FedSoc Forums

Nondelegation Doctrine Adds Another Good Year?


Listen Later

For many years, legal scholars have declared that the nondelegation doctrine is dead. Professor Cass Sunstein once quipped that the nondelegation doctrine had only "one good year" and more than 200 "bad ones." But that has changed recently. In 2024, the en banc Fifth Circuit held that the Federal Communications Commision's (FCC) Universal Service Fund is unconstitutional on nondelegation grounds. It was one of the only times since 1935 that a court has done so, and it appears that 2024 (and beyond) may turn out to be good years for the nondelegation doctrine.
Contrary to the FCC's argument, the en banc Fifth Circuit concluded that the Universal Service Fund operates as a tax, which only Congress has the power and authority to require. Regardless of the public policy that it seeks to advance, Congress cannot delegate this power to the FCC or to any other executive branch agency. The nondelegation doctrine has not been entirely dead for the last hundred years; courts often construe statutes so as not to invalidate them under the nondelegation doctrine. The en banc Fifth Circuit rejected that approach.
Does the canon in the common law of agency, mentioned by the Fifth Circuit, known as delegata potestas non potest delegari (Latin for “delegated power may not be delegated”), have any impact on the original meaning of the nondelegation doctrine? Assuming the nondelegation doctrine is valid, what are the standards that courts should look to when determining whether a statute is sufficiently intelligible? Do words like “in the public interest” or instructions for the agency to “provide reasonable regulations” provide sufficient guidance to agencies? What kind of principles can be applied that are also judicially enforceable?
If the Supreme Court affirms the Fifth Circuit, what will be the impact on other statutes? To discuss these important questions and others, Jeff Beelaert, a partner at Stein Mitchell, and Trent McCotter, a partner at Boyden Gray, will join us.
Featuring:

Jeffrey Beelaert, Partner, Stein Mitchell
Trent McCotter, Partner, Boyden Gray PLLC
Moderator: Devin Watkins, Attorney, Competitive Enterprise Institute

--
To register, click the link above.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

82 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,096 Listeners

Cato Daily Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Daily Podcast

961 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

City Journal Audio by Manhattan Institute

City Journal Audio

595 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by Ricochet

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

679 Listeners

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch by Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

2,792 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

678 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,776 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

822 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,801 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,757 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

370 Listeners

Capital Record by National Review

Capital Record

429 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

665 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

17 Listeners