
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in former president Donald Trump’s historic immunity case. Trump’s attorneys say he should be granted sweeping immunity in a federal election subversion case because he was acting “officially” as president. Now all eyes turn to how the court decides -- and whether or not this is sent back to lower courts for further adjudication -- with this November’s election potentially hanging in the balance. University of Michigan Law professor Leah Litman and CNN Political Director David Chalian break down the foundations of the case and talk about what’s at stake.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
3.6
316316 ratings
This week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in former president Donald Trump’s historic immunity case. Trump’s attorneys say he should be granted sweeping immunity in a federal election subversion case because he was acting “officially” as president. Now all eyes turn to how the court decides -- and whether or not this is sent back to lower courts for further adjudication -- with this November’s election potentially hanging in the balance. University of Michigan Law professor Leah Litman and CNN Political Director David Chalian break down the foundations of the case and talk about what’s at stake.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
1,321 Listeners
1,182 Listeners
3,440 Listeners
3,876 Listeners
713 Listeners
1,690 Listeners
837 Listeners
25,760 Listeners
1,023 Listeners
1,534 Listeners
634 Listeners
517 Listeners
376 Listeners
1,309 Listeners
140 Listeners
100 Listeners
123 Listeners
180 Listeners
148 Listeners
460 Listeners
338 Listeners
240 Listeners
81 Listeners
309 Listeners
924 Listeners
150 Listeners
22 Listeners
61 Listeners