
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In an excellent book on how aid agencies manage foreign aid projects, Dan Honig argues that tight top-down controls and a focus on target-setting and metrics often lead aid projects astray. 
If¬†one navigates from the top,¬†one may achieve more management control, more oversight, and more standardized behavior. But this may be at the cost of¬†flexibility and adaptability. By contrast, if one empowers those closest to the ground, and focuses on what field agents can see and learn, we may apply so-called ‚Äúsoft information‚ÄĚ that will in turn allow for more flexibility.¬†
Managing large organizations is not easy. And most politicians and bureaucrats struggle to find the right balance between when to control and when to let go. In the book¬†Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top-Down Control of Foreign Aid Doesn't Work, Dan Honig argues that a misplaced¬†sense of¬†what it¬†means to ‚Äúsucceed‚Ä̬†encourages many aid¬†agencies¬†to get the¬†balance¬†wrong.
Dan Honig is an assistant professor of international development at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He is currently a visiting fellow at Leiden University’s Institute of Political Science, and a non-resident fellow at the Center for Global Development. He was previously special assistant, then advisor, to successive Ministers of Finance in Liberia and ran a local nonprofit in East Timor focused on helping post-conflict youth realize the power of their own ideas.
Dan is busy completing his next book on ‚ÄúMission-Driven Bureaucrats‚ÄĚ, which¬†explores the relationship between motivation, management practice, organizational mission, and performance in the public service.¬†¬†¬†
Host
Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)
Apple Spotify YouTube
Subscribe:
https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com
https://globaldevpod.substack.com/
5
88 ratings
In an excellent book on how aid agencies manage foreign aid projects, Dan Honig argues that tight top-down controls and a focus on target-setting and metrics often lead aid projects astray. 
If¬†one navigates from the top,¬†one may achieve more management control, more oversight, and more standardized behavior. But this may be at the cost of¬†flexibility and adaptability. By contrast, if one empowers those closest to the ground, and focuses on what field agents can see and learn, we may apply so-called ‚Äúsoft information‚ÄĚ that will in turn allow for more flexibility.¬†
Managing large organizations is not easy. And most politicians and bureaucrats struggle to find the right balance between when to control and when to let go. In the book¬†Navigation by Judgment: Why and When Top-Down Control of Foreign Aid Doesn't Work, Dan Honig argues that a misplaced¬†sense of¬†what it¬†means to ‚Äúsucceed‚Ä̬†encourages many aid¬†agencies¬†to get the¬†balance¬†wrong.
Dan Honig is an assistant professor of international development at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He is currently a visiting fellow at Leiden University’s Institute of Political Science, and a non-resident fellow at the Center for Global Development. He was previously special assistant, then advisor, to successive Ministers of Finance in Liberia and ran a local nonprofit in East Timor focused on helping post-conflict youth realize the power of their own ideas.
Dan is busy completing his next book on ‚ÄúMission-Driven Bureaucrats‚ÄĚ, which¬†explores the relationship between motivation, management practice, organizational mission, and performance in the public service.¬†¬†¬†
Host
Dan Banik (@danbanik @GlobalDevPod)
Apple Spotify YouTube
Subscribe:
https://in-pursuit-of-development.simplecast.com
https://globaldevpod.substack.com/
13 Listeners
59,265 Listeners
15,222 Listeners
2,325 Listeners