Opening Arguments

OA310: Citizenship and the Military and...


Listen Later

Today's Rapid Response Friday takes a look at the recent Trump Administration memorandum "clarifying" the rules on military citizenship for children born to U.S. employees -- largely, those in the armed forces -- serving overseas. Is it as bad as you've heard? (Yes.) Is it actually worse than that? (Yes.)

First, though, we continue to revisit the apportionment question discussed in Episode 307. Have we finally crowdsourced a solution? The answer may surprise you!

After that, it's time for a deep dive into the latest policy manual update from the department of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services "clarifying" that servicemembers living overseas don't actually count as "living in the United States." Will this cause Trump-supporting military members to vote for Elizabeth Warren in 2020? (No.) Should it? (Yes.) Is it way, way worse than you could possibly imagine? Oh yes.

After that, it's time for a very brief Andrew Was Wrong (the best kind!).

Then, it's time for an all-new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam, in which we have... something approaching "Don't Take Legal Advice From A Podcast" Law? You won't want to miss this question involving a disgruntled landlord and a put-upon law student. Can Thomas break his losing streak? Listen and find out!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at [email protected].

Show Notes & Links

  1. We first covered the potential apportionment crisis in Episode 307.
  2. You can read the latest policy manual update from the department of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for yourself.
  3. The relevant legal provisions of the Immigration and Naturalization Act are 8 U.S.C. § 1401, 8 U.S.C § 1431, and 8 U.S.C. § 1433.
  4. This is the August 15th, 2019 story about how the Trump administration continues to use the "out-of-wedlock" rule against LGBTQ couples.
  5. Finally, this is the garbage, racist National Review article on birthright citizenship, and this is U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S> 649 (1898).

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Opening ArgumentsBy Opening Arguments Media LLC

  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3

4.3

3,552 ratings


More shows like Opening Arguments

View all
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

3,518 Listeners

Cognitive Dissonance by Atheist and Skeptical News

Cognitive Dissonance

4,039 Listeners

The Scathing Atheist by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

The Scathing Atheist

3,208 Listeners

Skeptics with a K by Skeptic Media Limited

Skeptics with a K

431 Listeners

God Awful Movies by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

God Awful Movies

2,603 Listeners

The Skepticrat by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

The Skepticrat

1,987 Listeners

The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

The Lawfare Podcast

6,289 Listeners

Knowledge Fight by Knowledge Fight

Knowledge Fight

4,650 Listeners

Citation Needed by Citation Needed Media

Citation Needed

2,660 Listeners

UnJustified by MSW Media

UnJustified

7,637 Listeners

Cleanup on Aisle 45 with AG & Harry Dunn by MSW Media

Cleanup on Aisle 45 with AG & Harry Dunn

1,888 Listeners

Dear Old Dads by Eli Bosnick, Thomas Smith, Tom Curry

Dear Old Dads

526 Listeners

Where There's Woke by Thomas Smith

Where There's Woke

268 Listeners

Law and Chaos by Liz Dye

Law and Chaos

375 Listeners

The Know Rogan Experience by Cross Pond Productions

The Know Rogan Experience

776 Listeners