(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) At 10:27PM on December 3, 2024, South Korea's President Yoon Suk Yeol went live on television while his country was sleeping to declare martial law. His country fought back. After all was said and done, Yoon's martial law proclamation lasted only 6 and a half hours.

Hawaii's lasted three years.

Internment camps, forced labor, military tribunals, and a pause on all constitutional and due process liberties. Curfews, blackouts, barbed wire covering the beaches. Death penalties and forced blood donations. Thousands of Japanese residents were rounded up and put behind barbed wire, while every Hawaiian was forced to live under total, merciless military control.

"It's too expensive to ship them somewhere," U.S. Secretary of Navy Frank Knox remarked. "Just make the islands an internment camp."

This is Duncan v. Kahanamoku (1946).

***

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

0:00 - Intro

3:46 - Martial law drama (South Korea edition)

7:20 - WHAT GRINDS REB'S GEARS

19:24 - Martial law drama (South Korea edition) cont.

28:47 - Democracies are fragile! <3

34:24 - MARTIAL LAW IN THE USA

35:44 - Harry White's arrest

37:09 - No one knows WTF "martial law" means

39:34 - 1941 HAWAII UNDER MARTIAL LAW

44:53 - Why was martial law so bad?

50:00 - Japanese internment tales

56:44 - NO RIGHTS, NO JUSTICE

57:13 - Insane punishments

58:33 - Saffrey Brown Murder

1:02:08 - SUPREME COURT CLOCKS IN (kinda)

1:09:55 - Reb's Rebuttal

1:13:15 - BONUS! HOW THE U.S. STOLE HAWAII

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) Out of nowhere, your front door explodes. You see a man with a gun run through your door and up the stairs, firing shots at the police chasing after him. Luckily, you run for cover before a SWAT team begins their "protocol" to flush him out - explosives, toxic gasses, grenades, BearCat armored tanks, robots, and chemical weapons hit every inch of your home.

Eventually, the situation is secure. The neighborhood is safe. Police followed "all necessary protocol."

Your house? Destroyed. Your personal belongings? Melted by explosives. Your cat? Blind and deaf from the events.

And you? Hopefully financially stable. Because neither insurance nor the courts will help you. In fact, a judge says that the City police department doesn’t owe you a dime.

This is Baker v. City of McKinney (2020) (cert. denied 2024).

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

* * *

0:00 - Intro

3:01 - Baker v. City of McKinney (2020)

7:20 - A 15 year-old hostage in tow

10:06 - Tomfoolery begins / SWAT blow a house to smithereens

21:06 - Not the first nor the last!

30:12 - Lech v. City of Greenwood Village (2015) / Two Belts, One Shirt

38:56 - Cops lie in police reports (pt. 47982347372492)

41:10 - SWAT team turns Lech's house into chemical weapons target practice and I'm not even joking

42:53 - The goddamn robots

53:49 - Victims galore

56:28 - Varlitskiy v. County of Riverside, CA, et al. (2024)

1:02:06 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) Reb hits you with rapid fire summaries of 13 lawsuits filed in 2003 that are unhinged enough to make it on Rebuttal (the legal sanctuary of chaos and calamity, of course).

***

0:00 - Intro / Life update

4:16 - The Docked Dog Tail Case

8:55 - The Condom Soup Case

10:48 - Port-A-Potty Prison

12:32 - Depose The Parrot

13:59 - Suing The Casino Instead of Your Husband

15:43 - Convicted Felon Wants His Playstation Back

17:18 - BREAKING: Lightning Loves Cars

18:16 - Kid Sues High School For $50 Million

19:49 - Lion Beats Your Crappy Bullet (Yay!)

21:05 - Dancing With The Scars

22:03 - Don't Record Your Local Grandma

23:14 - She's Just Not That Into You

24:15 - Black Pepper Throws Hands

26:52 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) A chicken farmer, World War II, and 150 suicidal chickens were the only ones up to the task to answer this question for the Supreme Court. No, I'm not joking.

This is United States v. Causby (1946).

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

0:00 - Intro

00:40 - Case begins

3:00 - The Takings Clause

3:30 - The Causbys and their crime scene coop

7:26 - The Causbys get a (good) lawyer / Lower court case

10:00 - US Supreme Court arguments

17:41 - Supreme Court's analysis + holding

26:46 - After Causby...seriously, who owns it? / Drones are a problem y'all

37:43 - Wait, what about the Causbys?

37:52 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) Being a lawyer is a stressful job, and we all handle the anxiety of this high-pressure field in different ways. Some enjoy pilates, others indulge in junk food, a few find relief at the bottom of a liquor bottle. But in 2023, one lawyer's preferred method of "blowing off steam" made headlines. It read: "BREAKING: LAWYER SUSPENDED FOR POOPING IN A PRINGLES CAN AND THRO-"

Listen at your own risk to find out the rest. Reb washes her hands and unpacks Ohio Bar v. Blakeslee (2023).

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

0:00 - Intro

0:45 - Brief background on State Bars and the moral character application

6:57 - Headline / Case starts / James (Jack) Blakeslee

11:27 - His “Pringles Prank” defense

14:07 - Ethics case against Blakeslee

16:25 - Reb’s several concerns

24:20 - Ohio Supreme Court Opinion - Ohio Bar v. Blakeslee (2023)

32:40 - Discipline and 2024 Update

34:50 - Reb’s Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) On December 31, 1918, Colonel Luke Lea of the 114th Field Artillery Regiment handed his commanding officer a request for leave from his post in Allied-occupied Luxembourg. He would not say where he was going or what he intended to do, though he assured the general he had nothing to worry about. General Spaulding called it the "strangest request for leave he had ever read," but approved it anyway. After all, Luke Lea was not just an excellent officer, he was also a successful lawyer, newspaper publisher, and one-term senator from Tennessee. How much trouble could he possibly get into.....

Grab a baseball and an ashtray (trust me). Reb is breaking down State v. Wallace B. Davis, Luke Lea, & Luke Lea, Jr. (1932), but more importantly, all of the unbelievable chaos that happened before it.

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

0:00 - Intro w/ Executive Producer Simba

2:59 - CASE STARTS / LET’S GO BACK TO WWI

4:00 - Colonel Luke Lea needs a vacation to be a nuisance

6:00 - Tennesseans only

6:59 - We’re kidnapping whomst?

7:46 - What’s the Kaiser been up to these days?

11:40 - COLONEL LUKE LEA’S *MESSY* LORE

12:41 - Bloody Tennessee political drama

16:07 - Luke’s newspaper is now TMZ

19:12 - A good ol’ fashioned duel in the street

20:32 - Luke is messy and reaps the benefits

22:30 - REB’S SUMMARY OF ALL THAT CHAOTIC BEEF & LUKE LEA LORE

24:20 - The U.S. declares war, Luke joins the Army

24:50 - What was the plan here, babes?

27:23 - It’s Armistice Time! No need to ~arm~ the stice!

28:07 - Colonel Lea takes a vacation to….somewhere….

29:05 - ONLY Tennesseans allowed on my poorly planned kidnapping mission

30:00 - SUDDENLY I’M PATRIOTIC / LARRY MACPHAIL BASEBALL LEGEND

34:32 - KIDNAPPING ROAD TRIP IN A CADILLAC

42:05 - The border is crossed, shenanigans ensue

56:32 - #AshtrayGate

57:45 - PUNISHMENT….?

1:06:57 - I think Luke is a weirdo / Luke dabbles in felonies back home in the States

1:11:59 - What happened to Kaiser Wilhelm II, his cool ashtray, and the MLB guy who stole it?

1:12:58 - REB’S REBUTTAL

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) In America, unaccompanied children are forced to represent themselves in immigration court. That's right. Children as young as infants to teenagers. Each year, thousands of immigrant children are placed into court proceedings in which government prosecutors seek to deport them unless those children can prove they have a right to stay in the United States. While the U.S. government may provide pillows and booster seats for children who are too small for the chairs in immigration court, the government does NOT have to give them an attorney to protect their rights.

In this episode, Reb tells these children's stories and interviews attorneys Amanda Doroshow and Lauren Esterle with the Acacia Center for Justice who have firsthand experience advocating for these children both inside the courtroom and beyond.

LINKS TO RESOURCES AND FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES:

https://acaciajustice.org/

https://acaciajustice.org/careers/students/

https://justicecorps.org/justice-fellowship/

Thank you to the Acacia Center for Justice, Amanda Doroshow, and Lauren Esterle for making this episode a reality. Your presence, advocacy, and brilliance is second to none.

0:00 - Intro

1:50 - Guillermo's Story

5:23 - The Law - Unaccompanied children in U.S. immigration court

7:51 - What rights do unaccompanied children have?

9:25 - Why lawyers are CRUCIAL

14:00 - Legally, what is an "unaccompanied child"?

16:25 - Recent cases on this issue - What do the courts say?

21:48 - Treatment of children in Juvenile Court v. Immigration Court

27:05 - Current policies are disconnected from common sense

29:05 - Reb speaks with attorney Amanda Doroshow from the Acacia Center for Justice

51:20 - Reb speaks with attorney Lauren Esterle with the Acacia Center for Justice

1:18:15 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) In 500 BC, corrupt judges were treated a little differently than the ones we have today. The punishments have changed, but one question remains the same: What do we do when judges can't stop taking bribes?

Hold onto your birthday suit, Reb is slicing open The Judgment of Cambyses (~530 BC).

(Side note: A 30-MINUTE EPISODE CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?!)

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

00:00 - Intro

00:50 - The Cursed Envelope Case

02:38 - Judge Sisamnes gets flayed

11:22 - Impartiality is important...

12:37 - ...but Supreme Court Justices play dirty (gasp)

15:58 - Justice Thomas

18:29 - Justice Gorsuch

19:35 - Recusal reform please

21:31 - Justice Alito

22:28 - Don't get it twisted

23:43 - Justice Alito

25:02 - Justice Sotomayor

26:12 - A CODE OF CONDUCT THAT WORKS WOULD BE COOL

29:53 - Reb's Rebuttal



Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) A paid informant who should've been fired, a police officer who LOVES a good eraser, and a dad who can't stop bragging about his poor sons.

Grab a bag of baking soda and a large Coke and hear Reb snitch on Albright v. Oliver (1994).

Follow @RebuttalPod on Instagram and Twitter!

Follow @Rebmasel on TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter!

***

0:00 - Intro

2:26 - Legal mumbo jumbo you should know before we begin

9:00 - Reb's rant on wrongful arrests

13:31 - Why do malicious prosecution cases rarely succeed?

15:22 - Albright v. Oliver (1994)

19:59 - The worst informant draft pick of all time

21:26 - The old man from Up beats the allegations

24:58 - Every son under the bus

29:12 - Shut your mouth (pt. 45457493589295) + Albright's lawsuit

33:09 - The Court of Appeal agrees it was a huge bummer at least

39:05 - SCOTUS opinion

41:10 - Albright v. Oliver and malicious prosecution = a whole mess

43:30 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

(WATCH THIS EPISODE ON YOUTUBE) What do you call a 6-week period in which you and a handful of very recent acquaintances get drunk every day at lunch, sleep through the afternoons, sell weed to each other, smoke weed with each other, and whip out a few bags of cocaine to snort when the time feels right?

For a group of twelve people in Florida in 1987, they would call it jury duty. That’s right. Since 1987, jury misconduct stories only got crazier and crazier...including one where a jury convicted a man of double homicide by breaking out a Ouija board and asking the victims' ghosts. Yep.

Reb tops off a martini and hosts a seance in Tanner v. United States (1987).

***

0:00 - Intro

2:17 - Facts of Tanner v. United States

12:39 - Trial (Coke, Booze, and Court)

23:00 - Rule 606(b) and SCOTUS Majority Opinion

40:53 - SCOTUS Dissenting Opinion

54:11 - Juror misconduct still haunts us

56:19 - SCOTUS heard our complaints and ignored them<3

58:59 - Remedies for juror misconduct

1:01:10 - Case after case after case (Delusional, sleeping, drunk, racist jurors)

1:10:00 - The Ouija Board Jury

1:19:35 - Reb's Rebuttal

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices