A recent scientific study has explored the non-classical aspects of quantum physics by creating photons that simultaneously exist in 37 dimensions. This experiment aimed to push the boundaries of quantum mechanics and test the limits of the Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) paradox. The research team successfully manipulated light to demonstrate unprecedented quantum effects. The findings suggest that our understanding of quantum physics may still be in its early stages. Researchers hope this work will facilitate building quantum advantages in high-dimensional systems. The study highlights the vast potential for future breakthroughs in quantum technology and demonstrates the strange, counterintuitive nature of the quantum world.

http://philosophics.blog for related content

The segment examines the concept of a "post-rationality era," questioning whether Western society is moving away from reason and evidence-based thinking. Generative AI platforms were prompted to assess this concern, with their responses highlighting factors such as polarisation, misinformation, emotional appeals, and declining trust in institutions. The AI responses suggest that emotions, personal beliefs, and ideologies are increasingly influencing public discourse, potentially eroding critical thinking and social cohesion. However, the platforms also acknowledge that rationality persists and advocate for promoting critical thinking, media literacy, and fact-based journalism to counteract these trends. Some perspectives suggest that the shift indicates a re-evaluation of rationality's limitations, rather than a complete rejection. The source ultimately suggests the necessity for defending rationality as a foundation for societal progress.

https://philosophics.blog/2025/02/13/are-we-in-a-post-rationality-era/

This segment critiques the field of psychology, arguing that it often overlooks systemic issues in favour of individual explanations for mental health problems. The author contends that psychology, particularly within Western capitalism, serves to blame individuals for societal issues such as anxiety and depression, rather than addressing the root causes stemming from structural forces. The piece suggests that focusing solely on neurotransmitters and pharmaceutical solutions ignores the broader societal stressors impacting well-being. The author advocates for a more holistic, systemic perspective that scrutinises societal structures to understand and address mental health challenges effectively. The post draws inspiration from Max Bennet's book on the history of intelligence and Mark Fisher'sCapitalist Realism. The author sees psychology as a pseudoscience that is unable to provide a useful analysis of societal problems. The author suggests searching for solutions outside the narrow focus that psychology provides.

https://philosophics.blog/2025/02/12/history-of-intelligence/

This segment explores the connexion between the number of teeth and facial size in modern humans. It uses a case-control study to show that individuals with tooth agenesis, the congenital absence of teeth, tend to have smaller facial structures, particularly in the maxilla. The study suggests that genes influencing tooth development also play a role in facial growth. Interestingly, the cranial base and mandible did not show a similar size reduction. The findings support the idea that the number of teeth and facial size are coordinated by shared genetic mechanisms, which have evolved over time as the human brain has enlarged and jaws have reduced. The study anticipates their findings to enrich the comprehension of the evolution and development of the human head.

• Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-58565-8
• Find more content at http://philosophics.blog

This segment explores whether Metamodernism can reconcile Modernism and Postmodernism. The author reviews ideas associated with each philosophy, critiquing their underlying assumptions and inherent biases. Modernism's faith in science, progress, and reason are questioned, while Postmodernism's emphasis on cultural critique and social justice is analysed for prescriptive elements. The author argues that Metamodernism appears to be an attempt by Modernists to repackage their ideas. Ultimately, the author finds Metamodernism unconvincing, viewing it as a re-gifting of Modernism. The piece concludes by briefly touching on metaphysical and spiritual elements, along with other related philosophical concepts such as post-liberalism.https://philosophics.blog/2021/01/17/can-metamodernism-sublate-modernism-and-postmodernism/

The segment presents a six-question survey designed to map an individual's worldview within the context of modernity.The survey, presented on a philosophy blog, aims to position respondents on a ternary plot, visually representing their ideological leanings.The creator, a statistician, acknowledges a blend of methodological rigour and expediency in the survey's design.Privacy is prioritised, with no personally identifiable information collected.Feedback is encouraged to refine the survey's questions, response options, and overall accuracy.The project intends to spark intellectual exploration and discussion surrounding modern thought.

https://philosophics.blog/2025/02/08/surveying-modernity/

This segment critiques Kurt Gray's book, *Outraged!*, which argues that morality fundamentally boils down to the concept of harm. The author disagrees, asserting that Gray overemphasises intuition while neglecting the significant role of cultural conditioning in shaping moral beliefs. The post highlights the subjective nature of morality and how Gray's mono-causal explanation fails to account for the complexity and messiness of moral psychology. The author further argues that Gray's theory allows for the justification of harmful ideologies and their self-perpetuation. Ultimately, the critique suggests that a more nuanced approach is needed to understand the multifaceted nature of morality.

https://philosophics.blog/2025/02/02/outrage-chapter-six/

The segment explores archaic and obsolete English words describing time, such as "eldornight" and "overmorrow." It highlights the nuanced temporal distinctions these words conveyed, contrasting them with modern English's more limited vocabulary. The author, prompted by a contemplation of lost words, consulted ChatGPT to compile this list and suggests reviving some of these terms. The post showcases the richness of historical English and reflects on the evolution of language.

https://philosophics.blog/2025/01/26/yesterday-and-today/

The article "Subjective Perception" argues that human understanding of nature is limited by our own sensory experiences. It uses the example of a tiger's camouflage, appearing orange to humans but effectively hidden from prey animals with different colour vision. The author contends that our interpretations of natural phenomena are often "just-so stories" based on our limited perspectives, highlighting the subjectivity of our understanding and the importance of considering alternative viewpoints. This concept is extended to broader discussions, suggesting that biases affect human interpretations in various fields like politics and morality. Ultimately, the piece promotes a more humble and nuanced approach to understanding the world, recognising the limitations of human perception.