Ep. 42 - The Great Escape & Escape from New York

This week, we are escaping into the worlds of two films video game auteur Hideo Kojima considers massive inspirations: John Sturges' The Great Escape (1963) and John Carpenter's Escape from New York (1981).

These classic escape thrillers provided the structural blueprint and antihero swagger for Kojima's gaming masterpiece Metal Gear Solid. We look at how The Great Escape defined high stakes stealth mechanics and tension on screen, while Snake Plissken's dystopian, punk rock cynicism birthed Solid Snake himself.

It is a double feature about cinematic cross-pollination, the evolution of antiheroes, and how obsession turns beloved media into groundbreaking art. Whether it is Steve McQueen jumping fences or Kurt Russell sneering at the government, both films prove that great video games owe everything to classic action cinema.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Great Escape (1963, Dir. John Sturges)

Escape from New York (1981, Dir. John Carpenter)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:40 So what KIND of double feature IS it???

1:40 Gamer Lore Dump aka "Why these movies for this month"

17:48 "The Great Escape" (1963)

40:23 "Escape from New York" (1981)

1:16:07 Outro

Final Thoughts

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Which cinematic escape artist defined your childhood: Steve McQueen's Hilts or Kurt Russell's Snake Plissken? Let us know in the comments.

#MetalGearSolid #EscapeFromNewYork #TheGreatEscape #HideoKojima #PhantasmaCast

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 32 - Ghost in the Shell & The Matrix

This week, we are plugging into the digital void with Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell (1995) and the Wachowskis’ The Matrix (1999).

These prophetic cyberpunk cornerstones take radically different approaches to artificial intelligence and human identity. We look at how Ghost in the Shell questions the boundaries of the soul when humanity and technology converge, and how The Matrix flips that dynamic entirely. Instead of merging with machine intelligence, humanity created something that destroyed its world, leaving a future that might ultimately belong to the machines.

It is a double feature about digital existentialism, cybernetic anxiety, and the terrifying line between simulated realities and authentic selfhood. Whether it is Motoko Kusanagi questioning her own consciousness or Neo waking up in a pod, both films forced sci-fi cinema into a bold new era.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Ghost in the Shell (1995, Dir. Mamoru Oshii)

The Matrix (1999, Dir. Lana Wachowski, Lilly Wachowski)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:15 The 90s Cyberpunk Boom

14:30 "Ghost in the Shell" (1995)

48:10 "The Matrix" (1999)

1:21:05 Final Thoughts

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you lean toward the cold, philosophical anime poetry of Ghost in the Shell or the high-octane simulated revolution of The Matrix? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 40 - Commando & Cobra

This week, we step onto the front lines of the legendary Stallone vs. Schwarzenegger arms race with Mark L. Lester’s Commando (1985) and George P. Cosmatos’s Cobra (1986).

The mid-1980s saw two mega-stars constantly trying to out-gun, out-muscle, and out-body-count each other, giving birth to a wildly specific archetype: the benevolent rogue. We trace how Reagan-era anxieties funneled straight into stories about one-man armies stepping up because the justice system lacks the nerve to finish the job.

It is a double feature about complete disregard for institutional authority, ridiculous firepower, and total narrative escalation. Whether John Matrix is delivering ice-cold one-liners while ripping apart an island army or Marion Cobretti is single-handedly taking down a fascist killer cult, both films prove that in 80s action cinema, subtlety was left at the door.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Commando (1985, Dir. Mark L. Lester)

Cobra (1986, Dir. George P. Cosmatos)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:15 Stallone vs. Schwarzenegger Arms Race

11:19 "Commando" (1985)

40:24 "Cobra" (1986)

1:07:14 Final Thoughts

💿 Physical Media Shoutout

 ⁨@Arrow_Video⁩ 

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer Arnold's relentless, log-carrying absurdity in Commando, or Sly's match-chewing, laser-sighted vigilante in Cobra? Let us know in the comments☝️

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 39 - RoboCop & Sorry to Bother You

This week, we are clocking in, selling out, and celebrating two masterpieces of cinematic satire: Paul Verhoeven’s RoboCop (1987) and Boots Riley’s Sorry to Bother You (2018).

These brilliant films weaponize pure, hilarious absurdity to attack corporate greed from opposite ends of the economic spectrum. We look at how RoboCop targets top-down privatization by turning public safety into a corporate playground, while Sorry to Bother You exposes bottom-up labor exploitation through forced identity shifts and surreal workplace horrors.

It is a devastating, brilliant double feature about how the modern economic machine attempts to claim total monopoly over our public infrastructure, our voices, and our literal bodies.

🎬 Movies Discussed

RoboCop (1987, Dir. Paul Verhoeven)

Sorry to Bother You (2018, Dir. Boots Riley)

0:00 Intro

1:26 Robocop

35:46 Sorry to Bother You

1:08:24 Outro, aka "C U Next Time..."

Original "Robo Wants an Oreo" clip via RoboCop Archive: https://youtu.be/BEhXAtFgNrk?si=sp51qptLLBg_ufC9

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

Arrow Video

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the corporate, top-down satire of RoboCop or the surreal, worker-perspective madness of Sorry to Bother You? Let us know in the comments.

#RoboCop #SorryToBotherYou #BootsRiley #PaulVerhoeven #Satire

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 38 - Fade In & Catchfire

This week, we're facing our past regrets and disowned creations with Jud Taylor’s Fade In (1973) and Dennis Hopper’s Catchfire (1990).

These films represent the absolute limit of corporate interference, operating as flawed, compromised monuments to the nightmare of the studio system. We look at how Jud Taylor's western romance gets completely lost in translation, and how Dennis Hopper legally scrubs his identity from a star-studded thriller.

It is a double feature about the high cost of creative compromise, the fragility of structural conventions, and the remnants of pure authorship that persist under duress. Whether it is a studio executive altering a film beyond recognition or a director completely abandoning their own project, both films suggest that when commerce wins, the true story gets buried. 🎬

Movies Discussed

Fade In (1973, Dir. Alan Smithee / Jud Taylor)

Catchfire (1990, Dir. Alan Smithee / Dennis Hopper)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

1:03 Who is "Alan Smithee"?

3:11 Fade In

24:45 Backtrack

57:33 Are these movies worth watching???

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

 @kinolorber 

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the ConversationDo you think a studio-compromised film is still worth watching for the director's surviving ideas, or should Alan Smithee movies be left entirely in the vault? Let us know in the comments.

#AlanSmithee #FilmHistory #CinephileCulture #DennisHopper #PhysicalMedia

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are celebrating Pride by hitting the highway with a double showing of drag queen road movies: Stephan Elliott’s The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994) and Beeban Kidron’s To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995).

These films show that a road movie is about much more than getting from point A to point B. We look at how Tick’s journey in Priscilla allows him to shed the fear of being himself in front of his estranged son, anchoring the comedy with beautiful, independent vulnerability. On the flip side, we watch how the trio in To Wong Foo confront and dismantle their own preconceived notions about small-town communities as they embed themselves in middle America.

It is a double feature about identity, community, and self-discovery. Whether it is navigating the harsh Australian outback or transforming a forgotten town, both films suggest that the ultimate destination on a drag journey is finding the confidence within yourself to be yourself completely.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994, Dir. Stephan Elliott)

To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995, Dir. Beeban Kidron)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Favorite Road Movies

11:50 The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994)

47:31 To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995)

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the grounded, indie storytelling of Priscilla or the light-hearted studio energy of To Wong Foo? Let us know in the comments.

#PriscillaQueenOfTheDesert #ToWongFoo #DragCinema #RoadMovies #PhantasmaCast

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 36 - The Long Good Friday & Casino

This week, we are stepping into the halls of crumbling criminal empires with John Mackenzie’s The Long Good Friday (1980) and Martin Scorsese’s Casino (1995).

These films feature protagonists who operate as kings in their own respects, letting their massive egos blind them to the immediate threats right in front of their faces. We look at how Harold Shand’s dream of a legitimized London empire clashes with a political nightmare, and how Sam "Ace" Rothstein’s obsession with total control in Vegas ultimately creates his own downfall.

It is a double feature about the illusion of power, the volatility of the underworld, and the high cost of unchecked ambition. Whether it is the rainy streets of London or the blinding neon of the desert, both films show that a king is only as strong as the foundation he ignores. Plus, we dig into the incredible performances from Helen Mirren and Sharon Stone, who serve as the crucial anchors to these men of ambition.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Long Good Friday (1980, Dir. John Mackenzie)

Casino (1995, Dir. Martin Scorsese)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Derek and Jake decide on their Top Scorsese picks

8:42 The Long Good Friday

36:08 Casino

1:05:11 Outro/Closing thoughts

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@criterioncollection

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast:

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the gritty British realism of The Long Good Friday or the maximalist operatic tragedy of Casino? Let us know in the comments.

#TheLongGoodFriday #CasinoMovie #MartinScorsese #BritishCinema #NeoNoir

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ep. 35 - Bad Lieutenant & Dragged Across Concrete

This week, we are looking at the law of the street with Abel Ferrara’s Bad Lieutenant (1992) and S. Craig Zahler’s Dragged Across Concrete (2018).

We explore "cops crashing out," looking at how these films handle officers who have completely abandoned the rulebook. Bad Lieutenant serves as a visceral redemption story, suggesting that even the most irredeemable, drug-addled soul can find a moment of spiritual clarity.

In contrast, Dragged Across Concrete functions as a pulpy reactionist fantasy. It presents a world of "white persecution" where the line between the badge and the mask is non-existent. We discuss how Zahler frames cops and criminals as two halves of the same coin, locked in a slow-burn cycle of suspicion and violence.

🎬 Movies Discussed

Bad Lieutenant (1992, Dir. Abel Ferrara)

Dragged Across Concrete (2018, Dir. S. Craig Zahler)

🕰️Chapters

0:00 Intro

2:34 Bad Lieutenant

38:39 Dragged Across Concrete

1:09:08 Conclusion or Final Thoughts Regarding "Morality in Media"

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

@KinoLorber and @Lionsgate

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: apple.co/phantasmacast

Spotify: spoti.fi/phantasmacast

💬 Join the Conversation

Does LT actually deserve redemption, or is Zahler's cynical worldview more realistic? Let us know in the comments.

#BadLieutenant #DraggedAcrossConcrete #AbelFerrara #SCraigZahler #Cinephile

Who is the ultimate "crash out" cop in your opinion?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are walking the beat with Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973) and Shane Black’s The Nice Guys (2016).

These films represent two sides of the same tarnished coin. We look at Philip Marlowe as a relic of a moral code that simply does not apply to the world anymore. In The Long Goodbye, Marlowe is a ghost in his own life, stumbling through a cynical, hazy L.A. that has no room for his brand of loyalty. Contrast that with The Nice Guys, where our leads are trying to affect change against an overwhelming tide of corporate and political corruption, only to realize the deck is stacked against them.

It is a double feature about the failure of the private eye archetype. Whether it is the nihilistic malaise of the 70s or the frantic comedy of a modern action-noir, both films suggest that the truth does not set you free, it just makes you tired.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Long Goodbye (1973, Dir. Robert Altman)

The Nice Guys (2016, Dir. Shane Black)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 "95 KFM Home of PhantasmaCast"/Shane Black and Other Musings

10:19 The Long Goodbye

41:55 The Nice Guys

1:10:46 Outro or "Never Trust a Billionaire"

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts @KinoLorber and @WarnerArchive

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

☝️ Does Philip Marlowe work better as a ghost in the machine or as a bumbling fixer trying to stay afloat? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, we are stepping into the Hollywood house of mirrors with Robert Altman’s The Player (1992) and Spike Jonze’s Adaptation (2002).

These aren't just movies about making movies; they are cynical, paranoid love letters to the nightmare of the creative process. We look at how Griffin Mill’s life in The Player becomes the very thriller he is trying to produce, and how Charlie Kaufman literally writes himself into a corner in Adaptation.

It is a double feature about the high cost of the "pitch," the absurdity of the studio system, and the paralyzing fear that you might just be a hack. Whether it is a studio executive getting away with murder or a screenwriter having a nervous breakdown on the page, both films suggest that in Hollywood, the story eventually consumes the storyteller.

🎬 Movies Discussed

The Player (1992, Dir. Robert Altman)

Adaptation (2002, Dir. Spike Jonze)

🕰️ Chapters

0:00 Intro

0:45 Favorite movies "about" movies

11:50 "The Player" (1992)

47:31 "Adaptation." (2002)

1:14:57 (very) Final Thoughts

📀 Physical Media Shoutouts

 @criterioncollection  and  @ShoutFactoryVEVO 

🔗 Find & Follow PhantasmaCast

YouTube: https://youtube.com/@2certifiedbangers

Instagram: https://instagram.com/2certifiedbangers

TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@2certifiedbangers

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/phantasmacast/id1745055694

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0eifTBsW1y8CkGQppn81Hp

💬 Join the Conversation

Do you prefer the cynical Hollywood satire of The Player or the neurotic self reflection of Adaptation? Let us know in the comments.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.