
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


With the First Step Act of 2018 came the great hope of expanded grounds and use of "Compassionate Release." Judges were offered the promise of wider discretion to give deserving clients a second look at sentencing.
But, the Supreme Court just made compassionate release a whole lot harder to get, because in two back-to-back decisions — Fernandez and Rutherford — the Court slammed the door on two of the most frequently used grounds for eligibility.
In this episode, Passon convenes two of the sharpest minds in federal sentencing — regular guest Mark Allenbaugh and returning star Prof. Doug Berman — for a deep-dive reaction. Together, we break down what each case actually holds, where the majority reasoning goes wrong, why the dissents matter, and — critically — what still works. Because even though it seems the door is shrinking--- it hasn't closed.
If you litigate compassionate release, this episode is required listening!
IN THIS EPISODE:
LINKS:
Sentencing Law and Policy – A new home for SL&P (Berman's Blog)
A great substack where Prof. Berman frequently contributes: Sentencing Matters Substack | DAB | Substack
On that note, here's a great SM Substack piece from today on this very issue: https://open.substack.com/pub/sentencing/p/textualism-in-name-policymaking-in?r=1f0z1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Link to Judge Block's Book, A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It, on Amazon: https://a.co/d/07xJD1zs
Drugs on the Docket, Season 3: Excited for start to Season Three of "Drugs on the Docket" podcast | Sentencing Law and Policy
Set for Sentencing is heading to Substack! We have not officially launched, but by all means, subscribe for future awesomeness coming down the pike: https://substack.com/@dougpassonlaw
By Doug Passon5
3030 ratings
With the First Step Act of 2018 came the great hope of expanded grounds and use of "Compassionate Release." Judges were offered the promise of wider discretion to give deserving clients a second look at sentencing.
But, the Supreme Court just made compassionate release a whole lot harder to get, because in two back-to-back decisions — Fernandez and Rutherford — the Court slammed the door on two of the most frequently used grounds for eligibility.
In this episode, Passon convenes two of the sharpest minds in federal sentencing — regular guest Mark Allenbaugh and returning star Prof. Doug Berman — for a deep-dive reaction. Together, we break down what each case actually holds, where the majority reasoning goes wrong, why the dissents matter, and — critically — what still works. Because even though it seems the door is shrinking--- it hasn't closed.
If you litigate compassionate release, this episode is required listening!
IN THIS EPISODE:
LINKS:
Sentencing Law and Policy – A new home for SL&P (Berman's Blog)
A great substack where Prof. Berman frequently contributes: Sentencing Matters Substack | DAB | Substack
On that note, here's a great SM Substack piece from today on this very issue: https://open.substack.com/pub/sentencing/p/textualism-in-name-policymaking-in?r=1f0z1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Link to Judge Block's Book, A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It, on Amazon: https://a.co/d/07xJD1zs
Drugs on the Docket, Season 3: Excited for start to Season Three of "Drugs on the Docket" podcast | Sentencing Law and Policy
Set for Sentencing is heading to Substack! We have not officially launched, but by all means, subscribe for future awesomeness coming down the pike: https://substack.com/@dougpassonlaw

8,454 Listeners

3,541 Listeners

87,529 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

2,374 Listeners

32,328 Listeners

7,230 Listeners

12,633 Listeners

8,090 Listeners

5,866 Listeners

15,950 Listeners

10,745 Listeners

429 Listeners

7,020 Listeners

1,090 Listeners