout horror films and share their thoughts on the Oscars' major contenders.

Timestamps and Topics

• [00:00:16] Welcome and Introduction Dave and Michael set the tone for the episode, outlining their approach to discussing the best films of 2024.

• [00:01:18] Reflecting on the Year in Film The hosts share general thoughts on 2024 in cinema—was it a year of classics or just solid hits?

• [00:02:09] Horror Highlights of 2024

Dave and Michael praise the exceptional year for horror, with standout titles like The Substance, Nosferatu, and Cuckoo.

• [00:03:22] Oscar Campaigns and Predictions A lively discussion about the politics of Oscar campaigns, including surprises, snubs, and predictions.

• [00:04:49] Themes of 2024 in Film Michael discusses the criteria that shaped his top 10 list, emphasizing themes like despair, resilience, and power dynamics.

• [00:06:44] Top 10 Films: Starting with Nickel Boys

Michael explains why Nickel Boys made his list, focusing on its themes and performances, while Dave critiques its filmmaking style.

• [00:09:16] Dave's Horror List and Honorable Mentions Dave shares his top horror films of 2024, including Alien: Romulus and Handling the Undead.

• [00:15:11] A Complete Unknown: A Deep Dive Michael highlights Timothy Chalamet's performance as Bob Dylan in this period drama, reflecting on its relevance to today.

• [00:28:09] Thematic Standouts: The Substance vs. Nosferatu

A comparison of two horror standouts, with Michael favoring The Substance for its timely relevance and Dave praising Nosferatu's timelessness.

• [00:50:20] International Gems: The Seed of the Sacred Fig Michael explores the Iranian allegory for authoritarianism and resilience, reflecting on its layered storytelling.

• [01:00:06] Animated Masterpiece: Flow Dave describes this visually stunning Latvian animated film, tying it to themes of community, refugees, and environmental decline.

• [01:03:28] Sean Baker's Anora: A Human Story

The hosts celebrate Anora as a funny, heartfelt, and raw depiction of resilience and humanity, with standout performances and themes.

• [01:08:07] Closing Thoughts and Listener Recommendations Dave and Michael reflect on how the year's films resonate with ongoing cultural conversations and share what's next for MindFrames.

Dave's non-ordered list(s)

A Different Man Seed of the Sacred Fig All We Imagine As Light Civil War Red Rooms The Substance Wicked Flow A Real Pain Sing Sing

HONORABLE MENTIONS

The Girl with the Needle The Room Next Door Anora Conclave September 5 Hard Truths

Michael's list

1. Sing Sing
2. Conclave
3. Anora
4. The Seed of the Sacred Fig
5. The Brutalist
6. The Substance
7. Nosferatu
8. A Real Pain
9. Wicked
10. A Complete Unknown
11. Nickel Boys

Mentioned Films

• The Substance
• Nosferatu
• A Complete Unknown
• Nickel Boys
• Flow
• Anora
• The Seed of the Sacred Fig
• Wicked
• Handling the Undead
• Alien: Romulus
• Red Rooms
• The Brutalist

Where to Find Us

www.mindframesfilm.com

Mindframes Episode: Robert Eggers' Nosferatu

Summary: In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave explore Robert Eggers' reimagining of the classic silent film Nosferatu. They discuss Eggers' meticulous approach to filmmaking, the legacy of Nosferatu, and the cultural evolution of vampires in cinema. The conversation touches on German Expressionist cinematography, standout performances, and the thematic depth of the film. They also reflect on how vampires mirror societal fears across decades, from early depictions of monstrous villains to modern sympathetic portrayals.

Timestamps:

00:00 – Introduction

• Overview of the podcast and today's topic: Robert Eggers' Nosferatu.
• Michael and Dave reflect on their history with Eggers' films.

05:30 – The Legacy of Nosferatu

• A look back at the 1922 silent film and its influence on cinema.
• Discussion of previous adaptations, including Werner Herzog's 1979 version.

12:00 – Eggers' Filmmaking Style

• Comparison to Ridley Scott's attention to detail and world-building.
• How Eggers adapts myths in The Northman, The Witch, and Nosferatu.

17:45 – Spoiler-Free Review

• Praise for the German Expressionist-inspired cinematography.
• Discussion of Lily-Rose Depp's performance and Count Orlok's menacing presence.
• The thought-provoking and ambiguous ending.

25:00 – Vampires in Cinema: A Cultural Lens

• How vampires have evolved from monstrous threats to sympathetic figures.
• Examples from Dracula (1931), Dark Shadows (1966), and Interview with the Vampire (1994).
• The resurgence of evil, monstrous vampires in recent films like Let the Right One In and The Last Voyage of the Demeter.

38:30 – Thematic Analysis of Nosferatu

• Count Orlok as a symbol of predation and isolation.
• Ellen's mystical connection to Orlok and her ultimate sacrifice.
• Reflections on societal fears of disease, isolation, and evil.

50:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations

• How Eggers' Nosferatu compares to his earlier films.
• Other films mentioned: The Lighthouse, The Witch, Herzog's Nosferatu, and Let the Right One In.
• Upcoming episodes teased: Best of 2024, The Wolfman, and animation coverage.

Where to Find Us:

• Website: mindframesfilm.com
• Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies
• Podcast Network: Now Playing Network

Next Episode:

• Best Films of 2024 (tentative)

Podcast Episode Description:

In this episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and Dave Canfield dive into the chilling world of Heretic, the latest horror film by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods (A Quiet Place). We explore the film's themes of faith, control, and belief, contrasting its intellectual horror with its visceral thrills. Join us as we analyze Hugh Grant's standout performance as the sinister Mr. Reed, the dynamic interplay between the two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes and Sister Paxton, and the movie's ambiguous exploration of spirituality and skepticism.

Whether you're intrigued by the film's intricate set design, its dialogue-driven narrative, or its controversial take on religious and philosophical themes, this episode is for you. We also share insights on how Heretic fits into the broader landscape of 2024's standout horror films, with comparisons to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. Tune in to hear our recommendations and join the conversation about one of the year's most thought-provoking horror films.

Podcast Summary with Timestamps

0:00 – 1:00 – Intro Michael and Dave introduce the episode, setting the stage for a deep dive into Heretic by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods. They touch on the directors' previous works (A Quiet Place, Haunt) and their distinct horror style.

1:01 – 5:30 – Overview of Heretic A brief plot summary: Two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East), find themselves trapped by Mr. Reed (Hugh Grant), whose philosophical and theological challenges evolve into a fight for survival.

5:31 – 12:00 – Themes of Faith and Control The hosts explore the film's central themes, including the idea of religion as a mechanism of control versus a source of hope. Mr. Reed's character embodies skepticism, while the missionaries represent differing interpretations of belief.

12:01 – 18:30 – Performances and Character Dynamics Hugh Grant's portrayal of Mr. Reed is highlighted as a standout performance. The hosts delve into the dynamic between the sisters, contrasting Sister Barnes' depth of faith with Sister Paxton's cultural adherence.

18:31 – 24:00 – Set Design and Technical Elements A discussion on the film's claustrophobic set design, the use of close-ups, and the intricate dollhouse motif that symbolizes control and manipulation.

24:01 – 30:00 – Comparisons to Other Films Connections are drawn to Hereditary, Get Out, and The Exorcist. The hosts note Heretic's unique blend of intellectual and visceral horror and its place within 2024's strong lineup of religious-themed horror films.

30:01 – 35:00 – Spoiler Section: Plot Twists and Ending A dive into the film's third act and its ambiguous ending. The hosts debate whether the film effectively balances its critique of faith and religion with its horror elements.

35:01 – 40:00 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations Michael and Dave share their final impressions, recommending Heretic for its bold themes and strong performances. They reflect on how the film leaves viewers questioning belief, control, and the power of faith.

40:01 – End – Outro The hosts close the episode, previewing a potential future discussion on Conclave, another film tackling themes of faith and religion. They invite listeners to connect with Mindframes online and thank them for tuning in.

Episode 82 on The Substance

Summary In this episode, Michael and Dave dive into The Substance, a film by Coralie Fargeat. The film explores the dark and gritty side of Hollywood's obsession with youth, following Elizabeth Sparkle (Demi Moore), a former aerobic star who turns to a mysterious serum for a youthful transformation. This risky choice leads her into a twisted psychological battle with her younger self, Sue (Margaret Qualley), as the two are forced to switch bodies every seven days.

Key Discussion Points

• Plot Overview: The film's exploration of ageism, Hollywood's beauty standards, and the battle between youthful ambition and the wisdom of age.
• Director's Style: Coral Le Far's cinematic techniques, reminiscent of her previous work in Revenge, and visual callbacks to classic horror films like The Shining and The Fly.
• Cinematography and Sound Design: Praise for cinematographer Benjamin Krakun and sound designer Emmanuel's Yard, creating a contrast between Hollywood's bright artificiality and the film's dark themes.
• Practical Effects: Emphasis on the effective use of prosthetics and 1980s-inspired effects over CGI, with comparisons to movies like The Thing and Requiem for a Dream.

Memorable Moments

• Shrimp Scene: The "disgusting" and metaphorical close-up of Dennis Quaid's character devouring shrimp, symbolizing Hollywood's consumption of aging stars.
• Body Horror: Discussions on the intense practical effects, leading to some wince-inducing moments that play with medical horror aesthetics.
• Themes of Identity and Self-Worth: The hosts analyze how the film examines the lengths people go to in order to stay relevant and young, questioning the true "value" of beauty and fame.

Ratings and Final Thoughts

• Michael gives the film four stars, highlighting its timely commentary on youth obsession, while Dave awards it five stars, calling it one of the best films of the year. Both agree on the standout performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley, predicting Oscar buzz.

Cultural Commentary The hosts reflect on Hollywood's commodification of beauty and youth, pointing out how the film exposes the industry's relentless pursuit of "perfection" and the unrealistic standards imposed on women.

Looking Forward Next episode, Michael and Dave consider reviewing Heretic, an A24 horror film, or exploring other films relevant to award season buzz.

Connect with Us Visit our website mindframesfilm.com or find us on Facebook at MindframesMovies for more insights, and feel free to reach out if you'd like to be a guest or suggest a movie!

• Introduction to The Substance 00:00:15 - Michael welcomes listeners and introduces the movie The Substance.

• Plot Summary & Themes 00:00:42 - Dave gives a brief overview of the film's plot, focusing on Elizabeth Sparkle's battle with her younger self, Sue. 00:02:17 - Michael and Dave discuss the film's themes of ageism, youth obsession, and identity in Hollywood.

• Director and Cinematography

00:03:01 - Discussion of Coral Le Far's style, including her previous work on Revenge and the "revenge movie" genre. 00:04:09 - Michael describes the vibrant color palette and camera work, including hallway shots reminiscent of The Shining.

• Shrimp Scene & Sound Design 00:05:34 - Michael and Dave analyze the infamous "shrimp scene" with Dennis Quaid's character, highlighting the film's sound design. 00:07:06 - Praise for Emmanuel's Yard's work on the sound effects, enhancing the visceral experience.

• Practical Effects and Body Horror 00:09:07 - Dave discusses the impressive practical effects, comparing them to The Thing and emphasizing the grotesque elements that made even seasoned horror fans look away.

• Discussion on Hollywood and Beauty Standards

00:13:38 - Michael and Dave explore the film's commentary on Hollywood's treatment of aging women and the pressures of beauty standards.

• Performances by Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley 00:14:22 - The hosts delve into the powerful performances, especially Demi Moore's nuanced portrayal of Elizabeth, and Margaret Qualley's rising-star status.

• Film References & Influences 00:50:38 - The hosts compare The Substance to other films like The Elephant Man, Frankenstein, The Fly, and Carrie, discussing how these influences shape the film's narrative and aesthetic.

• Ratings and Spoiler-Free Reviews

00:17:09 - Michael and Dave each give their spoiler-free ratings, with Michael awarding four stars and Dave giving it five.

• Third-Act Discussion & Moral Takeaways 00:46:18 - Spoiler discussion on the third act, where the hosts interpret the film's moral stance on aging, beauty, and acceptance.

• Closing and Next Episode Preview 00:57:04 - Dave previews potential films for the next episode, including Heretic, an A24 horror movie, as well as Rumors, a film featuring Tilda Swinton.

Episode Summary: In this fun and lively episode, Michael and David take a break from their usual thematic deep dives to enjoy the highly anticipated film "Deadpool and Wolverine." Join them as they explore the movie's humor, fourth-wall breaks, cameos, and more. This episode is packed with laughs, insightful critiques, and a healthy dose of fan service.

Key Discussion Points:

• Introduction (00:15 - 01:11):

  • The usual format involves pulling out one theme from a movie, but this episode is kept light and free to match the film's tone.
  • Introduction to "Deadpool and Wolverine," starring Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman.

• Director and Production (01:11 - 02:12):

  • Directed by Sean Levy, who previously worked with Ryan Reynolds on "Free Guy."
  • The film is described as a buddy comedy made by buddies.

• Humor and Fourth-Wall Breaks (02:12 - 06:35):

  • The movie is filled with jokes, cameos, and references that require multiple viewings to catch all details.
  • Outrageously violent and vulgar in keeping with Deadpool's character.

• Favorite Moments and Cameos (06:35 - 11:18):

  • Highlights include cameos from Henry Cavill and Chris Evans.
  • Discussion on how the film plays with meta-references and nostalgia.

• Comparisons and Critiques (11:18 - 13:54):

  • Compared favorably to other superhero films like "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness."
  • Praised for its self-awareness and comedic tone.

• Fan Service (13:54 - 18:07):

  • The film is described as fan service done right.
  • Michael appreciates the movie for being honest about its intentions and serving the fans well.

• Character Development and Themes (18:07 - 34:48):

  • Discussions on character growth, particularly for Wolverine and Deadpool.
  • Use of iconic costumes and staying true to the characters' comic origins.

• Upcoming Films and Recommendations (34:48 - 48:45):

  • Mentions of upcoming films like "Twisted Metal," "Long Legs," and "Alien Romulus."
  • Recommendations for future episodes and a look at some intriguing trailers.

Quotes:

• "This movie breaks the fourth wall so often you will literally need to see it twice just to get all of that."
• "I am a fan. Serve me."
• "It's a buddy comedy made by buddies."

Final Thoughts (44:04 - 48:45):

• Michael and David agree that "Deadpool and Wolverine" is a fun ride with beloved characters, making it worth the watch.
• The episode ends with a look forward to future movies and potential podcast topics.

Mind Frames Podcast - Episode 79: Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga Overview:

In this episode, Michael and Dave delve into the newest installment of the Mad Max universe, Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Directed by George Miller, this film explores the origin story of Imperator Furiosa, previously portrayed by Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road, now played by Anya Taylor-Joy. Join the hosts as they discuss the film's thematic elements, casting choices, and how it fits into the larger Mad Max franchise.

Key Topics: Introduction to Mind Frames (00:00 - 00:24)

Overview of the podcast and the format of the show.

Film Introduction (00:25 - 00:52)

Introduction of Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga. Brief synopsis and connection to Mad Max: Fury Road.

Discussion on George Miller (01:43 - 03:33)

George Miller's influence on the post-apocalyptic genre. His versatility as a filmmaker with works like Babe and Happy Feet.

Thematic Elements in George Miller's Films (03:35 - 06:32)

Themes of human society's impact on the world. Comparison of themes across Miller's diverse filmography.

Casting Choices (07:21 - 10:51)

Anya Taylor-Joy's performance as Furiosa. Physical and stylistic differences between Anya Taylor-Joy and Charlize Theron. Discussion of Chris Hemsworth's role as Dementus and his comedic influence.

Character Analysis (10:55 - 12:31)

Examination of Furiosa's character development. Comparison between Furiosa in Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga and Mad Max: Fury Road.

Chris Hemsworth as Dementus (15:45 - 19:17)

Analysis of Hemsworth's performance and character. Discussion on the balance of humor and menace in his role.

Immortan Joe and Prequels (19:18 - 22:06)

Role of Immortan Joe in Furiosa. Challenges of integrating iconic characters into prequels.

Supporting Characters (23:05 - 26:04)

Discussion on Tom Burke's character and his role in Furiosa's story. Critique of the necessity of his character in the narrative.

Cinematography and Visuals (27:24 - 30:14)

Comparison of cinematography in Furiosa and Fury Road. Use of CGI and its impact on the film's visual appeal.

Action Sequences (30:15 - 31:33)

Overview of the film's action sequences and stunt work. Comparison to other action movies of the year.

Box Office Performance and Marketing (31:34 - 42:31)

Discussion on the film's box office performance. Analysis of marketing strategies and their impact on the film's reception.

Cultural Impact and Audience Reception (42:32 - 50:01)

Broader discussion on the cultural impact of the film. Comparison of audience reception across different demographics.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations (50:01 - 53:01)

Hosts' final thoughts on Furiosa. Recommendations for exploring more of George Miller's work.

Conclusion:

Michael and Dave conclude the episode with reflections on George Miller's filmmaking career and the significance of Furiosa within the Mad Max franchise. They also touch upon broader trends in the film industry and audience preferences.

Next Episode:

?????

Follow Us:

- Website: [mindframesfilm.com](http://mindframesfilm.com) - Network: [Now Playing Network](http://nowplaying.org)