Mullooly Asset Podcast #188 – Tim & Tom’s Mailbag Questions – Transcript
Tom Mullooly: Welcome back to the podcast. This is episode number 188. 188 podcasts. That’s pretty good.
Tim Mullooly: That’s a lot.
Tom Mullooly: Yeah. I’m Tom Mullooly.
Tim Mullooly: And this is Tim Mullooly.
Tom Mullooly: Together we’re going to be answering your questions.
Tom Mullooly: This will be a pretty different podcast than we’ve done this week and last week in the sense that we are answering questions that we are getting in our mailbox.
Tim Mullooly: Right.
Tom Mullooly: And they’re pretty unique.
Tim Mullooly: Yeah, some of them are pretty interesting, so we figured, someone’s asking it, so other people are probably wondering the same thing. Might as well answer it for you in one big podcast for you.
Tom Mullooly: Right. Why don’t we jump in with the first one.
Tim Mullooly: Sure. The question is, “Should I be listing my brokerage firm as a primary beneficiary?”
Tom Mullooly: Okay, big sigh. Holy moly.
Tim Mullooly: In a word, no.
Tom Mullooly: No, don’t do it. “My broker had me designate his firm as the primary beneficiary to my variable annuity account,” okay so I just wanted to find out who this broker is. I have a real problem with this. I’m sure there’s a reason why. Either he didn’t know … I don’t know.
Tim Mullooly: I hope that’s the case.
Tom Mullooly: I just don’t understand why he would ever do that. “I was told that,” we’re reading here the letter, “I was told that upon death a payment would be made to an IRA account that my spouse is the primary beneficiary of as opposed to a direct payment to her. The firm is claiming that this is necessary because they’re custodians of my account. Everything I’ve read says ‘never list your brokerage house as the primary beneficiary for anything.'”
Okay, I’m not going to get into whether your broker is right or wrong, but I think naming a brokerage firm as a beneficiary anywhere is a terrible idea.
Tim Mullooly: I agree. Yeah. If the money’s going to go to an IRA account that your spouse is the beneficiary on, why wouldn’t you just make your spouse the primary beneficiary of the annuity?
Tom Mullooly: Right. I’m sensing that … This is all the information we have. I’m sensing that this is an annuity that is inside an IRA.
Tim Mullooly: That’s a whole other thing.
Tom Mullooly: Yeah. I have some real issues with this, but a pre Department of Labor law … We’ll find out what the numbers are this year, but before the Department of Labor Law was enacted for the last couple of years billions, with a B, billions of dollars inside retirement accounts have been placed annuities. So, we’re going to ask the question. I know I sound like a broken record, but I’m going to ask it again. Why? Just call up your advisor and ask them. Why would I ever invest in a tax-deferred investment, like an annuity, inside of a tax-deferred account, like an IRA? Or a 403(B) teacher’s annuity. Like, what?
Tim Mullooly: It doesn’t make any sense.
Tom Mullooly: I don’t understand. To me, there is little to no economic benefit to owning something like that inside of a tax-deferred account.
Tim Mullooly: It’s like tax-deferred inception. A dream inside a dream. tax-deferred account inside a tax-deferred account.
Tom Mullooly: I have reasons I’m not going to get into in this podcast that I think may be behind those kind of sales practices, but I just would love to get a straight answer why someone would own a tax-deferred investment inside of a tax-deferred account.
Tim Mullooly: Yeah.