
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in former president Donald Trump’s historic immunity case. Trump’s attorneys say he should be granted sweeping immunity in a federal election subversion case because he was acting “officially” as president. Now all eyes turn to how the court decides -- and whether or not this is sent back to lower courts for further adjudication -- with this November’s election potentially hanging in the balance. University of Michigan Law professor Leah Litman and CNN Political Director David Chalian break down the foundations of the case and talk about what’s at stake.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
3.6
315315 ratings
This week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in former president Donald Trump’s historic immunity case. Trump’s attorneys say he should be granted sweeping immunity in a federal election subversion case because he was acting “officially” as president. Now all eyes turn to how the court decides -- and whether or not this is sent back to lower courts for further adjudication -- with this November’s election potentially hanging in the balance. University of Michigan Law professor Leah Litman and CNN Political Director David Chalian break down the foundations of the case and talk about what’s at stake.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
4,039 Listeners
1,153 Listeners
1,169 Listeners
3,389 Listeners
3,851 Listeners
1,689 Listeners
25,782 Listeners
1,520 Listeners
667 Listeners
4,447 Listeners
385 Listeners
303 Listeners
1,309 Listeners
5,424 Listeners
139 Listeners
390 Listeners
8,226 Listeners
124 Listeners
179 Listeners
148 Listeners
460 Listeners
346 Listeners
81 Listeners
84 Listeners
309 Listeners
940 Listeners
168 Listeners
31 Listeners
12 Listeners
63 Listeners