Politics with Paul

Politics with Paul

By Paul RaderNewsGovernmentPolitics
Download on the App Store

Politics with Paul episodes

  • How Predictable are Election Results? | Politics with Paul #117

    Something that gets lost in the election noise is that a lot of contests are foregone conclusions. Many of the results and the way many voters behave can be seen from a mile away. But have you wondered why so many elections are easily predictable?

    Today's episode of Politics with Paul explores what is predictable in elections and the implications. Listen in to see which aspects of politics and voter behavior are easily foreseeable and which are harder to forecast, where the fluctuations are that lead to unexpected results, and most importantly why this level of predictability poses trouble for democracy and holding government accountable.

    0:00 The Predictability of Elections

    1:33 Predicting Individuals vs. Groups

    7:46 Common Data Points Used to Forecast Elections

    16:26 Other Election Aspects That are Predictable

    24:57 Outside Factors That Can Impact an Election’s Predictability

    30:48 Predictability Poses Problems for Accountability, Democracy

    36:36 Closing

    Other Works
    • FREE 5-day educational email course on how to fight polarization: https://detoxifyamericanpolitics.com/
    • Buy my book about political independents: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Independents-Rarely-Win-Elections-ebook/dp/B09K8PYM5J/
    • Medium articles on elections and political science: https://paulrader-42650.medium.com/
    Media
    • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrader352/
    • My website: https://paulrader.org/
    • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulRaderWrites
    • Email: [email protected]
    38 min
  • Do Winning Candidates Have a Voter "Mandate"? | Politics with Paul #116

    You often hear election winners claim they have a voter "mandate" - because they won, the public has entrusted that candidate to implement all their policy views. But does the idea of the voter mandate really hold up to scrutiny?

    Today's episode dives into the logic (or lack thereof) of the voter mandate, its implications, and why it's so often claimed by winning candidates. While it may not sound like a big deal to some observers, the mindset can have some important ramifications for government accountability, how well elected officials represent us, and whether we have sufficient choices in elections.

    0:00 The Voter "Mandate" Myth and Why it Matters
    2:01 The Faulty Logic of the Voter "Mandate"
    10:17 When the Voter Mandate Runs Into Reality
    15:03 Voter Mandates and Representation of the People
    20:04 Voter Mandates and Whether We Have Sufficient Choices
    23:38 Voter Mandates and Whether We Hold Officials Accountable
    31:15 What's the Big Deal About Claiming a "Voter Mandate"?
    34:09 Final Thoughts: Words, Actions Matter More as Elected Officials

    Other Works
    * FREE 5-day educational email course on how to fight polarization: https://detoxifyamericanpolitics.com/
    * Buy my book about political independents: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Independents-Rarely-Win-Elections-ebook/dp/B09K8PYM5J/
    * Medium articles on elections and political science: https://paulrader-42650.medium.com/

    Media
    * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrader352/
    * My website: https://paulrader.org/
    * Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulRaderWrites
    * Email: [email protected]

    37 min
  • Think About These Things Before You Vote | Politics with Paul #115

    Informed voting is about more than mulling over who the “right” candidates are or how you should vote on ballot measures. It’s about understanding fundamentals of American governance and well-rounded decision-making.

    Whether you are a regular election participant, a first-time voter, or anything in between, this episode of Politics with Paul seeks to provide advice on how to make your vote decision-making easier and clearer, with 6 principles you may or may not have considered previously. Before you vote, I ask that you think these ideas over, including how to evaluate candidates, weighing how much a candidate might keep their promises, and how often (if ever) you should vote AGAINST somebody rather for another.

    0:00 Navigating Election Season: An Introduction

    2:14 Do Not Vote Rashly or Immediately

    6:20 Campaigns are Trying to Influence Your Vote, Not Inform You

    12:28 The Reality of Candidate Promises

    17:48 How Much Should Candidates Do Exactly What Voters Want?

    21:26 Heuristics: What Candidate Aspects Should Impact Your Vote?

    29:22 Should You Ever Vote Against Someone Instead of for Another?

    36:18 Deciding What to Vote On: The Ballot Breakdown

    40:50 Closing Thoughts and My Other Media

    Other Works
    • FREE 5-day educational email course on how to fight polarization: https://detoxifyamericanpolitics.com/
    • Buy my book about political independents: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Independents-Rarely-Win-Elections-ebook/dp/B09K8PYM5J/
    • Medium articles on elections and political science: https://paulrader-42650.medium.com/
    Media
    • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrader352/
    • My website: https://paulrader.org/
    • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulRaderWrites
    • Email: [email protected]
    45 min
  • Is Negative Campaigning Effective? | Politics with Paul #114

    Negativity reigns in political ads — from assailing of candidate records to personal attacks. Despite candidate pledges to be positive and voters’ insistence that they hate negative campaigning, combative and adversarial ads become only more ubiquitous in the final weeks before an election.

    With the harmful impacts to democracy and dialogue that negative ads can bring, there are some questions we need to ask ourselves as voters, candidates, and political observers. Is negative campaigning really that effective? Do we truly hate negative campaigning like we say we do? Can it still sometimes serve a good purpose? And lastly, what can we do about it? Today’s episode of Politics with Paul explores these questions and more.

    0:00 What We Should Ask Ourselves About Negative Campaigning

    1:35 What is "Negative" Campaigning?

    6:26 The Blurred Line Between "Informative" and "Misleading"

    9:21 Why Negative Campaign Ads are So Common

    14:46 Do We Truly Hate Negative Campaigning?

    19:06 How Effective is Negative Campaigning?

    26:41 Why it's Hard to Legally Limit Negative Campaign Ads

    30:52 How We Can Push Back Against Excessive Negative Campaigning

    38:06 Closing and My Other Links

    Other Works
    • FREE 5-day educational email course on how to fight polarization: https://detoxifyamericanpolitics.com/
    • Buy my book about political independents: https://www.amazon.com/Why-Independents-Rarely-Win-Elections-ebook/dp/B09K8PYM5J/
    • Medium articles on elections and political science: https://paulrader-42650.medium.com/
    Media
    • LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrader352/
    • My website: https://paulrader.org/
    • Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PaulRaderWrites
    • Email: [email protected]
    40 min
  • Why Do We Vote? Why SHOULD We Vote? | Politics with Paul #113
    Voting is often treated as a simple civic duty, but the reasons people vote are more varied than that. In this episode of Politics with Paul, we look at why we vote in the first place, whether voting can be considered rational, and five common motives that shape turnout.
    The discussion evaluates those motives and explores the blurry lines between altruism and self-interest, as well as between duty, belonging, and social approval. It closes by asking why understanding our motives for voting matters at all.
    25 min
  • Are We Truly Rational When We Vote? | Politics with Paul #112
    Voting is often treated as a straightforward act of reason, but the reality is more complicated. In this episode of Politics with Paul, we examine what it means to vote rationally, how heuristics shape political choices, and 4 major models of voting behavior: rational vote theory, party-line voting, retrospective voting, and prospective voting.
    The discussion also looks at what influences our ballots beyond pure reasoning and asks a central question: how rational are we, really, when we vote?
    38 min
  • Is There Really a "Wasted" Vote? | Politics with Paul #111
    In elections, many voters worry about "wasting" votes on perceived uncompetitive candidates - but is there such a thing as a wasted vote? Or perhaps this is the better question: Is the logic behind "not wasting votes" flawed?
    Today's episode of Politics with Paul dives into this common thought process that affects countless votes - and therefore, countless election results. The discussion cuts to the heart of some of the most important questions in politics: why we even vote in the first place, how logical voters' thinking is, and whether we are truly holding politicians, interest groups, and media accountable.
    35 min
  • When is it Appropriate to "Talk About Politics"? | Politics with Paul #110
    Growing up and even as adults, we're often told that we should avoid talking politics because it is too divisive. That's understandable given how toxic the subject is, but that's not always good advice. Yet how do we know when we should and shouldn't discuss it?
    There's a time and place for everything, and today's episode of Politics with Paul explores when and where that is for elections and policy talk. Included in the discussion are the factors that influence the appropriateness of talking politics, why it's not just about when and where we discuss it, and whether that old advice to avoid political conversation may be contributing to today's divisiveness and polarization.
    44 min
  • The US Senate: Abolish, Keep the Same, or Reform? | Politics with Paul #109
    The US Senate often finds itself in the middle of controversy and as the subject of scorn. But does this mean we should eliminate it completely? Is it outdated ... or still a necessary part of American government?
    In today's episode of Politics with Paul, we tackle this question. While it's not a popular view, at its core are some of the most essential questions about how our government should work. The episode also covers why we need to know why the US Senate was created, the question of whether it is an extreme position, and potential changes to the US Senate including a lower threshold to override filibusters or slight changes to the number of Senators per state.
    42 min
  • How We Can Start Fixing Political Apathy w/ Travis Taylor | Politics with Paul #108
    Apathy about politics is always a looming threat to democracy - one that even the Founding Fathers warned about. But why do we see so much apathy? And what can we do about it?
    On today's episode, survey research expert Travis Taylor discusses his insights and findings on the problem of political apathy and how we can start fixing it. Drawing on his new book, "Democracy InAction: How Citizen Apathy Threatens America and What We Can Do About It," tune in to hear his advice on the sources of political detachment, where civic involvement can improve (which goes beyond voting), and how the solution starts with simple changes.
    52 min

About Politics with Paul

From the publisher's feed

Approachable, nonpartisan, and nonideological analysis of various political topics by nonpartisan political analyst, writer, researcher, and speaker Paul Rader.