I called him about one matter, something routine, but our conversation quickly went in a very different direction.
He told me that he had worked in military intelligence and was also an electrical engineer. At some point, I mentioned that I was a whistleblower and that I had filed a human rights violation complaint in Geneva.
He paused and asked, “May I ask why you filed the complaint?”
I told him about the non-consensual human experimentation, the ongoing surveillance, and the German man I had met at an EV charging station, well before I ever went back to the pool.
I told him about my experiences in the pool: the tai chi and qi gong movements that would come to me, the meditative flow state, the increased intuition or knowing, increased pattern recognition and synchronicity.
He listened quietly. Then he asked, “Why would they be surveilling you?”
When I explained my understanding of what was happening, he said something that caught me off guard:
“They sought to eliminate you because they knew they couldn’t control you.”
We discussed my filings in Geneva. he told me that even if I received a favorable resolution , it might not change much because the United States doesn’t recognize those courts’ jurisdiction in a binding way.
“So, it won’t have much bearing here at home,” he said.
I was taken aback. I thought to myself, if Geneva won’t eliminate the problem how will I or other victims ever get our lives back?
When I asked what I should do in the meantime, he said:
“Get some vacuum flasks. Collect several samples of the air in your apartment and have them tested at a lab to verify your hypothesis about chemical exposure. You will need that.
Then he added that I should move out of my apartment and into a single dwelling where I could have full control over the environment. He said but it was likely that there was already a tracking device on me.
I told him it is odd he should say that because in June I had been subjected to what appeared to be a forced injection, and that an ultrasound hadn’t detected anything.
He said an MRI would show it, explaining that even scar tissue wouldn’t grow over such a device, so it would still be visible. He said there were ways to remove or neutralize such a device.
We went on to discuss several other topics. I asked if he knew what a sovereign force was and he said yes. That surprised me.
I asked if he understood coherence and he said yes again.
Then I asked if he knew what a kill box was. Without hesitation, he gave the definition:
“It’s a military configuration in which an individual or target is surrounded. You’re not supposed to leave that zone alive.”
I told him, “That’s what this apartment is. I’m surrounded on all sides.”
He didn’t dismiss what I said. He listened.
Then, out of nowhere, he mentioned something that startled me. He said that he had once worked for a company they were developing monitoring or tracking devices.
He said that at one point, migrants crossing the Mexican border were told they were receiving an inoculation or flu shot, but that the injections were actually implanted tracking devices, inserted under the armpit or near that area as I recall. According to him, any time those individuals were later deported and if they returned to the United States, they could be tracked and identified through those implants.
I said, “My God, they were doing that?” He confirmed it, though I don’t remember the exact year he said it happened. I said how is that possible. He said because they have no legal standing in the US. I believe he described it as they were foreign subjects. As such, that had no constitutional protections or protections under our laws as what I understood from what he was saying.
Later in the conversation, when I brought up chemical suppression, he said that in the 1990s there had been something called the “chemical trails” and that I should look it up. He added that he personally knew of related activities occurring as recently as 2003.
I remember thinking at that point that I should have recorded the conversation. There were so many details, technical references, and confirmations that I wish I could revisit now.
I asked him what he thought should do in my situation. Before he could respond, I told him the call was likely being monitored. He said I know.
When I asked if we could meet in person, he said yes.
“You can come to x location. It’s secure.”
That’s where I plan to meet him next.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit drtamaradixon.substack.com