Nyay Samachar

Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. 2025 INSC 1002

This landmark case examines whether the withdrawal of "deemed export benefits" under Para 8.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, and related DGFT notifications, qualify as a “Change in Law” under Article 13 of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). #supremecourt #contractlaw #electricitylaw

• • Welcome to Nyay Samachar! Today’s episode features a landmark Supreme Court judgment in Mahesh Chand (Dead) Through LRs vs. Brijesh Kumar & Ors. (2025 INSC 1005).

  • Focus on statutes: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order VII Rule 10), Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Sections 143 & 145).

  • Key legal issue: Jurisdiction of Civil vs. Revenue Courts on land leased for non-agricultural commercial purposes.

  • Supreme Court clarifies legal procedures for land use declarations.

  • Tune in for expert analysis on a 50-year-old legal dispute!

Supreme Court shakes up the rules! Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. vs Vinod & Ors. brings a new twist to compensation and land rights for transmission projects.

Supreme Court Strikes Balance on Stray Dogs: Shelter, Sterilisation and Safety. In this landmark judgement, the SC addresses growing menace of stray dogs on the streets of Delhi and NCR, and tragic impact on children’s lives. It highlights the delicate balance between animal welfare and the law. Listen to the decision that will become a milestone in legal and civic governance for the future. #animalwelfare #straydogs #publicsafety #supremecourt #latestjudgement

Sunil S/o Darshan Saberwal vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Bombay High Court on “LOOTERE” title dispute!

Can a film/web-series title be protected under copyright? What about producer association registrations? Tap to listen to audio summary of this case #medialaw #IPLaw #copyright #indianlaw

Sh. Shabuddin vs. State of Telangana 2025 INSC 999 - An important legal principle reaffirmed by the Supreme Court: Mere possession of alleged stolen property is NOT enough for conviction under Section 411 IPC. Listen to this audio summary to know what criminal jurisprudence demands … #section411IPC #evidencelaw ##supremecourt

TRANS GENDER PERSONS ENTITLED TO HAVE THEIR NAME, GENDER REFLECTED IN ALL EDUCATIONAL DOCS - MANIPUR HIGH COURT IN Dr. Beoncy Laishram vs. The State of Manipur & Ors. This case reinforces constitutional rights and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

Listen to the full judgment breakdown and stay updated with the latest in legal progress! #transgenderrights #manipurhighcourt #LGBTQjustice

🚨 BREAKING JUDGMENT 🚨 - Smt. Archana Patil vs. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) Cr. Petition No. 12777/2024

A trailblazing ruling from Karnataka High Court crushes outdated myths—POCSO Act is GENDER NEUTRAL! ⚖️

Sexual offenses against boys are real and punishable, no matter the perpetrator’s gender. Justice served loud and clear!

🎧 Listen to the full verdict that’s reshaping child protection law NOW!

In this landmark Supreme Court judgment of 2025, the apex court addressed a critical question of inheritance rights for tribal women and their legal heirs. The case of Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Sukhram & Ors. challenges the traditional denial of equal property rights to women of Scheduled Tribes under prevailing customs and laws. The Court decisively held that in the absence of any proven custom excluding female succession, principles of justice, equity, good conscience, and the constitutional mandate of equality under Article 14 require that tribal women and their heirs are entitled to an equal share in their ancestral property. This judgment marks a significant step forward in upholding gender equality, social justice, and the constitutional rights of tribal communities in India.

In this episode, we delve into the Supreme Court of India's recent judgment in the case of Smt. Uma Devi & Ors. vs. Sri Anand Kumar & Ors. (2025), a significant dispute involving partition and limitation laws in ancestral property.

The Court revisited the principles governing oral family settlements, the importance of registered sale deeds as constructive notice, and the scope of limitation for claims challenging long-standing property arrangements. This judgment reinforces the legal position that delay in asserting rights over immovable property, especially after registered transactions, can bar a suit for partition and possession. Join us for a detailed analysis of how the Supreme Court applied Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and limitation laws to dismiss a suit filed decades after an oral partition and several registered sales.