Antibiotics are not magic. In this episode of the PFC Podcast, Dennis sits down with Ryan to cut through the common myth that “I’ve given antibiotics, so the wound is protected.” They unpack why vigorous wound care—irrigation, debridement of dead tissue, clean dressings, and early surgical washout—remains the foundation of infection prevention in combat and prolonged field care, while antibiotics only shift the probabilities after the basics are done.

Drawing on historical military medicine (pre-antibiotic eras through GWOT), observational data from the TIDOS study, sepsis timing principles, and real-world experience from Ukraine’s prolonged timelines, Ryan explains why mortality is a limited endpoint, why more broad-spectrum antibiotics are not the answer in high-resistance environments, and how medics and corpsmen at the point of injury make the biggest difference.

Key Takeaways

• Antibiotics help only after good wound care; they never replace irrigation, debridement, and clean dressings.
• Dead or grossly contaminated tissue will not respond to antibiotics no matter how many doses you give.
• Mortality is a blunt and uncommon endpoint in modern combat trauma—look instead at reduced wound infections, osteomyelitis, reoperations, and amputations.
• Practical timing for prophylaxis: ideally within 1 hour, at least within 3 hours (extrapolated from sepsis data).
• Superficial wounds may need wound care alone; deeper or contaminated wounds benefit from antibiotics once cleaned.
• Shorter courses (roughly 3–5 days) are often sufficient in stable patients without established infection—stop when the benefit is exhausted.
• In prolonged or delayed-evacuation settings (Ukraine lessons), vigorous bedside wound care outperforms escalating antimicrobials amid rising resistance.
• Guidelines often assume basic wound care knowledge; that assumption may need to be made more explicit.
• The medic or corpsman at the point of injury is the decisive factor; higher-echelon care is supportive.

Go to ⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠ for more austere and prolonged field care resources. Follow @prolonged_field_care on Instagram, subscribe on your preferred platform, and stay on the bleeding edge of combat medicine.

Chapters

00:00 – Intro & Disclaimer00:21 – Welcome and the Core Question: Do Antibiotics Actually Matter?01:18 – “Antibiotics Aren’t Magic” – Historical Context and the Penicillin Era02:17 – What Antibiotics Actually Do (and Don’t Do) in Infected Wounds03:14 – Wound Care Has the Bigger Impact04:00 – Pre-Antibiotic Military Medicine Lessons05:04 – Why Guidelines Don’t Emphasize Wound Care Explicitly06:49 – Fungal Prophylaxis Debate and “Hot Lights and Cold Steel”09:02 – Combat Medicine as Its Own Specialty and the Loss of Institutional Memory13:17 – Why We Don’t Have Clear Mortality Data on Prophylactic Antibiotics16:21 – What Antibiotics Actually Prevent (Complications, Not Early Death)18:48 – TIDOS Study, Observational Evidence, and Current Guidelines21:39 – Ukraine Lessons: Prolonged Care, Resistance, and Wound Care Priority24:31 – King for a Day: Would You Change Prehospital Teaching?27:42 – Timing of Antibiotics: 1-Hour Ideal, 3-Hour Reasonable Window30:03 – When Antibiotics Are (and Aren’t) Needed – Superficial vs Deep Wounds32:29 – Withdrawing Antibiotics in the Field – Duration Principles34:16 – Final Thoughts: Wound Care First, Antibiotics Second

Whole Blood Is Not a Solution (Until Conventional Forces Can Deliver It)

Recorded live at SOMA 26

Dr. Vanessa Hanick (emergency physician, former active-duty Army, now National Guard) and 1SG Cy Clayton (Ranger Regiment veteran, currently a conventional Role 2 first sergeant) deliver a blunt assessment of a critical readiness gap: while whole blood is the agreed standard of care for damage control resuscitation, conventional forces remain largely unprepared to provide it in support of SOF or any large-scale operations. Drawing on recent deployment experience, unit surveys, and Joint Trauma System training observations, they outline three lethal capability gaps—planning, logistics, and training—and call for proactive SOF-conventional collaboration, institutional reform, and immediate use of available Joint Trauma System mobile training teams.

Sponsored by the Special Operations Medical Association.

Key Takeaways

• The 2021 Joint Trauma System / Defense Committee on Trauma position statement establishes whole blood as the resuscitative fluid of choice that must be available at every echelon and on every evacuation platform within 30 minutes of injury. This is an operational standard, not an aspiration.
• Conventional forces currently fail this standard across three critical gaps: failure to plan (MASCAL and walking blood bank plans are incomplete, unilateral, or nonexistent), logistical incompetence (unreliable cold chain, storage, transport, and warming), and inadequate training (high failure rates on whole blood transfusion even among medics who pass TCCC recertification).
• Survey data from conventional brigade-sized elements show near-zero SOPs for walking blood banks, minimal storage capacity, zero transport or warming capability in many units, and cold-chain training limited to vaccines rather than blood.
• SOF leaders and medics cannot assume conventional support will materialize when needed. Early, deliberate linking with conventional Role 1/2 counterparts—sharing knowledge, training together, and validating capabilities—is essential.
• Joint Trauma System mobile training teams (including the Blood Whole Blood Training Program) already exist and can travel to conventional units to build pre-hospital, Role 2, and Role 3 whole blood and walking blood bank competency. These resources should be used now.
• In future large-scale combat operations the problem only intensifies; the time to close the gap is before the emergency, not during it.

Chapters00:00 – Introduction and disclosures

01:30 – Why SOF–conventional collaboration matters now

03:40 – The 2021 JTS whole blood standard and its implications

05:50 – Three critical capability gaps in conventional forces

06:50 – Gap 1: Failure to plan (Kuwait MASCAL and walking blood bank case study)

11:20 – Gap 2: Logistical incompetence (cold-chain failures on deployment)

13:20 – Gap 3: Training shortfalls (high failure rates on whole blood transfusion)

15:40 – Survey data from conventional units: near-zero capabilities

19:20 – Institutional, organizational, and individual solutions

21:40 – SOF responsibility: link early, train together, validate capabilities

24:40 – Joint Trauma System resources and call to action

28:00 – Closing remarks

In this episode of the PFC Podcast, Dennis sits down with missionary surgeon Jason to cut through the noise on real-world wound care in austere and unconventional warfare environments. From the bridge two miles from the front to resource-scarce guerrilla settings, Jason shares hard-won lessons on getting tourniquets off, aggressive debridement, and keeping patients from dying of infection weeks later.

You’ll hear why most tourniquets can (and should) come off early, how to use the 4 C’s (Color, Consistency, Contractility, Capillary bleeding) to decide what stays and what goes, why inactivity is harm, and how daily dressing changes plus early cleaning beat the classic “leave it alone for 5 days” approach in many field conditions. Jason also covers practical logistics, antibiotic reality checks, pain management during dressing changes, and when a wound is actually ready for delayed primary closure.

Key takeaways:

• Get the tourniquet completely off and look—most wounds do not need it left on.
• Dead tissue, dirt, and debris are the real infection risk; antibiotics cannot fix what you leave behind.
• The 4 C’s give medics a clear, actionable decision tool for debridement.
• Aggressive early cleaning usually means fewer later trips to the OR, less pain, and better long-term outcomes.
• In prolonged or definitive field care, the medic who stays with the patient for weeks must own the wound—not just the initial hemorrhage control.
• Beefy red granulation without cellulitis is the green light for closure decisions; high-tension or complex wounds may still do better left open.

Practical, no-nonsense guidance for anyone who may have to manage wounds far beyond the golden hour.

Chapters

00:00 – Intro & welcome

00:20 – Guest intro: missionary surgeon in UW environments

01:04 – Tourniquet still on + nasty wound: what actually improves outcome?

01:19 – Get the tourniquet off as soon as possible

01:40 – Data point: ~70% of tourniquets not needed

03:11 – Why taking tourniquets off feels so scary

04:14 – Don’t lower slowly—get past venous pressure fast

05:00 – Simple method: fully loosen, look, reapply only if needed

07:17 – Risk of a brief look is low; most bleeding is manageable

09:07 – Care under fire vs. tactical field care / PFC mindset

12:25 – System solutions for large-scale conflict (push capability forward)

14:46 – Optimizing the patient after hemorrhage control15:03 – Minimal tools needed + goal of removing barriers to healing

16:18 – The 4 C’s of viable tissue (Color, Consistency, Contractility, Capillary bleeding)

17:15 – Lean aggressive: dead tissue + debris kills more than a little extra muscle

19:05 – Fungal/opportunistic infections and why clean tissue matters

22:13 – Early and repeated debridement until only living tissue remains

24:00 – How far to go: check compartments, cut questionable tissue

30:33 – Dressing strategy after initial debridement

30:38 – Copeland method vs. daily (or more frequent) changes

33:12 – Checking the wound the next day in austere settings

34:34 – Pain control and watching the patient’s face during dressing changes

37:01 – What the dressing and wound bed should tell you

37:35 – Antibiotics: best antibiotic is good debridement

40:27 – Logistics in UW: travel light, use partner supplies, stay off the radar

42:47 – When is the wound ready for delayed primary closure?

45:45 – What Jason wishes more medics would internalize

For more content, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Recorded live at SOMA 26

Pierre Pasquier (France) and his German counterpart deliver a clear-eyed assessment of how European military medical systems are preparing for large-scale combat operations and major engagements, drawing heavily on lessons from Ukraine. They examine the scale of expected casualties, the return of mass-casualty and prolonged-care realities, the threat of multi-drug-resistant organisms, the vulnerability of medical treatment facilities to deliberate attacks, and the urgent need for true multinational interoperability. The discussion covers doctrine updates, shared training, data collaboration, civilian-military integration, and the strategic value of medical readiness as a deterrent.

Sponsored by the Special Operations Medical Association.

Key Takeaways

• Ukraine has demonstrated casualty rates of several hundred per day—orders of magnitude higher than Iraq/Afghanistan—requiring European medical systems to plan for mass casualties, prolonged field care at scale, and significant disease/non-battle injury burdens, including older soldiers with chronic conditions.
• Multi-drug-resistant bacteria are already arriving in European hospitals via Ukrainian patients; mass-casualty flows will amplify this biosecurity challenge and demand coordinated infection-control strategies.
• Systematic attacks on healthcare facilities necessitate a shift to flexible, mobile, low-signature medical treatment facilities that can hide and defend themselves—something current large Role 1–3 structures are not yet optimized for.
• Lessons from long-evacuation environments (e.g., Sahel) must now be scaled from a handful of patients to dozens or hundreds simultaneously; prolonged care is no longer an exception but a planning assumption.
• True interoperability requires shared language, clear capability definitions across nations, joint data collection and analysis, and training that moves beyond parallel national exercises to actual patient and team cross-flow.
• Germany is positioned as a key NATO medical hub for strategic evacuation; France is actively building civilian-military pathways so that civilian systems can absorb returning casualties while military teams remain forward.
• Medical superiority and demonstrated preparedness function as a strategic deterrent; “stronger together” through SOMA, CMC, shared science, and multinational training is essential.

Chapters

00:00 – Introduction and European context01:50 – Ukraine as the current laboratory and weekly French/German learning process03:10 – NATO Eastern Front realities and multinational medical challenges05:00 – Casualty rate comparisons: WWII → Ukraine and implications for doctrine07:00 – Disease, non-battle injury, and the multi-drug-resistant bacteria threat09:50 – Attacks on healthcare facilities and the need for mobile, low-signature MTFs12:20 – Lessons from the Sahel: prolonged care scaled for LSCO14:50 – Interoperability experience and the value of shared data and science17:40 – Changing mindsets, nomenclature, and national doctrines (French Sauvetage au Combat update)21:40 – Training together: Vigorous Warrior and the next steps for joint exercises23:10 – Strategic MEDEVAC, Germany as hub, and civilian-military integration25:10 – Take-home messages: new/old challenges, medical superiority as deterrent, stronger together27:20 – Q&A: hospital capacity concerns and integrating U.S. physician assistants

In this episode of the Prolonged Field Care Podcast, Dennis sits down with Mitch (U.S. family practice/ER physician) and Augustine (frontline surgeon with five years of experience) to unpack what it actually takes to build and sustain mobile surgical capability in a high-threat Asian conflict zone.

They share the hard-won realities of operating close enough to hear the fighting—often within a mile—while remaining mobile enough to survive repeated bombings. You’ll hear how a pre-war physician assistant training program created a ready pool of skilled local providers, how an engineering student turned a broken village diesel generator into life-saving power, and how two family tents duct-taped together became an operating theater.

Key topics include life-saving procedures that can actually be done under those constraints (chest tubes, hemorrhage control, laparotomy, emergency C-sections), the critical role of a pre-arranged walking blood bank, the art of improvisation (urine catheter as chest tube), the security reasons civilians and fighters refuse local government hospitals, and why underground facilities are often impossible. Most importantly, they discuss the non-negotiable principles: local invitation and ownership, language and cultural integration, knowing why you are there, and the constant tension between capability and mobility.

This is practical, unfiltered prolonged field care for anyone preparing to operate—or train others to operate—when the next facility is days away and the sky is full of drones.

Key Takeaways

• Pre-war training programs (5-year PA model focused on the 80% of common regional problems + trauma) create the only sustainable talent pipeline.
• Mobility is survival: plan the next location before you need it; a full move still costs roughly one day to tear down and one day to stand up.
• Improvisation is a core clinical skill—urine catheters become chest tubes when the real ones run out.
• Walking blood banks beat stored products in this environment if you pre-type the team and cultivate local donors before the first patient arrives.
• Community ownership and language fluency are force multipliers and personal survival tools; operating without local invitation is a fast way to get people killed.

• Generators, headlights, and ambulance patterns create detectable signatures; concealment and rapid patient throughput matter more than concrete.

Chapters

00:40 – Why Mobile Surgical Teams Are Essential in Modern Conflict

01:55 – Pre-War Training Program & Building a Ready Talent Pool

03:00 – First Lessons from the Golden Week Reality

04:30 – Improvising the Facility: Generators, Tents, and Operating Tables

07:00 – The Mobility Dilemma: What You Carry vs. What You Leave

09:30 – Life-Saving Procedures Actually Performed on the Front Line

13:00 – Critical Thinking & Improvisation in Action (Urine Catheter Chest Tube)

14:20 – Walking Blood Bank Strategy & Community Engagement

17:00 – Language, Trust, and Why Local Integration Keeps You Alive

19:00 – Why Patients Bypass Nearby Hospitals

21:00 – Access, Invitation, and Working Under Local Leadership

23:00 – How Close Is Too Close? Drones, Signatures & Site Selection

26:00 – Triage, Patient Flow & Pre-Arranged Evacuation Pathways

28:00 – Sourcing Supplies Without Becoming a Target

32:00 – Faith, Motivation & Enduring Under Fire

32:40 – Underground Facilities vs. Pure Mobility (Ukraine Comparison)

36:00 – How Long Do You Stay? Reading the Threat & Knowing When to Move

38:00 – Final Reflections: People Over Adrenaline

For more content, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Recorded live at SOMA 26

Dr. Emily Johnston (Cascadia Mountain Institute) and SFC Ezequiel Mendoza (Arctic Dustoff, Fairbanks) deliver a hard-hitting, field-validated look at how standard tactical medical gear and medications actually perform—and fail—in true Arctic and extreme cold conditions. Drawing from cold-soak testing, simulated combat exercises, and real operational experience, they break down battery and fluid-warmer failures, rapid freezing of IV tubing and blood sets, medication storage realities, tourniquet performance, and the critical need for early frostbite interventions like ibuprofen and iloprost far forward. Practical fieldcraft solutions, insulation strategies, and clear calls for better-designed cold-weather medical systems are front and center.

Key Takeaways

• No electronic or mechanical medical device (IV pumps, Buddy Lite warmers, etc.) can be trusted to operate unprotected in Arctic conditions—insulate everything, including fluids and tubing.
• Fluids and tubing freeze extremely quickly and become brittle; passive warming solutions using insulated containers + chemical heat packs can keep fluids viable for many hours even at –20°F to –30°F.
• Body heat (base-layer transport systems worn against the skin) is the only reliably consistent way to prevent medication freezing during multi-day cold operations; outer pockets, med boxes, and sling packs routinely fail.
• Current blood administration sets create major clotting and failure points in the cold; shorter, fully insulated, or redesigned kits are needed.
• Most common tourniquets performed adequately after freeze-thaw cycles; metal windlasses held up better than plastic ones under extreme cold.
• Reperfusion injury is the dominant mechanism of tissue loss in frostbite. Early NSAID (ibuprofen) loading and rapid iloprost administration dramatically improve outcomes, yet cold-chain and far-forward delivery of iloprost remain unsolved problems.
• Manufacturer claims about extreme-cold performance often do not match real-world Arctic testing. Independent field validation is essential before relying on any device or medication in these environments.

Chapters00:00 – Introduction & Arctic strategic context

04:45 – Operational realities: long evacuation times and limited cold-weather experience

06:00 – Battery and device cold-soak testing (IV pump & Buddy Lite)

09:20 – Functional testing: frozen pumps, ruptured warmer cartridges, and fluid output

11:40 – Practical insulation and pre-warming techniques for fluids

13:40 – Medication transport failures vs. base-layer body-heat solutions

18:50 – Blood product challenges and call for redesigned cold-weather kits

20:20 – Tourniquet performance after freeze-thaw cycles

21:15 – Frostbite pathophysiology and the critical role of early ibuprofen + iloprost

27:20 – Path forward: needed research, device redesign, and medication stability after freezing

29:40 – Closing remarks and Q&A discussion

For more content, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Consider supporting us: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/ProlongedFieldCareCollective⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.lobocoffeeco.com/product-page/prolonged-field-care⁠⁠⁠⁠

In this essential episode of the Prolonged Field Care Podcast, Dennis sits down with pediatric intensivist Dr. Sara Bibbens to tackle one of the most challenging and anxiety-inducing scenarios in austere medicine: pediatric burns. From initial trauma assessment using MARCH/ABCDE to nuanced airway decisions in small children, burn resuscitation formulas, fluid management pitfalls, hypothermia prevention, wound care, and safe pain/sedation strategies, this conversation delivers practical, downrange-applicable guidance every combat medic, flight medic, and austere provider needs.

Key Takeaways:

• Stick to MARCH/ABCDE — don’t get distracted by dramatic burns; treat life threats first.
• Pediatric airways swell faster — early intubation considerations (GCS <8, large TBSA, stridor, facial burns, soot).
• Initial fluid resuscitation rates by age + precise TBSA calculation using the Consensus Formula (3 mL × kg × %TBSA).
• Add maintenance D5 fluids in kids <30 kg and titrate everything to urine output goals (1 mL/kg/hr under 30 kg; 0.5 mL/kg/hr over 30 kg).
• Plasma-based resuscitation is preferred when available.
• Hypothermia prevention is more critical in children due to higher BSA-to-mass ratio.
• Pain management: Start low with opioids (morphine preferred), ketamine for dissociation/procedural sedation; watch for respiratory depression when combining meds.
• Avoid routine prophylactic antibiotics; focus on source control and dry dressings.

Whether you’re operating in contested environments, remote settings, or supporting pediatric casualties, this episode arms you with the knowledge to avoid common pitfalls like fluid creep and over-resuscitation while delivering life-saving care.

Website: ⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠

Follow @prolonged_field_care on Instagram for carousels, reels, and more austere medicine content.

Subscribe and stay on the bleeding edge of combat casualty care.

• Episode Chapters00:00 - Introduction & Welcome

• 00:46 - Guest Introduction: Dr. Sara Bibbens, Pediatric Intensivist
• 01:04 - Initial Assessment: MARCH/ABCDE in Burned Pediatric Patients
• 02:43 - Prioritizing Life Threats Over Dramatic Burns
• 03:37 - Airway Management in Children: When to Intubate?
• 06:11 - Surgical Airway Limitations & Head Positioning in Pediatrics
• 07:42 - Burn Resuscitation: Initial Fluids & Rule of Tens Limitations
• 08:04 - Pediatric Lund-Browder Chart, TBSA Estimation & Consensus Formula
• 11:46 - Maintenance Fluids (D5) + 4-2-1 Rule in Kids <30 kg
• 13:26 - Glucose Goals & Dextrose Fluid Mixing in Austere Settings
• 14:14 - Urine Output Goals & Endpoints for Resuscitation
• 16:15 - Avoiding Fluid Overload & Fluid Creep in Pediatrics
• 19:00 - Plasma Resuscitation (Vanderbilt Protocol) in Burns
• 20:25 - Titration Strategy: Urine Output Over Fixed Formulas
• 21:52 - Creative Urine Output Measurement (Diaper Weights)
• 22:59 - Hypothermia Prevention in Children (Large Head, High BSA:Mass)
• 24:26 - Wound Care & Why to Avoid Prophylactic Antibiotics
• 25:37 - Pain & Sedation Management: Opioids, Ketamine Dosing & Monitoring
• 28:46 - Common Pitfalls: Fluid Over-Resuscitation
• 29:48 - Managing Fluid Overload & Closing Thoughts

In this presentation, we take a deep dive into the 300-year history of mobile surgery supporting land campaigns — from Dominique Larrey’s ambulance volantes through the Letterman system, Arnhem, the Falklands, Mali, and the current Russia-Ukraine war. Drawing on rare surgical memoirs, battle maps, and personal accounts, the discussion extracts the recurring problems that technology has never fully solved: logistics drag, extended timelines, signature management, and the tension between mobility and capability.

We then turn to the horizon. In an era of mosaic warfare and large-scale combat operations, medicine cannot remain a drag factor. The talk explores contractile and expandable surgical systems, single-surgeon reach, austere armored resuscitation teams, underground and containerized facilities, emissions control, and how we expand the surgical workforce under resource constraints while still doing the most for the most.

Whether you are preparing for LSCO, SOF support, or prolonged field care in denied environments, the hard-won lessons of the past remain the best preparation for the fight ahead.

Key Takeaways

• Mobile surgery is not new — Larrey, Guthrie, Pirogov, and Letterman already solved (and documented) many of the mobility and triage problems we still face.
• Institutional memory fades fast. Rare single-edition war surgery texts must be digitized and pushed into training pipelines before the lessons are watered down.
• In mosaic warfare the linear Role 1–4 model is insufficient. Surgical capability must become a mesh: dispersed, diggable, low-signature, and able to expand or contract with the fight.
• Big fixed facilities and large tented Role 2/3s become high-value targets. Single-surgeon or small polyvalent teams, pre-dug containers, underground sites, and armored austere teams offer greater survivability and shorter wounding-to-surgery times.
• Blood, sterilizing capacity, anesthetic volume, and outflow remain the greatest logistic constraints. Expectation management and robust triage (including expectant) will be non-negotiable.
• Capability can be extended by bringing registrars, ODPs/CRNA-equivalents, and well-trained medics further forward earlier — but this requires deliberate peacetime training and wartime derogations.
• Command and control, decision-making loops, and the ability to cache or hand off casualties must be rehearsed now, not improvised under fire.

Chapters

00:00 – Introduction & Scope: 300 Years of Mobile Surgery02:00 – Institutional Memory, Rare Texts & the Risk of Forgetting05:25 – Dominique Larrey & the Birth of the Ambulance Volante07:00 – Guthrie, Napoleonic Lessons & Early British Mobility07:40 – Crimea, Pirogov’s Forward Teams & Brunel’s Prefabs08:15 – The Letterman System & the American Civil War08:50 – World War I: Auto-Chir, Operating Cars & the Limits of Static Warfare11:15 – Spanish Civil War: Civilian Surgeons & Fluid Fronts12:00 – World War II Desert, SAS & the Reality of Extreme Isolation13:40 – Arnhem, Market Garden & Improvised Care Under Fire16:00 – Varsity, Chindits & the Logistics Drag of Jungle Warfare18:00 – Falklands, Gulf War, Mali & Modern Mobility Challenges19:50 – Ukraine: Extended Timelines, Targeting of Medical Assets & Aged Injuries20:50 – Horizon Scan: Mosaic Warfare & Contractile Surgical Systems22:00 – Dispersion, Digging In, Underground Facilities & Signature Management24:00 – Capability Extenders, Team Composition & Decision-Making Under Constraint25:30 – Logistics, Blood, Sterilization & the Middle Ground Between Fixed and Tiny Teams27:00 – Closing Thoughts & Questions

Follow @prolonged_field_care and visit prolongedfieldcare.org for more austere and prolonged field care education.

In this episode of the Prolonged Field Care Podcast, Dennis sits down with Alex, CEO of Shannon Mechanics, a Ukrainian company that has produced more than 8,000 drag stretchers and over 330,000 immobilization splints for the front line since the full-scale invasion.

Alex shares the raw story of how the company started with scrap materials and construction-store aluminum during the early chaos of 2022, scaled production while operating physically underground with independent power and battery-powered equipment, and refined products based on real soldier feedback. They discuss the BM splint (a more rigid, radiolucent alternative designed for Ukrainian conditions), the philosophy behind their rollable plastic drag stretcher optimized for one-person extraction under drone threat and complex terrain, quality control under resource constraints, the transition from pure volunteering to a sustainable business, and the deeper questions of dignity in life and death, PTSD, and long-term rehabilitation.

This is practical, unfiltered insight into how medical manufacturing adapts when supply lines collapse, borders close, and every piece of gear has to work in the worst conditions imaginable.

Key Takeaways

• Medical equipment designed for true one-person drag evacuation becomes critical when vehicles and multi-person teams are unavailable under drone threat and destroyed terrain.
• Starting with simple, locally available materials (construction-store aluminum for splints) allowed rapid production when imports were impossible.
• Operating underground with independent power, internet, and battery-powered tools enables continuity during blackouts and air raids.
• Visual quality control plus a “donation pile” for minor cosmetic defects keeps functional gear moving to the front while supporting community needs.
• Sustainable production requires paying people and covering costs—pure volunteering burns out and collapses.
• Feedback loops from soldiers drive continuous product improvement (rigidity, size options, packing for NATO pouches).
• Beyond the gear itself, the conversation highlights the need for dignity in recovery of the wounded and the fallen, plus long-term psychological and prosthetic support for survivors.

Chapters

00:00 – Introduction & Disclaimer

00:26 – Meet Alex: CEO of Shannon Mechanics

01:15 – Company origins: Revolution of Dignity to 2014–2022

02:41 – Humble beginnings, scrap materials, and the siege of Kyiv

04:55 – Building supply chains under closed borders

07:18 – Starting with BM splints, then the Utah/drag stretcher

08:06 – Material challenges and community-driven solutions

11:20 – Learning the craft, teaching production, and favoring people over full automation

13:26 – From volunteering to a sustainable business model

16:21 – Quality control process for splints

23:20 – Introducing the drag stretcher design philosophy

24:02 – Why rigid NATO litters fail in modern Ukrainian conditions

25:01 – One-person drag, complex terrain, drones, and secondary injury prevention

28:15 – Limitations (sniper fire) and real-world evacuation stories (8 km drag, quad bike integration)

30:32 – Hypothermia protection, mud/snow durability, and recovery of the fallen

34:40 – PTSD as generational trauma and the need for long-term support

40:00 – Managing supply chain volatility and building Ukrainian supplier capacity

42:39 – What has allowed the company to succeed during war

For more content, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Consider supporting us: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/ProlongedFieldCareCollective⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.lobocoffeeco.com/product-page/prolonged-field-care⁠⁠⁠⁠

In this episode of the Prolonged Field Care Podcast, Dennis sits down with J.R. Pickett — unpack the controversial and high-stakes topic of what used to be called excited delirium.

They dig into the history of the syndrome (Bell’s mania, acute exhaustive mania, agitated delirium), why major organizations including ACEP, ACMT, and the National Association of Medical Examiners have rejected the term, and the preferred modern language: hyperactive delirium with severe agitation. The conversation covers real-world presentation, the physiologic cascade that can lead to sudden cardiovascular collapse, the critical differences between a contained hospital environment and the uncontrolled street or austere setting, and the hard lessons from the Elijah McClain case.

J.R. walks through practical decision-making for EMS and tactical medics: when de-escalation is possible, when sedation becomes necessary, why intramuscular ketamine remains the most forgiving and rapid option for the violently agitated patient, how to prepare for the predictable risks (brief apnea, loss of airway protection, metabolic derangement), and why continuous medical eyes-on monitoring after sedation is non-negotiable. They also address the dangerous intersection of law enforcement and medical care, the myth of “if they can talk they can breathe,” and the growing criminalization of medical decision-making that threatens providers’ willingness to engage.

Key Takeaways

• The condition is a true medical emergency with historically high mortality, even without restraint or intervention.
• Engagement ability is a practical field litmus test: if the patient cannot be redirected or answer basic questions, rapid intervention is usually required.
• Ketamine’s wide therapeutic index and rapid IM onset make it the preferred agent for violent agitation when IV access is impossible — but it is not risk-free.
• Sedation is a procedure. Have airway equipment, monitors, and a clear team plan ready before the drug is given. Continuous medical provider eyes-on is mandatory in the early phase.

• “If you can talk, you can breathe” is dangerous teaching. Treat complaints of inability to breathe seriously.
• Noble intent + thorough preparation is the best defense against both bad outcomes and the growing criminalization of medical care.

Chapters

• 02:45 – What is (or was) excited delirium? History, physiology, and why the term is being abandoned
• 09:30 – Real-world presentation vs. “just being a jerk” and the challenge of the uncontrolled environment
• 15:20 – Elijah McClain case and the broader controversy around restraint, force, and medical justification
• 21:00 – Causes of severe agitation and the difficulty of sorting them in the field
• 26:45 – Clinical clues and the “can I engage?” litmus test
• 32:10 – The physiology of sudden collapse: acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and the danger of sudden quiet
• 37:40 – “I can’t breathe” and why that teaching is hazardous

• 45:50 – Ketamine deep dive: dosing, therapeutic index, risks, and why it is still the safest rapid option
• 55:20 – Comparison with benzodiazepines and antipsychotics; timing matters
• 01:01:00 – Treating sedation like a procedure: airway readiness, monitoring, team roles, and continuous eyes-on
• 01:10:30 – Police vs. medical roles, the myth of walking away, and the duty to act
• 01:18:00 – Criminalization of medical care and final thoughts on honorable intent

For more content, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.prolongedfieldcare.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Consider supporting us: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠patreon.com/ProlongedFieldCareCollective⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠www.lobocoffeeco.com/product-page/prolonged-field-care⁠⁠⁠⁠