
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist | Case No. 24-724 | Oral Argument Date: 11/4/25 | Docket Link: Here
OverviewA father seeks justice after his son, Army Staff Sergeant Ryan Hencely, was killed in a 2016 terrorist attack at Bagram Airfield. The Army's own investigation found contractor Fluor failed to supervise the Afghan worker who carried out the attack, calling it the "primary contributing factor." Yet Fluor claims federal law shields them from any state tort liability.
Question Presented: Should Boyle be extended to allow federal interests emanating from the FTCA's combatant-activities exception to preempt state tort claims against a government contractor for conduct that breached its contract and violated military orders?
Oral Advocates:
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:
[00:00:00] Argument Overview
[00:00:48] Argument Begins
[00:00:55] Petitioner Opening Statement
[00:02:32] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[00:26:18] Petitioner Sequential Questions
[00:33:50] Respondent Opening Statement
[00:36:12] Respondent Free for All Questions
[00:54:59] Respondent Sequential Questions
[01:07:11] United States Opening Statement
[01:08:25] United States Free for All Questions
[01:18:13] United States Sequential Questions
[01:28:31] Petitioner Rebuttal
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist | Case No. 24-724 | Oral Argument Date: 11/4/25 | Docket Link: Here
OverviewA father seeks justice after his son, Army Staff Sergeant Ryan Hencely, was killed in a 2016 terrorist attack at Bagram Airfield. The Army's own investigation found contractor Fluor failed to supervise the Afghan worker who carried out the attack, calling it the "primary contributing factor." Yet Fluor claims federal law shields them from any state tort liability.
Question Presented: Should Boyle be extended to allow federal interests emanating from the FTCA's combatant-activities exception to preempt state tort claims against a government contractor for conduct that breached its contract and violated military orders?
Oral Advocates:
Link to Opinion: TBD.
Website Link to Opinion Summary: TBD.
Website Link to Oral Argument: TBD.
Timestamps:
[00:00:00] Argument Overview
[00:00:48] Argument Begins
[00:00:55] Petitioner Opening Statement
[00:02:32] Petitioner Free for All Questions
[00:26:18] Petitioner Sequential Questions
[00:33:50] Respondent Opening Statement
[00:36:12] Respondent Free for All Questions
[00:54:59] Respondent Sequential Questions
[01:07:11] United States Opening Statement
[01:08:25] United States Free for All Questions
[01:18:13] United States Sequential Questions
[01:28:31] Petitioner Rebuttal

25,869 Listeners

3,536 Listeners

373 Listeners

696 Listeners

1,119 Listeners

2,893 Listeners

6,294 Listeners

112,586 Listeners

32,365 Listeners

10,240 Listeners

7,077 Listeners

5,761 Listeners

3,868 Listeners

16,076 Listeners

737 Listeners