
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States
4.8
307307 ratings
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment’s protections against warrantless searches do not apply to “open fields.” Which means that government agents can jump over fences, ignore No Trespassing signs, and roam private land at will. There are no limits. On this episode, we talk to Richard and Linda Thornton, whose property in rural Maine was at the center of the case. And we ask: Can the Founders really have thought the Constitution did not protect private woods, fields, farms, and more from warrantless invasions?
Click here for transcript.
Oliver v. United States
Hester v. United States
1,110 Listeners
4,245 Listeners
967 Listeners
175 Listeners
2,263 Listeners
647 Listeners
2,833 Listeners
1,503 Listeners
970 Listeners
42 Listeners
722 Listeners
372 Listeners
666 Listeners
98 Listeners
1 Listeners