Welcome back to Positively Politics, the show that breaks down the often complicated and negative world of politics in a straightforward, academically rooted way. In this episode, Dr. Lara Marerfield-Wilson follows up on her recent primary elections discussion by cracking open the playbook on political conventions.

While it is a common misconception that conventions have evolved into nothing more than idealized, multi-million dollar pep rallies, Dr. Marerfield-Wilson dives deep into the data to show they still hold a crucial place in the election lifecycle. From the local weekend events to the massive national spectacles, this episode explores the history, the mechanisms, and the surprising amount of power that party delegates still yield. Plus, we take a look at the legal outliers—examining how states like Indiana, Michigan, and South Dakota legally mandate conventions to nominate specific statewide candidates outside of the regular primary system.

Whether you are trying to make sense of the upcoming 2026 midterm geography or looking ahead to the road to 2028, tune in to discover what is so conventional—and unconventional—about the modern political convention.

In this episode of Positively Politics, host Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson breaks down the shifting dynamics of the current congressional midterm landscape. She introduces the Cook Political Report's Partisan Voting Index to evaluate the safety and competitive outlook of current House and Senate seats. Dr. Wilson also provides historical context on how public perception can shift power during midterms. Finally, she highlights the direct impact of President Trump’s "revenge tour" and his endorsement strategy on high-profile primary elections in Texas and Kentucky.

Welcome back to Positively Politics with Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Indianapolis! We are officially in the thick of the primary election season, and in this episode, Dr. Wilson pulls back the curtain on how political parties actually select the candidates who make it to your November ballot.

Ever wonder where the primary system came from? Dr. Wilson traces the 130-year history of American primaries, charting the fascinating democratic shift away from the "smoke-filled rooms" of old-school party conventions to the voter-driven ballots we use today. We dive deep into the political science of primary elections, breaking down the mechanics of open, closed, partially open, and even the now-unconstitutional blanket primaries. You'll learn about the "bimodal distribution" of voters, exploring why primary turnouts tend to draw the most passionate, ideologically driven partisans rather than moderates.

The episode also tackles the strategic timeline of campaigns, explaining why the calendar order of state primaries is a massive deal for presidential races but carries very little weight in congressional midterms. Finally, Dr. Wilson connects the dots to recent headlines, discussing how recent Supreme Court decisions on redistricting (like the 11th-hour map battles in Louisiana and Alabama) alter the playing field. She also highlights the powerful, often quiet impact of partisan gerrymandering—revealing why, in heavily one-sided districts, the primary election is actually the real race where the winner is decided.

Tune in for a straightforward, academically rooted, and incredibly timely breakdown of how our two-step voting system shapes American democracy!

Join Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson, Professor of Political Science at the University of Indianapolis, for a deep dive into the inner workings of the executive branch. In this episode of Positively Politics, we explore the vital roles, formal powers, and historical context of the United States Cabinet.

The core of this episode examines the recent "Bye Bye Bye" trend in the Trump administration—the dismissal of three high-profile cabinet members in just two months. Dr. Wilson breaks down the specific circumstances surrounding each departure:

• Kristi Noem (Secretary of Homeland Security): Fired in early March following controversial testimony and a self-promotional ad campaign.
• Pam Bondi (Attorney General): Dismissed in early April amidst scrutiny over her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and perceived lack of alignment with the President.
• Lori Chavez-DeRemer (Labor Secretary): Resigned in late April following allegations of personal misconduct and improper behavior.

Key topics covered include:

• The "At Pleasure" Doctrine: Understanding the President's constitutional right to dismiss cabinet members without Senate approval.
• Cabinet Hierarchy: How the age of a department dictates the seating arrangements and ranking of its Secretary.
• The Specialist vs. Generalist: Why the President relies on the specialized expertise of the cabinet to implement laws and manage sprawling bureaucracies.
• The 25th Amendment: The informal yet critical role the cabinet plays in presidential succession and stability.

Whether you're a political science student or a curious citizen, this episode provides an academically rooted look at the personalities and power dynamics shaping the executive branch today.

Listen now on WICR 88.7 The Diamond or wherever you get your podcasts.

In this episode of Positively Politics, Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson dives into the high-stakes world of election recounts. Inspired by the razor-thin margins in Indiana’s recent state senate primaries—where races were decided by as few as four votes—we explore what happens when every single ballot counts.

What you’ll learn in this episode:

• The "Bimodal" Primary: Why primary voter turnouts look different than general elections and how candidate competition drives people to the polls.
• Recount Rules 101: A breakdown of how 48 states handle recounts, why Mississippi and Tennessee are the outliers, and the difference between automatic and requested recounts.
• The Cost of Accuracy: Who foot the bill for a recount? We discuss the financial barriers and the "loser pays" systems found in many states.
• The Margin of Victory: How political analysts categorize "landslides," "safe races," and "toss-ups" using percentage thresholds.

Whether it's a 15-vote gap or a 4-vote nail-biter, Dr. Wilson explains why the recount process is a paramount feature of a transparent and accountable democracy.

In this episode of Positively Politics, Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson provides a deep dive into the history and psychology of presidential assassination attempts. The discussion is framed around a recent thwarted attempt on President Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

Dr. Wilson walks through presidential assassination attemps:.

• Successful Assassinations: Only four sitting U.S. presidents have been killed in office: Abraham Lincoln, James A. Garfield, William McKinley, and John F. Kennedy.
• Failed Attempts: Dr. Wilson highlights several notable failures, including those against Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford (who faced two attempts in one month by followers of Charles Manson), and Ronald Reagan.
• Recent Events: She discusses the specifics of the 2026 attempt by a video game developer from California, as well as a previous 2024 campaign incident involving President Trump.

The episode explores the complex reasons why individuals target high-ranking officials:

• Psychological Factors: Many perpetrators, such as Arthur Bremer and John Hinckley Jr., suffered from mental health issues or sought notoriety rather than specific political change.
• The Role of Rhetoric: Dr. Wilson expresses deep concern over the "escalating rhetoric" in modern politics. She notes that while criticizing policy is a democratic necessity, personal vitriol and hateful language—often fueled by internet anonymity—can embolden individuals toward violence.
• The Vulnerability of Service: She emphasizes the paradox of public service: officials must remain visible and accessible to the public, which inherently makes them more vulnerable to aggression.

This week on Positively Politics, Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson breaks down the high-stakes confirmation hearings of Kevin Warsh, the man poised to succeed Jerome Powell as Chair of the Federal Reserve.

With the global economy hanging in the balance, Dr. Wilson explores:

• The Warsh Transition: Who he is, his background in finance and law, and how his relationship with the president might differ from Powell’s.

• Political Pressure: The increasingly public friction between the President and the Fed, and whether the Board can maintain its historical neutrality.

• The "Nuclear Option": A deep dive into the Senate confirmation process, the impact of partisan divides, and the role of the Vice President in breaking ties.

• Economic Stakes: What Warsh’s potential shift in meeting frequency and interest rate strategy could mean for inflation, employment, and your wallet.

Get the academic perspective on the week's biggest political headlines in a straightforward, accessible way.

Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson breaks down the escalating conflict in Iran and its major domestic ripple effects. This episode explores the constitutional tug-of-war over war powers, the mechanics of the newly expanded Selective Service, and how $4 gas prices are shaping public opinion ahead of the 2026 Midterm elections.

• The New Draft: Analysis of automatic registration and the age limit increase to 26.
• War vs. Conflict: The legal distinction between Article I and Article II powers.
• Public Opinion: Why the "Rally 'Round the Flag" effect is failing in current polls.
• Economic Stakes: How the blockade in the Strait of Hormuz hits American wallets and ballot boxes.

Listen & Subscribe: New episodes every Saturday at 11:30 AM wherever you get your podcasts.

In this episode of Positively Politics, Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson discusses the significant shift in the political landscape following Gallup’s decision to stop tracking presidential approval ratings after 88 years. Starting from the Truman administration and ending with the start of Donald Trump's second term, Gallup has been a definitive source for historical context on how Americans feel about their leaders.

• The "Gallup Gap": Why the loss of this consistent, long-term data is a major deficit for political analysts and historians.
• The Challenges of Modern Polling: Dr. Wilson breaks down why accurate polling is becoming harder, citing plummeting response rates and the "cell phone problem," where caller ID and the decline of landlines make it difficult to reach a representative sample.
• The Psychology of Polling: A look at "cognitive dissonance" in voters, where people are more likely to trust and validate polls that already align with their personal beliefs.
• Where to Look Now: Recommendations for alternative, methodologically rigorous sources such as Pew Research Center, Quinnipiac University, and Marist Poll.

Dr. Wilson concludes by reflecting on the "nostalgia" often seen at the end of a presidency and why consistent, repetitive polling is essential for understanding the natural ebbs and flows of American political approval.

This episode of Positively Politics dives into the significant Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara. Host Dr. Laura Merrifield Wilson provides an in-depth analysis of the arguments surrounding birthright citizenship, a topic brought to the forefront by President Trump's first executive order of his second administration.

The episode explores:

• The Case: Understanding the challenge to the executive order barring automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents who are either undocumented or on temporary visas.
• Historical Context: A look back at the 14th Amendment and the landmark 1898 case US v. Wong Kim Ark, which established the current understanding of birthright citizenship.
• Key Arguments: Examining the opposing views of groups like America First and the ACLU on constitutional rights and the concept of "allegiance".
• The Plaintiffs: Insights into the individuals behind the case, including the pseudonym "Barbara," an immigrant from Honduras.

Dr. Wilson concludes by discussing the potential political ramifications of the Court's upcoming decision, expected in late June 2026, and how it might shape the narrative on immigration heading into the general election.