The challenge of meeting pastoral and spiritual needs in the fast pace and mobility of a large acute hospital is contrasted with the steadier hospice environment leading us to wonder about how to be sure that we are not favouring some folk over others in our visiting practice. Referrals are often the backbone of chaplaincies, but can this skew who gets to see us? On the one hand there may be gatekeepers who expedite a chaplaincy visit because of their own convictions on behalf of a patient, and on the other hand those who might seek to 'protect' their patients due to a misunderstanding of the inclusive pastoral nature of the role. There is also a danger of us following own preferences and developing a case load of visiting with patients with whom we feel most affinity. We discuss ways to keep chaplaincy open to all, open to immediate or transitory need, open to skeptics, so that we can strive to be fair and equal and alert to the bias and assumptions that can favour some over others.