
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


With the First Step Act of 2018 came the great hope of expanded grounds and use of "Compassionate Release." Judges were offered the promise of wider discretion to give deserving clients a second look at sentencing.
But, the Supreme Court just made compassionate release a whole lot harder to get, because in two back-to-back decisions — Fernandez and Rutherford — the Court slammed the door on two of the most frequently used grounds for eligibility.
In this episode, Passon convenes two of the sharpest minds in federal sentencing — regular guest Mark Allenbaugh and returning star Prof. Doug Berman — for a deep-dive reaction. Together, we break down what each case actually holds, where the majority reasoning goes wrong, why the dissents matter, and — critically — what still works. Because even though it seems the door is shrinking--- it hasn't closed.
If you litigate compassionate release, this episode is required listening!
IN THIS EPISODE:
LINKS:
Sentencing Law and Policy – A new home for SL&P (Berman's Blog)
A great substack where Prof. Berman frequently contributes: Sentencing Matters Substack | DAB | Substack
On that note, here's a great SM Substack piece from today on this very issue: https://open.substack.com/pub/sentencing/p/textualism-in-name-policymaking-in?r=1f0z1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Link to Judge Block's Book, A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It, on Amazon: https://a.co/d/07xJD1zs
Drugs on the Docket, Season 3: Excited for start to Season Three of "Drugs on the Docket" podcast | Sentencing Law and Policy
Set for Sentencing is heading to Substack! We have not officially launched, but by all means, subscribe for future awesomeness coming down the pike: https://substack.com/@dougpassonlaw
By Doug Passon5
3030 ratings
With the First Step Act of 2018 came the great hope of expanded grounds and use of "Compassionate Release." Judges were offered the promise of wider discretion to give deserving clients a second look at sentencing.
But, the Supreme Court just made compassionate release a whole lot harder to get, because in two back-to-back decisions — Fernandez and Rutherford — the Court slammed the door on two of the most frequently used grounds for eligibility.
In this episode, Passon convenes two of the sharpest minds in federal sentencing — regular guest Mark Allenbaugh and returning star Prof. Doug Berman — for a deep-dive reaction. Together, we break down what each case actually holds, where the majority reasoning goes wrong, why the dissents matter, and — critically — what still works. Because even though it seems the door is shrinking--- it hasn't closed.
If you litigate compassionate release, this episode is required listening!
IN THIS EPISODE:
LINKS:
Sentencing Law and Policy – A new home for SL&P (Berman's Blog)
A great substack where Prof. Berman frequently contributes: Sentencing Matters Substack | DAB | Substack
On that note, here's a great SM Substack piece from today on this very issue: https://open.substack.com/pub/sentencing/p/textualism-in-name-policymaking-in?r=1f0z1k&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Link to Judge Block's Book, A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It, on Amazon: https://a.co/d/07xJD1zs
Drugs on the Docket, Season 3: Excited for start to Season Three of "Drugs on the Docket" podcast | Sentencing Law and Policy
Set for Sentencing is heading to Substack! We have not officially launched, but by all means, subscribe for future awesomeness coming down the pike: https://substack.com/@dougpassonlaw

8,463 Listeners

3,524 Listeners

87,518 Listeners

112,187 Listeners

2,365 Listeners

32,337 Listeners

7,231 Listeners

12,638 Listeners

8,105 Listeners

5,824 Listeners

16,172 Listeners

10,758 Listeners

425 Listeners

7,022 Listeners

1,092 Listeners