Don’t be mistaken. The only way to feel good about yourself, to have a life you love and a life you live powerfully is by being a producer. The secret of producers lies in the invisible dimension. The dimension that is invisible to both to you and them. They do something differently (not different, differently!) … Continue reading "The invisible difference between a producer and you…"

If you want to become more, grow, evolve, self awareness is important. But it is not enough. Meditation is not enough. Having a person to model yourself after is not enough. Reading is not enough. Understanding is not enough.

Something is missing, the presence of which would make the most difference, and could take you through the barrier to full knowledge of your machine.

What machine, you ask?

This is the same as when you mention to someone that their little voice is always talking... What little voice they ask?

90% of what matters about a human, about you, is in the invisible, the vague, the hidden. Even others can only see the peak of the iceberg, not the whole... not the part that is immersed, not the part that we call 'the machine'.

If it is an iceberg, why call it a machine? It's an iceberg because the immersed parts of it hold it up... And it's a machine because it works like a machine. It has moves, it has gears, it seems to have even a design.

I have a whole 53 video course on it, the 53 invisibles. I created that course a long time ago, and since then I have seen more, in more details, but this article is not about that.

This article is about mastering recognizing the machine in others.

Without mastering it you remain in the dark about yourself, and not in the driver's seat of your life. Without that you remain too focused on what you feel, what you think, what you want, what you need, and stay ineffective in life, ineffective with your own machine, ineffective in getting what you want.

And without mastering it you won't understand why you are still unsuccessful, miserable, unloved, and don't feel good about yourself, in spite all your efforts. all the 'work' you invested.

As you may know, I am leading an experimental program called The Playground.

For children, the playground is where they can, without pressure, without needing to, having to, or should, practice using their bodies in different ways, with different challenges, learn to get along with others, share, butt heads, etc. so when they get to Life ready, Life where they have to and need to. Get there knowing who they are, so they can perform.

Of course the playground can be a kindergarten, the street, the backyard with lots of trees, other people's backyards...

Climbing trees and falling down, riding the scooter and falling, swimming, running, competing who can pee farthest... you know all the things that children need to know to know who they are... to have enough independence and self awareness to start life on the right foot.

Most people never quite learn it.

In OUR Playground we do what we, adults, need to do to know who we are, where we are standing, what moves us to do what we do, why we get angry, upset, why we beg for being liked, accepted, appreciated, how we posture and why... Why we play hero, victim, attacked, never do well... Our unique machine.

But, and this is my newest learning, knowing ourselves, the inner workings, is near impossible if we don't see it reflected in others.

In the Playground we focus only on four of the 53 invisibles.

Understanding is the booby prize... near worthless.

Unless we can recognize those four invisibles when we see them, outside of us, we won't be able to see them and manage them inside us.

Some 35 years ago I participated in a seminar where the leader shared that he bought a red Honda. He bought red, because he wanted to be special. Different from everybody else. Because he had never seen a red Honda.

So he paid for his spanking new shiny red Honda, and drove off the lot. And to his surprise, all he could see on the road, in driveways, even behind half closed garage doors, were red Hondas.

Once you can distinguish something fully,

Is it self-sabotage if you never intended to succeed? Only to HAVE?

Asked in another way: can you sabotage your success if you just dream about success, as a destination, but never about the path, the work, the effort to get there.

Or can you sabotage your dreams?

In the Starting Point Measurements I muscletest your ambition.

What I call ambition is when you see that getting to the top of the mountain will take climbing, and you say: OK, then I'll climb. No big deal.

And I muscletest your desire.

Desire is building a picture in your imagination, in your mind, or on paper, like a vision board and wanting it. Maybe fervently wanting it. Maybe experiencing pain that you don't have it. God knows, maybe even hating that you don't have it.

But the cost of attaining that picture never enters your mind.

Ambition, the number, could also say to what degree you live in reality.

And desire, the number, could mean to what degree you live in your mind.

Your work ethic, your habits, your words also give that number away. but you can sell yourself as a mirage to someone who can't see how you live.

Often a client's original numbers paint a picture that hide the truth: they are not challenged... life doesn't challenge them, so they appear more ambitious and less desirous.

But when they find out that the mountain is taller than the hill they thought they needed to climb, climb so that they can be all they can become, the numbers correct themselves.

Here are two examples:

initial measures: ambition 30%, desire 30%. Today the same numbers are 1%/91%.

another example: original 10/30. Today: 1/91

Turns out both clients had (and still have) an easy life. Not much is required of them, and they made a comfortable living. They both knew that they were capable, knowledgeable, smart people.

Then came reality when they started to work with me: they weren't 'getting' the distinctions. It suddenly wasn't enough to know about stuff... they had to be consistent, persistent, and cause real change. They didn't.

So what did they do? They moved their whole being into their minds, where they were still OK... And abandoned reality.

All the 'work' you do in the mind won't get you anywhere near to what you desire... only to the mirage of it. The idea of it.

Whatever you want in reality will need you to do work, sometimes hard work, physical, intellectual, emotional.

To do what it takes, as long as it takes.

And the question is: are you really sabotaging yourself if you never INTENDED to do what it takes to get what you want?

So let's see if you can sabotage your intending?

Weird question, but I think it is a good one.

Depending on your soul correction you have a particular move to sabotage everything.

It is the move of the machine... the racket machine.

The racket is a machine that makes sure you do everything to get to the same exact conclusion every time.

This machine wants you to end up with a particular payoff... a result of sorts.

If your payoff is being right about being worthless, the moves of the machine will make sure you do.

If your payoff is to not be a match to what is needed of you, then you'll take on ten times more than anyone is capable of handling to make sure you end up right.

Here is another one: if your payoff is to be right that you can only trust yourself, then you'll have an army of people who disappoint you... and you'll make sure of it.

You'll make yourself literally stupid. Naively fall for everything... and never look twice: like a blind person without a white stick. You see, I was right... is the payoff. Never mind that you are alone, hurting,

Your vocabulary, the number and the kind of words you use, is a dead giveaway of the level of your spiritual evolution... simply put your vibrational frequency.

If I could not measure your spiritual/consciousness level accurately other ways, I would use your vocabulary number to tell you what is your spiritual vibration, what is your level of consciousness.

How? What? Are you kidding Sophie?

No, I am not kidding.

You have a billion words for 'what'... much like apes, by the way... and only a few, imprecise words for 'how'. How words are adverbs...

Here is a pdf with many adverbs... how words. Save it and use it.

Your world, your worldview, the possibilities you can see for yourself are directly related to the vocabulary you have.

This is one of the benefits you can derive from reading. Fiction. Good fiction.

I have just re-read one of my favorite books, 'Chasing the dime' by Michael Connelly. Why? The main character is a scientist. He brings the same methods he wins with in science to solving a problem: being set up for a murder rap. His methods, his attitude, how he thinks have been guiding me, ever since I first read it, in 1914. Connelly wrote it in 2002.

If you are in one of my coaching programs... you've been getting to a place where I can actually coach you about that. Congratulations.

Being at the door of the 'how world' is an accomplishment. I mean it.

The 'what' side of the door is what you have, thus far, paid attention to, what you have words for, what shows up in your world now.

On the other side, the 'how' side is what will take you to 'the promised land.'

In my work - if I took an inventory which is not so easy, but possible - you would see that I give 7% of my brain power to What and 93% to the How.

How is the attitude, the context, the beingness...

Even the process is a what: You do THIS first and then you do THAT.

No how there...

So how do you open that door to the 'how'?

That is the questions, isn't it?

I know a company that spends their entire time designing programs to train how's and don't get through to people, or not much, not really.

I am talking about Landmark Education. Landmark Education only teaches 'how' and 'who'... but it is like teaching pigs to sing... not very effective.

So I have no mentor, no teacher, no help other than reading fiction... I mostly have to invent, and then enroll you to be my partner in inventing ways to open that door, specifically for you.

One of my students... the one I write so much about... has cracked the door open for himself.

He started to read Sam Walton's autobiography, (Made in America) and it resonated with him.

It is likely that this was the first whole book he ever read.

Now, you need to understand, that the more 'what' words you have, the less likely that you will hear the how in a book like Sam Walton's biography, or in the 67 steps I have been using to train people.

Every step in Tai's 67 steps is a how treasury... and you can't hear it.

You hear the what when you first listen

Many of you hear only the what even at the second round.

It is NORMAL. But don't stop there.

The same with my Playground students: they hear the what, and cannot hear the how.

Only things done in a certain way produce the results I promise.

The problem with HOW is that it requires DNA capacities to do. Even to recognize.

And the problem with DNA capacities is, that even after I activate one for you, energetically, you still don't know, and don't even look at the how. You want to know what you should do, and after I tell you,

What are the most typical signs of stupid... aka low or no intelligence?

First off, what do I consider intelligent?

Intelligent, if you look, has a certain appropriateness. Flow. Fitting. Maybe even elegance. Maybe even grace and ease. Workability. Life working.

Nowadays we hear a lot about AI, artificial intelligence chatbots. Notice that they don't call it artificial smarts... It's intelligence.

First the AI recognizes the question. Fully. Even its hidden dimensions, so it doesn't only react to its surface, but it sees what the question doesn't say. The intent. The possible confusion, the misunderstandings. And then looks to solve the problem set up... or asks clarifying questions.

Now let's pit it against a human:

One of the shoulds sent to me today:

I should disengage from my conversation with my husband. I should have known better that he was just looking to rant and not want to talk, so I should try to listen and be interested, even if it's the same rant over and over again.

If it were the AI, from the lack of question it would get that it is a stream of consciousness, a person who just wants to be heard. The moment the complaint is heard, the issue disappears. Nothing needs to be fixed... no question to answer.

I am putting this here, because this is, maybe, the most frequent sign of low intelligence.

Not clarifying the purpose of the communication.

So it becomes a should. or a should have... an afterthought. recognizing something for what it is AFTER the damage is done.

So what do we call this aspect of intelligence? We call it astuteness. Astuteness is recognizing/identifying something accurately. Acute in perception and sound in judgment.

In Landmark Education I learned that mice is more intelligent than homo sapiens.

You set up a maze of tunnels for the mouse. Put cheese in one of the tunnels. The mouse finds it, eats it. Wonderful. Next day you put the cheese in a different tunnel. The mouse goes to the 'yesterday's tunnel'. No cheese. So he continues visiting all the other tunnels, finds the cheese and eats it.

You put a human in the same kind of maze. It finds the cheese, it eats it, and it's happy. Next day it goes straight to the same tunnel. It doesn't find any cheese. It cries, complains, ponders. And it says: there should be cheese here. He sets up house in the tunnel. He wallpapers it. Watches TV there... NEVER LOOKS IN ANOTHER TUNNEL FOR THE CHEESE.

This is true about every single human on the planet. The more true it is the less intelligent is the person.

This is what Einstein meant when he said: the measure of intelligence is the ability to change. Change what you do. Change how you do it. Modify your attitude to match reality...

But a 'normal' homo sapiens will expect the cheese to be there.

They expect to be important if they act important often enough.

They expect to be deserving if they do their heroic sh!t and act eager often enough.

Hell, they expect to know even if they don't even understand fully what it is.

They'll expect to be respected even if they don't respect themselves.

All the invisibles prove that homo sapiens is not intelligent. It may be very smart... but not intelligent.

Looking back, I could track as my intelligence rose by how long, how differently, how wide I was willing to look. By how long it took before resignation kicked in. How persistent, how consistent, how flexible I was in doing something that I used to do like a homo sapiens.

Shabby, sloppy, so-so, distracted, dutiful, jumpy, hopeful, cock sure, overconfident, all-knowing...

In my case overconfident and shattered that it didn't work.

Or doing slash slash... tish tush...

I woke up too early again this morning. 2:30. The question was: shall I get up? Will I have a good day?

I muscletested and muscletest says: get up... but in the end I went back to bed... And I had this insight:

All questions, is this good, is this bad, shall I do this?, shall I do that? are all a variation of should...

All are signs of not willing to take responsibility of how life turns out.

Taking responsibility that it is 90% up to you and to your actions what will happen, whether it will be good or bad. Not predetermined.

That it is up to you... and the moment you get that, the moment you own that, life is yours, and you are in the driver's seat of your life.

Turns out everything depends on the threshold capacity, responsibility.

Every single time you attempt to use it tells your brain to pay attention.

As you can see from my frequent leaning on, relying on muscletesting to avoid being responsible: responsibility is not a common trait.

It takes courage, willingness to put your back behind your word. WORK. But it's worth it.

And the rewards are tremendous.

Here is an example

On February 9th I accepted an assignment to heal someone.

I quoted 70 units of healing to get her well.

In the first seven days I spent all that healing energy just to hold back the tide and stabilize her.

In all my previous healing assignments I could only muster five units of the energy at one time. But when you face the Grim Reaper, you find energy you didn't know you had. And you push. And you push. Or else...

On the eighth day I started to make some headway. And I didn't dial myself back to the five units at a time level. No. Now I knew I could...

On the twelfth,  the illness succumbed to the energy. She now has a clean bill of health.

Did I heal her? Did the energy heal her? Did her brain heal her?

I am willing to take responsibility for what I did.

I asked Sourse to create the energy ten years ago.

Also I asked for an upgrade before I started this assignment... The upgrade added 20% more potency to the already strong energy.

I went and learned to control my attention to direct the energy way way way longer than I had ever managed before.

And I didn't give up. I didn't give in to blaming anything or anyone...

And I succeeded. And the energy succeeded.

I didn't HEAL her... Neither did the energy. The energy FORCED her consciousness and her brain to connect and wake up to the death threat.

Her brain healed her. But it only could heal her when she stopped spinning her wheels, doing what she thought she needed to do. When she finally succumbed and went to bed to just BE SICK.

So calling myself a healer would be a lie: I am just the instrument, a go-between. But a darn good at that.

I think people's tendency to overrate their own role, both in failure and success, might be one of those things that keep people from being willing to be responsible.

If you fail and then you are a failure, then the language suggests that life is over for you.

If you succeed and then you are a success, then the language suggests that life is over for you.

I don't know, I cannot decide which one is worse. They are equally stopping you from putting out effective effort.

Just try it out.

If you do something, and therefore you are smart... you won't ever want to find out that you are not smart. So you'll live a life of quiet desperation.

Most people who come to me fit into that mold. They were told by someone that they were a smart little boy or a smart little girl, and they stopped growing, and applying themselves then and there.

Intelligence,

If you look fixers want to fix the world. You, me, things. Everything. They are most people. The campaigners, the reddit, twitter, etc posters... They want to fix you, and they want to fix the world.

Why?

Because it is not the way they want you to be, they want me to be, things to be.

They are never happy, they are never fulfilled. They just complain, and label, and go around telling you, me, things, the world how we should be.

But you can never fix anything... You can't. Because nothing is ever wrong. And therefore can't be fixed.

Although you can fix a broken chair, but not by telling it how to be. By work.

So you just talk. So fixers are talkers.

Or said in another way:

Fixers argue with reality. Try to force reality. Hide from reality...

What they don't do is LIVE in reality. Like fish in water. Like bird in the air. No. They are at odds with reality... and they are never happy.

They get their sense of value in the world by talking.

Doing? They don't like doing. They can, but they don't like it. F... that!

Why?

Because in the world they want, they don't have to work.

So all doing feels like an imposition on them... giving them more reasons to talk and talk and talk.

Of course, if you want to be fair, and I do, all people are on a spectrum.

To the degree you are drawn to doing, enjoy doing, prefer doing, you move to the direction of creators.

Some examples of people on the fixing/creating continuum

Here the first two numbers measure fixing/creating, the next number is: How much power does your WORD have...

Ma: 30-70, 7

Miko: 70-30, 1

He: 30-70, 1

A: 91-9, 0

Ba: 100-0, 0

Bo: 70-30, 1

Ba: 91-9, 1

J: 94-6, 1

P: 30-70, 1

T: 70-30, 2

K: 70-30, 0

me: 10-90, 70

Alex Hormozi: 10-90, 40

Charlie Munger: 10-90, 70

Elon Musk: 30-70, 10

Donald Trump: 91-9, 1

Joe Biden: 10-90, 70

Tony Robbins: 2-98, 10

Eckhart Tolle: 10-90, 1

Oprah: 91-9, 1

Osho: 91-9, 1

Vishen Lakhiani: 10-90, 90

Creators see reality.

They can see that some parts don't work or don't work well... but they have no pull to fix by talking about what they see not working...

Instead they are pulled to be interested in how it'd look when it's working. Not as a comparison, but as a NEW REALITY.

And then they see that as a viable project, they start working on it.

Working, creating is self-expression for the creators...

You and I are on the spectrum...

So before YOU ask: which is better? I'll tell you what I think.

Because work, meaningful work is the path to fulfillment, people who are closer to the right edge, but not on it, FEEL more fulfilled more of the time.

The closer to the left side a person is, the more they 'disagree' with how the world is, how you are, how they are, the less fulfillment is available.

Why? Because the nature of reality is really clear about the fact, that only one thing can occupy any specific space at any one time.

So you are either complaining, trying to fix, or you work, create, and experience fulfillment.

Interestingly, work that isn't forced on you, by yourself or by others, is voluntary. Chosen by you. So you experience the lightness of having chosen. The lightness of responsibility. The lightness of being.

The common usage of the word responsibility is incorrect: it doesn't mean obligation. It doesn't mean duty. Dutiful. Forced, not chosen. Drudgery.

But that is how work feels to people closer to the fixing edge. The closer they are to that edge the less attractive, the more drudgery work feels like.

If I were god...

If I were god and my creation didn't function the way I envisioned, what would I do? Would I try to start over? Would I send in a repairman to fix it?

Whether I would be a powerful god, or a lesser god, reality and its rules would apply, and that is bad news.

You can't change something from the outside.

You can create it, but once it is done, it has its own rules, and you can only change it from the inside.

So if I were god, you know the god who created all this thing we live in, I would send in a repairman to live with us for a while and see what needs to get done from the inside, what can be done, so my creation would work the way I envisioned it.

'Go and live in it for a while...' I would tell that repairman, and see if it can be fixed.

Undercover job, if I have ever seen one.

When you look into the abyss the abyss looks into you.

Some things cannot be fixed.

You need to wait for it to run its course, annihilate itself, and you can start with a better design.

So how do you get a better design? Well, you need to send another man, this time not a repairman, but a designer, who can suss out where the original design went wrong, and suggest a new design where that design flaw will be absent.

You, the god, would root for that designer, give it as much support as you can, but let them know everything, from the inside and from the outside, so they can come up with the new design that hopefully will solve the issues that surfaced during the millennia this design was malfunctioning.

Keep all the good and suggest a redesign for a bad, the evil, the dysfunctional, the self annihilating species.

I haven't been the repairman. If there has ever been one, he's given up, because he saw this species cannot be repaired.

I have been the designer, and I have done my job. And now I don't know what to do with myself. I have some time left and I need to fill it with something meaningful, fun, enjoyable, and maybe useful, however long it may be.

I have been feeling the end of the project coming, and uncharacteristically I started to self-destroy... eating stuff that I could barely survive.

It would be easiest for me to just be killed... but this is not likely to happen.

So after a fortnight of self-destructive behavior, I am ready to man up, and design a not divinely assigned life for myself: where my only job will be to have fun, be productive, take care of my health, and do honest business with people who seek me out.

My job, on this windy Sunday will be to invent a new context.

A new context inside which I can do what I do, and be happy to do it, even though I will be just one of the many... nothing special... Not divinely ordained.

Thank god I am good at inventing empowering context... so I don't actually have to learn how to do it, which is not something I can say about my students.

It's an invaluable skill that can transform any life into a life that is meaningful, satisfying, and enjoyable, without fail.

I have written 614 articles on context, so I don't want to write a 615th.

Instead I want you to learn to craft a context, learn it like it's nobody's business.

The skill of creating context for any situation in life is the skill of winners.

In fact, in reality there is no winning: winning only exists in words... as does context.

And because all of your life, I repeat ALL OF YOUR LIFE stands or falls on words, you better learn to be skillful with words, so you can have a great life.

I mean it.

Now, warning, crafting context is...

The hardest thing you'll ever try your hand on.

Why? Because your meaning making machine, the mind,

This is the way the cookie crumbles: your life, the quality of your life depends on you.

I've read somewhere that people are only curious about something they already know. Not 'know about' but actually know. Had experience with.

Knowing about is idle curiosity: useless.

You don't know the river until you wade into it.

You don't know a person unless you wade in and deal with him.

And you don't know a poem until you try to say it out loud.

And this is how it is with this work.

You may read my articles, you may read what others have to say, but it doesn't, can't touch you, because you have no experience with it, so it can't touch you.

And you can't be curious either: you don't know it.

My age 1 clients are not curious yet. My age 2 client: neither. Age 3... some aspects, maybe. Very maybe.

Age 5: curious. Can sense that there is something there, and pokes at it. This week he is trying split pea soup... even though he has never had it before. Curious.

How come I have clients who have never waded into the 'river'?

I guess it is because I accepted incurious underachievers for clients.

Today I ordered pommelo in my grocery delivery. I normally buy grapefruits, but muscletest didn't like the grapefruit in plastic bag at BJ's...

I normally get my grapefruits at Aldi, but I need this week something Aldi doesn't have.

Anyway, the Pommelo is expensive. So I looked on google what the price should be. And also looked what questions people have about Pommelo... and about celery roots, and some other things I can't find in my usual stores.

The most frequent questions were about pommelo... asking what it tastes like.

That is you... you ask about the 'river', and never wade in.

Or some of you put your pinkie in the water and you think you are done.

My client who for a decade did nothing but play computer games, is now doing serious work. He grew through the Reality Challenge.

My client who is going for her RN degree in March... she is age 5, emotional/intellectual age.

She EARNED it during the Validation Challenge.

Challenges are the least expensive and most immersive tools.

I challenge you, and you challenge yourself.

If you do challenge yourself. Very few do... ever. Anywhere.

And those who don't challenge themselves are the sorry but opinionated people who Roosevelt, Teddy, talked about.

He railed against cynics who looked down at men who were trying to make the world a better place. 'The poorest way to face life is to face it with a sneer,' he said. 'A cynical habit of thought and speech, a readiness to criticize work which the critic himself never tries to perform, an intellectual aloofness which will not accept contact with life's realities—all these are marks, not ... of superiority but of weakness.'

He doesn't talk about the billions who, in addition, may know about, want to know about, interested about things that can't be known by looking on. Asking about.

They need to be involved in... The work, the assignment, life.

Not in the mind, mind you! In reality.

In the mind you cannot feel, cannot see, cannot experience reality, so 'the work' cannot work on you.

Some of my clients don't know reality. They only know what THEY said about reality, but that is NOT reality, that is a mish-mash...

If you want to effect reality then you want to, need to separate reality from what you said about it... and then you can effect reality.

If you are 'working' on the mish-mash reality (the occurrence, or some others call it the 'personal reality'), your results will be disappointing.

If I could stand on the rooftop and yell it to every person who visits my site, I would have a mailing list that has eliminated the weak, the slothful, the unable to think for themselves crowd.

So, what is the 'famous' law of attraction myth and what are the common characteristics of the people who believe in it?

In the New Thought philosophy, the law of attraction is the belief that by focusing on positive or negative thoughts a person brings positive or negative experiences into their life. The teaching is based upon the idea that people and their thoughts are both made from 'pure energy', and that through the process of 'like energy attracting like energy' a person can improve their own health, wealth and personal relationships.

The concept of law of attraction received criticism in skeptical essays, such as Robert Todd Carroll's The Skeptic's Dictionary.

Law of attraction is an example of a pseudoscience.

The essence of LOA

The essence of this pseudoscience teaching is that you can just wait for the universe to provide what you need... or as Pam Ragland said in her 5,700 dollar course (ugh) you can submit your order and the 'Universe' kitchen will fill it.

Not a word about action. Not a word about doing anything other than guarding your thoughts.

But...

Male Iceberg.

You have no control over your thoughts. And, besides, your thoughts sit on the top of the iceberg, with 90% of it immersed in water... And nowhere in the LOA teachings is anything about the immersed part.

I had a conversation the other day with a guy who obviously believes in the LOA... judging from his behavior.

In his own words, he says, he doesn't believe in the LOA... but you only need to observe a person to know what they really believe in... because their actions, their lack of actions, their misdirected actions, their protestation, their smile or the lack of it gives them away.

You actually have to be literally dumb and dupable to believe in garbage like that.

It is like opium for the masses. More convenient than actually becoming worth a damn. Becoming worth a damn is a whole lot of work.

LOA people are only TLB 1 because there is no lower score...

And in addition to being slothful, mentally and physically, LOA people are a self-righteous intolerant bunch.

People who cater to them get rich...

further proving that LOA works. Because selling to the quire is a cinch... But LOA teachers are NOT LOA believers, or they would never sell. It still takes work to sell... and a LOA person would never do that work.

So I have no use for LOA people on my site.

Here is an interesting tidbit: as an empath I can tell someone's overall attitude, emotional state, vibration, beingness.

LOA people are the most miserable bunch.

They remind me of the doomsday cult that was waiting for the UFO's to pick them up... and the UFO's never came. Actually there were several of these cults, because people are so damn stupid.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.

Albert Einstein: 'The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny, however, is alleviated by their lack of consistency.'

OK, in my search on google I found a guy, a Swedish guy who had a good article and may have some other good stuff, didn't actually check.

I Made Fun of the Law of Attraction And Here’s What Happened

What if I told you I had found an easy way to get rich and successful–would you be interested in knowing more?

Sure you would.

Alright, I will indulge your curiosity.

Here’s what I’d do. . .

I’d tell people whatever they wanted to hear.

I’d tell every guy he was a badass. Even if he was a lazy deadbeat...