Remote View

I commissioned a musician, Jiří Mottl, to make an initial arrangement of ‘Breaking Stones’, a song written by my brother Guy in 1999 that he donated to the MFMP in 2012 for when it became appropriate to use. I have worked with Jiří to produce an initial vocal and piano score and provide a midi file.

I loaded the midi file into Garage Band that comes free with all Mac computers and iOS devices (you can get similar programs for PCs and Android). I then assigned a grand piano to the accompaniment and recorded a quick voice track, to which I applied a little ‘church’ ambiance. The arrangement could do with some of my brothers ‘feeling’ in it and I encourage people to make their own arrangements with more soulful timings and vocal tracks where you can.

I am really interested in what you can come up with. Please credit the songwriter, Guy Greenyer and the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project and provide a link back to this page in any videos or other media. I will endeavour to add links of your versions to this page, as and when I am made aware of them. It would be great to have a load of different voices or choral pieces recorded - might make a ‘perfect day’ cut then!

You can download resource files here:

Midi File | Synthesised Piano Accompaniment | Synthesised Piano MelodyMy Raw Vocal | Piano Accompaniment Score | Vocal Score | All Source Zipped

Here is Guy thrashing out an off-the-top of his head performance after 10 years of no-plays. Lyrics are provided.

You can get a copy of the current state of the 1:1 book pdf here

A reading of the text of the preface and authors biography (pages 1 and 21 respectively, copied below) is given above.

There was a break in the stream at the end of the live session - the missing clip is here

Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse

----- Collected Papers (1989-1999) -----

MATSUMOTO Takaaki

Department of Nuclear EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporo 060-0813

JAPAN

Preface

Far in the universe, nuclear collapses very often take place by the gravitational force after stars consume their fuel. Since the electromagnetic force is about 40 orders stronger than the gravitational force, it should be easy to induce similar nuclear collapses by the electromagnetic force in laboratory. But we never knew until now how to do that.

Recently, the author discovered a nuclear collapse which was induced by the electromagnetic force in laboratory, during studying the mechanisms of so-called "Cold Fusion (CF)" phenomena. Several kinds of nuclear reaction which were directly induced by the electromagnetic force, called "Electro-Nuclear Reaction (ENR)," were found so far to occur in a special state of hydrogen clusters, called "itonic clusters," or "micro Ball Lightning (BL)." The nuclear collapse was one of the most remarkable reactions among ENRs, called "Electro-Nuclear Collapse (ENC)." Furthermore, very amazingly, completely broken materials by ENC were found to be regenerated again to thin tubes and films of conventional elements such as carbon, oxygen and iron. The latter process was called "Electro-Nuclear Regeneration (ENG)."

This book collects reviews and original papers related to ENRs (published or unpublished) between 1989-1999, which were mainly written by the author. Readers could follow steps to the discovery of ENC and understand that ENC related phenomena could take place widely in the natural environment as well as in other technical fields.

Biography of the Author

The author was born in Osaka in 1942 to have a parent of Matsumoto Setsuro and Ai, and three senior sisters. He grew up in Osaka and graduated from Sumiyoshi high school in 1960. He learned nuclear engineering in Kyoto University and finished its master course in 1966. He then worked as an assistant researcher at the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute (KURRI) in south Osaka. During seven years in KURRI, he studied neutron physics (neutron transport, thermalization and scattering). He obtained a doctor's degree of engineering from Kyoto University in 1979, for a study of transient phenomena of neutron thermalization.

The author moved to Hokkaido University in 1973 as a lecturer and became an associated professor in 1974. During several years, he studied neutron scattering by using an electron linear accelerator of 45 MeV. During the next seven years, he theoretically studied nuclear incineration of radioactive wastes by using electron or proton accelerators and nuclear reactors. A hybrid nuclear system of a proton accelerator and waste nuclear materials, which is to be built at Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI), was fundamentally based on the author's proposal.

The author started to study the CF phenomena in 1989 and continues the study of ENR until now.

Privately, he married with Eiko in 1967 and had a daughter (Hiroko) in 1968 and a son (Tsuyoshi) in 1970.

Hi, my name is Bob Greenyer and welcome to RemoteView.ICU

On the 18th November 2021, I announced that my friend Sho in Japan had obtained, from the author, verbal permission for me to scan and publish Dr. Takaaki Matsumoto’s 1989-1999 collected works. Dr. Matsumoto is a life-long nuclear scientist who leveraged his experience in radiographic photography and more, to gain unique insights into what was going on in his simple to conduct experiments.

On the morning of the 19th November 2021, I spent about 2.5 hours developing a good scanning approach to use for capturing this very important document.

My process will produce a clean A4, 600dpi greyscale scan, with Optical Character Recognised (OCR’d) text, so the digital work will be easily searchable. Below is the link to the latest version.

Steps to the Discovery of Electro-Nuclear Collapse, Matsumoto, T. (Draft 26: pp. 0-289 321.9MB [all pages]) LATEST VERSION DOWNLOAD

I expect the whole book, of 289 pages, to take around 190 hours total to scan and clean. I shall do this as and when I can and update the link above. I will probably put this out as the ‘raw copy version’. Further improvements may include adding hyperlinks to papers in the work.

You will see that there are grammatical and broader language errors in this raw copy, however, I think it is valuable to first have a 1:1 version freely available, before more time is spent to correct the language etc.

Correcting the language for optional print on demand

My ultimate aim was always to make a ‘print on demand’ version, which will be affordable and convenient for those that want a quality bound copy, for use as a text-book reference, without the hassle of printing and holding together nearly three hundred sheets of loose paper. This is where you might be able to help me.

I want this to have corrected language and updated images where better source can be found and possibly add an addendum, with some of his papers that are referenced in the index, but that are not included in this collection. So I need a few volunteers to help proof read and correct the text.

If you want to help with this process, please let me know. We would work collectively in a common google or office docx first, ideally the latter, so that formulas can be incorporated, with a few teams working on sections of the work. As I have said, I will be doing OCR on the original, so we will be able to have a reasonably good start point to work from.

The reward for those that help, would be a free printed copy of the finished work and a credit in the book for contributing to its production. I need a few dedicated people that are willing to put in the time and know how to work with docx and formulae. I want this to be a very high quality production. Let me know if you are interested.

To reiterate, the latest version of the 1:1 scanned version will be linked off this post above as and when available, so check back for the latest updates.

Thank you for listening to RemoteView.ICU

Hi, my name is Bob Greenyer and welcome to RemoteView.ICU

I’m 49, by declining the jabs I am 100% safe from known short term and unknown long term adverse reactions and according to UK official data, I am 99.9967% sure not to die from getting Covid.

In my judgement, they are pretty good odds. My body, my choice eh?

Additionally, I have already survived the sniffles and as per my last test, I still had good antibodies 16 months later, not to mention, I will have memory T-Cell immunity to the whole virus, not just the first version of the spike protein. Despite trying, I have been unable to catch the sniffles again from actively infected people. Why am I not allowed to get a haircut, eat at a restaurant or travel, to do what I can, to advance science?

From page 20 of a recent UK government’s report, we can see that:

Note, from the UK data, we can see that 63%, practically 2/3rds of all people that died are over 80 years of age, jabbed or not.In recent weeks, I had to waste hours of my life and pay government testing facilities here in Czech Republic $37.55 every 3 days, to get a predictably negative PCR test, in order to access my child’s ward at the hospital. I am immune, I have proven I cannot catch or spread the disease, this is madness.

I know the jabs fail, in the four members of my family that have had jabs that have failed, the mean time to failure has been around 12 weeks. The remaining three that have yet to get it post jab, may be naturally immune, like my younger daughter, or have recovered from the virus before jabbing and we don’t know, because no one is doing pre-jab antibody testing.

Boris Johnson, Bill Gates and the Head of the WHO and every country where boosters are being offerred, de-facto agree that the jabs don’t stop you getting it or spreading it and yet, a mother visiting her son in the same hospital room as my child, who had a cough all through the hospital stay, was permitted free access, without question, because she had been jabbed at some point this year.

If I am required to test as a recovered, genuinely immune person, why was she, regularly coughing, not required to test, when everyone should know by now the jabs are not fit for purpose?

Where is the critical thinking and rational response here?

No one should be required or coerced to submit to a medical procedure, to participate in life. What happens if the ‘pandemic’ threatening humanity was to morph into ‘climate change’ and these rights had been forfeit by precedent? Are we going to similarly allow forced stomach stapling for those that ‘eat too much’ or sterilisation ‘because there are too many of us already’?

Thank you for listening to RemoteView.ICU

Hi, my name is Bob Greenyer and welcome to RemoteView.ICU

Perception of risk

The sniffles fear in the west, arguably started in Italy via 10,000s of textile factory workers who flew from Wuhan, China to northern Italy. At the beginning, there was little known about how to treat the condition and a lot of people died due to what was thought to be the correct approach, intubation, which turned out to be a death sentence for many. 

On reviewing the data, the highest medical authorities in Italy found recently, that the reality of the danger from this disease is far from the perception. They made their findings public in a press conference on 21st October 2021 and it concluded that

"97.1% of deaths hitherto attributed to Covid were not due directly to Covid"

it goes on,

"Of the of the 130,468 deaths registered as official COVID deaths since the start of the pandemic, only 3,783 are directly attributable to the virus alone.”

Similar scale data adjustments emerged in September 2021 when looking again at US public data where only 6% of deaths attributed to Covid, had no other cause for death.

This makes the sniffles about as dangerous as seasonal flu or less.

Death comes to us all, it is very hard to deal with, I have experienced the trauma of a family member dying, most people will in their lives. However I don’t personally know anyone that has died of the sniffles. Moreover, if someone does think that they know someone that died from covid, there is a good chance, based on the Italian and US data, that they are wrong 95% of the time, it was likely another cause that was the major factor in their sad demise, something that could be very hard to accept for someone once they’d believed it was caused by something else.

That being said, I know my mother suffered a collapse and was rushed to hospital a few days after her first Astra-Zeneca (AZ) jab. Later, she showed high cancer markers in her blood which rose again after her second jab. They provisionally said she had ovarian cancer - to which she retorted “I highly doubt that, since I had them removed 3 decades ago!” Ever since her second jab, she has had brain fog, such that she cannot read easily, something she enjoyed greatly and this has lead to depression.

This looks like a life changing effect of her submitting to the jab. Was it worth it? Will the sacrifice really protect her?

Let’s look at recent jab effectiveness.

The tragedy in the public data of all countries as far as I know, is that no one has been testing for antibodies prior to jabbing. Which means, without a question, there will be a large proportion of the jabbed that already had natural immunity - this is never meaningfully part of the conversation. It is complete nonsense to say that we are ‘experiencing a pandemic of the un-jabbed’ because many of the jabbed may be long term immune due to their previously acquired natural immunity, not because of the jab. Doctors, nurses and any community facing employees or social individuals and their families, particularly come to mind.

No one can ever say, without extensive testing, that lack of cases in the jabbed cohort is solely from the jab - but we can, with certainty, say that the protection in the recovered un-jabbed, is from natural immunity.

As an example, by March 1st 2021, it was estimated by Masaryk University, Brno, that up to half of the Czech Republic had been infected with the sniffles. At this time, only 2.32% of the population had been jabbed. Given that as of 8th November 2021, 57.29% have been fully jabbed - it is likely that a large proportion, of these, have prior natural immunity.

Vaccine failure

In the UK, you are only considered fully jabbed, 14 days after your second jab. My nephew and his girlfriend, both in their late 20s, were jabbed with Pfizer (Pf) and he caught the sniffles 6 weeks later and passed it on to his partner, in a few days. I learned that he got it from a colleague at work, just a few days after that person had attended a concert.

In the UK, to attend concerts, you have to meet one of the following criteria:

* You have completed a full course of vaccination, at least 14 days ago.

* You have received a negative PCR or lateral flow test result within 36 hours of the event or

* You have proof of natural immunity by way of a positive PCR test at least 180 days ago.

I understand that his colleague is jabbed - that means he can go to the concert, easy peasy. Jabbed people don’t have to test, so they could go to the concert carrying the infection without symptoms. On the other hand, un-jabbed have to have caught the infection, not be ill enough to want to stay at home, but able to transmit it, all in a 36 hour window! Therefore, logically speaking, it is most probable that a jabbed person infected my nephews colleague. Each inoculation to positive case took 3 to 4 days. The implications are, that most likely:

An infected jabbed person, gave it to a jabbed person, gave it to a jabbed person (considered ‘fully vaccinated’ 6 weeks before) gave it to a jabbed person (that was considered ‘fully vaccinated’ less than 7 weeks before).

This is an appalling level of failure of this experimental intervention. If this were an experimental support for a parachute and you knew it failed so easily, would you want to have a parachute, using the technology, for regular sky diving?

Things got a little closer to home in the past two weeks. My brother-in-law and sister got their second AZ jab in early June - this means they were officially fully jabbed a few weeks later. Just 126 days later, my brother-in-law was feeling rough and exhausted and tested positive for the sniffles. That means he likely caught it just four months after he thought he was protected. Four more days later, my sister tested positive at the 130 day mark.

Out of the 7 people I know in my family that are fully vaccinated, 4 have already caught it post full vaccination. Moreover, their suffering was about the same as mine - which is interesting, since in my home, I was only one of the four of us that even noticed the sniffles - further more, none of us got it again, when a year later, we had an actively infected guest, in our apartment, for weeks.

As I understand it, for a jab to be classed as a vaccine, it has been traditionally assumed to give protection for at least 50% of the jabbed for at least a year. In my sphere, it has not achieved 50% effectiveness in four months, so at best this is an inconvenience to the sniffles. So how can this be?

Well, the jabs were designed to stop the assumed spike part of the version of the virus that originated in Wuhan, China. However, by the time my nephew got his ‘fully protected’ status, 99.8% of genetic submissions for infections in the UK, were for the version said to have evolved in India, termed ‘Delta’. Since I know that both the Pf and AZ failed both in and out of the household setting in my extended family and all of the jabs in the UK are currently based on the original virus spike, it is likely that no presently available jab offers lasting protection from the ‘Delta’ variety. In recent data published in the UK’s ZOE COVID Study, one might infer that ultimately there will only be a pool of the jabbed left to infect, even if one ignores that some of the jabbed may not have enough symptoms to get tested.

What I know for sure is, none of my own household has caught it again, despite travelling widely and hosting many travelling people in our home over the past 18 months since our recoveries - no jab we could ever take would be better than our natural immunity.

There were many ignored virologists and vaccine experts giving early warnings of the dangers of mas…

I got told earlier today that we have just till end of working day Japan on 30th 2021 to submit our proposal to NineSigma - So it’s ALL HANDS ON DECK.

Here is a recording of a crash conversation with Slobodan Stankovic. A working Google document will be on-line at some point tomorrow. Anyone that wants to draught linear, cylindrical or rotary concepts - go for it!

Yet others that can put together a list of key references in standard reference format with working links to documents - would help.

Transcript (Rough)

Hello my friend. How ya doin'.

All right.

Good, are ya at the school.

Yeah. Yeah, I'm at school. It's working a little bit.

So as you can see there in the document you sent me in 2013 that already had cold fusion, HHO, Browns gas being proposed

I didn't see it was from 2013. Sorry. Yeah, it

doesn't matter the point where 2014, I think it was. The point is, is those things have already been presented and they're still going to dump it in the ocean. Right. So, you know, so the point is, is that obviously the argument wasn't convincing enough.

Now we have a scenario where I think I'm going to I'm calling the title of the proposal, "Remediation of Tritium by way of Ball Lightning Induced Coherent Nuclear Transmutation." OK. And I will lead I will lead on Matsumoto's realization that it's Ball Lightning.

OK. And that it forms these mesh like clusters. And that the cluster's I tonic and that they have these neutrino, anti neutrino and electron positron and neutrino structure, but that this crystal structure has been observed in the peer reviewed paper by Bogdanovich et al.

So we have a peer reviewed paper showing the structure caught on film, and they are saying that this is like ball lightning. This is possibly a structure of Ball lightning. Then I will show that we've captured that same structure on the Ohmasa vibrator plate, that that's been observed by by a Takaaki Matsumoto and that inside a ball lightning reactor

generating reactor we've observed it on inside of these spheres where it would appear it's consuming matter and converting it to carbon, which is what he observed. And then I will show his carbon, blah, blah, blah, blah. And the point is, then I will lead into the fact that the US Air Force said that this is a way to do fusion. It's happening in nature. And if we could ever master, it would do fusion. And I will link into to the various other things that talk about the coherent nature of the inside skin. Then I will show the ten yen coin that is actually got the thing cut out in a one side cutout and not on

the other side showing the vortex there.

Yeah.

And then I will show that we've achieved exactly the same thing, using plasma in the reactor with copper at the exact same cutout and so forth. And so essentially what I am saying is that the the idea is that the binding energy is higher than any other Nucleon [Nuclei] arm and that it basically rips matter apart and reorganizes

the safe elements typically. And so so and that the tests on. The calcium carbonate was because it has carbon, it has oxygen, and as calcium, calcium is what everything fissions infusions to, and we'll show a spread of the literature like I did on the weekend.

Carbon is necessary to raise the temperature of Ohmasa gas or HHO, because for whatever reason, it raises the temperature. It almost doesn't matter. It just does. It raises the thermal temperature and that allows the process to hold on.

I've got someone sending me messages. OK. Oh, dear. OK, it doesn't matter. And. So raising the temperature and that we demonstrated with with an optical thermometer, but not very well because it is not meant to do that temperature, but because it does limelight.

We know from the literature that limelight is achieving in excess of the temperature at which Pakhomov, it says, is producing cold neutrinos. And then I have Parkhomov's book here and then the book, the 2006 paper by Savvatimova et. al. which connects the production of cold neutrinos with various di-neutronic reactions, cluster decays of alpha particles and clusters, the case of carbon particles, and that that that requires the production of itons as per Matsumoto. And and so and we've observed the production of carbon in various interactive systems with metals interacted with HHO and Browns gas, and that we've observed alpha conjugate nuclei in both titanium and things.

So. And then I'll just refer to other literature that that has observed the Alpha Conjugate nuclei. And so essentially what Savvatomova's paper is doing with her colleagues is it's connecting itons which are the structure of ball lightning to the reactions that are actually observed.

And in the end, it doesn't matter. The calcium is resilient. It can absorb a hell of a lot of neutrons. It can absorb a hell of a lot of neutrons. One of the reactions that they proposed in that paper is actually that.

And get this. It's an observed reaction in an experiment by Iwamura. The Japanese guy who used to work for Mitsubishi in the time the proposals were made that you sent me for potential solutions to the tritium water.

OK, so Iwamura has done these calcium oxide layers with Palladium deuteride and seen transmutations. So for whatever reason, it's proven and replicated that that calcium oxide plays a role in transmutation. OK, that's proven.

Need the proposal over there for for that.

I don't know what he did. It doesn't matter. The point is, it's in the literature that a Japanese person that was responsible for trying to find solutions. This guy, this is the paper that's being referred to by Savvatomova.

It's like Iwamura's calcium oxide, blah, blah, blah. So we are literally synthesizing calcium oxide on the fly. And one of the one of the reactions that they do is that you get a cluster decay that produces two neutrons, which gives us the neutrons to make silver.

Right, which you need a lot of neutrons to get to any a stable isotope of Ziconium. Yes. You can get the protons. You need perfusing to calcium atoms. But then, you know, if you do to that, you've got 80 in the first ones, 90, you need another 10 neutrons from somewhere.

Right.

So, uh, it we're looking at the data and this is what we get. And so, you know, it must be synthesizing the neutrons and that provides the mechanism through which it's providing it, producing the neutrons. It doesn't actually matter because this is a whole collapse.

But to make an argument to someone who doesn't understand that this is an electron nuclear collapse and it all happens instantaneously, trillions of atoms at the same time, then then you can give them a stepwise process to to make the argument.

So and effectively you have what they cite is one where the the a neutrino comes in, which is birthed from the CNO cycle. And because we were burning in gamma, because we were burning in air, you have two things.

One, you have the one in one in five atoms on the CaCO3 is carbon. Right. And it's almost certainly up 12 meant no carbon, 14, because that dead carbon, as I call it.

Right. Yeah.

And you have nitrogen in the air. So you have Nitrogen at the bottom of the CNO cycle and you have oxygen. So nitrogen can be brought in. And if you take nitrogen 15. OK, and do you do the neutrinos which are being synthesized in the process?

You can do this neutrino iton reaction, which takes two neutrons away and jumps across the carbon 12, doesn't release the alpha and moves it round to the unstable. Unlikely to occur. But anyway, nitrogen 13. So you can synthesize two neutrons are by still being within the CNO cycle, but using this itonic move.

And the point being is it's producing the neutrons. OK. Yeah. So and also it's synthesizing potentially by taking calcium. Forty two, which is accepted to neutrons. It synthesizes carbon. So the reaction should be as long as there's calcium available, calcium is effectively acting as a bit of a catalyst.

And synthesizing carbon. So basically, if you got if you've got tritium coming in, it produces protium or dueterons and 41Ca…

Bob: Hello my friend. How ya doin'?

Slobodan: All right.

Bob: Good, are ya at the school.

Slobodan: Yeah. Yeah, I'm at school. It's working a little bit.

Bob: So I'm going to I'm going to do a blog post some point, maybe this week or next week, because I finally found out what I suspected, er, was why my daughter never called Covid, even though she lives in the same room as us.

Slobodan: Yeah, and that's why?

Bob: Well, they now have this new test in in Czech Republic called the Blot Test, and it tests for antibodies against the capsid of Covid. The S2 / S1 part of the spike protein and the Delta variety. But it also tests against the four common coronaviruses that do the common cold.

Well, she has antibodies to all four of the common cold viruses.

Slobodan: OK, so that's what was protecting her yeh?

Bob: I think so. Yes. Oh, OK. So basically the conclusion is and I will write this up, I thought, OK, this is my hypothesis, but I didn't have a way to test it. Now I had to wait to test it.

And that's what it showed. And so then I thought, oh well, I'll see if anyone else has thought about this possibility. And it was even being discussed as early as August 2020 that people have had a lot of the colds recently will not be affected by by Covid.

And there's quite a lot of research that's come out since. So what is the absolute worst thing you can do to ensure the maximum number of deaths?

Slobodan: It's to get vaccinated, all the people who are...

Bob: No, no, no, no, no, no. Lock people up. Prevent them going to social gatherings and prevent any transfer from antipodean economies like Australia and New Zealand. That lowers the immune response of the ability of of the population, because there's no constant exposure to common colds, which are not going to kill [basically] anyone, they just get the sniffles genuinely. And so you are then very likely to die if you get the manmade pathogen.

When you - you understand what that that is the truth? You can say that literally the diabolical nature of what they've done. And the only other thing you can do worse is ask people to stay inside and so they don't get vitamin D.

I mean, it's literally - they've done literally what they needed to do to destroy your immune system, so that you were more likely to die, particularly as an old person from exposure to Covid.

It's utterly diabolical.

Immunity as a service

Planned medical tyranny P1 - Oct 29, 2019

Planned medical tyranny P2 - 2019

Planned medical tyranny P3

Flashback Arrestor

The failed flashback arrestor had functioned successfully in Slobodan’s testing with his father for the around 10 years. Perhaps it was fate that it should fail just as we were starting our testing. Actually, you can’t just go to a welding supplies shop and get an HHO flashback arrestor, so we had to do something no-one should copy, that was to buy one designed for acetylene torches. To illustrate this point, I will read from the supplied information sheet.

Operating instructions flashback arrestor Gloorotherm

Application/mode of action

Flame arresting devices are used to protect line regulators for fuel gases and oxygen (resp. compressed air) of central gas supply systems and pressure regulators of single cylinders. In case of a wrong manipulation, they prevent an explosion back pressure into the gas supply system, and therefore greatly contribute to working safety. 

The Gloorotherm has three safety components:

* a gas non-return valve, which prevents a back-flow of gas against normal flow direction

* a flame arrester made of sintered metal, which prevents a flashback of the flame

* a temperature sensitive cut-off valve, which interrupts the gas supply in case of a flame return 

Safety indications 

Application in accordance with the regulations 

Flashback arrestors may only be used for the type of gas for which they are marked. The specifications regarding pressure and flow rate may not be exceeded. 

Application not in accordance with their regulations 

With improper treatment and applications not in accordance with the regulations, risks for the user and other persons may arise and damage may occur. 

In particular it is not allowed:

* to make modifications or changes on the safety device

* to oil or grease parts that are entering in contact with oxygen 

Putting into service 

The safety device has to be mounted gas-tight directly after the pressure regulator or line regulator. The sealings are metal sealings and require therewith no further sealing elements. The gas tightness of the connections has to be controlled. 

Putting out of service 

The safety device requires no separate putting out of service. 

Operation, maintenance and repair 

Operation 

The safety devices include as a rule a gas non return valve, a flame arrester and a temperature sensitive cut-off valve. They operate automatically and independent of the operator.

Maintenance and repair

Repairs may only be performed by qualified staff and in authorised workshops. In case of improper repairs and wrong use, every responsibility for the resulting consequences will be declined. The operator has to check the safety devices after a flame return and as well periodically (according to the corresponding country specific regulations) for their safety regarding a gas back-flow and for gas tightness. If the temperature sensitive cut off valve has been activated the safety device has to be replaced 

Original instruction sheet text

Leaks

Our problems did not stop with the flash back arrestor, the electrolyser had become a little leaky having been sat dormant for a good while. Slobodan managed to find enough spare parts to get it operational - however, it was increasingly leaky throughout our testing and this needs more attention moving forward. That being said, we were all set for action.

The first and most critical test for Fixing Fukushima goal, was exposing CaCO3 to HHO to see if it:

* exceeded the required 1000ºC to produce the cold neutrinos needed to promote inverse beta decay of Tritium (as per Dr. Alexander Parkhomov’s theory) and/or

* to see if there were any signs that transmutation was occurring due to the formation of coherent matter / ball lightning, in line with my understanding

so that we could have reasonable confidence that it would be beneficial to deal with the waste water at Fukushima in Japan.

I will discuss the preliminary findings in my next posting.

Slobodan had been suffering the effects of tooth pain the last few days, so today he went for some root canal procedures. I stayed in the lab and got some pre-experiment things organised. His procedure went well and he is clearly better as, for the first time since I arrived, he is eating hot and cold food with ease.

In getting the Radiascan 701 Alpha/Beta/Gamma set up, I had an idea that we might be able to convert some Tungsten into cold neutrino condensates and detect them by proxy via radionuclide deactivation.

Fortunately, we had some recent check sources, 60Co, 90Sr and 210Po. The idea is to calibrate the radiation monitor and get a reading for these sources, then place them close to an experiment where it is hoped some Tungsten would be encouraged to undergo electro-nuclear-collapse. It is a long shot, but why not try.

The background and current check source sample activity was established so that any deviation may be detected after exposure to experiments.

Background and check source activity levels

* 60Co - 5.27 years - 0.5uCi - April 2021

* 90Sr - 28.8 years - 0.1uCi - June 2021

* 210Po - 138 days - 0.1uCi - June 2021

Fume extraction duct

It is intended that we will do a range of experiments, in some cases with fine particles and lead being involved and so to avoid the whole lab being filled with fine contaminants, we assembled an extraction duct from a duct fan and tubing.

Flash back arrestor

Slobodan tested the HHO generator earlier in the day and it worked fine. However, after we had gone out for a walk, he went to fire it up again only to find out that his over a decade old flash back arrestor had failed, it ceased to pass gas even in the forward direction.

Given the age of the component and its critical safety role and the recent knowledge of a death from precisely the thing that this component is designed to protect against - it was decided to call it a night and get a new one at 150 CHF - which will hopefully be acquired at the merchant we secured the steel from, for the pellet press.

Today we took a good look at the lab area and discussed how we were to augment the equipment, with what I had brought and what we needed to get on a shopping trip, to enable us to finish the pellet press and get other tests ready to go.

A look at Slobodan Stankovic’s HHO test rig and generator

Slobodan’s test rig is really neat with well positioned sample holders and rails for computer controlled insertion, there are spectrometers spanning from the UV to the IR and a neat little electric arc igniter. We discussed getting the parts for fume extraction and extra camera placements, given some of the planned experiments and desired data monitoring requirements. The custom built electrolyser is really clean and compact with sufficient flow to conduct the tests we need to do.

Shopping trip

We took a trip to Hornbach, a European centric home improvement and building supplies chain where we secured most of the parts we needed for the pellet press amongst other things. What we could not source there was some suitably sized steel sections and so we sped off to De Brunner Acefer which was an industrial scale steel section supplier.

Everyone there was very friendly and after a bit of asking around, they let us take two perfectly sized off cuts from the scrap bin for our needs, we thanked them kindly and went to the workshop for a bit of machining time.

Machine shop

At the machine shop, I did the best I could to cut a series of approximately 1cm x 2cm x 2cm sections of the Calcium Carbonate for our testing needs by way of a large hacksaw. Sure, a band saw or proper stone cutting rig would have been great, but sometimes you have to work with what you have. Some less than perfect chips produced will be fine to set up detectors and check the basic material response.

Also, 2mm and 4mm holes were drilled in the balance of the 10x10x2cm block to test potential capillary action of the gas.

Pellet press complete

Very satisfyingly, all the parts came together to make a very nice pellet press, very similar to that which I saw in Moscow at the beginning of 2015. Here you can see Slobodan very satisfied with his work.

I think we are ready for the limelight.