Powerlines

Australia’s renewable energy transition is becoming increasingly difficult to separate from the communities expected to host it.

In this News24 discussion, the debate turns to the growing tensions surrounding large-scale wind, solar and transmission projects across regional Australia. While some farmers who host renewable infrastructure see the benefits and believe it can coexist with agriculture, others argue that the rapid rollout is creating division, placing significant pressure on rural communities and leaving those outside the projects with little say.

At the centre of the discussion is Climate Change Authority Chair Matt Kean, who is challenged over the pace and scale of the transition, the amount of land required for new infrastructure and, most importantly, what it means for Australian households facing rising electricity costs.

The argument raises a bigger question about Australia’s energy policy: can the country deliver the transition it has committed to while maintaining affordable power and keeping regional communities onside?

It is a debate that is only going to become more important as the rollout accelerates.Video owned by News24

Energy policy is being sold as a simple transition, but the reality is a messy fight over costs, fairness, and who gets left holding the bill. Ben Beattie sits down with Gavin Dufty, National Energy Director at St Vincent de Paul and board member of Energy Consumers Australia, to unpack the hidden machinery behind Australia’s electricity and gas systems and why so many people feel the rules are working against them.Gavin pushes back on the idea that rooftop solar, home batteries, and new consumer energy tech are a free win. He explains how subsidies, fixed network costs, and pricing structures can quietly shift costs onto renters, younger households, and people without the luxury of putting kit on their roof. Ben brings a skeptical engineer’s eye to the conversation, challenging the bureaucracy, the regulators, and the central planning logic behind the current transition.You’ll discover:

* Why “prosumers” are no longer just consumers, and why that matters for network pricing

* How the bill stack actually works, from wholesale energy to transmission, distribution, retail, and GST

* Why fixed costs are becoming the real battleground as more households export power

* What the tariff tracker reveals about retail pricing, default market offers, and the end of big feed-in tariff returns

* Why smart meters, demand management, and home batteries could reshape the market faster than most people expect

Gavin also breaks down the coming wall of transmission costs, the changing economics of gas in Victoria, and the awkward reality of network decline, accelerated depreciation, and service exits that can leave households and businesses scrambling. Along the way, he explains why the system may be less about ideology than about hard trade-offs - and why pretending those trade-offs do not exist is making the politics worse.If you want a plain-English, no-spin conversation about why energy is getting more expensive, why the transition is harder than the headlines suggest, and where the real pressure points are in Australia’s grid, this episode is essential listening.

Ben Beattie

is an engineer and host ofPower Lines, bringing a skeptical, policy-focused lens to Australia’s energy debate.

Gavin Dufty

is National Energy Director, Policy and Research at St Vincent de Paul and a board member of Energy Consumers Australia, known for his work on consumer energy costs, market design, and the tariff tracker.

There’s a lot of talk about renewables being cheap and reliable, but much of what’s presented is misleading, especially when it comes to Australia’s energy policies and the costs they’re hiding.

This piece breaks down the assumptions behind the “green transition,” the real-world costs of batteries and transmission, and why rising energy bills are already telling a different story. It also asks a bigger question: who really pays when policy promises outpace reality?

Most Australians don’t realise how close Australia is to a genuine energy security challenge and how some of the policies being proposed today could make it worse.

In this episode, Jane Norman, CEO of Amplitude Energy, unpacks the debate around domestic gas reservation and explains why Australia’s abundant gas resources could become either one of our greatest strengths or one of our biggest vulnerabilities.

Drawing on more than 30 years of experience across the global energy industry, Jane explains why current policy proposals risk discouraging investment in new gas projects, putting future domestic supply under pressure, increasing prices and raising the likelihood of shortages.

She also explores the realities of Victoria’s gas reserves, why pipeline infrastructure plays such a critical role in delivering affordable energy, and what Australia needs to do to unlock its full energy potential.

In this episode you’ll discover:

• Why proposed domestic gas reservation policies could discourage investment and have unintended consequences for Australian consumers.

• Why long-term investment certainty and foundation contracts are essential in an industry that plans decades ahead.

• How Australia’s LNG export industry supports domestic gas development, and why restricting exports could reduce supply at home.

• The crucial role of pipelines and gas storage in maintaining reliable supply during periods of peak demand.

• Why faster project approvals and investment in new offshore gas basins are vital to improving energy security and putting downward pressure on prices.

Whether you’re an energy professional, policymaker or simply interested in Australia’s future, this conversation offers a clear, practical look at one of the country’s most important policy debates.

Jane Norman cuts through the politics and headlines to explain what’s really happening in Australia’s gas market, the risks of getting policy wrong, and the opportunities that exist if we make the right decisions today.

From billion-dollar battery subsidies and COP spending to transmission lines carving through regional communities, Aidan Morrison, Chris Uhlmann and Ben Beattie unpack the forces reshaping Australia’s energy future.

This wide-ranging discussion explores the political urgency behind net zero, the economic and technical realities of grid transformation, and the unintended consequences emerging across regional Australia. With sharp analysis and candid debate, they ask a difficult question: are we carefully building the energy system of tomorrow, or accelerating into an experiment with consequences we are only beginning to understand?

The Energy Transition Debate: Unpacking Australia's Renewable Energy Policy

The Current State of Energy Policy in Australia

The past few months have been pivotal for the energy sector in Australia. With rising taxation and the government's push for renewable energy sources, many are wondering about the efficacy and sustainability of these initiatives. The Australian Energy Producers Conference held recently highlighted various perspectives on these pressing issues.

The Push for Renewable Energy Zones

In recent years, the Australian government has aimed to establish Renewable Energy Zones (REZ) across the country. While the intent is clear—boost renewable energy generation—there's significant concern regarding the actual implementation. Many projects that were supposed to be connected to these zones have stalled, with local communities expressing skepticism about the viability of wind energy in their regions.

Why are Projects Stalling?

- Economic Viability: There is mounting evidence suggesting the business model for wind energy is collapsing, especially in areas like New England. Projects that were planned five years ago have failed to materialize, raising questions about the planning and execution of these initiatives.

- Community Response: Local communities have voiced their frustration, with many feeling sidelined in the decision-making process. As Chris Uhlmann points out, the sentiment in regions such as Walker is one of “white-hot rage” against what they perceive as imposed policies from the government without proper consultation.

### The Trade-offs of Energy Transition

Transitioning from traditional energy sources to renewable ones involves trade-offs, often leading to unforeseen consequences. As Chris Uhlmann notes, the shift from concentrated energy sources like coal to more dispersed and intermittent sources like wind and solar can lead to significant land use changes and environmental impacts.

- Environmental Concerns: The push for renewables is often at odds with conservation efforts. For instance, the construction of wind farms can lead to the destruction of natural habitats, raising ethical questions about the overall impact on Australia’s biodiversity.

- Economic Costs: The costs associated with building new transmission lines to support renewable energy can be passed onto consumers, resulting in increased electricity bills. The integration of these new energy sources into the existing grid poses significant logistical and financial challenges.

The Future of Natural Gas in Australia

Despite the emphasis on renewables, natural gas remains a critical component of Australia’s energy strategy. Chris Uhlmann discusses the growing recognition of gas as a necessary energy source, especially in light of recent global events affecting energy supply chains.

The Shift Towards Gas

- Government Policy Changes: There is a notable shift in government policy regarding natural gas, with recent discussions highlighting the need to retain gas as a viable energy source. The Australian Energy Market Operator has included gas in its Integrated System Plan as essential for meeting future energy demands.

- Market Opportunities: With global markets in flux, there is a unique opportunity for Australia to capitalize on its natural gas resources. However, this requires overcoming significant regulatory and logistical hurdles.

The Role of Government Policy

The effectiveness of energy policy is often dictated by the extent of government intervention. The recent gas reservation policy has raised concerns among industry stakeholders about its potential to stifle production and innovation in the gas sector. Moreover, the perception of government policies often influences public sentiment regarding energy projects.

Conclusion

The energy transition in Australia presents both challenges and opportunities. As stakeholders navigate the complexities of renewable energy policies, it’s crucial to strike a balance between environmental sustainability and economic viability. The ongoing debates and developments will significantly shape the future of energy in the region.

Key Takeaways

- The establishment of Renewable Energy Zones faces significant hurdles, including community opposition and stalled projects.

- Transitioning to renewable energy involves trade-offs that impact both the environment and the economy.

- Natural gas remains essential in Australia’s energy strategy, but government policies must adapt to ensure its viability.

The Australian Energy Producers conference in South Australia last week came as the world grapples with its biggest energy shock in decades, while at home the oil and gas industry is being cast as both saviour and cash cow. In the lead-up to the federal budget there was a populist push for a 25 per cent gas tax that industry warned would crush investment. The Albanese government stepped back from that, for now, but its move on setting up a domestic gas reservation has left many in the sector confused.

It was against that backdrop that this discussion, A Global Energy Reset, unfolded.

Dr Michael Green from the United States Studies Centre set the tone by pointing to the shockwaves from the third Gulf war. Even if the conflict eases and the Strait of Hormuz fully reopens, he argued, something more lasting has shifted: energy security is now front of mind, and countries are actively seeking reliable alternatives.

Australia is well placed to meet that demand. As BP’s Rachael Risucci, MODEC’s Soichi Ide and Wood’s John Mtanios each noted, the opportunity is real, but so is the risk. If Australian governments make it too difficult to invest and operate, capital and customers will simply look elsewhere.

The tension, as the panel saw it, is that while domestic politics is confused and flat-footed, the rest of the world is moving fast, scrambling to secure supply in an increasingly uncertain age.

Panel

Prof Michael J Green, chief executive officer at the United States Studies Centre.

Rachael Risucci, BP’s vice president Australia, Gas & Low Carbon Energy

Soichi Ide, senior executive managing officer MODEC

John Mtanios is president of Wood’s Asia-Pacific business

Video courtsey of Australian Energy Producers, the peak body representing Australia’s natural gas and oil explorers, developers and producers.

In 2017, I left the ABC and walked down the corridor in Parliament House to begin again as political editor for Nine News.

This was the first story I filed for Nine. At the time, my new bosses were a little bemused by it, but they humoured me.

I don’t claim credit for the insight. I was convinced by the power of an argument I had heard from a man I had come to know well, former fighter pilot and retired Air Vice-Marshal John Blackburn AO.

In 2014, Blackburn authored a report for the NRMA warning that Australia’s fuel reserves were running on empty. This fossil fuel–rich island nation had lost the capacity to produce and refine its own fuel. We were dangerously dependent on imports. Our reserves were wafer thin.

So thin that we were in breach of our obligations to the International Energy Agency.

We counted fuel on tankers at sea as part of our stockpile.

Nearly 90 per cent of the liquid fuel that kept this nation running came from overseas.

Even then, the picture was clear. We were dangerously exposed in a world that was becoming less stable.

Now the echo from the past is all too real. Today, that vulnerability is no longer theoretical.

The Third Gulf War has choked off the oil that feeds the Asian refineries supplying this nation with diesel, petrol and jet fuel. Prices have spiked. The threat of rationing is real. Parts of regional Australia are already running on empty.

We are hostage to long and fragile supply lines in a world now gripped by an energy war. Our economy depends on more than two massive tankers arriving on our shores every single day.

If that flow is disrupted, even briefly, the consequences will be dire. Oil and gas underpin the price of everything. When they rise, everything rises.

If supply stalls, road transport stops, shelves empty, and the economy collapses. This is a crisis we were warned about.

This is what a just-in-time nation looks like when time runs out.

So the question arises: will we learn the right lessons from this crisis?

The lesson is simple.

Fuel security is national security. We need to be far more self-sufficient in the fuels that keep this country running. We need to tap our vast resources of coal, oil and gas. We need to explore the possibilities of converting coal to liquid fuel. We need to explore for oil. We need more gas.

Otherwise, the next shock will not just test our economy. It will test our sovereignty.

The Gulf war has exposed two hard truths: military force still shapes the world, and hydrocarbons still power it. Coal, oil and gas remain the foundation of modern life, embedded in everything from food and medicine to transport, industry and household goods.

When oil and gas prices rise, the cost of living rises with them.

Australia is especially vulnerable because it still depends overwhelmingly on fossil fuels, particularly imported liquid fuels. Diesel keeps freight, farming and mining moving, and without it the country stops.

See more of Opinionated, on Sky News hosted by Danica De Giorgio.

Dr Oleksandra Molloy is not a soldier. But war has defined her work, reshaped her life, and heightened her fears for the West.

A native of Kyiv, now based at the University of New South Wales, Molloy’s research has focused on aviation, emerging technologies, and the changing face of modern warfare. Her early work was on developing the skills of pilots.

“I’ve been interested in aviation for a long time from different perspectives,” she told Powerlines.

That fascination led her to drones. And nowhere has the war-fighting edge of that technology moved faster than in her birthplace, Ukraine. She has seen firsthand how large and small uncrewed systems are changing the nature of war.

“The battlefield is monitored 24/7. It’s very hard to hide anywhere.”

In Russia’s war on Ukraine, drone combat is constantly evolving and has shifted from large platforms to smaller, more agile ones.

“We are no longer talking about the payload of 200 kilograms, but we are talking about a small, cheap, expendable drone that may be delivering a precise strike. Any large systems, including these big and sophisticated ones, have become obsolete, because anything that is moving 100 kilometers away can be easily detected and destroyed.”

Drones have moved from the skies to the land.

“Uncrewed ground vehicles have been one of those important assets at the front line. Why? Particularly for logistics purpose, but also for saving wounded soldiers from the front line and also for mining and demining.”

At sea, Ukrainian systems have taken a heavy toll on Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. And on June 1, Ukraine launched “Operation Spider’s Web,” using 117 drones smuggled into Russia to strike multiple airbases, destroying or damaging over 40 aircraft—including bombers and surveillance planes—in one of the war’s most audacious attacks. The operation, which inflicted an estimated $7 billion in damage, marked a new level of sophistication in Ukraine’s asymmetric drone warfare.

“They have become a relatively cheap option for destroying multi-million and multi-billion dollar assets.”

European nations are paying close attention to the war on their doorstep and are stepping up their spending on uncrewed systems.

“Now there is a sense of urgency on how to develop the systems at scale. How to find the right capabilities, how to keep up with the Ukrainian forces in their development, and also how can we learn and gain that experience so we are able to protect ourselves.”

But there is little evidence the Australian Defence Force has got the memo.

“We don't often hear about the experience of the ADF Ukraine. We just need to keep up and see what actually matters on the battlefield.”

Molloy says there is much to learn, but Australia must also consider the kind of theatre in which it will be operating.

“Context matters. And understand how these systems could be integrated within our geographical location, within our capabilities and providing that additional support to legacy systems. We are surrounded by water, so obviously naval drone capabilities are very important. There has to be a balance between large and powerful systems and small and expendable ones. And most importantly, we need to invest into electronic warfare and counter drone capabilities to be able to defend our assets, our people, and our country. We need to develop the systems indigenously in Australia and spend the effort to develop that manufacturing base.”

Right now, Australia is in a grey zone where the threat from China is driving a step-up in military spending but it lacks any sense of urgency. We should not waste that most precious of gifts.

“The difference between Australia and Ukraine is we have time. We have time, we have resources, we have many talented people who actually are doing the work in this space and we need to really think how to leverage those resources.”

China is not wasting time. Molloy says it is not just supplying drones and watching what is happening from the Russian trenches.

“I think some of their instructors are actually participating in some operations, in Kursk and so forth, together with North Korean. There are orders by 2027 or 2026 to develop millions of those drones. And I think we need to watch what our potential adversaries are doing. And they are investing in these systems. They are also getting the real world experience from the battlefield. And I think that's a little bit scary.”

Australia’s isolation has fed complacency, but a more dangerous world is on our doorstep and we need to rise to meet the times.

“There is no longer peace mentality, and we really need to be concerned and prepare now to defend ourselves.”