
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States
By Institute for Justice4.8
307307 ratings
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States

969 Listeners

1,517 Listeners

983 Listeners

1,400 Listeners

4,907 Listeners

173 Listeners

6,617 Listeners

2,841 Listeners

40 Listeners

738 Listeners

3,940 Listeners

3,359 Listeners

3,833 Listeners

744 Listeners

215 Listeners