For the past several weeks, I’ve been writing about architectural ingress: how shared wall cavities, light switches, electrical outlets, and ceiling fixtures can serve as direct vectors for chemical intrusion. I’ve discussed the role of fragrance VOCs in masking more dangerous chemical profiles. I’ve outlined the need for a basic understanding of odor behavior, air pressure differentials, and compound reactivity to make sense of what modern exposure can look like, especially when it’s deliberate. But this has now shifted from theory to potentially verifiable evidence in progress.
How I Discovered the Intrusion
This evening, as I sat down for meditation, I became aware of a distinct odor: a crisp, clean scent that smelled like air but with something slightly off. It had a sharpness to it, one that immediately alerted my senses. Above me, I heard movement. Footsteps from the upstairs unit aligned precisely with the appearance of the scent and a subtle change in airflow.
I already knew that the ceiling light fixtures in my unit were open to the wall cavity above as there appears to be no insulation, no proper seal, just an open architectural conduit.
I know this because of the speed and strength of the chemical odor’s arrival after movement from the unit above. If insulation were fully intact above the fixture, it would act as a barrier to vapor transfer, especially for semi-volatile compounds. But the immediacy of symptom onset and the clarity of the odor suggest either a complete lack of insulation, insulation that has been disturbed or removed, or a deliberately maintained airflow path. It’s also possible that the ceiling cavity itself is functioning like a plenum: an open space that allows air and vapors to travel freely, especially when pressure or temperature differences are involved. In any case, the flow is active and direct, which rules out a fully sealed structure.
I’ve written about this before, and now, sitting in that quiet space of meditation, I experienced firsthand what I had only suspected. A chemical release had occurred, and the vector was architectural.
But the method wasn’t the only violation: it was the timing that sharpened the blow.
They had chosen to do this while I sat in prayer.
The Spiritual and Psychological Weight of Intrusion
Meditation is a sacred practice. It’s a moment of stillness, focus, and clarity. Most people instinctively respect this boundary. That’s what made the timing of this intrusion especially grotesque. If we are looking at it strategically or psychologically it was either staggeringly tone deaf or deeply intentional.
There’s a reason that targeting someone during a spiritual practice is such an egregious violation. Meditation is a state of heightened awareness, and any attempt to destabilize that focus or interfere with mental clarity in that context is a deliberate strike at emotional balance. There’s something deeply violating about being targeted in that vulnerable, sacred space. It’s not just about chemical exposure anymore: it’s symbolic. It communicates: ‘We’re listening. We know your schedule. We can act anytime.’
When you begin to time chemical intrusions precisely to coincide with someone’s personal or spiritual routine, it’s no longer random. It becomes a theater of control. It becomes desecration. Whether through ignorance or calculation, releasing something into someone’s living space during a time of prayer reframes the act as not just environmental assault but spiritual violation.
Evidence of Intentional Release Timing
During a 90 to 120 minute window after returning home, I detected four distinct chemical odors: each with a unique scent profile. What made the pattern especially telling was the consistent sequence of events: audible movement from the upstairs unit, followed immediately by the appearance of a new chemical odor in my space. This repeated four times in roughly two hours.
The timing isn’t coincidental. In each case, the chemical presence followed upstairs activity, not preceded it. That temporal alignment is key: it’s not just exposure, it’s orchestrated exposure.
Whether it’s experimentation, surveillance, or harassment, the pattern speaks to deliberate timing and targeted release. Changing compounds in short succession also complicates detection and testing, creating chemical interference and potentially producing synergistic or masking effects.
Strategic Saturation: Hallways, Windows, and the Kill Box Effect
In addition to the releases from the unit above, chemical intrusions have also been traced to the hallway. Compounds have been detected coming from the adjacent unit behind me, the unit beside me, and from apartments facing the grass courtyard behind. These aren’t isolated events: they represent coordinated dispersal from every surrounding axis: window, hallway, ceiling, and shared walls.
Each of these shared boundaries becomes a potential delivery point.
This isn’t random: it’s structural. What’s taking shape is a containment field: a classic “kill box” configuration where exposures are introduced from multiple sides: above, across, behind, and beside. The result? No matter where you move inside the unit, you remain within the exposure zone
Even the hallway, once used to ventilate, has become a dispersal point.
This tactic isn’t just spatial; it’s psychological. It attempts to close off every perceived escape route, creating not just exposure, but an environment of total saturation.
What Might Be in the Air?
One of the most persistent odors I’ve encountered carries that strange, deceptive “crispness”: a scent that registers at first like clean air, only to betray a chemical sharpness beneath. It’s subtle, fleeting, and wrong in precisely the way that points to ozone reactive compounds or aldehydes.
Based on its behavior, rapid dissipation, immediate symptom onset, and distinct sensory profile, these are the most likely culprits:
* Formaldehyde – Common in adhesives, treated wood, and composite materials. Highly irritating to mucous membranes even at low levels.
* Acetaldehyde – A pungent, slightly fruity solvent known to cause respiratory and neurological symptoms.
* Peracetic acid – A powerful sterilant used in low concentrations; sharp, acrid, and volatile.
* Limonene or linalool – Fragrance VOCs often marketed as “natural.” On contact with ozone, they transform into potent respiratory irritants.
* Propionaldehyde – Smells like disinfectant or sharp air; causes eye, nose, and throat irritation.
These chemicals don’t just vanish after release. They:
* Mimic or distort familiar scents, making detection harder.
* React with ambient ozone to create secondary pollutants, some even more toxic than the original compound.
* Persist in indoor environments, producing chronic low level exposure that can be hard to trace without targeted testing.
In short, what feels like “nothing” in the air can be something engineered to be nearly invisible until your body reacts to it.
Fragrance VOCs: More Than Just Scent
When people think of fragrance, they often think of pleasant smells: citrus, florals, something labeled “fresh linen.” But in reality, many of these so called scents are complex chemical cocktails. Fragrance VOCs (volatile organic compounds) don’t just linger in the air; they interact with it. And once airborne, they can have real, measurable effects on human health, especially when used intentionally to mask or manipulate.
Fragrance VOCs are often used to:
* Mask the presence of more harmful or reactive compounds
* Synergize with other chemicals to create new, less detectable blends
* Confuse odor perception or obscure the original point of release
Many of these compounds, like limonene, linalool, and geraniol, are not benign. While they may start off as relatively low toxicity ingredients, they can oxidize on contact with ozone or other air pollutants, forming secondary compounds that are far more harmful.
Health impacts can include:
* Respiratory irritation (wheezing, coughing, airway inflammation)
* Neurological symptoms (headaches, dizziness, fatigue, disorientation)
* Dermatological reactions (rashes, burning sensations, itching)
* Sensory confusion (loss of smell sensitivity, distorted scent detection)
In other words, when you smell “clean,” you may be smelling something engineered to conceal and confuse. And that scent? It isn’t inert—it’s chemically active, and in some cases, biologically aggressive.
How We’ll Be Testing
We’re initiating a full round of environmental testing using standard forensic techniques:
1. Wipe sampling inside the ceiling fixture and wall cavity: to detect chemical residues on surfaces (drywall, trim, wiring).
2. Passive air sampling with VOC badges: to capture airborne compounds as they naturally off-gas.
3. Material testing (optional): If needed, we’ll extract insulation or drywall for GC-MS (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) lab analysis.
These methods are used in industrial hygiene, sick building syndrome investigations, and even law enforcement.
This testing strategy wasn’t chosen at random: it directly matches the behavior of the compounds I’ve described. Each sample point corresponds to a known or suspected path of exposure, ensuring that we’re targeting not just the symptoms, but the source.
Can They Clean It Up?
Yes, they might try. But any attempt to “clean” the space, whether from above or through unauthorized entry, could actually strengthen the case. Chemical intrusions don’t just disappear; they leave traces. Cleaning agents, VOC neutralizers, or even masking fragrances leave their own residues. And those residues are detectable.
Non-targeted lab analysis methods like GC-MS (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) are designed to catch not just the expected toxins, but unexpected compounds and byproducts. If they scrub, wipe, or spray, that chemical fingerprint still gets recorded, just layered.
The more they try to erase the intrusion, the more visible it becomes. Which is why trying to “clean” the evidence is not just futile: it’s reckless.
Securing the Scene: Cameras and Lock Changes
Given the architecture of this intrusion and the repeated access through shared structures, security isn’t just about health: it’s about evidence preservation. I’ve installed cameras focused on key entry points and common areas. I’ve changed locks in my unit. These actions serve three purposes:
* Preventing unauthorized entry that could alter the physical environment or tamper with potential evidence before law enforcement, code enforcement as well as other agencies have had an opportunity to complete investigations and inspections.
* Creating timestamped visual records of movement in spaces adjacent to the point of intrusion.
* Signaling that this is now a monitored environment not a passive victim space.
Because the structure itself has become the weapon (wall cavities, ceiling light fixtures, outlets), the next step for the coordinated actors may be internal access: cleaning, neutralizing, or rearranging the source within my unit. Any attempt to enter the unit, especially using the landlord’s key or under the guise of maintenance, could constitute an additional layer of legal liability: including unauthorized entry, tampering with a potential evidence scene, and attempted destruction of material evidence.
Encapsulation and Chemical Behavior
If the chemicals were truly encapsulated, sealed off from air, they wouldn’t be detectable by odor. The fact that I could smell them indicates either a breach in the seal or that they were never encapsulated in the first place. Many VOCs and semi-VOCs can be encapsulated in microcapsules or dispersal systems, but those systems degrade with heat, pressure, or age.
Once released, the vapors interact with the surrounding environment, and their movement leaves a trace. VOCs can adhere to porous materials like drywall, insulation, wiring jackets, and even household dust. That traceable residue is precisely why this was such a foolish tactic. The easiest thing to prove in an environmental investigation is the presence of these compounds in wall cavities and fixtures.
Why This Matters for You
If you live in an apartment, condo, or any building with shared walls, floors, or ceilings, you are not insulated from what your neighbors do or from what passes through the architecture. Chemical intrusion isn’t always visible, and often it’s not even odorous. But it can still affect you. And it can be proven.
If you’re experiencing symptoms, headaches, dizziness, burning eyes, fatigue, and suspect your space may be compromised, there’s a process for uncovering what’s happening:
* Start by mapping the architecture: which walls, ceilings, or fixtures are shared with other units.
* Monitor the timing of symptoms. Note any correlation with movement, sounds, or changes in air or smell.
* Use wipe sampling and passive air badges to collect physical evidence. These tools detect chemical residues and airborne VOCs at the point of entry: outlets, vents, light fixtures, or wall gaps.
* Keep meticulous documentation: dates, times, symptoms, observations, airflow patterns, and photos.
What you’re sensing isn’t imaginary. It’s physiological. And it’s traceable.
Legal Implications: This Is a Felony
Why anyone would believe they could live above another person and subject them to chemical intrusion through shared building cavities is beyond comprehension. But let’s be clear: this isn’t just morally repugnant: it’s criminal. In Oregon, these actions meet the threshold for multiple felony charges:
• Assault in the Second Degree (ORS 163.175): If someone intentionally causes physical injury using a dangerous or harmful substance, it qualifies as a felony assault.
• Unlawful Use of a Weapon (ORS 166.220): Oregon law recognizes the use of toxic or harmful chemical agents as a form of weaponized assault.
• Reckless Endangerment (ORS 163.195): Knowingly creating a substantial risk of serious physical injury through chemical exposure also constitutes a criminal offense.
• Criminal Conspiracy: If multiple individuals coordinate these actions, they may face enhanced charges for conspiracy or organized misconduct.
• Landlord Negligence and Civil Liability: The landlord was present in the building today. As the property owner and manager, he bears legal responsibility for ensuring tenant safety. That includes responding promptly to tenant reports of hazardous conditions , especially potential chemical exposure, by initiating environmental assessment and remediation. His failure to take those steps constitutes to not just negligence, but potential liability. Had he fulfilled that obligation, inspectors would have evaluated the ceiling light fixtures and wall cavities during any thorough inspection. When a tenant identifies likely points of entry, such as light fixtures, wall sockets, or ceiling cavities, those areas become standard targets for inspection. His inaction raises serious concerns about complicity and enabling chemical intrusion.
What You’re Really Seeing Here Isn’t Just Tactics - It’s Character
The nature of this operation, if we can call it that, speaks to something darker than simple strategy or enforcement. It suggests a perverse thrill in control, cruelty without provocation, and a deep detachment from humanity.
This isn’t just toxic behavior: it’s sadism. Because who does this to a stranger? Who interferes with someone’s health, peace, body, and even their air? Not someone guided by conscience. Not someone grounded in a spiritual or moral tradition.
People with ethical grounding don’t launch chemical assaults on people during prayer. They don’t try to collapse someone’s mental and physical equilibrium over weeks or months. They don’t weaponize architecture. They don’t need to. And they certainly don’t take pleasure in it.
This is the kind of behavior that reveals not just a moral vacuum, but a gleeful participation in harm. It’s sadism in plain clothes. The real question isn’t, “Why would someone do this?” It’s, “What kind of inner void needs this to feel powerful?”
This isn’t just a tactic or a strategy: it’s a failure of conscience. A failure of empathy. Because to do this to another human being, someone you don’t know, someone who’s done nothing to you, requires a level of spiritual and moral erosion that can’t be explained by ignorance alone. It takes detachment from your own humanity.
And whatever you believe in, justice, decency, karma, or simple cause and effect, you don’t escape that kind of harm without consequence.
Command and Competence: A Strategic Breakdown
What this also reveals is a shocking level of incompetence by whoever is orchestrating this operation. The individual above me is clearly a low-level operative not a private contractor, likely with no relevant training, and obviously no grounding in basic chemistry or physics. But the real failure isn’t hers: it belongs to whoever gave the order. Because from a strategic standpoint, using shared wall cavities as a delivery vector for airborne chemicals is one of the most easily proven methods of intrusion. These compounds don’t just vanish. They absorb into drywall, wiring jackets, insulation, and dust. They linger. They build up. And they leave a trail that can be traced. This isn’t cunning: it’s reckless. And when the testing is done, the evidence won’t just imply chemical intrusion. It will confirm it. So if this was supposed to be a covert operation, it’s already failed. Whoever approved it green‑lit a strategic disaster: exposed, traceable, and running under the assumptions of ignorance.
They chose to chemically assault me during evening meditation: a deliberate act carried out in a moment meant for stillness and clarity. That choice didn’t just violate a boundary; it exposed both their intent and their ignorance. Even after being exposed, they didn’t stop. They persisted as the evening went on, and in doing so, they transformed recklessness and incompetence into evidence, and arrogance into potentially verifiable proof.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit drtamaradixon.substack.com
