PeerView Kidney & Genitourinary Diseases CME/CNE/CPE Audio Podcast

Go online to PeerView.com/YSX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) is a serious and potentially fatal oncologic emergency that, paradoxically, is partially linked to the use of highly effective anticancer treatment. How can the management team rise to the challenge of TLS? In this activity, Anthony R. Mato, MD, MSCE, and Kristen Battiato, MSN, RN, AGNP-C, will provide an answer. Join them as they explore team-based management of TLS and provide guidance on developing TLS management plans. Throughout this program, the experts will use real-world case scenarios to demonstrate how professionals can work together to identify risk factors for TLS, recognize its laboratory and clinical symptoms, and prevent its occurrence. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Determine the presence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and risk status based on patient-, disease-, and treatment-related features in patients with cancer, Develop risk-based prophylactic protocols for TLS that include adequate hydration, patient assessment, and antihyperuricemic medications based on current efficacy evidence, Integrate individualized antihyperuricemic therapy into TLS management plans for patients with cancer, including administration of appropriate treatment, appropriate dosing of antihyperuricemics, and patient counseling measures.

Go online to PeerView.com/TRX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Are you ready to bring the new standard of care for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into your clinical practice? Join PeerView and KCCure to learn what the latest research on multi-targeted TKIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination strategies (dual checkpoint blockade and immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations) means for your patients with advanced disease. Our panel of experts will discuss how highly efficacious therapeutic strategies are changing outcomes in earlier lines of treatment and the potential for approved agents to be used in new settings. With illustrative patient cases guiding the discussion, this engaging activity will provide participants with the information they need to navigate important clinical decisions, including how to sequence available therapies; which systemic therapies to use in patients with metastatic, locally advanced, or high-risk localized disease; what steps should be taken to manage AEs associated with newer treatment strategies; and which patients could benefit from clinical trial enrollment. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn more about providing guideline-recommended individualized care for your patients with RCC. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Incorporate novel therapeutic approaches, latest clinical evidence, expert recommendations, and patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific factors in the development of contemporary, personalized management plans for patients with RCC, Recommend clinical trials evaluating novel agents and/or combination approaches as standard treatment options for eligible patients with RCC across the disease spectrum, Apply evidence-based strategies and best practices to diagnose, mitigate, and manage AEs related to novel systemic therapies, including combination regimens, for patients with RCC.

Go online to PeerView.com/TRX860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Are you ready to bring the new standard of care for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) into your clinical practice? Join PeerView and KCCure to learn what the latest research on multi-targeted TKIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination strategies (dual checkpoint blockade and immune checkpoint inhibitor/TKI combinations) means for your patients with advanced disease. Our panel of experts will discuss how highly efficacious therapeutic strategies are changing outcomes in earlier lines of treatment and the potential for approved agents to be used in new settings. With illustrative patient cases guiding the discussion, this engaging activity will provide participants with the information they need to navigate important clinical decisions, including how to sequence available therapies; which systemic therapies to use in patients with metastatic, locally advanced, or high-risk localized disease; what steps should be taken to manage AEs associated with newer treatment strategies; and which patients could benefit from clinical trial enrollment. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn more about providing guideline-recommended individualized care for your patients with RCC. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Incorporate novel therapeutic approaches, latest clinical evidence, expert recommendations, and patient-, disease-, and treatment-specific factors in the development of contemporary, personalized management plans for patients with RCC, Recommend clinical trials evaluating novel agents and/or combination approaches as standard treatment options for eligible patients with RCC across the disease spectrum, Apply evidence-based strategies and best practices to diagnose, mitigate, and manage AEs related to novel systemic therapies, including combination regimens, for patients with RCC.

Go online to PeerView.com/JCU860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, an expert in complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) discusses evidence-based approaches to differentially diagnose patients with C3G and reviews the evidence for current and emerging treatment strategies. Upon completion of this activity, participants should be better able to: Explain the pathophysiology of C3G, highlighting the rationale for using complement proteins and proteinuria as therapeutic targets, Differentially diagnose patients with C3G using evidence-based tools and strategies, Identify the mechanisms of action for agents targeted at specific complement inhibitors (eg, Factors B, C5a, C3, etc), Incorporate the latest findings for approved and emerging pharmacotherapies to optimize the management of patients with C3G.

Go online to PeerView.com/GZF860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Clinicians who treat patients with prostate cancer have new opportunities to improve outcomes across a variety of settings, but the rapid expansion of treatment options has also presented dilemmas for those trying to choose the right treatment for the right patient. For instance, next-generation anti-androgen agents have proven efficacious in early stages of prostate cancer, while approvals of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are available in later-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Combination approaches, under investigation across various stages of prostate cancer, further highlight the expansive opportunities for treatment personalization across the disease continuum. Given this new wealth of options, how do clinicians determine the best treatment course for each patient? Join PeerView and the Prostate Conditions Education Council for an expert-led event designed to answer important questions on prostate cancer treatment in the modern era. Combining insight on relevant data from important trials with practical guidance on using guideline-recommended strategies in clinical practice, this event will help clinicians provide optimal personalized care informed by relevant patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors and address AEs related to newer therapies and combinations. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Apply current guideline recommendations for germline and tumor testing for clinically relevant biomarkers in patients with prostate cancer, Integrate novel treatment regimens into the management of patients with advanced prostate cancer, based on recent evidence, genetic/molecular features, current guideline recommendations, and individual patient needs and preferences, Employ evidence- and team-based approaches to proactively mitigate and manage treatment-related AEs that may arise in patients receiving novel therapies and combinations for advanced prostate cancer.

Go online to PeerView.com/RVA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Improving outcomes for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has been challenging, with many patients experiencing only short periods of progression-free survival after treatment with first-line chemotherapy. A game changer in many cancers, immunotherapy has provided new avenues for the cancer care team to help their patients with advanced UC live longer. In particular, new data on the use of immunotherapy in the first-line maintenance setting has shown that using immunotherapy before patients’ progress to the second-line setting increases survival without a negative impact on quality of life. In this activity, a panel of experts discusses strategies for incorporating these important data into individualized patient care. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Cite the available clinical evidence on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line (1L) maintenance vs. delayed (2L) therapy in patients with advanced UC after response to 1L platinum chemotherapy, Select patients with advanced UC who may be eligible for 1L maintenance therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor based on response to initial chemotherapy, PD-L1 status, and other patient- and disease-related factors, Incorporate new clinical evidence and updated guideline recommendations on 1L immunotherapy maintenance regimens into current treatment algorithms for patients with advanced UC.

Go online to PeerView.com/RVA860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Improving outcomes for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) has been challenging, with many patients experiencing only short periods of progression-free survival after treatment with first-line chemotherapy. A game changer in many cancers, immunotherapy has provided new avenues for the cancer care team to help their patients with advanced UC live longer. In particular, new data on the use of immunotherapy in the first-line maintenance setting has shown that using immunotherapy before patients’ progress to the second-line setting increases survival without a negative impact on quality of life. In this activity, a panel of experts discusses strategies for incorporating these important data into individualized patient care. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Cite the available clinical evidence on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line (1L) maintenance vs. delayed (2L) therapy in patients with advanced UC after response to 1L platinum chemotherapy, Select patients with advanced UC who may be eligible for 1L maintenance therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor based on response to initial chemotherapy, PD-L1 status, and other patient- and disease-related factors, Incorporate new clinical evidence and updated guideline recommendations on 1L immunotherapy maintenance regimens into current treatment algorithms for patients with advanced UC.

Go online to PeerView.com/YVS860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening condition caused by the inability of the kidneys to excrete potassium sufficiently. Excessive potassium levels can lead to cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Hyperkalemia is often encountered in hospitalized patients and frequently recurs after discharge. The problem is further complicated by the fact that guideline-directed medical therapies frequently used to reduce cardiorenal risks in patients with heart failure (HF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) can increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Newer potassium binders may allow these patients to better tolerate guideline-directed therapies, as well as reduce the risk of hyperkalemia recurrence. Interprofessional models of care, such as those involving the pharmacist in transition-of-care interventions, have also been shown to improve patient outcomes. In this activity, based on a recent live web broadcast, an interprofessional expert panel examines the diagnostic thresholds for hyperkalemia, the factors that contribute to its risk in patients with HF, CKD, or diabetes, and the associations between hyperkalemia and poor patient outcomes. The experts also explore the latest evidence for modern potassium binders, share evidence-based strategies for integrating these agents into patient-centered treatment plans, and consider how interprofessional approaches to care can improve patient outcomes and potentially reduce readmission rates. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Recognize thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe hyperkalemia and their implications for recurrent hospital admissions and mortality, Describe the burden of hyperkalemia in patients with HF and CKD and its association with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, Differentiate agents for managing hyperkalemia according to their mechanisms of action, indications, and pharmacologic characteristics, Apply evidence-based strategies to manage hyperkalemia, optimize care transitions, and potentially reduce hyperkalemia-related hospital readmissions in patients with HF or CKD.

Go online to PeerView.com/DVD860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In this activity, multidisciplinary oncology experts discuss immunotherapy advances, focusing on transitioning immunotherapies to earlier disease settings to improve outcomes, prevent recurrences, and increase curability in early-stage cancers. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Describe the rationale for using neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative immunotherapy in early-stage cancers, key trials and relevant endpoints, and evolving evidence supporting ICI use in different early-stage solid tumors, Implement best practices for multidisciplinary/interprofessional patient and tumor evaluation as well as coordination of care when managing patients with early-stage cancers, Integrate immunotherapies into individualized, multimodal treatment plans for appropriate patients with early-stage cancers in clinical practice or through clinical trial participation, Assess the risks and benefits associated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant/perioperative immunotherapy use to ensure safe, optimally selected, and appropriately timed delivery of systemic and local multimodal therapies to patients with early-stage solid tumors.

Go online to PeerView.com/TGE860 to view the activity, download slides and practice aids, and complete the post-test to earn credit. In recent years, the multidisciplinary relationship between urologic oncologists and advanced practice clinicians in the management of patients with prostate cancer has become increasingly more important in providing the best patient care. During this video, an expert panel highlights how a multidisciplinary team can use the latest clinical evidence, treatment guidelines, and expert consensus recommendations to improve care for patients with prostate cancer and gives practical insights on applying next-generation anti-androgen agents, PARP inhibitors, and chemotherapy to the prostate cancer treatment landscape. The experts also provide meaningful guidance to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment planning based on a modern understanding of prostate cancer biology, best treatment practices, and the expanding opportunities for treatment personalization across the disease continuum. Upon completion of this CE activity, participants will be able to: Implement guideline recommendations related to genetic testing when managing patients with prostate cancer, Apply current evidence about available and emerging anti-androgen and non-hormonal agents when deciding on treatment for prostate cancer, Integrate appropriate anti-androgen and non-hormonal strategies into treatment plans for patients with prostate cancer.