In Chapter 5, we examine the essential process of securing patient access to psychedelic therapies post-regulatory approval by working with Payer and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies.
The chapter discusses the importance of demonstrating clinical efficacy through direct comparisons and indirect comparisons when head-to-head trials aren't feasible. It explains how different European countries have unique HTA processes, such as Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic, each with distinct requirements for clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
The episode also covers critical components of health economic models, including cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), and budget impact analyses (BIAs), and addresses the importance of early engagement with HTA bodies.
Additionally, innovative reimbursement models like outcomes-based agreements and managed entry agreements are examined as potential ways to manage the uncertainties and high upfront costs associated with psychedelic therapies.
(00:00) Introduction to Psychedelic Therapies and Regulatory Approval
(00:21) Understanding Payer and Health Technology Assessments (HTA)
(01:57) HTA and Payer Evidence Requirements
(02:02) Clinical Efficacy and Comparative Trials
(03:21) Indirect Comparisons and Their Challenges
(05:53) Subgroup Analyses in Psychedelic Therapies
(08:31) Cost-Effectiveness and Health Economic Modelling
(13:37) Country-Specific Economic Evaluations
(18:00) Budget Impact and Affordability
(20:48) Engaging with HTA Bodies
(28:28) Innovative Reimbursement Models
(30:04) Conclusion and Next Steps