Never Seen It Podcast

In this episode, we finally tackle Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, a film that has only grown more divisive with time. We approach it not just as a Tarantino film, but as a meditation on Hollywood nostalgia, aging masculinity, and the mythmaking power of cinema itself.

We start by talking about the film’s loose, meandering structure and how it operates more like a hangout movie than a traditional narrative. Rather than building toward constant plot escalation, the movie asks us to live alongside Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth as they drift through late-1960s Los Angeles. For some of us, that vibe is intoxicating; for others, it can feel indulgent and self-satisfied.

We spend a lot of time on Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance as Rick Dalton, breaking down how his insecurity, desperation, and occasional self-awareness make him one of Tarantino’s most human characters. His fear of irrelevance hits especially hard in a story obsessed with the end of an era. We contrast that with Brad Pitt’s Cliff Booth, cool, capable, and intentionally opaque, and debate whether the character is aspirational, troubling, or both.

Margot Robbie’s Sharon Tate becomes a major point of discussion as well. We examine Tarantino’s choice to portray her more as a presence than a fully fleshed-out character, and whether that approach feels respectful, reductive, or somewhere in between. Her scenes embody the film’s nostalgia but also raise questions about agency and perspective.

Naturally, we dig into Tarantino’s revisionist history and the insane third act. We talk about why rewriting real-world violence into cathartic fantasy has become such a defining feature of his later career, and whether Once Upon a Time in Hollywood earns that ending emotionally and thematically.

By the end, we land in a complicated place. We admire the craft, performances, and atmosphere, even as we wrestle with the film’s pacing, indulgence, and tonal choices. It’s a movie we don’t entirely love, but one we can’t stop thinking about, which might be the most Tarantino outcome possible.

In this episode, we sit down to discuss Left-Handed Girl, the 2025 film directed by Shih-Ching Tsou, making her long-awaited solo directorial debut after years of collaboration with Sean Baker (Take Out, Tangerine, Anora). The film follows a mother and her two daughters as they relocate to Taipei to open a noodle stand in a bustling night market, hoping for a fresh start—only to find that family secrets, tradition, and unresolved trauma come with them.

We talk about how Left-Handed Girl uses the idea of left-handedness as both a literal and symbolic device, touching on cultural superstition, childhood imagination, and the way shame and fear can be passed down through generations. The character of I-Jing becomes a fascinating lens for how kids internalize adult anxieties, sometimes in playful ways, sometimes in destructive ones.

Visually, we break down how the film was shot largely on an iPhone, and why it never feels like a gimmick. Instead, the vibrant colors, natural lighting, and fluid camera movement make Taipei feel alive. The night markets, streets, and small apartments aren’t just settings—they’re characters. We discuss how limited resources, small crews, and real locations actually enhance the authenticity of the film rather than holding it back.

We also share insights from the San Diego Asian Film Festival, where the film screened and where Shih-Ching Tsou participated in a Q&A, including the revelation that Left-Handed Girl had been in development for nearly two decades. That long gestation shows in the confidence of the storytelling and the emotional precision of the performances—especially from the young lead, who delivers one of the most natural child performances we’ve seen in recent years.

Throughout the episode, we reflect on why films like Left-Handed Girl are so inspiring for independent filmmakers, how Sean Baker’s influence can be felt without overpowering Tsou’s voice, and why this quiet, observational drama lingers long after the credits roll. If you’re interested in Asian cinema, indie filmmaking, or character-driven storytelling, this is one we highly recommend.

Join our Discord!

In this episode of Never Seen It, we finally sit down with Joe Dante’s Gremlins (1984), a movie that somehow balances Christmas cheer, creature-feature horror, slapstick comedy, and sharp social commentary all at once.

We talk about watching Gremlins through fresh eyes, especially for those of us who only remembered scattered images from childhood like Gizmo in the toy car, the bar scene, or Stripe causing chaos. Rewatching it now, we explore how the film functions as both a holiday movie and a subversive horror film, complete with genuinely dark moments hiding under its family-friendly reputation.

The conversation digs into practical effects and puppetry, praising how the gremlins’ physical presence gives the movie a texture that modern CGI often can’t replicate. We also highlight how the green blood, exaggerated violence, and cartoon logic allowed the film to push boundaries while still landing a PG rating.

We examine the film’s Reagan-era themes, including American consumerism, corporate greed, and authority figures who are hilariously useless when things go wrong. That naturally leads us into a candid discussion about the movie’s problematic racial elements, particularly how Eastern mysticism and warnings are ignored and what that says about Western arrogance baked into the story.

We also connect Gremlins to its cinematic lineage, including Chris Columbus’s original script, Steven Spielberg’s producer influence, Jerry Goldsmith’s iconic score, and how the film echoes earlier gremlin myths, The Twilight Zone, and even Bugs Bunny cartoons.

Of course, we can’t avoid some of the movie’s most infamous moments, including Phoebe Cates’ wildly dark monologue, the bar scene chaos, and the sheer audacity of calling this a Christmas movie. We wrap things up with final ratings, thoughts on rewatchability, and whether Gremlins still works for new generations, including whether it’s safe or insane to show it to kids.

Whether you’re a lifelong fan or watching it for the first time, Gremlins proves that holiday movies don’t have to be wholesome to be unforgettable.

In this end-of-year wrap-up episode of the Never Seen It Podcast, we take a step back from our usual deep dives and instead run through a rapid-fire list of movies that stood out to us this year, an intentionally uncomfortable storyfilms we watched, argued about, and couldn’t stop thinking about, even if they never got a full episode of their own.

We kick things off by reflecting on the sheer volume of movies released this year and why this episode exists in the first place: there’s simply too much great cinema to cover everything in depth. That leads us into a broader conversation about what we’re excited to see next year, including upcoming releases, returning franchises, and how modern studios are increasingly blurring the line between filmmaking and corporate branding.

One of the central discussions revolves around Eddington, a deeply polarizing film set during the early days of the pandemic. We break down Joaquin Phoenix’s unsettling performance as a small-town sheriff, Pedro Pascal’s role as a politically charged mayor, and how the film layers social unrest, tribal land jurisdiction, and media spectacle into a story that’s intentionally uncomfortable. While not all of us landed in the same place on the movie, the conversation highlights how messy, challenging films can still be worth engaging with.

From there, we pivot into a nostalgic but revealing discussion about Ghost World and the evolution of color in cinema. We talk about how films from the late ’90s and early 2000s embraced bold, vibrant color palettes—even when the characters themselves were cynical or emotionally detached—and how modern movies and TV shows often favor muted, gray color grading. This sparks a broader conversation about “millennial gray,” production design, and how visual storytelling subtly affects how we emotionally experience films.

One of the biggest moments of the episode comes when we talk about watching Jaws for the first time. We dig into why Steven Spielberg’s 1975 classic still works so well today, how its themes of political denial and public safety feel eerily modern, and why its restraint—especially the limited use of the shark—makes it more terrifying than many contemporary horror films. We also unpack its massive cultural influence, from John Williams’ iconic score to references that continue popping up in movies, TV shows, and pop culture decades later.

Throughout the episode, we weave in personal anecdotes, side tangents, and genuine laughs—whether we’re talking about movie theaters, live concert screenings, classic directors, or the slow realization that we’re all getting older. We wrap things up by thanking listeners for sticking with us, shouting out new followers, and reflecting on the fact that the podcast has now been running for over five years.

This episode is less about rankings and more about celebrating why we love movies in the first place—how they linger, how they change with time, and how watching them together makes the experience even better.

In this episode, we dive deep into the film’s powerful and unsettling portrayal of schizophrenia, paying special attention to how the sound design creates an authentic sense of what it feels like to hear literal voices in your head. We talk about how the film uses audio to make the audience experience the same eerie confusion, fear, and disorientation that someone with schizophrenia might face.

We also explore the theme of secrets and how both central characters are hiding major parts of their lives from each other. Lucy Liu’s character is carrying a significant secret about her health, while her son struggles silently with symptoms he does not fully understand. We discuss how these unspoken truths build emotional walls between them and how the film uses these barriers to highlight the importance of communication in relationships.

Throughout the conversation, we look at how the lack of openness intensifies their struggles and how their journey reflects real-world challenges around mental health, trust, and vulnerability. We share our takeaways on why empathy and understanding are essential when dealing with mental health issues and how better communication could have changed the trajectory of their story.

If you’re interested in mental health representation in film, the psychology of sound design, or character-driven storytelling, this episode provides a thoughtful, engaging, and insightful breakdown of how the movie tackles schizophrenia, secrets, and emotional connection.

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

In this episode, we take a deep dive into The Black Phone and unpack the film’s blend of real-world horror and supernatural mystery. We explore how Derrickson uses 1970s true-crime anxieties, child abductions, and local paranoia to ground the story’s paranormal elements, while also asking whether the film fully commits to either side of its identity. We break down Ethan Hawke’s chilling performance as The Grabber and discuss why his motives, rituals, and connection to the black phone itself remain so ambiguous. We question whether the movie intentionally leaves major narrative gaps in hopes of expanding into a franchise—especially since many elements feel like setup for a larger mythology that didn’t materialize until years later when the sequel finally arrived. We also get into the design of The Grabber’s masks, the concept of “naughty boy,” and Finney’s mysterious ability to hear the phone. Does it imply something supernatural about him? Was he always meant to be the final victim? And does the film subtly tease the Grabber’s transformation into a more mythic, Freddy-Krueger-like entity? These theories are all on the table, and we compare them to what the film actually provides onscreen. Finally, we discuss how the movie uses its short runtime—whether it’s lean and effective, or whether it sacrifices crucial character depth and world-building. With so many ideas introduced but not fully explored, we talk about what The Black Phone 2 might clarify, expand, or even retcon after the first film’s unresolved threads. We examine the film’s themes, unanswered questions, and what truly makes it resonate with viewers, even when parts of the story feel underdeveloped. If you’ve ever wondered what The Grabber actually wants—or what the franchise could become—you’re in the right place.

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

• Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)
• Justn - @GhostNerd88
• Alex - @dailydares
• Donnie - @_donnieappleseed
• Arnold - @arniecallego

In this episode, we're cracking open the containers and digging into the 2004 (released 2008) indie gem, Take Out, co-directed by the brilliant Sean Baker and Shih-Ching Tsou. We are the Never Seen It podcast, and we're all about fresh perspectives on films we should have seen by now.

We start by discussing why we chose this film, connecting it to the San Diego Asian Film Festival and the new work from co-director Shi Qing Su. From there, we sink our teeth into the movie's simple yet powerful plot: an undocumented Chinese immigrant, Ming, must pay back a smuggling debt by the end of a single, grueling day working as a deliveryman in New York City.

Our conversation covers the signature Sean Baker filmmaking style—the gritty, guerrilla-style, cinema verité approach that makes you feel the rain-soaked streets and claustrophobic apartments of New York. We talk about how the city itself becomes a character, a relentless force that Ming must battle against.

We delve deep into the film's themes, including:

The immigrant struggle in America and the immense pressure to provide for a family left behind.

The brutal reality of the service industry and the often-unseen hustle of delivery workers.

The powerful social realism that makes the story feel less like fiction and more like a documentary.

The stark contrast between life pre- and post-smartphones, and how technology has changed the nature of this kind of work.

We share our personal connections to the film's themes, from our own experiences in the food service industry to financial hustles that echo Ming's desperate race against the clock. We also highlight the incredible collaboration between Sean Baker and Shi Qing Su, noting her crucial role and continued influence in his later works like Tangerine, The Florida Project, and Red Rocket.

Tune in for our full Letterboxd-style reviews, Arnold's official "Snooze-a-Meter" rating, and a heartfelt discussion on why this micro-budget film remains so impactful and relevant today. This is a must-listen for fans of independent cinema, social realist films, and anyone who wants to understand the roots of Sean Baker's filmography.

In this episode of the Never Seen It podcast, we sit down together and unpack Ryan Coogler’s 2025 vampire horror film Sinners. We went into this one with a mix of hype and curiosity, and the conversation pretty much exploded in every direction because the movie gives us a lot to work with. We talk about how the film blends genres, how it holds back on revealing its horror elements until almost an hour in, and how that decision affects the pacing. Some of us loved the slow burn, and some of us felt the setup went on a little long, but we all agreed that once the movie kicks into gear, it really delivers.

One of the biggest talking points for us is the look of the film. Coogler and cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw shot Sinners on IMAX and Ultra Panavision 65 millimeter film, which blew us away when we realized it. We dig into how the film uses the widest lenses available and leans into those massive Delta landscapes and intimate church and juke joint sequences. We talk about how switching formats subtly prepares the viewer for what is coming next, and how even if you are not actively watching for those choices, they hit you on a subconscious level.

Music became one of our favorite parts of the discussion. Sinners is soaked in it, from blues to jazz to gospel to spoken word. We get into how the film treats music as identity, history, and survival. There is a whole section of the movie that shows the evolution of Black music across generations, and we all thought it was one of the most magical scenes in the film. We also loved the casting of Saul Williams as the preacher father. Several of us were huge fans of his slam poetry work, so seeing him here sparked a whole tangent about spoken word, performance, and even a side journey into Stomp and Blue Man Group.

We also spend a lot of time talking about character work, especially Michael B. Jordan playing twin brothers Smoke and Stack. We talk about their dynamic, how we wanted more time with them, and how Jordan brings effortless charisma to both roles. We also get into Sammie, played by newcomer Miles Caton in his first major film role, and how his performance stands out. That leads us into a conversation about the Cyclops guitar he uses and how it becomes a symbolic object in the story.

A major theme we explore is the film’s metaphor around vampirism, culture, and exploitation. The idea of vampires as soul suckers of Black culture really hits us, and we talk about how making the vampire villains Irish adds another layer because of their own history with discrimination. We also debate whether the vampires are truly evil or simply another community seeking survival. That leads into a deeper talk about freedom, equality, and how the film frames immortality as another form of bondage. Alex brings up how becoming a vampire might prevent you from moving on and seeing the loved ones waiting for you on the other side, which ties directly into Smoke’s story and the film’s emotional core.

We also discuss the film’s religious elements. Donnie brings up the preacher’s warning about blues being devil music and how the real message is tied more to the environment and associations than the music itself. We talk about how Sinners uses scripture, temptation, and spiritual symbolism to highlight cultural pressure and manipulation.

A big part of our conversation focuses on awards chances, Oscar snubs, and how prestige shapes the fate of movies like this. We compare Sinners to other genre films that got ignored and talk about how award shows miss the mark on horror and culturally rich stories.

As always, we have plenty of tangents, jokes, and off the rails moments. We talk about vinyl collections, VHS tapes, Comic Con merch flips, pyramid schemes, and even what music we all put on when we are setting a mood. There are a lot of laughs, a few chaotic moments from the live chat, and a whole lot of love for the movie.

By the end, we give our ratings. Several of us landed in the four to five star range. Adrian gives his detailed review, calling the film stylish, well acted, thematically rich, and respectful of its material even if the pacing is a little top heavy. We all agreed that Sinners swings big and lands more often than not.

If you love movies with big ideas, stacked performances, and conversations that go from deep analysis to absolute nonsense, this is a good one.

Join our Discord
Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more at www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
  TikTok
  Facebook
  Twitch
  Instagram

Follow us across all social media
Adrian - @b00tz2big / b00ks2big on TikTok
Justn - @GhostNerd88
Alex - @dailydares
Donnie - @_donnieappleseed
Arnold - @arniecallego

In this episode of the Never Seen It podcast, the hosts take a deep dive into the highly anticipated horror film Weapons. As one of the most talked-about horror releases of the year, Weapons has sparked widespread discussion and debate—and the hosts explore exactly why. From its chilling atmosphere to its multi-perspective storytelling, this episode unpacks the film’s many layers and what makes it such a standout entry in modern horror.

The conversation kicks off with the technical challenges of streaming and the hype surrounding Weapons before moving into a detailed breakdown of the film’s themes. Parental fear emerges as a central thread, underscoring how the movie weaponizes emotional vulnerability. The hosts also examine the subversion of traditional villain archetypes, the film’s haunting visual aesthetic, and how its nonlinear storytelling and multiple POVs enhance its emotional impact.

Symbolism plays a major role in Weapons—from the imagery of the assault rifle to the recurring triangle motif—inviting multiple interpretations and deeper readings of fear, control, and morality. The hosts discuss how these symbols connect to broader cultural and psychological ideas, including the Mandela Effect, collective memory, and how real-world trauma influences art.

The discussion expands to include the evolution of horror filmmaking and how Weapons fits into the genre’s current trajectory of innovation. Touching on moments of humor, surreal tension, and emotional intensity, the hosts reflect on how Weapons balances horror with humanity. They also explore how childhood trauma and societal anxieties shape the film’s characters and story arcs, creating a narrative that’s as unsettling as it is thought-provoking.

By the end of the episode, the hosts share their final thoughts and ratings—debating the film’s effectiveness, its place among recent horror masterpieces, and the lingering questions it leaves behind. Weapons is more than just another horror flick—it’s a dark mirror held up to modern fears, and this episode unpacks every loaded frame.

Join our Discord!

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs and more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

In this episode, we revisit The Crow — one of the most haunting and beloved cult classics of the ’90s. We talk about the film’s gothic atmosphere, Alex Proyas’ stunning direction, and how Brandon Lee’s final role became a powerful symbol of art born from grief.

We break down The Crow beat by beat, analyzing its visual storytelling, miniature cityscapes, and how the movie captures loss and vengeance through poetic, comic-book noir. We also discuss the original comic by James O’Barr and the deep emotional pain that inspired it.

From the eerie coincidence of Hollywood once pitching The Crow as a Michael Jackson musical, to the movie’s groundbreaking soundtrack featuring Nine Inch Nails and The Cure, we unpack the cultural legacy that keeps fans returning again and again.

Of course, we take time to remember Brandon Lee — celebrating his legacy, his artistry, and the profound impact his passing had on both the production and the entire film industry.

Whether you’ve seen The Crow once or a hundred times, this episode will remind you why it still resonates with audiences who “can’t rain all the time.”

Listen now wherever you get your podcasts and join the conversation.

#TheCrow #BrandonLee #CultClassic #FilmPodcast #MovieDiscussion

Join our Discord!

Follow us across all social media:

Adrian - @b00tz2big/b00ks2big(TikTok)

Justn - @GhostNerd88

Alex - @dailydares

Donnie - @_donnieappleseed

Arnold - @arniecallego

Check out our website for episodes, short-form reviews, blogs a,nd more @ www.neverseenitpodcast.com

• YouTube
• TikTok 
• Facebook
• Twitch
• Instagram