Nyay Samachar

This verdict spotlights the vital powers of the NCLT under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 to decisively intervene in cases of oppression and mismanagement, and reinforcing that technicalities must not deprive affected members of true justice. The Court restored NCLT’s order because procedural irregularities and fraud cannot be shielded by narrow jurisdictional views. #CompanyLaw #NCLT #SupremeCourt

The Court underscored the strict bar on anticipatory bail under Section 18 of the SC/ST Act when prima facie caste-based offences are made out. The judgment stresses that courts must not conduct a mini-trial or dilute statutory protections where the FIR shows humiliation in public view. #AnticipatoryBail #SupremeCourt #SCSTAct

Supreme Court shields prosecution under Section 138 NI Act, even for ‘SICK’ companies under SICA. Unless restraint orders specifically prohibit payment. The Court held that such mixed law that is fact issues must be proved at trial and early discharge is improper. This judgment stresses evidence-based justice and tightens standards for process recall. #SupremeCourt #NegotiableInstrumentsAc

Sushil Kr. Tiwari vs. Hare Ram Sah & Ors. 2025 INSC 1061 - The judgment delves deep into Section 223 and Section 464 of Cr.P.C., clarifying that procedural errors like misjoinder of charges or joint trial under Section 223 Cr.P.C. won’t vitiate a conviction unless actual prejudice or miscarriage of justice is proven, as per Section 464. The Court restored rigorous imprisonment under Section 376(2) IPC & Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act #CrPC #SupremeCourt #Section223 #Section464 #POCSO #IPC376

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in M/s Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. vs State of UP (2025 INSC 1060) turns a sharp spotlight on the mandatory statutory safeguards in environmental litigation. The Court held that any proceeding under the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 must strictly comply with sections 21, 22 and 19—ensuring the occupier’s right to notice, participation in sample collection, and an opportunity to contest findings. Any shortcut not only undermines justice but renders the entire process null and void. #StatutorySafeguards #EnvironmentalLaw #SupremeCourt #nyaysamachar

The Supreme Court has clarified a long-debated issue: Is a proprietorship concern distinct from its proprietor for the purpose of litigation? The Court ruled that suing the proprietor suffices and technical objections under Order XXX Rule 10 CPC cannot defeat substantive rights. #SupremeCourt #CPC #CivilProcedure

The Supreme Court’s latest ruling revisits critical issues of proof of marriage, legitimacy of heirs, burden of proof, and evidentiary value under Section 50 of the Evidence Act. With strong observations on presumption of marriage, revenue records, and adverse inference from silence in the witness box … #SupremeCourt #EvidenceAct #PropertyLaw

When justice hinges on circumstantial evidence and forensic lapses, the Supreme Court reminds us: doubt cannot replace proof. This landmark ruling underscores the chain of custody in DNA evidence, admissibility protocols, and the necessity of fair opportunity under Sec. 313 CrPC. #SupremeCourt ##CrPC #criminallaw

Ravindra Pratap Shahi v. State of U.P. (2025 INSC 1039) has pulled up High Courts for failing to deliver judgments long after hearings are concluded. 🚨

Reiterating Anil Rai v. State of Bihar (2001), the Court stressed that delayed pronouncements erode public faith in justice. ⚖️ Now, explicit timelines and accountability mechanisms are reinforced—ensuring judicial discipline and litigants’ trust. #SpeedyJustice #SupremeCourt #Judiciary

the Court upheld the rights of contractual Assistant Professors to receive the minimum pay scale, invoking Articles 14 & 39(d), Putti Lal (2006), Jagjit Singh (2017), Sabha Shanker Dube (2019). The judgment condemned years of disparity where qualified educators were paid just ₹30,000 while doing identical duties as ad-hoc/regular colleagues. 🔔 Landmark ruling for dignity of teachers and public education! #EqualPayForEqualWork #SupremeCourt #IndianConstitution