Opening Arguments

OA49: Why Originalists Don't Belong on the Supreme Court


Listen Later

In today's episode, we take a long look at the judicial philosophy of "originalism" made popular by former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and advocated by his would-be replacement. First, we begin with a question from Jodi, who asks Andrew for his opinion of LegalZoom and other law-in-a-box services.  Andrew gets a little emotional in his response.... Next, we break down originalism as a form of jurisprudence and examine why it is (1) internally incoherent and contradictory; (2) dangerous and unconstrained; and (3) contrary to the fundamental purpose of the judiciary.  Andrew's argument is that originalists do not belong on the Supreme Court.  Period. Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Takes the Bar Exam question #13 about hearsay.  Remember that TTTBE issues a new question every Friday, followed by the answer on next Tuesday's show.  Don't forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)! Recent Appearances: Andrew was a panel guest on The Thinking Atheist episode "Donald Trump's America," which you can listen to by clicking right here. Show Notes & Links
  1. Here are Andrew's two blog posts -- one about Legal Zoom and one about downloading contracts off the internet.  His law firm site is here.
  2. This Huffington Post piece quotes Scalia's 2008 interview with Nina Totenberg about the Eighth Amendment not prohibiting 18th-century forms of torture.
  3. Here's a link to the full text of the Federalist Papers.
  4. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
  5. United States v. Carolene Products, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
  6. Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 347-48 (2002) and opinion in Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997) are where he makes fun of citations to international law.
  7. Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991) is the infamous decision in which Scalia declared that the Eighth Amendment only bars punishments that are both "cruel" and "unusual in the Constitutional sense."
Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at [email protected]
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Opening ArgumentsBy Opening Arguments Media LLC

  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3
  • 4.3

4.3

3,520 ratings


More shows like Opening Arguments

View all
Skeptics with a K by Skeptic Media Limited

Skeptics with a K

429 Listeners

Cognitive Dissonance by Atheist and Skeptical News

Cognitive Dissonance

4,044 Listeners

The Scathing Atheist by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

The Scathing Atheist

3,194 Listeners

Serious Inquiries Only by seriouspod.com

Serious Inquiries Only

1,000 Listeners

The Skepticrat by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

The Skepticrat

1,981 Listeners

God Awful Movies by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm, LLC

God Awful Movies

2,574 Listeners

Knowledge Fight by Knowledge Fight

Knowledge Fight

4,493 Listeners

Citation Needed by Citation Needed Media

Citation Needed

2,635 Listeners

UnJustified by MSW Media

UnJustified

7,541 Listeners

D&D Minus by Puzzle in a Thunderstorm LLC

D&D Minus

1,087 Listeners

Cleanup on Aisle 45 with AG & Harry Dunn by MSW Media

Cleanup on Aisle 45 with AG & Harry Dunn

1,846 Listeners

Dear Old Dads by Eli Bosnick, Thomas Smith, Tom Curry

Dear Old Dads

516 Listeners

Where There's Woke by Thomas Smith

Where There's Woke

235 Listeners

Law and Chaos by Liz Dye

Law and Chaos

297 Listeners

The Know Rogan Experience by Cross Pond Productions

The Know Rogan Experience

697 Listeners