
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States
By Institute for Justice4.8
307307 ratings
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States

970 Listeners

1,513 Listeners

988 Listeners

1,403 Listeners

4,909 Listeners

172 Listeners

6,623 Listeners

2,835 Listeners

40 Listeners

739 Listeners

3,946 Listeners

3,357 Listeners

3,833 Listeners

746 Listeners

213 Listeners