Real Science Radio

For the first time in science history the iconic double-slit experiment's startling results are explained. We posit. Real Science Radio hosts Bob and Fred Williams in their second program on this apparent breakthrough begin by laying out their outline for this and the next broadcast. - That beautiful equations could describe physics Einstein thought incomprehensible - Comprehending how such equations can describe physics is a key to the 2-slit results - Describe again and explain further the "Day-4 Double-Slit Explanation" - Further elucidate the How and Why of the 2-slit experiment - Propose experiments to test the day-4 double-slit explanation - Address any early challenges - Make D4DS predictions about photosynthesis and space cameras The double-slit experiment results are known for seeming physically impossible. To overcome that hurdle, see RSR's... - List of Things that are Not Physical, and - The Wave-Particle Duality is a Triality. RSR's observations in their rsr.org/physical and rsr.org/triality series also explain: - how quantum tunneling can occur - how the instantaneous decoherence of vastly separated entangled particles can occur - how to resolve what Einstein said was incomprehensible, about how our equations can describe physics - how a massive waveform can instantaneously collapse - how two specks of dust a universe apart can attract one another. With the How address by RSR's previous series, the Day-4 Double-Slit (D4DS) Explanation combines: - the size of a single photon's wave form - the distance of the closest and furthest visible stars, and - the purpose of God's work on Day Four of creation. From rsr.org/math#beautiful-equations: * Astounding and Unexpectedly Beautiful Equations: E = mc2. Exploring unexpected and even startling symmetry and patterns from the microscopic to the galactic scale, mathematicians often describe their work as an aesthetic pursuit of beauty, as Lacayo quotes Einstein that relativity was his "most beautiful discovery." i- Symmetry: E = mc2 - Electrons: (i∂ - m)ψ = 0 - Entropy: S = k log W - Propagation: I = P/(4π r2) - Fields: ∇∙B = 0 - Uncertainty: ∇ P ∇x ≥ ħ/2 - Thermodynamics: dS ≥ 0 - Radiation: E = hf - Waves: ψ(x, y, z, t) = a + ib a - Force: F=ma - And then there's even complex numbers, and the square root of negative one, which itself is a beautiful conundrum, which govern electric circuits and other areas of quantum mechanics! Notice: Live on YouTube, see Bob and Fred speak tomorrow, Sat., Aug. 14, at 1:30 p.m. Central Time from San Antonio, Texas about creationism at, of all places, an ex-Jehovah's Witnesses event. Just go to YouTube and search for: Witnesses Now for Christ, Southwest Conference. What forces obey the inverse square law? Light, gravity, electric fields, sound, radiation. Why say, "obey"? And what do we make of the beauty of Dirac's equation, (∂ + m) ψ = 0, describing how fast-moving electrons behave? He himself wrote in Scientific American in 1963, "It seems to be one of the fundamental features of nature that fundamental physical laws are described in terms of a mathematical theory of great beauty", and further, on a blackboard in Moscow, "A physical law must possess mathematical beauty." Consider that scientists enjoy the inverse square law  I = P/(4π r2), the beauty of Maxwell's field equations, and of Ludwig Boltzmann's formula for entropy, which is even engraved on his tombstone. And as math becomes increasingly purely theoretical, it seems to do an even better job at describing reality, as with the use of the square root of negative one, not only as in describing electrical circuits in the 1800s, but also today for describing quantum mechanics. Another Ludwig, von Mises, similarly wrote in Human Action, that contemporary philosophers "are entirely wrong in their endeavors to reject any kind of a priori knowledge and to characterize logic, mathematics and [economics] as empirical and experimental disciplines. ... Moreover, it is not experience but thin

Real Science Radio hosts Bob and Fred Williams make science history by explaining why scientists get the results they do from the startling two slit experiment. Consider the WHY and the HOW. With the double-slit experiment results seeming to be physically impossible, last year the guys aired two broadcast series that go to the question of HOW the double-slit results could possibly occur. The first series was our List of Things that are Not Physical, and the second series, on quantum mechanics, was The Wave-Particle Duality is a Triality. The observations made in these groundbreaking series remove the seeming impossibilities and contradictions and address HOW it is that the double-slit experimental results can occur! (They also address how quantum tunneling can occur, how the instantaneous decoherence of vastly separated entangled particles can occur, etc.) On today's program, the guys combine the following: - the size of a single photon's wave form - the distance of the closest and furthest visible stars, and - the purpose of God's work on Day Four of creation. Then with the HOW of the double-slit experiment already addressed, by adding these three factors, the guys can now explain the WHY! * Prerequisites: RSR suggests the following prerequisites to best understand today's program. - RSR's List of Things that are Not Physical - Know the Double-Slit Experiment - RSR's Wave-Particle Duality is a Triality * Series on RSR's Day-4 Two-Slit Solution: - RSR Solves Two-Slit Experiment Pt. 1 (this program) - NO-BEL Prize? Nobel ain't worthy... Pt. 2 - Day-4 2-Slit Solution named Pt. 3 (coming soon, Lord willing) * The Day of the Night of Stargazing with the Huxfords:   * RSR's Previous Series on the One-Way Speed of Light: - Stretch Cosmology Pt. 1 - Veritasium, Lisle, and Light's One-Way Speed Pt. 2 (this show) - RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Experiment Proposal Pt. 3

* RSR's Light Speed Experiment Proposal: A 2019 article posted here at Real Science Radio (at rsr.org/stretch) proposed an experiment, Einstein, Lisle, and Hartnett notwithstanding, that just might enable the measurement of the one-way speed of light. Let's think through the following. * Billions of Frames Per Second Cameras: The field of physics almost with one voice has maintained for over a century that the one-way speed of light cannot be measured and therefore that it cannot be shown to be equal to its roundtrip speed. Do high speed cameras require a reassessment of that long-standing claim? Transmission of light filmed at CIT at 100 billion FPS. * RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Series: - Stretch Cosmology Pt. 1 - Veritasium, Lisle, and Light's One-Way Speed Pt. 2 - RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Experiment Proposal Pt. 3 (this show) * A Fast Camera Proposal for a One-Way Measurement: RSR's asks whether 10-trillion FPS cameras (and Caltech's planned faster versions) might be used in a round-trip configuration to challenge the conventionality thesis and measure the one-way speed of light. Here's the concept for neutralizing that pesky 2-way speed of light problem... * Light Speed in a Vacuum: To state the problem more fully, it's the one-way speed of light in a vacuum that can't be measured. Scientists at Cambridge and Harvard have slowed light down to 38 mph by shooting a laser through extremely cold sodium atoms, so it's relatively easy to measure that one-way speed. But this RSR experiment, especially its second iteration, through water vapor, will measure a speed so very close to the speed through a vacuum that the difference cannot falsify the primary results, that is, that it is possible to measure light's one-way speed! After all, there is no known perfect vacuum, not at CERN and not even in space. So if anyone wants to quibble they might as well argue that physicists have never measured even the roundtrip speed of light. For interestingly, even interstellar space is estimated to contain anywhere from a million molecules per cubic centimeter down to a thousand atoms per cubic meter. If you'd like to help RSR, please consider Donating, Subscribing, or See our Research Wish List! * Vacuum Rabbit Trail: The European Organization for Nuclear Research has bragging rights for their massive super-rarified ultra high vacuum that they compare to the vacuum in space as far away from Earth as the moon. One RSR caveat on that though. It just so happens that the Earth's atmosphere extends beyond the Moon. So that environment isn't as void of particles as many may expect. And that atmospher extension is another young-earth argument because it is one of scores of transient conditions and events in the solar system that could not long persist. And while we're on this rabbit trail, the more than 100 annual meteor showers caused by Earth flying through known streams of cosmic debris is evidence, directly observed by millions of people, that Earth orbits in a dusty region of space, whereas evidence only known to those who study the solar system tells us that as the asteroid belt is approached the estimated number of micrometeroites per cubic kilometer decreases significantly. So something, recently, dirtied up Earth's environment.) * Light Speed in Milk and Stuff: RSR's proposed light speed experiment is performed first with the bottle filled with water and a splash of milk. The milk sufficiently increases the refractivity of the medium so that the laser's progress can be captured on video. The experiment is then repeated with the bottle empty except for some water vapor. The speed of light in a vacuum is: - 50% faster than in glass - 25% faster than in water, but only negligibly faster - three hundredths of 1% than in air. Of course the introduction of milk in the water, and even the water vapor alone, will reduce the speed of light through these mediums. But that reduction should be quantifiable and sufficiently minimal as to not preve

Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams discuss excerpts from the Veritasium/Derek Muller YouTube video, "Why no one has measured the speed of light". Einstein stipulated that the speed of light in one direction is the same as light's roundtrip speed, decreeing this by definition, rather than measuring it, because measuring the one-way speed of light has been technically impossible and many argue that it is even theoretically impossible. Einstein then observed (as discussed on Veritasium) that the one-way speed of light might be infinite in one direction and half its agreed-upon speed in the reverse direction, averaging to what we refer to as c, or about 300,000 kilometers per second. * RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Series: - Stretch Cosmology Pt. 1 - Veritasium, Lisle, and Light's One-Way Speed Pt. 2 (this show) - RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Experiment Proposal Pt. 3 * Next Series: - RSR's Solution to the Double-Slit Experiment  Astrophysicist Jason Lisle uses this to negate the atheists' objection to a young earth, that light from distance stars could not get to Earth in less than 10,000 years, by pointing out that the light could be traveling at infinite speed, and arriving here from the most distant galaxies instantly, so that we observe the heavens in real time. This is Dr. Lisle's Anisotropic Synchrony Convention. The the guys ask listeners to try to falsify a diagram on a suggested experiment for measuring the one-way speed of light, at rsr.org/stretch#one-way.

When good and evil compromise, evil always wins. In this special edition of Real Science Radio, Bob Enyart thanks the founder of Answers in Genesis, Ken Ham, for rebuking Bethany Christian Services and Holt International for placing children into homosexual households. (Bob shares excerpts from Ken's most recent newsletter.) AiG has canceled Holt's sponsorship this summer at the Ark Encounter! As a board member with Colorado Right To Life, Enyart had to do something similar with the Billy Graham Evangelical Association for their support for killing unborn children (as documented at prolifeprofiles.com/billy-graham). Today's broadcast, airing on America's most-powerful Christian radio station, Denver's 50,000-watt AM 670 KLTT, references BEL's Superfluous List of "Christian Leaders" Going Gay (at kgov.com/superfluous) and has been informed by the Bible verses listed at kgov.com/homosexuality). Today's Resource: Bob Debates a Catholic In the KGOV studio, Bob Enyart, as the Pastor of Denver Bible Church, debated a Roman Catholic on the teachings of the Vatican and the text of the Bible. In the two decades since, the respectful and wide ranging discussion has brought many thanks from folks trying to understand better evangelical criticism of the Vatican's doctrine.

With Real Science Radio co-host Fred Williams on assignment out of state, Bob Enyart interviews Brian Lauer, the creation activist making a difference (here at RSR and) on the campus of Saint Cloud State University in Minnesota. When Fred returns, the guys will do as promised, Lord-willing, and discuss their rsr.org/one-way-speed-of-light measurement proposal. And... why not, in a separate program regarding the iconic quantum mechanics two-slit experiment getting the results it does (wave/particle duality and the waveform collapsing upon observation/recording/measurement), the guys will present RSR's own understanding of WHY the two-slit experiment gets its startling results! And they'll also discuss HOW it is that the waveform can collapse upon observation and how it is that duality can occur. (Nothing big to see here. Just move along. Move along. :) So in the meantime our ally Brian Lauer debriefs the recent RSR talk on the scientific predictions of the fountains-of-the-great-deep flood model called the Hydroplate Theory. And while praising the big creation organizations, Brian also laments that they've wasted 40 years during which they could have been making stunning HPT predictions with the likelihood that really big predictions would be confirmed every five years or so, which would have provided greatly increased opportunity to reach the lost.

* RSR'S Timesaving Google Creation Tool: Multiple Creation Site Search! * The Flesh: Just as universal gravitation affects our physical universe, the world (system) and our flesh attract one another and affect our spiritual lives. While two families, Bob Enyart's and Doug McBurney's, spend a couple days in Manitou Springs summiting a mountain, ziplining down, and exploring a cave, we've reaching into our archives to present this program which we're calling a special episode of Real Science Radio! * Trading Genesis: Check out Bob Enyart's theistic evolution presentation in Malibu: * Announcing our Brand New Rumble KGOV Channel: It's easy to find, at rumble.com/c/c-894583.

AN RSR GOOGLE CREATION TOOL: The time-saving multiple creation-site search! Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams discuss the scientific world's measurement of the roundtrip speed of light with Einstein pointing out the inability of physicists to measure the one-way speed. The guys compare those who claim to have measured light's one-way speed to those who claim to have manufactured a perpetual motion machine. Yet with fear and trepidation, they've been asking themselves whether or not they should publicly propose an experiment to measure the one-way speed of light using brand new technology the likes of which Einstein (and even almost all current scientists) would never have dreamed could be possible. But before getting to that, the guys reminisce about their radio program from 2011 and the written material on its page at rsr.org/stretch, where for the last couple of years they've hidden in plain view their proposed experiment (shhh, don't tell anyone) to measure the one-way speed of light. * RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Series: - Stretch Cosmology Pt. 1 (this show; preview to warm us up) - Veritasium, Lisle, and Light's One-Way Speed Pt. 2 - RSR's One-Way Speed of Light Experiment Proposal Pt. 3

* Time-Saving Google Creation Tool: Multiple Creation Site Search! * Science News RSR Style: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams share observations from secular science sources, from Psalm 139, and from MendelsAccountant.com! Also, the guys pull off a neat trick. During today's program they update LAST WEEK's broadcast! :) And finally, about the fabulous dramatized television series on the life of Jesus called The Chosen, Bob and Fred disclose, well, almost, a fun BEL insider project to help promote the production! Today's Resource: Get all of our 2020 Real Science Radio shows on two MP3 discs!

[While Bob & Cheryl Enyart go fishing we invite you to enjoy from the RSR archives our favorite List of Not So Old Things! Photos from today, June 25, 2021.] -- Finches Diversify in Decades, Opals Form in Months,  Man's Genetic Diversity in 200 Generations, C-14 Everywhere: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams present their classic program that led to the audience-favorites rsr.org/list-shows! See below and hear on today's radio program our list of Not So Old and Not So Slow Things! From opals forming in months to man's genetic diversity in 200 generations, and with carbon 14 everywhere it's not supposed to be (including in diamonds and dinosaur bones!), scientific observations fill the guys' most traditional list challenging those who claim that the earth is billions of years old. Many of these scientific finds demand a re-evaluation of supposed million and billion-year ages. * Finches Adapt in 17 Years, Not 2.3 Million: Charles Darwin's finches are claimed to have taken 2,300,000 years to diversify from an initial species blown onto the Galapagos Islands. Yet individuals from a single finch species on a U.S. Bird Reservation in the Pacific were introduced to a group of small islands 300 miles away and in at most 17 years, like Darwin's finches, they had diversified their beaks, related muscles, and behavior to fill various ecological niches. Hear about this also at rsr.org/spetner. * Opals Can Form in "A Few Months" And Don't Need 100,000 Years: A leading authority on opals, Allan W. Eckert, observed that, "scientific papers and textbooks have told that the process of opal formation requires tens of thousands of years, perhaps hundreds of thousands... Not true." A 2011 peer-reviewed paper in a geology journal from Australia, where almost all the world's opal is found, reported on the: "new timetable for opal formation involving weeks to a few months and not the hundreds of thousands of years envisaged by the conventional weathering model." (And apparently, per a 2019 report from Entomology Today, opals can even form around insects!) More knowledgeable scientists resist the uncritical, group-think insistence on false super-slow formation rates (as also for manganese nodules, gold veins, stone, petroleum, canyons and gullies, and even guts, all below). Regarding opals, Darwinian bias led geologists to long ignore possible quick action, as from microbes, as a possible explanation for these mineraloids. For both in nature and in the lab, opals form rapidly, not even in 10,000 years, but in weeks. See this also from creationists by a geologist, a paleobiochemist, and a nuclear chemist. * Finches Speciate in Two Generations vs Two Million Years for Darwin's Birds?  Darwin's finches on the Galapagos Islands are said to have diversified into 14 species over a period of two million years. But in 2017 the journal Science reported a newcomer to the Island which within two generations spawned a reproductively isolated new species. In another instance as documented by Lee Spetner, a hundred birds of the same finch species introduced to an island cluster a 1,000 kilometers from Galapagos diversified into species with the typical variations in beak sizes, etc. "If this diversification occurred in less than seventeen years," Dr. Spetner asks, "why did Darwin’s Galapagos finches [as claimed by evolutionists] have to take two million years?" * Blue Eyes Originated Not So Long Ago: Not a million years ago, nor a hundred thousand years ago, but based on a peer-reviewed paper in Human Genetics, a press release at Science Daily reports that, "research shows that people with blue eyes have a single, common ancestor. A team at the University of Copenhagen have tracked down a genetic mutation which took place 6-10,000 years ago and is the cause of the eye colour of all blue-eyed humans alive on the planet today." * Adding the Entire Universe to our List of Not So Old Things? Based on March 2019 findings from Hubble, Nobel laureate