pplpod

pplpod

Download on the App Store

pplpod episodes

  • The Cola Wars: How Coke and Pepsi's Feud Rewired Consumer Psychology

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    In 2006 a Coca-Cola executive secretary named Joya Williams and two accomplices offered the company's trade secrets to Pepsi for $1.5 million. Pepsi called Coca-Cola, then the FBI, and undercover agents posing as rogue Pepsi executives closed the trap. That moment of honor between enemies opens a history that starts with two Southern pharmacists: John Stith Pemberton, who created Coca-Cola in Georgia in 1885, and Caleb Bradham, whose North Carolina syrup Brad's Drink became Pepsi-Cola in 1898.

    From there the fortunes split. Coke built an identity out of the contour bottle and Santa Claus, while Pepsi went bankrupt in 1923 and again in 1931 and survived by selling 12 ounces for a nickel. This episode tracks the rivalry through the Pepsi Challenge of 1975, the New Coke panic of 1985, the celebrity arms race of the MTV years, and the modern stalemate in which Powerade fights Gatorade and Dasani fights Aquafina in every cooler.

    • During its bankruptcy years Pepsi offered to sell itself to Coca-Cola, and Coke declined twice, a miscalculation compared here to Blockbuster passing on Netflix.
    • The Pepsi Challenge was tilted by biology: in a single sip the brain favors the sweeter drink, and Pepsi is slightly sweeter with a sharper citrus profile.
    • New Coke launched in April 1985. Less than three months later, in July, the company apologized and brought back the original as Coca-Cola Classic.
    • In January 1984 pyrotechnics went off early during a Pepsi shoot at the Shrine Auditorium and set Michael Jackson's hair on fire. He donated the $1.5 million settlement to a burn center.
    • A Pepsi Stuff commercial joking that seven million points could buy a Harrier jet led a college student to demand one and sparked the Leonard v. Pepsico lawsuit.
    19 min
  • Casino de Monte-Carlo: The Desperate Gamble That Saved Monaco

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    The citizens of Monaco have never been allowed to gamble in the casino that made their country famous. That rule goes back to the beginning, when the House of Grimaldi was nearly broke. In 1848 the towns of Menton and Roquebrune declared independence, taking with them the olive oil and fruit taxes that funded the state. Prince Florestan froze. His wife, Princess Caroline, looked to the spa and gambling resort at Bad Homburg in Germany and decided Monaco would copy it: drain wealthy foreigners at the tables while keeping locals away from the house edge.

    The first attempts flopped. A temporary casino opened in December 1856 in a villa with no roads leading to it, no hotels, and no marketing, and the concession passed from one overwhelmed manager to the next. This episode follows how Caroline finally landed François Blanc, the man behind Bad Homburg, and how his money, railways, and rebranding turned a spot called The Caves into Monte Carlo, a stage for famous winning streaks, costly superstition, and a name borrowed by physics.

    • After Blanc refused her offer, Caroline befriended his ailing wife and kept insisting that Monaco's mild climate was the cure. By 1863 he had taken over with 15 million francs in capital and a 50-year concession.
    • Blanc had lent nearly five million gold francs to help finish the Paris Opera, which let him call in architect Charles Garnier to add the Beaux-Arts concert hall facing the sea.
    • Breaking the bank meant emptying one table's reserve of chips, at which point the croupier draped it in black cloth until more funds arrived from the vault.
    • In 1873 British engineer Joseph Jagger hired six clerks to log every winning number, found a biased wheel favoring nine numbers, and bet on its mechanical flaw.
    • In the summer of 1913 a roulette ball landed on black 26 times in a row while gamblers lost millions of francs betting that red was due.
    22 min
  • The Potlatch: Where Giving Away Your Wealth Was the Path to Power

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    Among the Kwakwaka'wakw, Haida, and Tlingit peoples of the Pacific Northwest coast, status came from emptying your pockets. The potlatch was a winter feast held for births, deaths, adoptions, and weddings, hosted by a kinship house of about 100 members under an aristocrat regarded as the living incarnation of its ancestral founder. To an outsider it looked like a party. In practice it was a legal system: guests who accepted a blanket or a basket of food were being paid to witness and validate the host's titles and the hunting, fishing, and berry territories attached to them.

    This episode explains how that system worked, how smallpox and a flood of Hudson's Bay blankets set off potlatch inflation, and why aristocrats began breaking coppers and burning fortunes in what amounted to financial duels. It then follows the Canadian government's 1884 ban under the Indian Act, the decades the ceremony spent underground, the repeal in 1951, and its return as living law.

    • A child received a second name at a potlatch a year after birth, and around age 12 hosted a small one of their own to earn a third.
    • Coppers, two-foot shields of beaten metal, were each considered equal in value to a human slave. Chilkat blankets of mountain goat wool and cedar bark could take a year to weave.
    • Gifts had to be returned in full plus interest. A rival who could not match a host's giving or destruction lost face and political standing.
    • The 1884 ban carried two to six months in jail, yet a chief told Franz Boas: let the white man observe his law, we shall observe ours.
    • Families hid the practice in small dinners and gatherings disguised as Christmas or Thanksgiving. Today the Haida Nation roots its constitution in potlatch law.
    22 min
  • Veblen Goods: Why Raising the Price Makes Luxury More Desirable

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    The law of demand says people buy less of something as it gets more expensive. Veblen goods break that rule. Named for Thorstein Veblen, whose 1899 book The Theory of the Leisure Class dissected the Gilded Age mansions of the Carnegies and Vanderbilts, these are products whose high price is the main feature. A luxury watch keeps the same time as a $10 pharmacy digital, yet cutting its price could send the waiting list elsewhere. Veblen called the motive pecuniary emulation, and the episode compares it to a peacock's tail: waste as proof of fitness.

    From there the conversation moves into brain scanners, bonus envy, and brand strategy. It explains why a 40 percent price cut can produce a brief sales rush and then hollow out a luxury label, why loud logos are giving way to conspicuous thrift and conspicuous ethics, and why economists classify status spending as a deadweight loss. It closes by sorting Veblen goods from their cousins: the snob effect, the bandwagon effect, the hot hand fallacy, and the Giffen good.

    • A 2007 MRI study led by Klaus Fliessbach found the ventral striatum lit up far more when a participant earned $60 against a peer's $30 than when both received the same reward.
    • The relative consumption trap: a $5,000 bonus feels like a loss the moment you learn a coworker doing the same job got $10,000.
    • Critics such as Colin Campbell long faulted Veblen's theory for resting on assumptions about motives that people will never admit to in a survey.
    • The counter-Veblen effect shows up when someone brags that a complimented jacket cost six dollars at a vintage store. The flex is savvy, and it is still a flex.
    • A Giffen good is a poverty trap about survival, as with potatoes during the Irish famine. A Veblen good is a wealth trap about status.
    21 min
  • Groupon: The Daily Deal Giant That Turned Down $6 Billion From Google

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    In 2006 Andrew Mason got so frustrated trying to cancel a mobile phone contract that he built a website for collective action. The Point launched in 2007 with a million dollars in seed money from his former employer, Eric Lefkofsky, and its users promptly ignored the social causes and used it to organize group discounts. In November 2008 the pivot became Groupon, and its first deal was two-for-one pizza at Motel Bar, on the ground floor of the company's own Chicago building.

    Sixteen months later Groupon was worth over a billion dollars, with comedy writers penning its daily emails and a tipping-point model that turned customers into an unpaid sales force. This episode traces what came next: a rejected Google offer of $5.3 billion plus a $700 million earn-out, a November 2011 IPO shadowed by creative accounting, a stock that lost 80 percent of its value by 2012, a notorious Super Bowl ad, and the long retreat to a smaller company focused on local experiences.

    • Groupon originally kept about 50 percent of each coupon sold, and only about 20 percent of deal buyers ever came back to pay full price.
    • Its custom metric, ACSOI, stripped out online marketing costs to show $60.6 million in operating income for 2010. Standard accounting revealed a $420 million operating loss.
    • Of roughly $1.12 billion in venture capital raised before the IPO, more than $940 million, about 84 percent, was paid out to the three founders and early backers.
    • The 2011 Super Bowl commercial starring Timothy Hutton used the plight of the Tibetan people as a punchline, forcing Mason to apologize and pull the ad.
    • By 2020 Groupon was phasing down physical goods, cutting 44 percent of its workforce, and shrinking from 27 countries to 15.
    13 min
  • The Broken Window Fallacy: Why Destruction Never Creates Wealth

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    A kid's baseball goes through a bakery window, and someone in the crowd shrugs that at least the glazier gets paid. In 1850 the French economist Frédéric Bastiat took that reflex apart in his essay That Which Is Seen and That Which Is Not Seen. His shopkeeper, James Goodfellow, spends six francs replacing a pane his careless son broke, and those six francs never reach the cobbler or the bookseller. Nothing new was created. A window that already existed was simply bought back.

    This episode follows the idea from Bastiat to Henry Hazlitt, who named the broken window fallacy in his 1946 book Economics in One Lesson, and then tests it against bigger wreckage: the Great Fire of London, hurricanes and earthquakes, cash for clunkers, and the old belief that war is good for business. Along the way it separates GDP, which measures flow, from wealth, which is the stock that destruction drains, and explains why economies recover from lost buildings far more easily than from lost people.

    • Bastiat imagined the glazier secretly paying a boy one franc per smashed window, then showed the economic math is identical whether the breakage is an accident or a racket.
    • He mocked a protectionist journal by following its logic to the conclusion that burning Paris to the ground would be a boost for national trade.
    • A bathtub analogy explains post-disaster booms: a hurricane blows a hole in the tub, insurance money turns the faucet on full, and GDP spikes while the region only refills what it lost.
    • Geological disasters like the 1995 Kobe earthquake do more lasting economic harm than climate disasters, because they destroy human capital along with property.
    • About a tenth of the economic cost of the United Kingdom's 2007 summer floods was attributed to public health effects, spending that raises GDP while only healing a wound.
    26 min
  • Cornering the Market: Chocfinger, the Hunt Brothers, and Silver Thursday

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    In July 2010 a trader named Anthony Ward bought 7 percent of the world's annual cocoa production, pushed prices to a 33-year high, and earned the nickname Chocfinger. He was attempting one of the oldest and riskiest plays in commerce: cornering a market, gaining enough control of an asset to dictate its price. This episode explains why the strategy nearly always destroys the person who tries it. Buying on that scale inflates the price you pay, invites other traders to bet against you, and leaves you with a hoard you cannot sell without crashing the very market you built.

    The history begins with Thales of Miletus, who rented every olive press around Miletus and Chios before a bumper harvest and proved a philosopher could get rich. It turns darker in the Gilded Age, when journalist Edwin Lefevre found vanity and revenge behind most corners. Jay Gould and James Fisk's assault on gold produced the Black Friday panic of 1869, and F. Augustus Heinze's failed copper scheme fed the Panic of 1907. Later chapters cover onions, the Hunt brothers' silver, Sumitomo's rogue copper trader, and Porsche's secret move on Volkswagen.

    • The Treasury broke the 1869 gold corner by releasing government gold. Gould and Fisk, tipped off early, sold out and escaped while ordinary investors were wiped out.
    • Sam Siegel and Vincent Kosuga's onion corner in Chicago led Congress to pass the Onion Futures Act, which still bans onion futures trading.
    • The Hunt brothers drove silver from roughly $11 an ounce in the fall of 1979 to nearly $50 by January 1980. Exchanges then tightened margin rules and the price collapsed on Silver Thursday.
    • Yasuo Hamanaka of Sumitomo controlled roughly 5 percent of the world's copper for a decade through forged signatures and hidden positions, costing the firm $2.6 billion and earning him eight years in prison.
    • In October 2008 Porsche revealed control of over 74 percent of Volkswagen through shares and options, and the resulting short squeeze briefly made VW the most valuable company in the world.
    24 min
  • Betamax vs VHS: How Sony Lost the Videotape War It Started

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    Sony brought Betamax to market in 1975 and briefly owned all of home video. By 1988 it had agreed to build VHS machines under its own name. This episode dissects how that happened. Sony had shown its Beta prototype to rivals in 1974, expecting them to adopt it. JVC, then a subsidiary of Matsushita, refused and developed the Video Home System instead. Betamax delivered a sharper picture, about 250 horizontal lines, but its tape ran out in exactly one hour. VHS arrived in 1976 with two hours on a cassette, enough for a movie or a football game.

    The larger difference was strategy. Sony kept Betamax proprietary and protected its hardware margins. JVC licensed VHS to RCA, Panasonic, Zenith, Magnavox, Hitachi, and Sharp, and later Korean makers such as Samsung and GoldStar pushed player prices under $200 by 1986. Video rental stores, paying $80 to $100 per tape and short on shelf space, stocked the majority format, and Beta owners found fewer titles every year. The popular claim that the adult film industry picked the winner gets a hard look here, and the economics of the rental shelf turn out to matter more.

    • To match VHS, Sony added a slower Beta II mode that reached two hours but cut resolution to 240 lines, giving up much of its picture advantage.
    • When RCA wanted four hours on one tape, JVC's engineers resisted on quality grounds. Matsushita executives overruled them to win RCA's American distribution.
    • VHS held 60 percent of the North American market by 1980 and 90 percent of the United States VCR market by 1987. Beta's share in the United Kingdom fell to 7.5 percent by 1986.
    • Sony took some revenge when Blu-ray defeated HD DVD in February 2008.
    • The last Sony Betamax unit was produced in 2002, and the final VCR, a VCR and DVD combination, came off the line in 2016.
    22 min
  • Bank Runs Explained: From Goldsmiths to the $42 Billion Cyber Run

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    The balance on a banking app looks like cash in a vault. Most of it is out in the world as mortgages and business loans. That is fractional reserve banking, and it means no bank can pay all its depositors on the same day. This episode explains why a bank run follows from that fact. The Diamond-Dybvig model shows that joining a run can be perfectly rational: if you expect others to withdraw, your best move is to get in line first, even when you know the rumor behind the panic is false. Sociologist Robert K. Merton used bank runs as his prime example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    The history runs from 16th century English goldsmiths who issued more notes than they had gold, to the panics that began in Tennessee and Kentucky in November 1930 and spread through the Great Depression. Along the way come the defenses: imposing stone architecture, deposit insurance, weekend takeovers by the FDIC, and central banks as lenders of last resort. Then comes the modern problem. Silicon Valley Bank lost $42 billion in deposits in a single day in March 2023, a speed that rules built around a 30-day panic were never designed to handle.

    • In 1832 British reformers set off a deliberate run under the slogan Stop the Duke, Go for Gold, pressuring the Duke of Wellington aside and clearing the way for the Reform Act.
    • Canada avoided the banking panics that wrecked the United States in the 1930s because its banks had nationwide branch networks, while American unit banks depended on a single local economy.
    • Old banks built cavernous lobbies so that lines stayed out of public view, staged visible cash deliveries, and paid employees' relatives to stall at the teller windows.
    • In June 2025 a hacktivist group called Predatory Sparrow disabled Iran's Bank Sepah without stealing money. The outage alone triggered a run that spread to other banks.
    • Proposed defenses for digital panics include dormant emergency payment nodes and algorithmic withdrawal fees that rise as more people try to pull money at once.
    27 min
  • Gresham's Law: Why Bad Money Drives Out Good, From Athens to Now

    Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

    Given a crisp five dollar bill and a torn one, most people hand over the torn one. Gresham's law is that instinct at the scale of nations: when the law forces two unequal kinds of money to pass at the same face value, people spend the worse and hoard the better. This episode starts in Tudor England, where Henry VIII secretly replaced about 40 percent of the silver in English shillings to pay for his wars. Merchants noticed the duller look and lighter feel at once. Financial agent Thomas Gresham later warned Elizabeth I that the good coin had fled the realm.

    Gresham did not name the law. Economist Henry Dunning Macleod attached his name to it in 1858, and others had described it far earlier, among them Copernicus in a 1519 treatise, the scholar Ibn Taymiyyah, and Aristophanes in The Frogs around 405 BC. The episode follows the pattern through the vanishing American silver half dollar, Isaac Newton's costly mispricing of gold at the Mint, and the reversal known as Thiers' law, when hyperinflation lets sellers refuse bad money outright. It ends with used cars, carbon offsets, and workplaces.

    • After the Coinage Act of 1965 cut the half dollar from 90 percent to 40 percent silver, the older coins disappeared from circulation. The cycle repeated when silver was removed entirely in 1971.
    • In 1717 Newton, as Master of the Mint, set the gold guinea at 21 silver shillings, overvaluing gold. Merchants carried silver abroad and Britain slid onto a de facto gold standard.
    • Aristophanes compared Athenians passing silver-plated bronze over their good old coin to a city promoting corrupt politicians over upright ones.
    • Thiers' law, popularized by economist Peter Bernholz, describes the breaking point seen in Weimar Germany in 1923 and Zimbabwe in 2009, when people abandon worthless currency for money that holds value.
    • In the used car market, buyers who cannot tell a good car from a lemon offer only an average price, so owners of well-kept cars withdraw them and the lemons take over.
    21 min

About pplpod

From the publisher's feed

pplpod is a podcast about people, places and lots of other stuff. Each episode takes a deep dive into the lives, choices, and legacies of fascinating figures from history, culture,…