
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


New research published in the journal Global Change Biology raises alarming questions about the efficacy of forest carbon programs registered in California’s cap-and-trade program. Utilizing satellite imagery, particularly of forests in Northwest California, researchers have compared the carbon sequestered by forests versus what is claimed and have emerged with a concerning conclusion: forests registered in the offset program are overcounting the carbon that they are paid to protect.
Researcher Shane Coffield joins Gang Green to discuss his findings and the implications of his research on California’s carbon emission reduction strategy.
Support the show
By The Green Gang4.8
1515 ratings
New research published in the journal Global Change Biology raises alarming questions about the efficacy of forest carbon programs registered in California’s cap-and-trade program. Utilizing satellite imagery, particularly of forests in Northwest California, researchers have compared the carbon sequestered by forests versus what is claimed and have emerged with a concerning conclusion: forests registered in the offset program are overcounting the carbon that they are paid to protect.
Researcher Shane Coffield joins Gang Green to discuss his findings and the implications of his research on California’s carbon emission reduction strategy.
Support the show

91,297 Listeners

43,837 Listeners

8,801 Listeners

3,530 Listeners

18,397 Listeners

87,868 Listeners

6,122 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

24,585 Listeners

5,832 Listeners

15,506 Listeners

16,525 Listeners

7,014 Listeners

4,433 Listeners